Aaron Cooper wrote:
Perhaps we need a
language preference to hide all Wiki links other than your preferred
language(s)?
mb_server could use HTTP header Accept-Language to guess preferred
languages.
--
Gioele [EMAIL PROTECTED]
___
On Tue, 2008-04-08 at 10:31 -0400, Andrew Conkling wrote:
The name problem would prevent us from doing any kind of language
guessing, akin to what we do with Amazon URLs (redirect to the
desired Amazon store).
But ultimately, I'd like to think we should handle this like we should
box sets
On Tue, Apr 8, 2008 at 1:55 AM, Lauri Watts [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
n Tue, Apr 8, 2008 at 7:41 AM, Paul C. Bryan [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi all:
I'm beginning to see more redundant Wikipedia links in various languages
in MB, and as I've seen voting in both directions when faced
On Tue, Apr 8, 2008 at 8:15 AM, Brian Schweitzer
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Mozart as example of extreme case aside, I don't see myself (or
anyone, normally) adding every single possible page. But I do think
the real question isn't which language(s), or should we have all
these languages,
On Tue, Apr 8, 2008 at 7:55 AM, Lauri Watts [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Current practise by the majority of editors is to only include English and
the band's native language, and perhaps any others that are notably
more extensive (for instance, I know a Canadian band who have had
multiple top
+1
Lauri Watts schreef:
n Tue, Apr 8, 2008 at 7:41 AM, Paul C. Bryan [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi all:
I'm beginning to see more redundant Wikipedia links in various languages
in MB, and as I've seen voting in both directions when faced with such
AR adds, I'm seeking to clarify what
On Tue, Apr 08, 2008 at 08:36:57AM +0200, Lauri Watts wrote:
I prefer to distinguish 'it exists' and 'it exists and is useful'.
I agree with this.
But, assuming most of those mozart pages are reasonably well written,
they're probably useful to those people who don't have english as a
native
On Tue, Apr 8, 2008 at 7:33 AM, Kuno Woudt [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Tue, Apr 08, 2008 at 08:36:57AM +0200, Lauri Watts wrote:
I prefer to distinguish 'it exists' and 'it exists and is useful'.
I agree with this.
But, assuming most of those mozart pages are reasonably well written,
On Tue, Apr 8, 2008 at 1:55 AM, Lauri Watts [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
n Tue, Apr 8, 2008 at 7:41 AM, Paul C. Bryan [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I'm beginning to see more redundant Wikipedia links in various
languages
in MB, and as I've seen voting in both directions when faced with such
AR
On 8-Apr-08, at 7:33 AM, Kuno Woudt wrote:
On Tue, Apr 08, 2008 at 08:36:57AM +0200, Lauri Watts wrote:
I prefer to distinguish 'it exists' and 'it exists and is useful'.
I agree with this.
But, assuming most of those mozart pages are reasonably well written,
they're probably useful to
Hi all:
I'm beginning to see more redundant Wikipedia links in various languages
in MB, and as I've seen voting in both directions when faced with such
AR adds, I'm seeking to clarify what may become a reasonable policy for
Wikipedia ARs in MB.
Perhaps to illustrate what I consider the worst
On 8-Apr-08, at 1:41 AM, Paul C. Bryan wrote:
Hi all:
I'm beginning to see more redundant Wikipedia links in various
languages
in MB, and as I've seen voting in both directions when faced with such
AR adds, I'm seeking to clarify what may become a reasonable policy
for
Wikipedia ARs in
n Tue, Apr 8, 2008 at 7:41 AM, Paul C. Bryan [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi all:
I'm beginning to see more redundant Wikipedia links in various languages
in MB, and as I've seen voting in both directions when faced with such
AR adds, I'm seeking to clarify what may become a reasonable policy
13 matches
Mail list logo
