OH P..L..E..A..S..E...!!!
Bunnies on an IBM commercial
They just got outta the white shirt thingie just a couple of years back.
BUT...I would replace that rotund naked guy standing with his arms
outstreached with a cute bunny or to keep it equal a chip-n-dale guy fer da
I really resisted the urge to give a wise answer early on in this discussion, but now that it's a free for all, I'll give my two cents.
Readers Digest
European Car
z/Journal
IBM's CICS, MQ Series, z/Series and p/Series magazines (published bi-monthly or something like that -- I forget what
My two cents
Black Belt
Taekwondo Times
Mens Health
PC Magazine
John
-Original
Message-
From: Bruce Baxter
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, October 20, 2004
7:38 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: What do MQAdmins
read?
I really
resisted the urge to
I recall there was a problem in saveqmgr at one time. When I issue a dis
ql(*) all Q's come up OK. In the MQS file I get the QMGR object and the
first queue in the dis QL(*) list. Any idea what is the issue.
bobbee
C:[EMAIL
It's not the size of your queue, it's the service interval that counts.
-Original Message-
From: MQSeries List [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Roger
Lacroix
Sent: Tuesday, October 19, 2004 6:45 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: What do MQAdmins read?
Hummm,
So, put a couple of
Is it the NPMCLASS parameter? This was introduced in the latest verion
of saveqmgr.
-Original Message-
From: MQSeries List [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, October 20, 2004 9:25 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: saveqmgr Windows
I recall there was a problem in saveqmgr at one
This is hilarious and I just wanted to say thank you for making my morning.
It's always a great time when you can take a break and laugh. So, Roger I
think the opportunity to market a product is diverse, interesting, and may
bring wealth, pleasure, and possibly new partners to the table
We're giving some consideration to moving in the direction of implementing pSeries Blade Servers to host our Web Applications which get their data from our back end systems using MQ Series. What are the practical ins and outs of administering this sort of configuration?
I'm wondering
unsubscribe
__
For information about the Standard Bank group visit our web site
Our applications have been shown to run much better with a local queue manager and Java Bindings rather than client access. That's why we'd be leaning towards local queue managers on each blade.
Christopher Warneke [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Christopher Warneke [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent by:
Did any one else receive this, because it shouldn't have come any other
way.
- Forwarded by Chris Fryett/MutualOMA on 10/20/2004 01:51 PM -
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
l.com.br
To
I received it too.
Some email harvester got a hold of the
lists email addresses.
Christopher Fryett [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent by: MQSeries List [EMAIL PROTECTED]
10/20/2004 01:56 PM
Please respond to MQSeries List
To:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
cc:
Subject:
Fw: FROM MRS
I will be out of the office starting 10/20/2004 and will not return until
10/25/2004.
I will respond to your message when I return.
Instructions for managing your mailing list subscription are provided in
the Listserv General Users Guide available at http://www.lsoft.com
Archive:
Would there be delivery and commit assurance considerations for him to
use client from each blade vs. QM-to-QM?
-Original Message-
From: MQSeries List [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of
Potkay, Peter M (ISD, IT)
Sent: Wednesday, October 20, 2004 1:54 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject:
Env: Solaris 5.8, WMQ 5.3 CSD05.
I have a very odd situation which I am at a loss right now to either
explain or fix (unless I resort to the brute force approach of kill all
the mqgr processes)...
I have two active queue managers running, each belonging to a different
cluster, each listening on
bobbee,
'slated' ?? I told you not to make enemies of people in the mob!! :))
I got the damn email too.
Regards,
Roger Lacroix
Quoting Robert Broderick [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
I feel slated...I didn't get it.
From: Christopher Fryett [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Reply-To: MQSeries List [EMAIL
I get the same from multiple people. It is one of the latest scams.
Glen Shubert
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Associate Director
TSYS - MQSeries Technical Support
Robert Broderick [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent by: MQSeries List [EMAIL PROTECTED]
10/20/04 16:16
Please respond to MQSeries List
We had a Listener stop once. That stops you dead in the water. Just a
thought.
Alan
-Original Message-
From: MQSeries List [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Tony
Boggis
Sent: Wednesday, October 20, 2004 3:16 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Non-responsive qgmr
Env: Solaris 5.8,
I've seen this kind of behavior when the filesystem runs out of space. What does 'df
-k /var/mqm' show?
-- T.Rob
-Original Message-
From: MQSeries List [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Tony
Boggis
Sent: Wednesday, October 20, 2004 4:16 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject:
See APAR IY52951, fixed in CSD08. The sypmtom we saw was that the QM was
completly unresponsive. We were at 5.3 CSD04 on Windows, and IBM gave us a
new dll with this APAR # associated with it. It did fix the problem.
IY52951 - When strmqcsv is started repeatedly without stopping after
We have this same problem which I was told would go away when we upgraded to
5.3.2.1 - it didn't. We actually connect the MQ Server supported by another
one of the people on this group - Bill Anderson.
Our heartbeat is set to 300 - still get errors and channel re-starts 10 or
20 times a day.
We get something like this fairly regularly on hp when processes are
performing operations against local queues with high depth ( 2000
msgs). We get FDC files showing long semaphore lock waits. If we wait
long enough, it eventually resolves itself.
Scott
-Original Message-
From:
22 matches
Mail list logo
