David Bridson schrieb am Mon, 17 Jul 2000: > > In http://privatewww.essex.ac.uk/~djmrob/mp3decoders/index.html > >there's a comparison of mp3 decoders. Lame is one of the three that > passed > >the test (the other two are Winamp 2.22 and Ultra Player). But mpg123 > is > >not tested. What about it? Does anyone know any decoding problem with > it? > > Yes, don't even try to decode a VBR MP3 with CRC data with mpg123. Just > won't work. Don't forget that Winamp isn't flawless - there's a link to > a known bug on the LAME home page. > > David Lame 3.86 encoded VBRs with protection on should be decodeable with mpg123. Robert -- MP3 ENCODER mailing list ( http://geek.rcc.se/mp3encoder/ )
- [MP3 ENCODER] MP3 decoder comparison Alberto Garc�a
- Re: [MP3 ENCODER] MP3 decoder comparison Mark Taylor
- Re: [MP3 ENCODER] MP3 decoder comparison David Bridson
- Re: [MP3 ENCODER] MP3 decoder comparison Alberto Garc�a
- Re: [MP3 ENCODER] MP3 decoder comparison Robert Hegemann
- Re: [MP3 ENCODER] MP3 decoder comparison mailing-steve
- Re: [MP3 ENCODER] MP3 decoder comparison Cavallo de Cavallis
- Re: [MP3 ENCODER] MP3 decoder comparison Steve Lhomme
- RE: [MP3 ENCODER] MP3 decoder comparison Ross Levis
- Re: [MP3 ENCODER] MP3 decoder comparison Naoki Shibata
- Re[2]: [MP3 ENCODER] MP3 decoder comparis... E. Zann
- Re: [MP3 ENCODER] MP3 decoder compari... David Balazic
- RE: [MP3 ENCODER] MP3 decoder comparison Ross Levis
- RE: [MP3 ENCODER] MP3 decoder comparison David Brown
- Re: [MP3 ENCODER] MP3 decoder comparison David Balazic
