On Tue, Jun 26, 2012 at 01:16:24PM +0300, Alexander Gattin wrote:
I tried my best to not give a clueless advice this
time, so before suggesting to omit the user@ part
from smtp_url I studied the mutt-1.5.20/smtp.c
source:
if (conn-account.flags M_ACCT_USER)
{
if (!mutt_bit_isset
Hello,
On Mon, Jun 25, 2012 at 06:08:10PM -0700, jeremy
bentham wrote:
I'm sure I tried that--I didn't record
everything I did, but that is something I
_would_ try.
I tried my best to not give a clueless advice this
time, so before suggesting to omit the user@ part
from smtp_url I studied the
Hello,
On Sun, Jun 24, 2012 at 05:23:36PM -0700, jeremy
bentham wrote:
3.263. smtp_authenticators
Type: string
[...]
Yes. I found this. I tried various values,
including the empty string, and nothing changed.
probably, mutt uses default authenticators list
when
On Mon, Jun 25, 2012 at 11:13:15AM +0300, Alexander Gattin wrote:
[...]
msmtp does SMTP well, and I use msmtp instead of
smtp_url -- that's why my advices earlier in the
thread missed the target. I have the last
suggestion though: try to omit user@ part from
smtp_url.
I'm sure I tried
On Sat, Jun 23, 2012 at 07:45:32PM -0400, Patrick Shanahan wrote:
* jeremy bentham d...@eskimo.com [06-23-12 19:36]:
...
Ok, I installed msmtp and after a bit of flailing about got it
working.
Part of the flailing included an error message from
mail.eskimo.com that it didn't support
On Fri, Jun 22, 2012 at 06:37:54PM -0700, jeremy bentham wrote:
On Jun 22 you wrote:
Hello,
On Thu, Jun 21, 2012 at 05:06:40PM -0700, jeremy
bentham wrote:
[stuff about inability to send mail from my own machine's mutt]
instant connection refused, with either smtp
or smtps,
* jeremy bentham d...@eskimo.com [06-23-12 19:36]:
...
Ok, I installed msmtp and after a bit of flailing about got it
working.
Part of the flailing included an error message from
mail.eskimo.com that it didn't support authentication.
So I suppose it's puking when mutt insists.
msmtp
Hello,
On Thu, Jun 21, 2012 at 05:06:40PM -0700, jeremy
bentham wrote:
instant connection refused, with either smtp
or smtps, ssl_starttls yes or no.
I've checked ports on mail.eskimo.com with nmap:
PORT STATESERVICE
25/tcp open smtp
465/tcp closed smtps
587/tcp filtered
On Jun 22 you wrote:
Hello,
On Thu, Jun 21, 2012 at 05:06:40PM -0700, jeremy
bentham wrote:
instant connection refused, with either smtp
or smtps, ssl_starttls yes or no.
I've checked ports on mail.eskimo.com with nmap:
PORT STATESERVICE
25/tcp open smtp
465/tcp
Hello,
On Wed, Jun 20, 2012 at 06:24:37PM -0700, jeremy
bentham wrote:
I found by experimenting that imap works as well
as pop: if I start an imap session before I try
to send an e-mail, I can send; otherwise I
can't.
I think that POP-before-SMTP and IMAP-before-SMTP
should work just fine
On Jun 21 you wrote:
...
incoming-folders=Mail/[]
eski {mail.eskimo.com/ssl/novalidate-cert}mail/today
As I understand, mail.eskimo.com/ssl translates to
smtp_url=smtps://u...@mail.eskimo.com:465, i.e.
it's SSL from the beginning, not STARTTLS, and
it's served on port 465, not 587 or 25.
El día Wednesday, June 20, 2012 a las 01:11:05AM -0500, Breno Colom escribió:
As a side question related to this: is it possible that mutt writes some
kind of log file of sent mail like sendmail does to /var/log/maillog ?
I don't think you can log the actual SMTP session with the builtin
* Matthias Apitz g...@unixarea.de [2012-06-20 07:26:40 +0200]:
El día Tuesday, June 19, 2012 a las 03:00:50PM -0400, Tim Gray escribió:
Not sure if I can help you, but a simple config line works for me with
my SMTP server, when I use it directly from mutt:
set
Hello,
On Tue, Jun 19, 2012 at 11:47:53AM -0700, jeremy
bentham wrote:
I can't send mail from my local machine, using
my isp's smtp server.
I can do it just fine from pine, providing I
have started an imap session on one of my isp's
machines. (I'm doing this message in pine).
This looks
On Jun 20 you wrote:
Hello,
On Tue, Jun 19, 2012 at 11:47:53AM -0700, jeremy
bentham wrote:
I can't send mail from my local machine, using
my isp's smtp server.
I can do it just fine from pine, providing I
have started an imap session on one of my isp's
machines. (I'm doing this
I recently switched to mutt from pine, and I like it a lot,
except for one thing: I can't send mail from my local machine,
using my isp's smtp server.
I can do it just fine from pine, providing I have started an imap
session on one of my isp's machines. (I'm doing this message in
pine).
But,
On Jun 19, 2012 at 11:47 AM -0700, jeremy bentham wrote:
What simple, head-smacking thing have I overlooked?
Not sure if I can help you, but a simple config line works for me with
my SMTP server, when I use it directly from mutt:
set smtp_url=smtp://u...@smtp.example.com:587
Port 587
El día Tuesday, June 19, 2012 a las 03:00:50PM -0400, Tim Gray escribió:
Not sure if I can help you, but a simple config line works for me with
my SMTP server, when I use it directly from mutt:
set smtp_url=smtp://u...@smtp.example.com:587
Port 587 on my SMTP server is TLS.
...
18 matches
Mail list logo
