Hello,
First thank for your work, mutt is great.
sometimes, I send some mails with bcc field filled, but in the sent
mailbox the recipients are not showed, it would be usefull (for the
sender) to know the mail have been sent.
In my sent mailbox, it appears that the mail has been sent to
William Wu wrote:
sometimes, I send some mails with bcc field filled, but in the sent
mailbox the recipients are not showed,
that's why it's called Bcc (blind carbon copy)
it would be usefull (for the sender) to know the mail have been sent.
In my sent mailbox, it appears that the
On 2002.02.01, in [EMAIL PROTECTED],
Will Yardley [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
William Wu wrote:
sometimes, I send some mails with bcc field filled, but in the sent
mailbox the recipients are not showed,
that's why it's called Bcc (blind carbon copy)
This sort of dodges one
William --
...and then William Wu said...
%
% Hello,
Hello!
%
% First thank for your work, mutt is great.
I think so, too!
%
% sometimes, I send some mails with bcc field filled, but in the sent
% mailbox the recipients are not showed, it would be usefull (for the
% sender) to know
David Champion wrote:
This sort of dodges one solution, though, which is to retain the bcc:
header on locally-filed copies (while leaving it out of those pumped
into the MTA). I actually prefer this approach, having gotten used to
it on some other mailer I used to use.
Mutt can do it,
David Champion wrote:
Mutt can do it, too: set write_bcc in your .muttrc. But note that this
makes mutt send the Bcc: header to your MTA, too. If your MTA filters it
out, that's ok, but if it does not, you might want to wrap your MTA in a
script or just avoid this setting.
formail (from the
