Re: outlook 2000 attachments

2001-03-13 Thread Lars Hecking
Encapsulation Format." The product I QA for can read these, but there isn't any publicly available code that I'm aware of to decompose TNEF files. There are plenty. Off my head, I can think of Convert-TNEF on CPAN, and a standalone conversion program called tnef on

Re: outlook 2000 attachments

2001-03-13 Thread Suresh Ramasubramanian
Lars Hecking proclaimed on mutt-users that: There are plenty. Off my head, I can think of Convert-TNEF on CPAN, and a standalone conversion program called tnef on http://world.std.com/~damned/software.html. Amavis uses (or rather, requires) this damned program afaict. -s (well,

Re: outlook 2000 attachments

2001-03-13 Thread Conor Daly
On Mon, Mar 12, 2001 at 10:21:33PM -0700 or thereabouts, Dave Murray wrote: Drew Fisher wrote on mutt-users: I have a (hopefully) quick question to ask. I am running Mutt v1.3.14i and whenever I receive an email with an attachment from someone using Microsoft Outlook 2000, the

can't pgp sign

2001-03-13 Thread Horace G. Friend III
Hi, I've got pgp (ver. 6.5.8i) working outside of mutt. I can also verify signed msgs after I get their public keys outside of mutt. But I can't sign outgoing msgs. After selecting the (s)ign command from the pgp menu enter my passphrase, I get a received signal 11 press any key to

Re: outlook 2000 attachments

2001-03-13 Thread Lars Hecking
There are plenty. Off my head, I can think of Convert-TNEF on CPAN, and a standalone conversion program called tnef on http://world.std.com/~damned/software.html. Amavis uses (or rather, requires) this damned program afaict. I find it extremely funny that you should mention amavis

Minor build problem with 1.3.16i

2001-03-13 Thread Chris Green
I have just built mutt 1.3.16i and had a (minor) problem. The ./configure produced one error:- sed: can't read ./doc/instdoc.sh.in: No such file or directory which I ignored, but this goes on to make install fail as follows:- Making install in doc

Re: Minor build problem with 1.3.16i

2001-03-13 Thread Lars Hecking
I have just built mutt 1.3.16i and had a (minor) problem. This is mutt-users. mutt-1.3.16.i is a development version, and feedback about this version should go to mutt-dev. The solution to your problem is in the mutt-dev archives. In fact, it was even posted here less than a week ago.

Re: Minor build problem with 1.3.16i

2001-03-13 Thread Chris Green
On Tue, Mar 13, 2001 at 01:47:22PM +, Lars Hecking wrote: I have just built mutt 1.3.16i and had a (minor) problem. This is mutt-users. mutt-1.3.16.i is a development version, and feedback about this version should go to mutt-dev. Yes, OK, but I don't really want to get on the

hostname

2001-03-13 Thread Horace G. Friend III
Hi, I'm not sure if this has any bearing but I've recently setup procmailrc to handle local mail delivery (mailists) and it works fine. I sent two msgs to two members of Mutt-Users' List (directly to their email address) and both msgs were bounced back because of the ff. errors: The

Re: hostname

2001-03-13 Thread Suresh Ramasubramanian
Horace G. Friend III proclaimed on mutt-users that: The following addresses had permanent fatal errors [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Reason: 554 [EMAIL PROTECTED]: Sender address rejected: Access denied.) Put this in sendmail.mc MASQUERADE_AS(`your-domain.com')

Still having problems with 8-bit characters and/or locale

2001-03-13 Thread Chris Green
I'm still trying to get 8-bit characters displayed correctly when I'm in the mutt pager. I've been playing with this on and off for a while now and it's really getting me annoyed - more from the point of view that I can't find how to fix it than that it's really important! I run mutt on this

Suggestions: indicator color; To me in index

2001-03-13 Thread W M Brelsford
Three years ago I had a number of suggestions/questions, two of which remain: 1. In the index menu, I would like to specify something like "color indicator reverse"? I.e., the indicator line would be colored the reverse of whatever its color would be if it weren't the

Re: Colors in Mutt

2001-03-13 Thread David Rock
On Mon, Mar 12, 2001 at 04:01:45PM +0100, Olivier Billet wrote: Hi everyone, I have the following issue using mutt: it don't display the colors even though + I run it on a xterm_color (I can see colored prompt) + I have colors settings in my .muttrc What do I have to do ? Was there

Re: Minor build problem with 1.3.16i

2001-03-13 Thread Nelson D. Guerrero
Here's the file you need. The message was posted on this list on Feb 26th. * On Tue Mar 13 2001, Chris Green screamed: - On Tue, Mar 13, 2001 at 01:47:22PM +, Lars Hecking wrote: - - I have just built mutt 1.3.16i and had a (minor) problem. - - This is mutt-users. mutt-1.3.16.i is a

Re: Suggestions: indicator color; To me in index

2001-03-13 Thread Charles Cazabon
W M Brelsford [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: 2. A minor cosmetic one: with the %F code in $index_format, messages one sends to oneself would look better without the "To ". E.g., a message I send to myself would appear as "W M Brelsford" rather than "To W M Brelsford". Please

Re: Suggestions: indicator color; To me in index

2001-03-13 Thread Dave Ewart
On Monday, 12.03.2001 at 18:33 -0700, W M Brelsford wrote: 2. A minor cosmetic one: with the %F code in $index_format, messages one sends to oneself would look better without the "To ". E.g., a message I send to myself would appear as "W M Brelsford" rather than "To W M

Re: Minor build problem with 1.3.16i

2001-03-13 Thread Rich Lafferty
On Tue, Mar 13, 2001 at 01:57:10PM +, Chris Green ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote: Yes, OK, but I don't really want to get on the mutt-dev list to report just the occasional build problem. I tend to go with development versions at the moment because I use IMAP and that is where a lot of the

Re: hostname

2001-03-13 Thread Lars Hecking
I sent two msgs to two members of Mutt-Users' List (directly to their email address) and both msgs were bounced back because of the ff. errors: So that was you ... How can I fix the problem? Before I set ~/.procmailrc everything seems fine. Could the error be cause by ~/.procmailrc?

Re: can't pgp sign

2001-03-13 Thread David Champion
On 2001.03.13, in [EMAIL PROTECTED], "Horace G. Friend III" [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hi, I've got pgp (ver. 6.5.8i) working outside of mutt. I can also verify signed msgs after I get their public keys outside of mutt. But I can't sign outgoing msgs. After selecting the (s)ign

Re: Still having problems with 8-bit characters and/or locale

2001-03-13 Thread Andre Berger
* Chris Green [EMAIL PROTECTED], 20010313 16:46 +0100: [] How do I get mutt to understand that 8-bit characters (well '£' anyway) are valid and shouldn't be changed at all? I've tried setting the LANG and/or LC_CTYPE variables but this seems to have no effect. What *exactly* should one

Problem with PGP linebreaks

2001-03-13 Thread Rejo Zenger
Hi, I'm using Mutt 1.2.5i and GPG 1.0.4 on a Linux 2.2.16. I have been told the encrypted email I'm sending does not have the correct linebreaks. This is a hexdump of a part of a message I have sent to him. Linebreaks are platform-specific ("0A"; Unix style) instead of the platform-

Re: can't pgp sign

2001-03-13 Thread rex
On Tue, Mar 13, 2001 at 06:58:32PM +0800, Horace G. Friend III wrote: I've got pgp (ver. 6.5.8i) working outside of mutt. I can also verify signed msgs after I get their public keys outside of mutt. But I can't sign outgoing msgs. After selecting the (s)ign command from the pgp menu enter

Sorting by date-received (was: Removing date)

2001-03-13 Thread Gregor Zattler
Hi, * Irwan Hadi [EMAIL PROTECTED] [Mon 12 Mär 2001 01:37:25 GMT]: I want to know how do I strip the Date: line from the header of messages coming to me using procmail, and after that procmail should generate a new Date: based on the date at my computer. I want to do this, because there

Re: Still having problems with 8-bit characters and/or locale

2001-03-13 Thread David
Chris Green wrote: In the mutt pager 8-bit characters (the GB pound sign is the most frequent one) used to display as '?', now I've moved to a more recent development version of mutt they display as '\nnn' (i.e. the pound sign is '\243'). Other programs (vi, cat, more) display the I was

Re: can't pgp sign

2001-03-13 Thread Horace G. Friend III
On Tue, Mar 13, 2001 at 11:28:18AM -0800, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Tue, Mar 13, 2001 at 06:58:32PM +0800, Horace G. Friend III wrote: I've got pgp (ver. 6.5.8i) working outside of mutt. I can also verify signed msgs after I get their public keys outside of mutt. But I can't sign

Re: hostname

2001-03-13 Thread Horace G. Friend III
Hi Lars, Yup it was me alright. :) I tried to take up your offer of scanning that AHAOFIAH.EXE file that I suspected of having a virus. I encrypted and signed the binary and tried to send it to your email address as an attachment. What baffles me is that I can send to this list. I've set

Re: Still having problems with 8-bit characters and/or locale

2001-03-13 Thread Thomas Dickey
On Wed, Mar 14, 2001 at 09:23:20AM +1100, David wrote: Chris Green wrote: In the mutt pager 8-bit characters (the GB pound sign is the most frequent one) used to display as '?', now I've moved to a more recent development version of mutt they display as '\nnn' (i.e. the pound sign is

Re: hostname

2001-03-13 Thread Suresh Ramasubramanian
Horace G. Friend III proclaimed on mutt-users that: What baffles me is that I can send to this list. I've set sendmail on verbose mode and I can see that outgoing mail is from [EMAIL PROTECTED] and yet the remote system accepts this "without a whimper". Most server operators prefer

Re: outlook 2000 attachments

2001-03-13 Thread Dave Murray
Drew Fisher wrote on mutt-users: I have a (hopefully) quick question to ask. I am running Mutt v1.3.14i and whenever I receive an email with an attachment from someone using Microsoft Outlook 2000, the attachment always comes up looking like: As an experiment, I made a word-doc.zip and

Macro to edit procmailrc?

2001-03-13 Thread Andre Bonhote
hi out there i am using mutt 1.2.5i together with fetchmail and procmail. is there a way to kinda automatically add an entry to my procmailrc from within mutt? someting like this: - mail arrives - ah, it's spam - hit ^k (or something else, of course) - let me decide, what procmail will be