We don't have the or a/an in the Finnish language
Anyone remember the band The The? Probably not in Finland. ;-)
Steven Cook.
--
From: Olli Niemitalo o...@iki.fi
Sent: Monday, January 16, 2012 6:56 PM
To: A discussion list for music-related DSP
On 1/16/12 1:16 AM, Nigel Redmon wrote:
Nice improvements.
This may seem like nitpicking, but the Timeline of additive synthesizers
section seems to choose keeping the instrument name as the start of the sentence over
proper grammar. For instance:
Hammond organ, invented in 1934[26], is
I'd like to say well done to everyone who has edited this so far, it looks
massively better :)
-Original Message-
From: music-dsp-boun...@music.columbia.edu
[mailto:music-dsp-boun...@music.columbia.edu] On Behalf Of robert
bristow-johnson
Sent: 16 January 2012 16:16
To:
No, it was my doing that the paragraphs had the synth name as their
first word(s). We don't have the or a/an in the Finnish language,
so I'm not always sure if they are needed, like in front of names (of
synthesizers) here. But I'm going to claim that most of that text
looked even worse before.
I agree Olli—it was much worst before—the article was painful to read. (And as
I said, this is nitpicking.)
There's nothing wrong with have just the name first—it just needs a bit of
change to keep it that way and make it grammatically correct. I didn't change
it right away when I read it
hey, i appreciate the help from folks here (namely Olli and Ross)
dropping in on that Wikipedia article, now that it has been released
from protection.
please don't go away, there is lotsa stuff to do and we have time to do
it. it appears that this editor who wanted to rewrite everything
On 11/01/12 06:45, Nigel Redmon wrote:
Just to get my fingertips wet again, I fixed something trivial that I had commented on
over two years ago: One of the simplest things you could imagine, an article on the while
loop construct in programming. There were examples in many computer languages,
Hi Tom,
The wikipedia entry was:
Very similar to C and C++, but the ''while loop'' could also have been written
on one line:
As I said, this implies that that it couldn't be done in one line in C/C++, and
it can. So, I'd say that the original writer was incorrect.
And again, so you think
On January 9, 2012 at 3:02:04 PM Veronica Merryfield
veronica.merryfield@shaw.cawrote:
The Synergy was also an FM machine and could do everything the DX-7 could do
just it wasn't packaged or priced that way.
I would say, in fact, that the Synergy was _primarily_ an FM machine. One of
the
On 1/10/12 9:31 PM, Alen Koebel wrote:
I get paid to write, so I'm no stranger to research. I have edited the work of
others and had my work edited. Many here can say the same, I'm sure. With that
background I have tried to edit articles on Wikipedia. IMO, Wikipedia is
fundamentally a bad
On January 9, 2012 at 3:02:04 PM Veronica Merryfield
veronica.merryfield@shaw.cawrote:
My feel is that to make it right, it probably needs more than a bit of
adjustment.
If this is to be fixed, I think it needs to be an organized effort. I scan down
the page and see all the things wrong:
On 1/10/12 11:29 PM, Scott Nordlund wrote:
On January 9, 2012 at 3:02:04 PM Veronica Merryfield
veronica.merryfield@shaw.cawrote:
My feel is that to make it right, it probably needs more than a bit of
adjustment.
If this is to be fixed, I think it needs to be an organized effort. I scan down
I've long treated wikipedia as a useful tool that I reference often, and trust
about as far as I can throw the internet.
That is, it's good for getting a quick look at many things, as long as you
understand that anything that has the slightest chance of involving a point of
view will be bias,
Ah, that (the RMI using Walsh functions) sounds familiar...I remember Bernie
Hutchins (Electronotes) did some articles back in the 70's on Walsh
functions...it also reminds me of having fun back in the 70's when I figured
out I could run my analog sequencers at audio rates and get some cool
Hi Robert,
Care to narrow down the target (I suppose there are multiple, but maybe start
with the one or two of most immediate concern)?
I looked at it a bit, and it's a lot to juggle, looking at diffs and the back
and forth. Maybe it's just getting late, and I played a lot of basketball
Wouldn't it be nice if all of the knowledge embodied in this list could find
its way into Wikipedia, fixing the howlers and myths that exist in some of the
audio, synthesis, effects, computer music, etc pages? I know that some of us
have at time contributed, but it would be a nice community
On 1/9/12 11:00 AM, Victor Lazzarini wrote:
Wouldn't it be nice if all of the knowledge embodied in this list could find
its way into Wikipedia, fixing the howlers and myths that exist in some of the
audio, synthesis, effects, computer music, etc pages? I know that some of us
have at time
On 1/9/12 11:58 AM, Scott Nordlund wrote:
I looked at it a bit, and it's a lot to juggle, looking at diffs and the back and forth. Maybe it's
just getting late, and I played a lot of basketball earlier, but the final thing that told me
it's bed time was, in skimming the article, Its [RMI]
On 2012-01-09, at 8:58 AM, Scott Nordlund wrote:
The thing that bugs me about the RMI Harmonic Synthesizer part is that I've
seen the schematic. It doesn't do that (though the Keyboard Computer models
probably do). The Harmonic Synthesizer uses Walsh functions. Resistor
networks mix the
there's a guy there with handle Clusternote (who might be lurking here
for all's i know) who is slugging it out with an IP (can't imagine who
that is) about the math that goes into additive synthesis. if you ever
bother to edit the en WP, it might be a good time to examine the article
and
20 matches
Mail list logo