rum.com] *On Behalf Of *Heaton, Joseph@Wildlife
> *Sent:* 06 December 2016 14:35
> *To:* mssms@lists.myitforum.com
> *Subject:* RE: [mssms] 1610 update not showing in console
>
>
>
> I don’t have a lab environment, so would you recommend running the script
> in production
] On
Behalf Of Heaton, Joseph@Wildlife
Sent: 06 December 2016 14:35
To: mssms@lists.myitforum.com
Subject: RE: [mssms] 1610 update not showing in console
I don’t have a lab environment, so would you recommend running the script in
production, or will the update show up at a later date for those that don’t
, December 01, 2016 10:59 AM
To: mssms@lists.myitforum.com
Subject: Re: [mssms] 1610 update not showing in console
in my lab; after running the script; I noticed 1610 wasn't there right away
either. I don't recall how long it was--I got distracted by production. by
the time I got back to the lab
: listsad...@lists.myitforum.com [mailto:listsad...@lists.myitforum.com] On
Behalf Of the codepoets
Sent: Thursday, December 01, 2016 7:21 PM
To: mssms@lists.myitforum.com
Subject: Re: [mssms] 1610 update not showing in console
Looks like we got it working.
We used a different PowerShell enable than
;
>
>
> Ivan
>
>
>
> *From:* listsad...@lists.myitforum.com [mailto:listsadmin@lists.
> myitforum.com] *On Behalf Of *the codepoets
> *Sent:* Thursday, December 1, 2016 4:36 PM
> *To:* mssms@lists.myitforum.com
> *Subject:* Re: [mssms] 1610 update not showing in cons
@lists.myitforum.com
Subject: Re: [mssms] 1610 update not showing in console
Actually, Ivan, that is what I was asking about (I hope I didn't sound too
demanding, didn't mean to...) :)
We're not even seeing the option for an upgrade, so if you are, and you're
currently at 1511, that tells me that we
s
> *Sent:* Thursday, December 1, 2016 3:46 PM
> *To:* mssms@lists.myitforum.com
> *Subject:* Re: [mssms] 1610 update not showing in console
>
>
>
> Again, we are at 1511 in our environment. Microsoft is stating that 1511
> should be the minimum for upgrading to 1610. I am asking specific
Lindenfeld
Fidelity National
From: listsad...@lists.myitforum.com [mailto:listsad...@lists.myitforum.com] On
Behalf Of the codepoets
Sent: Thursday, December 1, 2016 3:46 PM
To: mssms@lists.myitforum.com
Subject: Re: [mssms] 1610 update not showing in console
Again, we are at 1511 in our environment
er I checked for updates.
>
>
>
> Sol
>
>
>
> *From:* listsad...@lists.myitforum.com [mailto:listsadmin@lists.
> myitforum.com] *On Behalf Of *the codepoets
> *Sent:* Thursday, December 1, 2016 2:21 PM
> *To:* mssms@lists.myitforum.com
> *Subject:* Re: [mssms] 1
To: mssms@lists.myitforum.com
Subject: Re: [mssms] 1610 update not showing in console
Thanks for the reply Sherry. It's been 2 days since the script was run. Still
nothing.
Was your lab running 1511 or something newer?
My colleague has told me he's seeing a version check in one of the logs and
thinks
ttp://rite.buffalostate.edu/>
From: listsad...@lists.myitforum.com [mailto:listsad...@lists.myitforum.com] On
Behalf Of Sherry Kissinger
Sent: Thursday, December 1, 2016 1:59 PM
To: mssms@lists.myitforum.com
Subject: Re: [mssms] 1610 update not showing in console
in my lab; after running the scr
Thanks for the reply Sherry. It's been 2 days since the script was run.
Still nothing.
Was your lab running 1511 or something newer?
My colleague has told me he's seeing a version check in one of the logs and
thinks that's what is denying us access to 1610. So I am just trying to
confirm that
12 matches
Mail list logo
