[mssms] RE: UEFI PXE Across Router

2016-09-30 Thread Mote, Todd
I followed Andreas' white paper and can UEFI PXE boot across routers to specific IPs using reservations and dhcp options. It works great. before anybody admonishes me for using options over iphelpers, options serve my needs better. It's a mix of OSes on each subnet, not everybody lives in

Re: [mssms] RE: CM12 industry standard Deployment success rate

2016-09-30 Thread Mark Gailey
98% is our target for apps/packages targeting active machines. We hit 95% on Java a year ago and it's still a sore topic. Updates are lower 90's due to how we target and measure success. Sent from my iPhone > On Sep 30, 2016, at 11:51 AM, Daniel Ratliff wrote: > > 95% for

[mssms] RE: CM12 industry standard Deployment success rate

2016-09-30 Thread Chris Barnes
+1 Chris Barnes Coretek Services | Enterprise Consultant * 248.767.4415 cell * chris.bar...@coretekservices.com * http://www.coretekservices.com From: listsad...@lists.myitforum.com [mailto:listsad...@lists.myitforum.com] On Behalf Of Daniel Ratliff Sent:

[mssms] RE: UEFI PXE Across Router

2016-09-30 Thread Andreas Hammarskjöld
Are you sure of that it's not using DHCP scopes? I would expect that behavior if using DHCP scopes and you haven't got the option #60 set in the the DHCP scope as there is a bug in the Windows loaders. //A From: listsad...@lists.myitforum.com [mailto:listsad...@lists.myitforum.com] On Behalf

Re: [mssms] RE: CM12 industry standard Deployment success rate

2016-09-30 Thread Sherry Kissinger
for us, squishy-ness comes in if one counts "offline" boxes as failures or not. There's some lines of business that want to count them as non-compliant for whatever it is they are sending to them; so they fall into the "failure" bucket. If that's how you "count failures", then 90-95% is about

[mssms] RE: CM12 industry standard Deployment success rate

2016-09-30 Thread Jimmy Martin
I track it monthly and have for the last 7 years... I use it to boost my self-esteem :) 95-97 is what I would expect. That last 3-5% is a VERY expensive (in time) to account for/remediate... Jimmy Martin (901) 227-8209 From: listsad...@lists.myitforum.com

Re: [mssms] Horrible food at Ignite

2016-09-30 Thread Jay Parekh
I always pick the special food options during registration, usually Indian. This way if I don't like the main lunch options, I can go to the shorter lines and less mass produced option. Sent from Outlook Mobile On Fri, Sep 30, 2016 at 11:27 AM -0500, "Marcum, John"

[mssms] RE: CM12 industry standard Deployment success rate

2016-09-30 Thread Daniel Ratliff
95% for packages, applications, and software updates. 99% for Compliance Items. Daniel Ratliff From: listsad...@lists.myitforum.com [mailto:listsad...@lists.myitforum.com] On Behalf Of Heavner, Charlie Sent: Friday, September 30, 2016 2:38 PM To: mssms@lists.myitforum.com Subject: [mssms] CM12

[mssms] Deployment status discrepancy

2016-09-30 Thread Jeff Poling
ConfigMgr 2012 R2 SP1….if I go to Monitoring | Deployments, an application deployment’s completion statistics show one number for errors. If I click “View Status,” to get details, the error number is much lower. If I use the software distribution reports, I see that the Application Deployment

[mssms] CM12 industry standard Deployment success rate

2016-09-30 Thread Heavner, Charlie
Hi Folks, .long time no post Anyways, does anybody know if there are any metrics around SCCM Deployment success rates? I've been at this game a long time and I'm having trouble convincing some higher ups that the success rate for a Package/Application deployment is a squishy thing.

[mssms] UEFI PXE Across Router

2016-09-30 Thread Marable, Mike
I'm setting up a ConfigMgr lab in Hyper-V and testing my OSD task sequence. I can PXE boot both Gen1 (BIOs) and Gen2 (UEFI) VMs that are on the same subnet as my primary site server and PXE enabled DP. So far, so good. I use a VM running Windows Server with RRAS as a router between the "main"

RE: [mssms] Horrible food at Ignite

2016-09-30 Thread Marcum, John
Personally…. I NEVER eat the conference food lunch, they always suck. I’d rather there just be nearby places to eat affordably. That’s one thing I don’t like about Dev Connections being at Aria, there’s no food court. At the Venetian when MMS was there the food court was fast and somewhat

RE: [mssms] Horrible food at Ignite

2016-09-30 Thread Henry.Wilson
bwahahaha From: listsad...@lists.myitforum.com [mailto:listsad...@lists.myitforum.com] On Behalf Of Todd Hemsell Sent: Friday, September 30, 2016 11:09 AM To: mssms@lists.myitforum.com Subject: Re: [mssms] Horrible food at Ignite Duncan was in the bathrooms again? WTF? On Fri, Sep 30, 2016 at

RE: [mssms] Horrible food at Ignite

2016-09-30 Thread rodtrent
Orlando is really the best location for this type of crowd. There are very few bottlenecks (if any) at the Orlando convention center. I’ve always had a stellar experience there. Rod Trent From: listsad...@lists.myitforum.com [mailto:listsad...@lists.myitforum.com] On Behalf Of Michael

AW: [mssms] Horrible food at Ignite

2016-09-30 Thread Roland Janus
I’m here… Von: listsad...@lists.myitforum.com [mailto:listsad...@lists.myitforum.com] Im Auftrag von Andreas Hammarskjöld Gesendet: Freitag, 30. September 2016 04:25 An: mssms@lists.myitforum.com Betreff: RE: [mssms] Horrible food at Ignite Ready as ever! :) Will call you out. //A

AW: [mssms] Horrible food at Ignite

2016-09-30 Thread Roland Janus
For me Ignite got too big and not focused enough, if I can attend again (budget) I may choose other events instead. Overall content may be more focused and certainly food will be better :) Social aspect. Had a chat with a German guy at the party (great party BTW!) and we really would like to

RE: [mssms] Horrible food at Ignite

2016-09-30 Thread Michael Niehaus
As announced yesterday, we move on to Orlando for next year. They have more escalators in their convention center, but like all convention centers there are still bottlenecks. (Pre-register now to get the best hotels ☺) And they have the same challenges with feeding 20,000+ attendees.

RE: [mssms] Horrible food at Ignite

2016-09-30 Thread Marable, Mike
Very good points, Michael. The complaints I’ve been hearing about this year’s Ignite are the similar to some of those from last year’s event. Food and crowd management seem to be the top concerns. I have not heard a single complaint about the content. Even though this is a Microsoft event,

Re: RE: [mssms] SCCM 2007 Deny permissions on 1 report.

2016-09-30 Thread Eswar
Have you looked at class security rights and instance security rights options? I think you can go with instance security rights for specific report in the console. I did blog post few years ago on this I do not have CM07 lab to try.