Alex Wulms wrote:
] And Manuel, about that Wrong Version of MSX-DOS.YES, it did solve
] itself. I just tried the same procedure several times again and again and
] suddenly it worked...Very strange indeed.
Oh my. Your MSX is turning into a Windows machine ;-)
This also
This also concludes the 'real MSX name meaning discussion'.
This behaviour indicates clearly that it is a MicroSoft eXtended thingy
:-)
*LOL*
Problems? contact [EMAIL PROTECTED] See also http://www.faq.msxnet.org/
Hi
Can eeproms be used in sted of eproms in a msx to replace system roms.
(If correctly programed ofcourse!)
thanks
JPGROBLER
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Problems? contact [EMAIL PROTECTED] See also http://www.faq.msxnet.org/
[...]
- Somebody out there with a MSX mouse which he/she wants to sell ?
I'm sure Anne de Raad will help you solve some of the problems.
Well now *that* is a useful reply... :)
~Grauw (this too)
=
--
email me: [EMAIL PROTECTED] or ICQ: 10196372
visit my homepage at
At 06:19 26-9-00 -0700, you wrote:
Did you solve the Wrong version of MSX-DOS problem? If so: how?
No, I didn't solve this problem. It solved itself! That's why I have
the
feeling something is still not 100% with either the Fdisk or the
FAT16.com.
Errm... SET EXPERT = ON???
At 07:28 26-9-00 -0700, you wrote:
[...]
- Somebody out there with a MSX mouse which he/she wants to sell ?
I'm sure Anne de Raad will help you solve some of the problems.
Well now *that* is a useful reply... :)
:)
Please leave the original intact okay?
GreeTz, BiFi
Visit my Home Page
Hi,
On behalf of Leonardo Padial I want to ask
your attention for a question about the pulses of a MSX mouse. Padial has
developed a PS2 mouseconnector for the new MMSX, and now he wants to combine
several other cards like the keyboardinterface and a PSG+Audio connector in one
card. To do
Hi
all,
Recently the MSX
Resource Center has put up a new forum (instead of the old one that wasn't even
ours).
It's multithreaded
and very easy in use. You don't need to be a member to use it
ofcourse!
Other"recent"
updates include:
- The updated
MSX ICQ list (by Grauw)
- The ability
In linux, interrupt handlers and their children are not processes and thus
don't have a priority. If they claim the processor, they'll get it. So
just ajusting the polling frequency should do. I don't know how uzix does
this.
UZIX processes have priority. You can use a daemon
I don't know much about IP either, but Adriano Camargo Rodrigues da Cunha
knows (and implemented it in UZIX) and Laurens Holst is now learning (and
implementing) it. Guys, please enlighten us.
Pfff... It's really very simple. An IP packet consists of a header
IP packets are a
UZIX is multi-threaded. JoyNet send could be a thread and JoyNet receive
another thread.
It's not a good way to do it, Maarten.
On "heavy systems", like a PC, it's a good solution.
But on MSX, that has limited memory and clockspeed, it's not.
You're wasting twice the
JG Can eeproms be used in sted of eproms in a msx to replace system roms.
JG (If correctly programed ofcourse!)
Yes they are. All 27xx and 28xx devices are read-compatible
Problems? contact [EMAIL PROTECTED] See also http://www.faq.msxnet.org/
On Tue, 26 Sep 2000, you wrote:
Basic and most games work fine, but with SpaceManBow, SolidSnake and some
other games, the grapics are kind of double.
If you're using the English Solid Snake, press SELECT while booting and
you'll get 50Hz.
Bye,
Maarten
Problems?
"JP Grobler" [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote
Can eeproms be used in sted of eproms in a msx to replace system roms.
(If correctly programed ofcourse!)
Why not Flash EPROM?
Flash is a "block device" while EEPROM can used as a
"character device."
The 28C256 EEPROM is pin-compatible to 32Kx8 SRAMs;
"JP Grobler" [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote
When replacing roms in a msx would it matter if you use 27256 or
27C256? The same would apply for 27512 or 27C512.
That's not a problem as long as the chip uses TTL levels.
Regards,
Tomas
The Unofficial Spectravideo Homepage
15 matches
Mail list logo