mutt-1.2.5i RPMs

2000-10-24 Thread Leonid Mamtchenkov
Hello All, I have just compiled mutt-1.2.5 rpms including the following patches: - Roland Rosenfeld - compressed folder patch - Byrial Jensen - patch.status-time - patch.hash_destroy - Vsevolod Volkov - patch.nntp - patch.change_charset - patch.initials -

Re: My Contribution to Anti-Spam

2000-10-24 Thread raf
Suresh Ramasubramanian wrote: Corey G. proclaimed on mutt-users that: Procmail simply needs to use many of the filters that were presented on this list, but the most powerful weapon is with sendmail. I use code that I found from sendmail.org which rejects domains found in a text

Re: My Contribution to Anti-Spam

2000-10-24 Thread Suresh Ramasubramanian
raf proclaimed on mutt-users that: or FEATURE(`rbl') to make use of realtime blackhole list at rbl.maps.vix.com. then you don't have to do anything else :) Use both. They go hand in hand. -s (just because you think a guy is a bozo, you can't have his domain RBL'd - see

Re: GPG 1.0.3 and mutt

2000-10-24 Thread Andrew W. Nosenko
Brian Salter-Duke wrote: : I may stick with GnuPG as is. However that : raises my original question. gpg.rc uses gpg_2comp (I may have the name ^ gpg.rc don't use gpg_2comp starting at 2000-03-03. All commands what use gpg_2comp is commented

Re: GPG 1.0.3 and mutt

2000-10-24 Thread Brian Salter-Duke
On Tue, Oct 24, 2000 at 11:08:14AM +0300, Andrew W. Nosenko wrote: Brian Salter-Duke wrote: : I may stick with GnuPG as is. However that : raises my original question. gpg.rc uses gpg_2comp (I may have the name ^ gpg.rc don't use gpg_2comp

Re: mailbox list order?

2000-10-24 Thread Larry Rosenman
* Bruce DeVisser [EMAIL PROTECTED] [001023 23:20]: On Sat, Oct 21, 2000 at 05:02:21PM -0500, Larry Rosenman wrote: Is there a way (1.3.10i if it matters) to set the mailbox list order? I.E. I want it to be reverse date sent always (I do O d when I get into it). I can't seem to find

Re: GPG 1.0.3 and mutt

2000-10-24 Thread raf
Andrew W. Nosenko wrote: Brian Salter-Duke wrote: : I may stick with GnuPG as is. However that : raises my original question. gpg.rc uses gpg_2comp (I may have the name ^ gpg.rc don't use gpg_2comp starting at 2000-03-03. All commands what

Re: GPG 1.0.3 and mutt

2000-10-24 Thread raf
raf wrote: Andrew W. Nosenko wrote: Brian Salter-Duke wrote: : I may stick with GnuPG as is. However that : raises my original question. gpg.rc uses gpg_2comp (I may have the name ^ gpg.rc don't use gpg_2comp starting at 2000-03-03.

Re: flag as important when sending

2000-10-24 Thread Thomas Roessler
On 2000-10-24 10:03:13 +0530, Suresh Ramasubramanian wrote: This might be better off as an editor macro, IMHO. I could imagine a nice function in mutt. However, does anyone have an RFC for this which we could implement? -- Thomas Roessler [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: flag as important when sending

2000-10-24 Thread Lars Hecking
Is it possible to mark a message as Important or Urgent, so that the receiver notices this. I know this is common for other clients (Importance: or X-Priority:). It is of course possible to add this manually, but shouldn't this be an standard mail client feature? Or this not depreciated?

Re: flag as important when sending

2000-10-24 Thread Thomas Roessler
On 2000-10-24 11:10:28 +0100, Lars Hecking wrote: Some MUAs (elm, I think) provide support for a Precedence: header, but this header does something very different: it allows to tweak the priority of messages (= sort order) in sendmail's queue. The algorithm behind that is described in

Re: flag as important when sending

2000-10-24 Thread Lars Hecking
Some MUAs (elm, I think) provide support for a Precedence: header, but this header does something very different: it allows to tweak the priority of messages (= sort order) in sendmail's queue. The algorithm behind that is described in the Sendmail Installation and Operation

Re: flag as important when sending

2000-10-24 Thread raf
Lars Hecking wrote: Is it possible to mark a message as Important or Urgent, so that the receiver notices this. I know this is common for other clients (Importance: or X-Priority:). It is of course possible to add this manually, but shouldn't this be an standard mail client feature?

Re: flag as important when sending

2000-10-24 Thread Suresh Ramasubramanian
Thomas Roessler proclaimed on mutt-users that: On 2000-10-24 15:21:12 +0530, Suresh Ramasubramanian wrote: RFC 2076 - Common Internet Message Headers That's a summary of existing usage Yes - and it documents the common usages of the Priority: header. RFC 2524 - EMSD (Efficient Mail

Re: resend-message

2000-10-24 Thread Mikko Hänninen
Jesper Holmberg [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote on Tue, 24 Oct 2000: So: what I would have expected to happen is that the newly sent message be saved to my out-mailbox, since it is in effect a new message sent from me. What am I missing? You're missing that there's no default Fcc value provided

Re: flag as important when sending

2000-10-24 Thread Mikko Hänninen
Thomas Roessler [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote on Tue, 24 Oct 2000: ... and not supported by MTAs different from sendmail, such as postfix or qmail, right? Right for qmail too. Mikko -- // Mikko Hänninen, aka. Wizzu // [EMAIL PROTECTED] // http://www.iki.fi/wiz/ // The Corrs list maintainer

mutt and hook question

2000-10-24 Thread Marco Giardini
I'd like that all the outgoing mail to a certain e.mail address are saved automatically in a special folder instead of in the outbox one. Is it possible? If yes, how? Thanks for replying .oesse. -- -- Marco Giardini

Re: mutt and hook question

2000-10-24 Thread Jack McKinney
Big Brother tells me that Marco Giardini wrote: I'd like that all the outgoing mail to a certain e.mail address are saved automatically in a special folder instead of in the outbox one. Is it possible? If yes, how? Thanks for replying fcc-hook [EMAIL PROTECTED] +special-folder -- "Restore

Default search string

2000-10-24 Thread Jeff Howie
Hi all. Is there some setting that I haven't been able to find that allows me to set a default search pattern in the pager? I have a set of cron jobs that run hourly that send me updates from various systems processes, and I'd like to be able to just open mutt recall this default search

Re: Two suggestions

2000-10-24 Thread David Champion
On 2000.10.24, in [EMAIL PROTECTED], "Dan Boger" [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: yikes! why would you want to ever overwrite a whole folder with one message? I'd be scared of hitting o by mistake... Mutt treats all save files as folders. Sometimes you just want the one message, but you

send-hooks a la Pine Roles.

2000-10-24 Thread Adrian Chung
Hi all! A co-worker stated the other day that the biggest feature that has kept him from switching from Pine to mutt is the fact that pine supports roles. From what I could gather, a role in pine basically allows you to set your From: email address depending on who the message you're replying

Re: send-hooks a la Pine Roles.

2000-10-24 Thread Suresh Ramasubramanian
Adrian Chung proclaimed on mutt-users that: The suggestions I've heard say to do something like: send-hook \ '~t [EMAIL PROTECTED]' \ 'my_hdr From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]' set alternates, and set reverse_name I'm assuming that this is a feature that is

Re: send-hooks a la Pine Roles.

2000-10-24 Thread Adrian Chung
On Tue, Oct 24, 2000 at 11:13:30PM +0530, Suresh Ramasubramanian [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Adrian Chung proclaimed on mutt-users that: The suggestions I've heard say to do something like: send-hook \ '~t [EMAIL PROTECTED]' \ 'my_hdr From: [EMAIL

Re: macros and attachments

2000-10-24 Thread Byrial Jensen
On Tue, Oct 24, 2000 at 00:01:18 +0200, Mark Weinem wrote: Is it possible to attach a file via macro? This doesn't work: macro compose f2 "attach-file=/home/mark/templates/mime" Try this: macro compose f2 "attach-file/home/mark/templates/mimeenter" Perhaps it would be more elegant

Re: send-hooks a la Pine Roles.

2000-10-24 Thread Suresh Ramasubramanian
Using a large mallet, Adrian Chung whacked out: when I hit reply, I get my username @ my.local.machine.name. likely you have to set the envelope sender too - post the relevant parts of your muttrc plz Why don't you like qmail? it's an allergy of some kind :P I prefer exim (or if

Re: resend-message

2000-10-24 Thread Jesper Holmberg
* On Tuesday, October 24, Mikko Hänninen wrote: You're missing that there's no default Fcc value provided with resend-message. This is certainly something I think should be changed, it could even be called a bug. Hey, a mutt bug, I didn't think those existed! Anyway, I've been trying to

Re: resend-message

2000-10-24 Thread Charles Curley
On Tue, Oct 24, 2000 at 08:48:31PM +0200, Jesper Holmberg muttered: * On Tuesday, October 24, Mikko Hänninen wrote: You're missing that there's no default Fcc value provided with resend-message. This is certainly something I think should be changed, it could even be called a bug. Hey,

Re: Two probable RTFMs

2000-10-24 Thread Michael Tatge
Paul Makepeace muttered: 1) How I do instruct mutt to recognize me as a variety of alternate email addresses see $alternates 2) Turn off a limited view. (l)imit to ~A or . HTH, Michael -- APL hackers do it in the quad. PGP-Key:

Mutt 1.0.1i

2000-10-24 Thread Martin Schweizer
Hello I've FreeBSD4.0 and Mutt 1.0.1i. It runs ok but I've some questions: - when I start Mutt the following error occurs: "repetion-operator operand invalid" - when I send mails the following error occurs: "/home/info/Mail/sent: No such file or directory (errno=2)" . I know there are some

send-hooks not reset

2000-10-24 Thread Adrian Chung
Hi! I figured out how to set things up so that now I can properly reply to different people based on the original inbound email address. But I ran into a strange occurrence, which I'm not sure is my fault. I've set up mutt so that: set reverse_name set from="Adrian Chung [EMAIL PROTECTED]"

Re: send-hooks not reset

2000-10-24 Thread Dan Boger
On Tue, Oct 24, 2000 at 04:53:25PM -0400, Adrian Chung wrote: set from="Adrian Chung [EMAIL PROTECTED]" alternates="(support|achung)@mycompany\.(com|net|org)" send-hook '~f support@mycompany' 'my_hdr From: company support [EMAIL PROTECTED]' send-hook '~f support@mycompany' 'set

Re: resend-message

2000-10-24 Thread Byrial Jensen
On Tue, Oct 24, 2000 at 20:48:31 +0200, Jesper Holmberg wrote: * On Tuesday, October 24, Mikko Hänninen wrote: You're missing that there's no default Fcc value provided with resend-message. This is certainly something I think should be changed, it could even be called a bug. Hey, a

Re: send-hooks not reset

2000-10-24 Thread Adrian Chung
On Tue, Oct 24, 2000 at 05:22:30PM -0400, Dan Boger [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Tue, Oct 24, 2000 at 04:53:25PM -0400, Adrian Chung wrote: set from="Adrian Chung [EMAIL PROTECTED]" alternates="(support|achung)@mycompany\.(com|net|org)" send-hook '~f support@mycompany' 'my_hdr From:

Re: attachment macro

2000-10-24 Thread Mikko Hänninen
Mark Weinem [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote on Mon, 23 Oct 2000: Is it possible to attach a file via macro? Sure. This doesn't work: macro compose f2 "attach-file=/home/mark/templates/mime" Perhaps it would be more elegant if the macro just offers the templates directory and the user

Re: send-hooks a la Pine Roles.

2000-10-24 Thread Mikko Hänninen
Adrian Chung [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote on Tue, 24 Oct 2000: I've got alternates set, and I tried both set reverse_name and set reverse_realname. I'm not having any luck with either. With mail addresses to a different address (actually different user, same domain), when I hit reply, I get

Re: resend-message

2000-10-24 Thread Jesper Holmberg
* On Tuesday, October 24, Byrial Jensen wrote: Not: macro generic \eu "resend-messagef=sentmailenter" This should in theory work if you have remembered to remove the default key bindings for escu in the various menus which otherwise will take precedence over the generic definition. No,

Re: Default search string

2000-10-24 Thread Mikko Hänninen
Jeff Howie [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote on Tue, 24 Oct 2000: Hi all. Is there some setting that I haven't been able to find that allows me to set a default search pattern in the pager? Not beyond doing a macro which first invokes a pager and then does a "searchPATTERNenter" (where PATTERN is your

Re: send-hooks not reset

2000-10-24 Thread Mikko Hänninen
Adrian Chung [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote on Tue, 24 Oct 2000: send-hook . 'unmy_hdr From:' Is this classified as a bug, or a feature? :) It's a feature, a design desicision. Since you can use any muttrc command in send-hooks, it would be unworkably complex to try to limit the scope to that

Re: Searching in multiple mailboxes

2000-10-24 Thread Mark Weinem
On Mon, 23 Oct 2000, Benjamin Korvemaker wrote: See "grepm" and "grepmail" But are there no tools for Maildirs? Ciao, Mark PGP signature

mutt cyrus IMAP problem (folders)

2000-10-24 Thread Scott Boss
Hello All, My users convinced me to go to IMAP for the mail system verses using sendmail/local mailboxes/POP. They swore up and down that the old command line junkies like me would not be effected. So I let them implement cyrus IMAP. I can get to my inbox ( {localhost:143}INBOX ) but I

Re: resend-message

2000-10-24 Thread Ben Reser
On Tue, Oct 24, 2000 at 02:25:22PM +0300, Mikko Hänninen wrote: You're missing that there's no default Fcc value provided with resend-message. This is certainly something I think should be changed, it could even be called a bug. So: There is no Fcc unless you remember to manually add one

Viewing application/msword thingies.

2000-10-24 Thread Morten Liebach
Hi! I'm getting a lot af mail with *.doc files attached, and I'd like to use catdoc to show them in mutt, how do I do that? I have the line: application/msword; catdoc -s iso8859-1 %s|less; cupiousoutput in my ~/.mutt_mailcap, and an autoview antry for it in my ~/.muttrc, and I still

Re: resend-message

2000-10-24 Thread Mikko Hänninen
Ben Reser [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote on Tue, 24 Oct 2000: Depends on what you're using the resend feature for. If you're resending a message that you already sent it should already be in your Fcc and what's the point of adding it again? True, but in that case you can delete the Fcc from the

Automate Bcc to myself?

2000-10-24 Thread Glyn Millington
Hi! Is it possible to set up Mutt to send a blind copy to myself each time I send out an email? Can anyone tell me how, or point me to the right place to find out? TIA Glyn M -- * None can love freedom

Re: Searching in multiple mailboxes

2000-10-24 Thread Suresh Ramasubramanian
Mark Weinem proclaimed on mutt-users that: On Mon, 23 Oct 2000, Benjamin Korvemaker wrote: See "grepm" and "grepmail" But are there no tools for Maildirs? I believe grepmail does maildirs rather well. -- Suresh Ramasubramanian + Wallopus Malletus Indigenensis mallet @ cluestick.org +

Re: Mutt 1.0.1i

2000-10-24 Thread Suresh Ramasubramanian
Martin Schweizer proclaimed on mutt-users that: I've FreeBSD4.0 and Mutt 1.0.1i. It runs ok but I've some questions: - when I start Mutt the following error occurs: "repetion-operator operand invalid" Try recompiling it. - when I send mails the following error occurs:

Re: Automate Bcc to myself?

2000-10-24 Thread Suresh Ramasubramanian
Glyn Millington proclaimed on mutt-users that: Is it possible to set up Mutt to send a blind copy to myself each time I send out an email? Can anyone tell me how, or point me to the right place to find out? Mutt generally saves copies of sent mails - anyway, rtfm about fcc hooks. --