[MDT-OSD] RE: McAfee ePO Agent

Yep, we have it in our B&C. %~dp0FramePkg_WKS.exe /INSTALL=AGENT /silent Daniel Ratliff From: listsad...@lists.myitforum.com [mailto:listsad...@lists.myitforum.com] On Behalf Of Murray, Mike Sent: Wednesday, March 19, 2014 7:58 PM To: mdt...@lists.myitforum.com; mssms@lists.myitforum.com Subjec

[mssms] RE: McAfee ePO Agent

Yep, we have it in our B&C. %~dp0FramePkg_WKS.exe /INSTALL=AGENT /silent Daniel Ratliff From: listsad...@lists.myitforum.com [mailto:listsad...@lists.myitforum.com] On Behalf Of Murray, Mike Sent: Wednesday, March 19, 2014 7:58 PM To: mdt...@lists.myitforum.com; mssms@lists.myitforum.com Subjec

[MDT-OSD] McAfee ePO Agent

Has anyone successfully deployed the McAfee ePO Agent silently? I've tried the suggestions linked below, the client installs, but no sire information is transferred, so the client doesn't know where to look. And there's no log, even though I entered one. https://kc.mcafee.com/corporate/index?pa

[mssms] McAfee ePO Agent

Has anyone successfully deployed the McAfee ePO Agent silently? I've tried the suggestions linked below, the client installs, but no sire information is transferred, so the client doesn't know where to look. And there's no log, even though I entered one. https://kc.mcafee.com/corporate/index?pa

[mssms] CM12 RoleNames from SMS_SystemResourceList

Would anyone have a complete list of RoleName's available in CM12 from SMS_SystemResourceList So far I have: SMS Application Web Service SMS Component Server SMS Distribution Point SMS Fallback Status Point SMS Management Point SMS Notification Server SMS Portal Web Site SMS Provider SMS Site Se

RE: [mssms] Task Sequence to install software

That is not how I did it before...well I think anyway. But I like this! Thanks. From: listsad...@lists.myitforum.com [mailto:listsad...@lists.myitforum.com] On Behalf Of Daniel Ratliff Sent: Wednesday, March 19, 2014 10:35 AM To: mssms@lists.myitforum.com Subject: RE: [mssms] Task Sequence to

Re: [mssms] pls vote it up if you think it's important.: standalone media progress bar is meaningless

very odd, it's public too here's the bugid Type: Bug ID: 825724 Opened: 2/28/2014 7:19:40 AM Access Restriction: Public On Wed, Mar 19, 2014 at 5:54 PM, Mark Mears wrote: > Me either. > > > > Thanks, > > > > *Mark Mears* > > mark.me...@cireson.com > > Phone: (757) 945-2651 > > > >

RE: [mssms] pls vote it up if you think it's important.: standalone media progress bar is meaningless

Me either. Thanks, Mark Mears mark.me...@cireson.com Phone: (757) 945-2651 [cid:image001.png@01CEAC8E.61A72300] [Description: cid:image002.jpg@01CCDA1D.0FE05A90] Check out our System Center App Store

RE: [mssms] pls vote it up if you think it's important.: standalone media progress bar is meaningless

Broken link. :) Daniel Ratliff From: listsad...@lists.myitforum.com [mailto:listsad...@lists.myitforum.com] On Behalf Of Niall Brady Sent: Wednesday, March 19, 2014 12:45 PM To: mssms@lists.myitforum.com Subject: Re: [mssms] pls vote it up if you think it's important.: standalone media progress

RE: [mssms] pls vote it up if you think it's important.: standalone media progress bar is meaningless

[cid:image001.png@01CF4369.F26AB420] From: listsad...@lists.myitforum.com [mailto:listsad...@lists.myitforum.com] On Behalf Of Niall Brady Sent: Wednesday, March 19, 2014 11:52 AM To: mssms@lists.myitforum.com Subject: Re: [mssms] pls vote it up if you think it's important.: standalone media

Re: [mssms] pls vote it up if you think it's important.: standalone media progress bar is meaningless

i've asked the product group why you can't access it i'll come back when i get a reply On Wed, Mar 19, 2014 at 5:59 PM, Trevor Sullivan wrote: > I tried searching for it, to no avail. > > > > Cheers, > > Trevor Sullivan > > > > *From:* listsad...@lists.myitforum.com [mailto: > listsad...@lists.

RE: [mssms] pls vote it up if you think it's important.: standalone media progress bar is meaningless

I tried searching for it, to no avail. Cheers, Trevor Sullivan From: listsad...@lists.myitforum.com [mailto:listsad...@lists.myitforum.com] On Behalf Of Niall Brady Sent: Wednesday, March 19, 2014 11:57 AM To: mssms@lists.myitforum.com Subject: Re: [mssms] pls vote it up if you think it's

RE: [mssms] pls vote it up if you think it's important.: standalone media progress bar is meaningless

Didn't work for me either. Cheers, Trevor Sullivan From: listsad...@lists.myitforum.com [mailto:listsad...@lists.myitforum.com] On Behalf Of Niall Brady Sent: Wednesday, March 19, 2014 11:52 AM To: mssms@lists.myitforum.com Subject: Re: [mssms] pls vote it up if you think it's important.:

Re: [mssms] pls vote it up if you think it's important.: standalone media progress bar is meaningless

works here, just tried it again https://connect.microsoft.com/ConfigurationManagervnext/feedback/details/825724/mvp-dcr-when-creating-standalone-media-the-wizard-progress-bar-is-meaningless On Wed, Mar 19, 2014 at 5:49 PM, Daniel Ratliff wrote: > Broken link. J > > > > *Daniel Ratliff* > > >

RE: [mssms]SCCM DPs with Client but Updateds managed by different WSUS

The Configuration Manager client will configure the Software Update Point using Local Group Policy. If you wish to override this setting, because you are using a stand-alone WSUS instance for server updates, then you'll need to use an Active Directory Group Policy Object (GPO) to configure it.

Re: [mssms] pls vote it up if you think it's important.: standalone media progress bar is meaningless

wow either only 6 people create standalone media or you missed this mail, cmon please vote ! On Fri, Feb 28, 2014 at 10:50 PM, Niall Brady wrote: > > https://connect.microsoft.com/ConfigurationManagervnext/feedback/details/825724/mvp-dcr-when-creating-standalone-media-the-wizard-progress-bar-is

RE: [mssms] RE: SCCM 2012 task sequence for software updates

The task sequence doesn’t have any implicit knowledge of what updates need to be installed. The Install Software Updates task sequence item will either install: 1) Mandatory (Required) Software Updates, or 2) All “available” (and “required”) Software Updates that are targeted to the device.

RE: [mssms]SCCM DPs with Client but Updateds managed by different WSUS

The Configuration Manager client will configure the Software Update Point using Local Group Policy. If you wish to override this setting, because you are using a stand-alone WSUS instance for server updates, then you'll need to use an Active Directory Group Policy Object (GPO) to configure it.

[mssms]SCCM DPs with Client but Updateds managed by different WSUS

We have a bunch of DP's that have client installed but have different client setting that tell them to not use Software Updates. We are seeing the WSUS reg key set to SCCM's WSUS instead of the Server groups WSUS. Does anyone else have the separation of workstation managed by SCCM and servers

RE: [mssms] RE: SCCM 2012 task sequence for software updates

I see how the TS would work now. The next question is how does the TS know which updates to install? I don’t see a way of applying the required monthly software update group to the TS. From: listsad...@lists.myitforum.com [mailto:listsad...@lists.myitforum.com] On Behalf Of slkissin...@sbcglo

RE: [mssms] Task Sequence to install software

Oh, I misread the post . that's what happens when you skim :) I initially thought the post was referring to using a single task sequence to deploy a 32-bit and 64-bit WIM image, not an application. Cheers, Trevor Sullivan From: listsad...@lists.myitforum.com [mailto:listsad...@lists.myitfo

RE: [mssms] Task Sequence to install software

I would think that is overkill. Just use the built in task sequence conditions? There are a few task sequence variables you could use. ARCHITECTURE SupportsX64 Or just do a condition for the OS? [cid:image001.png@01CF4367.3799EA00] Daniel Ratliff From: listsad...@lists.myitforum.com [mailto:li

Re: [mssms] Task Sequence to install software

I use this code: $OsArch = (Get-WmiObject -Class Win32_OperatingSystem -ComputerName $CompName).OSArchitecture if ($OsArch.Contains("64")) {} if ($OsArch.Contains("32")){} On Wed, Mar 19, 2014 at 10:23 AM, Linkey, Mike wrote: > I have a task sequence that installed an application based

RE: [mssms] Task Sequence to install software

Check out the %PROCESSOR_ARCHITECTURE% environment variable, or you can use PowerShell with WMI: @(Get-WmiObject -Class Win32_Processor)[0].DataWidth; I *think* the %PROCESSOR_ARCHITECTURE% environment variable might be "x86" if you're running a 32-bit boot image on 64-bit hardware. Maybe

[mssms] Task Sequence to install software

I have a task sequence that installed an application based off of the OS Architecture (x86 or x64). Some how it got whacked and I am trying to recreate it. I have everything except how I determined what the OS architecture is. How does everyone do this? I can't find my notes on how I did thi

RE: [mssms] Modify Task Sequences with a Script

Michael Niehaus pointed out that there's a method called SetSequence() on the SMS_TaskSequencePackage class. Let me try to modify the PowerShell code to use this, and see if it works. Cheers, Trevor Sullivan From: listsad...@lists.myitforum.com [mailto:listsad...@lists.myitforum.com] On Be

Re: [mssms] Modify Task Sequences with a Script

Yes, the C# code is. This is how they set a new task sequence variable: public void AddTaskSequenceVariable( WqlConnectionManager connection, IResultObject taskSequence, string variableName, string variableValue) { try { // Create the task sequence variable object.

RE: [mssms] RE: SCCM 2012 task sequence for software updates

+1 to Mark's idea of using Orchestrator. Since you don't have Orchestrator installed in your environment, how about using a PowerShell script configured as a Scheduled Task? Cheers, Trevor Sullivan From: listsad...@lists.myitforum.com [mailto:listsad...@lists.myitforum.com] On Behalf Of Ia

[mssms] RE: SCCM 2012 task sequence for software updates

We do not have Orchestrator setup in our environment. In looking at the task sequence wizard I don't think creating a new custom task sequence does what I need and I don't need to install an image. Am I looking at this the wrong way? From: listsad...@lists.myitforum.com [mailto:listsad...@lis

[mssms] RE: SCCM 2012 task sequence for software updates

You might want to utilize calling an Orchestrator runbook activity in your task sequence and let Orchestrator do all of the heavy lifting. Thanks, Mark Mears mark.me...@cireson.com Phone: (757) 945-2651 [cid:image001.png@01CEAC8E.61A72300]

[mssms] SCCM 2012 task sequence for software updates

I have several servers that require special attention when it comes to software update deployments. Theses servers needs to have a service stopped before updates are installed and then force a reboot once the updates are completed. I was thinking of creating a task sequence that can be used to

Re: [mssms] RE: old question sure you folks know.. java 5 update 22 - how to kill the updates

I had similar issues on XP with Java 1.5 Update 16 and disabling the auto update feature through command line or a transform - setting this key worked for me in my environment: [HKEY_LOCAL_MACHINE\SOFTWARE\JavaSoft\Java Update\Policy] "EnableJavaUpdate"=dword: Another setting you may ne

RE: [mssms] Tips to deal with a backlog in Schedule.box on a 2007 infrastructure

well, I would either move all the files to different folder and drop few files back to process OR stop the sms exectuive service,component manager,remove the backlogs and then start the service as what i can see possible solution. Eswar Koneti Configmgr Cons

Re: [mssms] Tips to deal with a backlog in Schedule.box on a 2007 infrastructure

Thanks for the reply Eswar, I've found your blog to be so helpful over the years :) In my case, I've cleaned up all of the jobs in sender, the backlog is actually in schedule.box. On Wed, Mar 19, 2014 at 4:59 AM, Eswar Koneti wrote: > I don't see a way to speed up rather waiting for the site s

RE: [mssms] Tips to deal with a backlog in Schedule.box on a 2007 infrastructure

I don't see a way to speed up rather waiting for the site server to finish the jobs.backlogs could have caused if the respective component manager was stopped or not responding to process the jobs. If you really want to clear all the jobs (if you feel theu don't require to process now), then i w