Re: [MP3 ENCODER] The coder

2000-05-30 Thread Gabriel Bouvigne
Moreover, using a 15.1 kHz lowpass freq with 32kHz resampling is impossible. Oh, lame says it's filtering like this: "transition band: 15097 Hz - 15484 Hz", which I thought would be alright because 16kHz would be the cutoff frequency at 32kHz sample rate. Have I got this wrong? Yes, maybe

Re: [MP3 ENCODER] The coder

2000-05-29 Thread Gabriel Bouvigne
lame -d -h -X 6 -Y -Z --cwlimit 12 --lowpass 15.1 --resample 32 -b 128 ... This gives *very* acceptable results in the studio on all the test cases I last tried two months ago, including a very difficult track of choral music. I just have 2 observations: *to my mind, you should remove

Re: [MP3 ENCODER] The coder

2000-05-29 Thread John Hayward-Warburton
Gabriel Bouvigne wrote: to my mind, you should remove -d. This switch allows to have different blocks on the left and on the right, but as it's implemented right now, it requires a little more bits than without. Thank you very much for the advice which I shall gladly take. * as you're using

[MP3 ENCODER] The coder

2000-05-28 Thread John Hayward-Warburton
Gentlemen, I must thank you for the recent improvements to LAME (not to mention the removal of dependence on ISO source code). We are currently compiling a "20 year" celebration for the independent classical record label Hyperion Records and, to make it easy for the compiler to get the tracks in