Re: Is Max Msg Length 500K in AMI???

Peter, I do know all that. Thanks for your response anyway. I had checked all of the settings including max len on queue manager, DLQ, channel, xmit queue... The AMI manual does not say anything about max msg len specific to AMI. All this had led me to believing that the max msg len limit of WMQI

WBIMB and Oracle

Any good practise or how-to documents available to move a broker environment from using DB2 to using Oracle? Also, is it best to move broker V2 first to V5 on DB2 or can you move it from V2 on DB2 to V5 on Oracle? Thanks Francois van der Merwe Instructions for managing your mailing list

Re: WBIMB and Oracle

Hi, We are going from V2 with DB2 on Windows 2000 to V5 with Oracle on Sun Solaris. Main changes with Oracle are: When making SELECT calls, with DB2 you use Database.table name, with Oracle you will use Database.Schema.tablename There are restrictions using the DATE/TIME clauses in Oracle,

Calum Craigie/IS/SLC/StandardLifeGroup is out of the office.

I will be out of the office starting 26/01/2004 and will not return until 27/01/2004. I will respond to your message when I return. Instructions for managing your mailing list subscription are provided in the Listserv General Users Guide available at http://www.lsoft.com Archive:

More than 1000 svrconn processes started

Hi, Can anyone clarify this issue? We are running MQ on an iSeris with WebSphere app srv. The app srv use client connection to connect to the qmgr. Now and then the system get full on disk and an ipl is required to free the disk space again. At the same time a lot of svrconn channel processes is

Re: Is Max Msg Length 500K in AMI???

But this particular group that I am dealing with has always blamed MQ when something unexpected occured, in the past. What? You've got other groups that *don't* blame MQ? Can I be their support tech? :-) -- T.Rob Instructions for managing your mailing list subscription are provided in the

Re: More than 1000 svrconn processes started

We implemented a lower KeepAlive value, both on our MQ server AIX machine and on our PeopleSoft web server machines (where 95% of our svrconn connections are coming from), and that significantly lowered the number of connections. The web server is WebLogic 6.1, MQ is v5.3. Peter Heggie

Re: More than 1000 svrconn processes started

Hello Jonas, I believe that happens when the client dies at the state where server (actually, the user agent) does not want to send anything to the client; then the TCP connection will stay there theoretically indefinitely (in practice, I guess, it is being reaped after some very long

amqmsrvn.exe - Invalid Cur4rent Directory

I installed MQ ver 5.3 on my Windows NT workstation and am receiving this inormation. Anyone know what is wrong and how to fix it? ___ amqmsrvn.exe - Invalid Cur4rent Directory The process cannot switch to the startup current directory C:\WINNT\system32\.

Re: More than 1000 svrconn processes started

Jonas, In addition to Pavel's comments TCP KeepALive on TCP/IP PROFILE dataset would have to be modified to set the INTERNAL parm (I haven't done this yet, but I think I will soon). Each channel can be configured to have a different time-out value. Heartbeats may not be able to catch some

API Crossing Exit on z/OS ?

I know there's an api crossing exit for CICS on z/OS, and one available on the distributed platforms, but does IBM plan on having an API Crossing exit similar to that on the distributed environment available on z/OS ? Any comments ... Interest ... ? what does IBM have to say ? thanks, PHIL