On Mon, Aug 07, 2023 at 01:57:04AM +1000, Nemo Thorx wrote:
> Quoting Ed Blackman from 04 Aug (a Friday in 2023) at 1434 hours...
> > Any suggestions for a command line program to select emails for
> > deletion based on command line options? I specifically want one that
> &
Answering late:
* Ed Blackman , 2023-08-04 14:34:44 Fri:
> Any suggestions for a command line program to select emails for
> deletion based on command line options? I specifically want one
> that can remove emails that were received more than X days ago, but
> can also express "
Would 'mu find' and 'mu remove' from mu/maildir-utils help? You'd
have to do a bit of scripting around them.
--
Mark H. Wood
Lead Technology Analyst
University Library
Indiana University - Purdue University Indianapolis
755 W. Michigan Street
Indianapolis, IN 46202
317-274-0749
On Sun, Aug 06, 2023 at 06:41:30PM +0100, Darac Marjal wrote:
> On 04/08/2023 19:34, Ed Blackman wrote:
> > I could probably port archivemail to Python3 with enough time.
>
> I had a go at rewriting archivemail into python3 (partly because I wanted to
> pipe messages into spam learning as I
On Mon, Aug 07, 2023 at 01:57:04AM +1000, Nemo Thorx wrote:
> Quoting Ed Blackman from 04 Aug (a Friday in 2023) at 1434 hours...
> > Any suggestions for a command line program to select emails for
> > deletion based on command line options? I specifically want one that
> &
On Fri, Aug 04, 2023 at 03:15:41PM -0400, Jon LaBadie wrote:
> On Fri, Aug 04, 2023 at 02:34:44PM -0400, Ed Blackman wrote:
> > I could probably port archivemail to Python3 with enough time.
>
> I make extensive, but very basic, use of archivemail. I'm concerned about
> its going away. Does
On 04/08/2023 19:34, Ed Blackman wrote:
Any suggestions for a command line program to select emails for deletion based on command
line options? I specifically want one that can remove emails that were received more
than X days ago, but can also express "but don't delete if they're fl
On Sun, Aug 06, 2023 at 04:04:34PM +0200, Marcus C. Gottwald wrote:
> > I think for a true date received test, you have to look at the
> > timestamp part of the filename.
> Well, it looks like both mtime and timestamp-as-part-of-filename may
> change when copying messages between Maildirs, at
Quoting Ed Blackman from 04 Aug (a Friday in 2023) at 1434 hours...
> Any suggestions for a command line program to select emails for
> deletion based on command line options? I specifically want one that
> can remove emails that were received more than X days ago, but can
>
On Fri, Aug 04, 2023 at 10:56:18PM +0200, Marcus C. Gottwald wrote:
>find ~/mail/folder1/cur/ -maxdepth 1 -type f -not -name '.*' \
> -mtime +30 \
> -not -name '*:2,*F*' \
> -delete
> The conditions in the
Ed Blackman wrote (Fri 2023-Aug-04 14:34:44 -0400):
> ... remove emails that were received more than X days ago, but can also
> express "but don't delete if they're flagged".
..
> I could give up on using the message headers to determine the message date,
> learn how filenames are constructed
On Fri, Aug 04, 2023 at 02:34:44PM -0400, Ed Blackman wrote:
Any suggestions for a command line program to select emails for deletion based on command
line options? I specifically want one that can remove emails that were received more
than X days ago, but can also express "but don't d
Any suggestions for a command line program to select emails for deletion based
on command line options? I specifically want one that can remove emails that
were received more than X days ago, but can also express "but don't delete if
they're flagged".
I had been using archivema
ommands.
The usual approach is to "push" the requisite keystrokes, which then get
played.
However, to "bounce" a message from the command line it is far more
expedient to just go:
sendmail -oi addr addr addr ... < message
which is all mutt will be doing. Drops the same m
On 08Jun2021 09:06, Cameron Simpson wrote:
>The usual approach is to "push" the requisite keystrokes, which then
>get played.
Example from one of my scripts:
mutt -f "$folder" -e "push '$pattern'"
I still recommend just using sendmail directly though.
I thought procmail had some
site keystrokes, which then get
played.
However, to "bounce" a message from the command line it is far more
expedient to just go:
sendmail -oi addr addr addr ... < message
which is all mutt will be doing. Drops the same messages straight into
the local mail system for deliver to the specified addrs.
Cheers,
Cameron Simpson
Some messages I receive my wife should see also. Rather than
"Forward" ("f" command) them, I typically "Bounce" ("B" command)
them to her.
I would like to automate this procedure for certain sender addresses
so I'm developing a procmail recipie.
Is there a way to use mutt from the command like
ail using mbsync. For example, I run a systemd timer every 15minutes in the
background which downloads all email and updates notmuch. This way, you do not
need to ever worry about the sync. But then you're free to just use notmuch on
the command line, or make some macros to use notm
12021/01/38 06:41.76 ನಲ್ಲಿ, Julius Hamilton ಬರೆದರು:
>
> Thanks very much.
> I'm a beginner to this, so I'd appreciate being able to ask a few
> questions about setting this up.
> It asked for the path to my email archive. I had a folder on my desktop
> called Mail, but it's empty, and not
m:Julius Hamilton'
> thread:000000015cd4 25 mins. ago [1/1] Julius Hamilton; Search and limit
> from command line (inbox unread)
>
> $ notmuch search --format=json 'from:Julius Hamilton'
> [{"thread": "00015cd4", "timestamp": 161622, &quo
> Use notmuch.
...
> I have integrated it with my mutt like so
BTW, are there any plans to integrate notmuch into mutt? (like neomutt does)
Cheers,
Andy
--
If you see someone without a smile, give 'em one of yours. (anonymous)
On Sat, Mar 20, 2021 at 11:11:43AM +0100, Jens John wrote:
> On Sat, 20 Mar 2021, at 10:42, Julius Hamilton wrote:
> > Hello Mutt users,
> >
> > I would like to know if there is a way to retrieve a list of emails from
> > a particular user at stdout in bash, rather than launching the mutt
> >
rch and limit
from command line (inbox unread)
$ notmuch search --format=json 'from:Julius Hamilton'
[{"thread": "00015cd4", "timestamp": 161622, "date_relative": "26
mins. ago", "matched": 1, "total
Hello Mutt users,
I would like to know if there is a way to retrieve a list of emails from
a particular user at stdout in bash, rather than launching the mutt
application. Or, if one can launch mutt with the search already
executed. I currently know how to launch mutt, and then search for a
On 21Nov2020 23:42, Kurt Hackenberg wrote:
>On 2020-11-21 21:31, Cameron Simpson wrote:
>> The draft file is expected to contain just an RFC822 email:
>> headers and a body. Although it is not an mbox file, if an mbox "From
>> " line is present, it will be silently discarded.
>
>Good.
On 2020-11-21 21:31, Cameron Simpson wrote:
This then?
The draft file is expected to contain just an RFC822 email:
headers and a body. Although it is not an mbox file, if an mbox "From
" line is present, it will be silently discarded.
Good.
I'll figure out how to do a *roff
On 21Nov2020 16:37, Kurt Hackenberg wrote:
>On 2020-11-21 00:10, Cameron Simpson wrote:
>>How about:
>>
>>The draft file is expected to contain just an RFC822 email:
>>headers and a body. Although it is not an mbox file, if an mbox "From
>>" pseudo-header is present, it will be
On Sat, Nov 21, 2020 at 04:10:24PM +1100, Cameron Simpson
wrote:
> On 21Nov2020 13:07, raf wrote:
> >On Sat, Nov 21, 2020 at 10:32:03AM +1100, Cameron Simpson
> >wrote:
> >> New ticket for amending the manual entry here:
> >> https://gitlab.com/muttmua/mutt/-/issues/302
> >> Comments on
On 2020-11-21 00:10, Cameron Simpson wrote:
How about something like this:
The draft file is expected to contain just the email.
It is not an mbox file. However, if an mbox From_ header
is present, it will be accepted.
Hmm. Pretty wordy. But not bad. How about:
The draft file is
On 21Nov2020 13:07, raf wrote:
>On Sat, Nov 21, 2020 at 10:32:03AM +1100, Cameron Simpson
>wrote:
>> New ticket for amending the manual entry here:
>> https://gitlab.com/muttmua/mutt/-/issues/302
>> Comments on wording/clarity welcome.
>
>In general, I usually think saying "ignored" is
On Sat, Nov 21, 2020 at 10:32:03AM +1100, Cameron Simpson
wrote:
> On 19Nov2020 14:14, raf wrote:
> >Just a thought: if it needs to have a From_ mbox
> >message header (or if it needs to not have that), it
> >might be worth mentioning. Even if the mbox message
> >header is optional, it might
On 19Nov2020 14:14, raf wrote:
>Just a thought: if it needs to have a From_ mbox
>message header (or if it needs to not have that), it
>might be worth mentioning. Even if the mbox message
>header is optional, it might be worth mentioning that
>it's optional. And I think there are several
On 2020-11-19 04:29, Cameron Simpson wrote:
‐H draft Specify a draft file which contains header and body
to use to send a message.
...
Just a thought: if it needs to have a From_ mbox
message header (or if it needs to not have that)...
I'm pretty sure no From_
On 19Nov2020 14:14, raf wrote:
>On Thu, Nov 19, 2020 at 10:40:43AM +1100, Cameron Simpson
>wrote:
>> The man page says:
>>
>>‐H draft Specify a draft file which contains header and body
>> to use to send a message.
>>
>> Aside from saying that the message includes
On Thu, Nov 19, 2020 at 10:40:43AM +1100, Cameron Simpson
wrote:
> On 18Nov2020 12:08, Olli Savolainen wrote:
> >> You could for this:
> >> - save all the messages to a local filesystem maildir folder
> >> - write a short shell loop to run mutt -H for each message file in the
> >> maildir
> >
On 18Nov2020 12:08, Olli Savolainen wrote:
>> You could for this:
>> - save all the messages to a local filesystem maildir folder
>> - write a short shell loop to run mutt -H for each message file in the
>> maildir
>
>Thanks! This is what I was looking for. Couldn’t find any documentation
>on
On Sun, Nov 15, 2020 at 23:19, Cameron Simpson wrote:
> On 15Nov2020 09:56, Olli Savolainen wrote:
>>I have draft messages appearing in an imap folder. I would like to
>>write a script that reads a message (or all messages) from that folder
>>and sends it as it is, then moving the message to
I have draft messages appearing in an imap folder. I would like to write
a script that reads a message (or all messages) from that folder and
sends it as it is, then moving the message to imap Sent folder.
It seems something like mutt -H would do the job, just can’t figure out
how to get
On Mon, Nov 16, 2020 at 08:19:21AM +1100, Cameron Simpson
wrote:
> On 15Nov2020 09:56, Olli Savolainen wrote:
> >I have draft messages appearing in an imap folder. I would like to
> >write a script that reads a message (or all messages) from that folder
> >and sends it as it is, then moving
On 15Nov2020 09:56, Olli Savolainen wrote:
>I have draft messages appearing in an imap folder. I would like to
>write a script that reads a message (or all messages) from that folder
>and sends it as it is, then moving the message to imap Sent folder.
>
>It seems something like mutt -H would do
>>
>> I have draft messages appearing in an imap folder. I would like to write
>> a script that reads a message (or all messages) from that folder and
>> sends it as it is, then moving the message to imap Sent folder.
>>
>> It seems something like mutt -H would do the job, just can’t figure out
>>
Hi,
I have draft messages appearing in an imap folder. I would like to write a
script that reads a message (or all messages) from that folder and sends it as
it is, then moving the message to imap Sent folder.
It seems something like mutt -H would do the job, just can’t figure out how to
get
sing a separate
> > startup file.
>
> Does adding -e 'set record="=Sent"' to the command line help?
>
> --
> Kevin J. McCarthy
> GPG Fingerprint: 8975 A9B3 3AA3 7910 385C 5308 ADEF 7684 8031 6BDA
It does indeed do the trick. Thanks very much.
Dave
--
Kansas sta
On Sat, Dec 01, 2018 at 11:31:38PM +, Dave Woodfall wrote:
Is there a way to make sure that all mail sent via CLI saves a copy in
=Sent? The only way I can see at the moment is by using a separate
startup file.
Does adding -e 'set record="=Sent"' to the command line help?
Hi
I have been using a script for a while now that uses mutt to send
emails out. I've just noticed today that it no longer saves in
=Sent, and I suspect it's since I started using a dynamic record
setting - i.e. ^ for most mail, but =Sent for mailing lists.
I can't see any option for fcc'ing
Hello,
mutt 1.5.21 under Centos 7
gpg 2.0.22 under Centos 7
I have been trying to send encrypted messages via mutt in command line.
The email arrives at destination but is never encrypted.
If I send the same thing using mutt interactively, the message arrives
encrypted.
Any idea where I could
On Fri, Aug 12, 2016 at 08:22:17AM +0100, spaceman wrote:
> Having just been looking at a similar problem it might better to use
>
> set sendmail = "/usr/bin/msmtp --read-envelope-from"
>
> Which removes the need to specify an account completely with msmtp so long as
> it can find a matching
Hi,
A more mutt-like solution could be to use send-hooks to set the
$sendmail variable every time the From: header of an email changes.
msmtp accepts the account to be used on the command line as -a $account,
send-hook "~f o...@example.com" 'set sendmail = "/usr/bin/msmtp -a
On Thu, Aug 11, 2016 at 05:48:01PM -0500, Peng Yu wrote:
> Hi, I have msmtp set up on my computer. But I don't find how to
> specify different accounts to send email from mutt command line. Does
> anybody know how to do it? Thanks.
I am also using msmtp, but in a way so that differ
* Peng Yu <pengyu...@gmail.com> [08-11-16 18:54]:
> Hi, I have msmtp set up on my computer. But I don't find how to
> specify different accounts to send email from mutt command line. Does
> anybody know how to do it? Thanks.
copy your ~/.muttrc to another filename and then
Hi, I have msmtp set up on my computer. But I don't find how to
specify different accounts to send email from mutt command line. Does
anybody know how to do it? Thanks.
--
Regards,
Peng
I found:
http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.mail.mutt.user/40965
And right now I'm trying to send S/MIME signed mails from the command
line.
Invoking mutt interactively using my custom config:
% mutt -F ~/muttrc
works as expected (mail is being signed, sender is set correctly and
so on)
Invoking
On Sat, Jun 20, 2015 at 04:52:11AM +0100, David Woodfall wrote:
I have a script that emails a cover.txt message plus a pdf
attachment, but the message, while being readable, shows as an
attachment too:
[-- Attachment #1 --]
[-- Type: text/plain, Encoding: 7bit, Size: 0.4K --]
Is there a way
On Sat, Jun 20, 2015 at 04:52:11AM +0100, David Woodfall wrote:
I have a script that emails a cover.txt message plus a pdf
attachment, but the message, while being readable, shows as an
attachment too:
[-- Attachment #1 --]
[-- Type: text/plain, Encoding: 7bit, Size: 0.4K --]
Is there
Hi,
I have a script that emails a cover.txt message plus a pdf
attachment, but the message, while being readable, shows as an
attachment too:
[-- Attachment #1 --]
[-- Type: text/plain, Encoding: 7bit, Size: 0.4K --]
Is there a way of having it send inline?
The command I am using at the
On 2015-06-20 04:52 +0100, David Woodfall wrote:
I have a script that emails a cover.txt message plus a pdf
attachment, but the message, while being readable, shows as an
attachment too:
This seems to be a common application (I'm aware of the pun).
I do it with a shell script involving
_or_
using the my_hdr mutt command, via mutt's -e command line option.
I considered, and tried, message-hook. But that
seems to only take effect as the message is read,
not while viewing the index.
BTW, this sounds like you need this only for yourself. In which case I would
advocate doing
When using mutt in a shell script to send notices,
I would like for important notices to stand out
when viewed in the mutt index.
Turning on the flag status would be sufficient
if I could do it when sending the mail rather than
after I receive it.
I considered, and tried, message-hook. But that
Dear all,
I am obviously doing something wrong but can't find out what...
I configured mutt to PGP-sign/encrypt (~/.muttrc and ~/.gpg.rc). When sending
out an email interactively, everything works fine: emails get signed and
encrypted by mutt.
But if I am sending a mail via the command line
On (20/05/13 20:33), Patrick Shanahan ptilopt...@gmail.com put forth the
proposition:
* David Woodfall d...@dawoodfall.net [05-20-13 20:01]:
I've found that sending mail as root saves a copy in /root/mail/Sent/,
whereas sending as my user doesn't seem to keep a record at all.
The only
On Tue, May 21, 2013 at 06:56:56AM +0100, David Woodfall wrote:
On (20/05/13 20:33), Patrick Shanahan ptilopt...@gmail.com put forth the
proposition:
* David Woodfall d...@dawoodfall.net [05-20-13 20:01]:
I've found that sending mail as root saves a copy in /root/mail/Sent/,
whereas sending
I've found that sending mail as root saves a copy in /root/mail/Sent/,
whereas sending as my user doesn't seem to keep a record at all.
The only difference between root and user is that root is using mbox
and user is maildir.
Is there some way around this?
D.
* David Woodfall d...@dawoodfall.net [05-20-13 20:01]:
I've found that sending mail as root saves a copy in /root/mail/Sent/,
whereas sending as my user doesn't seem to keep a record at all.
The only difference between root and user is that root is using mbox
and user is maildir.
Is there
On (20/05/13 20:33), Patrick Shanahan ptilopt...@gmail.com put forth the
proposition:
* David Woodfall d...@dawoodfall.net [05-20-13 20:01]:
I've found that sending mail as root saves a copy in /root/mail/Sent/,
whereas sending as my user doesn't seem to keep a record at all.
The only
2013/3/6 Andre Klärner kan...@ak-online.be:
Hi Kunszt,
On Tue, Mar 05, 2013 at 09:05:06AM +0100, Kunszt Árpád wrote:
When I'm using the interactive user-interface everything works fine,
but from the command line it doesn't work. I tried a lot of things,
googled half of the day, but I didn't
Hi!
I want to use Mutt to send S/MIME encrypted (no signing is planned at
the moment, so just encrypting) e-mails from command line. The e-mails
consists of a short body and a variable number of attached files. The
content is generated by a cron job.
When I'm using the interactive user-interface
Hi Kunszt,
On Tue, Mar 05, 2013 at 09:05:06AM +0100, Kunszt Árpád wrote:
When I'm using the interactive user-interface everything works fine,
but from the command line it doesn't work. I tried a lot of things,
googled half of the day, but I didn't found any working solution.
Is it possible
Hi Thomas
On 2013-02-22, Reim, Thomas wrote:
What do I miss?
I don't know, but make sure that in both cases (interactive
and command line) you use the same configuration file. Maybe
using mutt's -F option.
--
Greetings
Elias
Dear all,
I've succesfully configured mutt to receive messages via IMAP and send
messages via SMTP from/to a mail server (Dovecot, Postfix) in the
network.
If I send mails using Mutt's user interface, sent mails are saved in the
relevant IMAP folder Sent.
But if I use the command-line mode
On Tue, Dec 04, 2012 at 05:26:34PM -0500, Spangler, Tim wrote:
I have several automated processes that send e-mail from the command line, and
I'd like each one to use its own .muttrc. This would allow me to specify the
return address for each of these sets of e-mails based on the process
On 2012-12-04, Spangler, Tim tim.spang...@adp.com wrote:
I have several automated processes that send e-mail from the command
line, and I'd like each one to use its own .muttrc. This would allow
me to specify the return address for each of these sets of e-mails
based on the process sending
On Tue, Dec 04, 2012 at 06:41:28PM -0500, Spangler, Tim wrote:
The Muttrc_client files look similar to this (file name for this one is
Muttrc_batch):
set realname=Batch Reports
set from =donotre...@adpselect.com
set use_from=yes
Which version of Mutt are you using?
On Tue, Dec 04, 2012 at 11:50:47PM +, Grant Edwards wrote:
Are you sure that the -n is needed?
-n Causes Mutt to bypass the system configuration file.
That may be telling mutt to ignore the configuration file that you're
specifying with the -F options.
The -n option only controls
On Tue, Dec 04, 2012 at 06:41:28PM -0500, Spangler, Tim wrote:
The Muttrc_client files look similar to this (file name for this one is
Muttrc_batch):
set realname=Batch Reports
set from =donotre...@adpselect.com
set use_from=yes
I put the above in 'testrc' and then ran:
$ echo 'hello world'
On 13Sep2011 03:43, Michael Graham mich...@skky.org wrote:
| On Mon, Sep 12, 2011 at 17:07, Leo Vegoda wrote:
| […] In my experience it works the same on whichever OS you choose as long
as you build in all the bits and pieces you need.
|
| That’s my experience too. I use it on my Mac, and also
On 13Sep2011 10:06, Tom Baker tba...@tbaker.de wrote:
| I have a related problem since moving from XP to Mac last May. I save email
| threads as MBOX files and reference them on the (local) home page of my
| browser, Firefox. The home page is my to-do list, and it contains references
| along the
On Thu, Sep 15, 2011 at 10:58:08PM +1000, Cameron Simpson wrote:
| I have a related problem since moving from XP to Mac last May. I save email
| threads as MBOX files and reference them on the (local) home page of my
| browser, Firefox. The home page is my to-do list, and it contains
On Mon, Sep 12, 2011 at 17:07, Leo Vegoda wrote:
[…] In my experience it works the same on whichever OS you choose as long as
you build in all the bits and pieces you need.
That’s my experience too. I use it on my Mac, and also on a Linux VPS (which
I’m using now), and I haven’t had any
On Mon, Sep 12, 2011 at 02:56:08PM -0800, Tim Johnson wrote:
Not so much a mutt question as a request for a reference.
FYI: I have used mutt for years on linux. I am considering getting a
mac mini. Some time ago, I queried this list about using mutt on a
mac and from the responses, it
On Sep 13, 2011 at 10:06 AM -0400, Tom Baker wrote:
If I could solve this problem, then presumably I could configure the Mac to
open mutt when I click on a file such as important-email-exchange.mbox in
the Mac Finder.
I have tried everything I could think of, even looked into Emacs's Rmail, but
On Sep 12, 2011 at 04:39 PM -0800, Tim Johnson wrote:
Ah! Package systems, that is valuable info.
I'd definitely recommend homebrew over the others. A lot less messy and
easier to install and manage in my mind.
As far as installing mutt, even though I have a lot of stuff installed
with
Wow - this is great. Thanks! Options to work with :-)
I installed iTerm, configured it for /sw/bin/mutt -f $$URL$$ and tried
clicking on:
A HREF=wais://Users/tbaker/mboxmbox - 2 slashes/A
A HREF=wais:///Users/tbaker/mboxmbox - 3 slashes/A
Firefox prompted me to choose a program, with
Not so much a mutt question as a request for a reference.
FYI: I have used mutt for years on linux. I am considering getting a
mac mini. Some time ago, I queried this list about using mutt on a
mac and from the responses, it appears that some of you do just that.
What I am most interested in at
On Mon, Sep 12, 2011 at 02:56:08PM -0800, Tim Johnson wrote:
Not so much a mutt question as a request for a reference.
FYI: I have used mutt for years on linux. I am considering getting a
mac mini. Some time ago, I queried this list about using mutt on a
mac and from the responses, it
* Ravi Pina r...@cow.org [110912 15:15]:
On Mon, Sep 12, 2011 at 02:56:08PM -0800, Tim Johnson wrote:
Not so much a mutt question as a request for a reference.
FYI: I have used mutt for years on linux. I am considering getting a
mac mini. Some time ago, I queried this list about using
On Mon, Sep 12, 2011 at 03:28:30PM -0800, Tim Johnson wrote:
[...]
I'm not sure what you're looking for. Terminal.app and iTerm.app
are just a means for running your preferred shell that you would
otherwise use to launch Mutt.
I would be looking for (initially) something that I could
* Leo Vegoda l...@bind.org [110912 16:16]:
On Mon, Sep 12, 2011 at 03:28:30PM -0800, Tim Johnson wrote:
[...]
I'm not sure what you're looking for. Terminal.app and iTerm.app
are just a means for running your preferred shell that you would
otherwise use to launch Mutt.
I would
Hi Patrick,
Thanks to your advise. Do you expect that sending to 1000 recipients
on one SMTP session be less than invoking sendmail for 20 time?
-- afshin
On Sun, Aug 14, 2011 at 1:37 AM, Patrick Ben Koetter p...@state-of-mind.de
wrote:
* afshin afzali a.afzali2...@gmail.com:
I'm using
* afshin afzali a.afzali2...@gmail.com:
Thanks to your advise. Do you expect that sending to 1000 recipients
on one SMTP session be less than invoking sendmail for 20 time?
Invoking the sendmail command is much slower, compared to a SMTP Session.
p@rick
-- afshin
On Sun, Aug 14, 2011
The SMTP support is implemented in 1.5.x versions. As stated in
mutt.org the stable version still is 1.4.2.3!
Do you recommend use of 1.5.x in production enviroments?
Thanks,
-- afshin
On Sun, Aug 14, 2011 at 6:42 PM, Patrick Ben Koetter p...@state-of-mind.de
wrote:
* afshin afzali
* afshin afzali a.afzali2...@gmail.com:
The SMTP support is implemented in 1.5.x versions. As stated in
mutt.org the stable version still is 1.4.2.3!
Do you recommend use of 1.5.x in production enviroments?
Yes, I recommend using the production version. I use it myself everyday:
p@x220:~$
The last thing,
I could not find last release RPM package for EL5. Would you address
me where I would find it or mutt.spec to build it by myself?
-- afshin
On Sun, Aug 14, 2011 at 9:16 PM, afshin afzali a.afzali2...@gmail.com wrote:
The SMTP support is implemented in 1.5.x versions. As stated
* afshin afzali a.afzali2...@gmail.com:
The last thing,
I could not find last release RPM package for EL5. Would you address
me where I would find it or mutt.spec to build it by myself?
Can't help with that. I switched to Debian/Ubuntu a few years ago.
p@rick
-- afshin
On Sun, Aug
Thanks for your help :)
On Sun, Aug 14, 2011 at 10:47 PM, Patrick Ben Koetter
p...@state-of-mind.de wrote:
* afshin afzali a.afzali2...@gmail.com:
The last thing,
I could not find last release RPM package for EL5. Would you address
me where I would find it or mutt.spec to build it by myself?
Hi there,
I'm using mutt to send bulk emails by postfix.
I'll appreciate if know there is any limitation on recipients count.
BEST,
-- afshin
* afshin afzali a.afzali2...@gmail.com:
I'm using mutt to send bulk emails by postfix.
I'll appreciate if know there is any limitation on recipients count.
You could use a script to invoke mutt in batches of 50 recipients and have
mutt use the sendmail command.
You could also configure mutt to
Hi
I want mutt to startup and run imediately a macro.
Is this possible?
--
- Eric Smith
On Wed, Apr 20, 2011 at 10:51:52AM +0200, Eric Smith wrote:
Hi
I want mutt to startup and run imediately a macro.
Is this possible?
would that work?
mutt -e 'push m''
Richard
---
Name and OpenPGP keys available from pgp key servers
Richard said:
would that work?
mutt -e 'push m''
Yehee, and so it does, thanks Richard.
On Sep 27, 2010 at 11:59 AM +0200, Jostein Berntsen wrote:
If you install the mu search utility, you can open mails directly with
the mu view file path command. To find the file path for a specific
mail you can use mu find search criteria --fields l, d, f, s to
get this displayed on stdout.
1 - 100 of 270 matches
Mail list logo
