On Mon, 17 Jul 2000, David Bridson wrote:
> > In http://privatewww.essex.ac.uk/~djmrob/mp3decoders/index.html
> >there's a comparison of mp3 decoders. Lame is one of the three that
> >passed the test (the other two are Winamp 2.22 and Ultra Player).
> > But mpg123 is not tested. What about it? Does anyone know any decoding
> > problem with it?
> Yes, don't even try to decode a VBR MP3 with CRC data with mpg123. Just
> won't work.
Yes, you're right. But in this case it's very clear that it
doesn't work. I was talking about other kind of bugs, those bugs where you
have to analize the output in order to know if it's right. Like, for
example, Winamp bug.
> Don't forget that Winamp isn't flawless - there's a link to a known bug
> on the LAME home page.
Yes, but according to that page, 2.22 isn't affected by that bug.
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] -= Alberto Garc�a =-
http://www.cryogen.com/berto
Clave p�blica PGP disponible Fidonet: 2:348/105.108
--
MP3 ENCODER mailing list ( http://geek.rcc.se/mp3encoder/ )
