Hmm... Didn't our current mayor work for a publication
that sometimes had personal and phone service ads in
it of a sexually explicit nature or for busniesses
such as Augie's?
I believe several other candidates in the cities, in
fact nearly all of them I can think of, who have some
background in t
Well, here's my two-cents. Yes, the term "pornographic" is very subject and
for the most part, remains in the eyes of the beholder. Wheter or not the
"trendsetter" is pornographic is not, nor should it be the sole context from
which CM Samuels statements on the matter are viewed.
Had the tab
Michael Thompson wrote:
> The Trendsetter (or any other pornographic publication) isn't
> bringing women down, nor is the cabal of publishers and the
> "concentrated media ownership society." Men who allow
> porn to negatively impact their interactions with women are
> bringing ALL of us dow
ip society." Men who allow
porn to negatively impact their interactions with women are bringing ALL of
us down. But they're the ones that hold the onus of change, not the
publications they read.
Mike Thompson
Windom
- Original Message -----
From: "Kayla Smith" <[EMA
I have been following things closely and kept my mouth shut, but this is my
area of expertise and I have devoted many years of study & debate to this
sort of subject so I decided to chime in. Long before Don Samuels called
The Trendsetter pornographic, many woman in my life have had this exact
Dear Don Samuels:
I attended a candidate debate for 5th Ward Council held at North high school.
You and Natalie Johnson-Lee are the candidates that debated. Stunningly,
during a candidate and policy debate, you called Travis Lee, NJL's husband, a
"pornographer" and alluded to the "Trendsetter".
