Did you disable fcntl-style locking when building Mutt?
-Clint
On Mar 14, Eric Boehm wrote:
I have found that mutt 1.1.9 is about 4x slower reading a 7.4 MB mail
file with 1451 messages in it than mutt 1.0.
I tried this several times to eliminate the effects of caching. It took
mutt 1.0
Hello,
patch-0.95.3.hb.save_alias.1
You can download a new version of this patch at:
http://www.stack.nl/~hansbo/mutt.html
The version for the development version is patch-1.1.1.hb.save_alias.1
--
Doei
Hans
=+==
| Hans Bogaards
On Sun, Mar 19, 2000 at 06:13:16PM -0500, David T-G wrote:
Now that I can build because I have a working compiler (sorry for the
noise :-) I would like to look into my favorite feature patches. I use
patch-0.00.sec.patchlist.7
patch-0.95.4.sec.expand_hook.1
[...]
Can the
On Sun, Mar 19, 2000 at 18:13:16 -0500, David T-G wrote:
Can the authors or maintainers of the patches let me know if any
of them are obsoleted or need to be updated, and where to get them?
I'm now updating my patches (those with "bj" in their filenames) to
the soon-coming Mutt 1.2. More info
On 2000-03-20 01:27:51 +, Thomas Ribbrock wrote:
I have a slight problem with Muttrc in the 1.1.9. In
1.0.1 and before, the Muttrc that got installed was
automatically changed during install to contain the
correct path to "manual.txt" according to --prefix.
This no longer works for
Hi, folks --
Now that I can build because I have a working compiler (sorry for the
noise :-) I would like to look into my favorite feature patches. I use
patch-0.00.sec.patchlist.7
patch-0.95.4.sec.expand_hook.1
patch-0.95.4.sec.reverse_reply.1
patch-0.95.sec.condense_pgp.1
Hi *!
I have a slight problem with Muttrc in the 1.1.9. In 1.0.1 and before, the
Muttrc that got installed was automatically changed during install to
contain the correct path to "manual.txt" according to --prefix. This no
longer works for 1.1.9. Even after configuring with --prefix, the
On 2000-03-14 21:23:36 -0500, Eric Boehm wrote:
I have found that mutt 1.1.9 is about 4x slower
reading a 7.4 MB mail file with 1451 messages in it
than mutt 1.0.
You are transferring almost 8 MBit/s with the new mutt
versions. This looks like the bottleneck is really NFS
and your Ethernet,
I have found that mutt 1.1.9 is about 4x slower reading a 7.4 MB mail
file with 1451 messages in it than mutt 1.0.
I tried this several times to eliminate the effects of caching. It took mutt
1.0 about 7.8 seconds to bring up the file, it took mutt 1.1.9 about 28.8
seconds to bring up the
"Thomas" == Thomas Roessler [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
"Lars" == Lars Hecking [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Thomas You are transferring almost 8 MBit/s with the new mutt versions.
Thomas This looks like the bottleneck is really NFS and your Ethernet,
Thomas not mutt. With the old mutt,
Eric Boehm [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Yes, across NFS. I copied the file to a local drive and ran both
mutts. The time was about the same (1.8 sec). Both mutts were also
run from a local drive.
Mutt wants to use fcntl-locking on the file. This forces NFS to use a
non-caching mode, where
Lars rant Convenient as they are, charsets are another feature that
Lars make it easier for ppl to shoot themselves (and others) in the
Lars foot. Now that my mutt is charset sensitive, I often find messages
Lars with big5, iso-2022-jp, or koi8-r, although none of the
On 2000-03-13 20:03:37 +0100, Thomas Roessler wrote:
Mutt-1.1.9 is out on ftp://ftp.mutt.org/pub/mutt/devel/,
Just a reminder: There is a mutt-announce mailing list.
The last mail there announced 1.0pre3 :-{
Best regards
Martin
--
Martin Schröder, [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Mon, Mar 13, 2000 at 02:16:40PM -0800, Gary Johnson wrote:
Works like a charm on HP-UX 10.20
That's good news! I've had to hack the configure script of previous
releases (0.95.4 and 1.0) to get them to use the proper curses library
on my HP-UX 10.20 system. Is this still necessary?
On 2000-03-14 10:15:41 +0100, Martin Schröder wrote:
Just a reminder: There is a mutt-announce mailing list.
Thanks, I know.
The last mail there announced 1.0pre3 :-{
The last mail I sent there announced 1.0.1.
Additionally, I have intentionally announced the public
1.1 betas to
Sure. The problem has to do with the expansion of the $ macro. For
the HP-UX make, $ is evaluated only for inference rules. For GNU make,
$ is evaluated for both target and inference rules. At least one of
mutt's Makefiles (I don't remember offhand which one) has a target rule
that
On Tue, Mar 14, 2000 at 10:27:43AM +0100, Ralf Hildebrandt wrote:
I use slang-1.4.0 -- the latest. Right now I'm trying to build PGP-6.5.1,
the guy who made the hpux/aix patch is a moron. I had to give patch the
filenames by hand... -- does GNUpg work on your HP-UX box?
I don't know about
On Tue, Mar 14, 2000 at 11:35:53AM +, Lars Hecking wrote:
Sure. The problem has to do with the expansion of the $ macro. For
That was in m4/Makefile.*, and it's has been fixed for a while now.
That's good to hear, too. It appears that the fix may be only in the
development branch
On Tuesday, 14 March 2000 at 11:35, Lars Hecking wrote:
Sure. The problem has to do with the expansion of the $ macro. For
the HP-UX make, $ is evaluated only for inference rules. For GNU make,
$ is evaluated for both target and inference rules. At least one of
mutt's Makefiles (I
That was in m4/Makefile.*, and it's has been fixed for a while now.
That's good to hear, too. It appears that the fix may be only in the
development branch though, as mutt-1.0-us/m4/Makefile still has the
"sed ... $ ..." lines.
That's right, I think this wasn't backfixed for 1.0. Easy
Gary Johnson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
CPPFLAGS="$CPPFLAGS -I/usr/include/curses_colr"
LIBS="$LIBS -lcur_colr"
I have done this myself, and while the resulting Mutt does build, I
found that the color support does not work. I haven't tried it lately,
though. Do you get correct colors
Gary Johnson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
CPPFLAGS="$CPPFLAGS -I/usr/include/curses_colr"
LIBS="$LIBS -lcur_colr"
I have done this myself, and while the resulting Mutt does build, I
found that the color support does not work. I haven't tried it lately,
though. Do you get
On Mon, Mar 13, 2000 at 02:03:37PM -0500, Thomas Roessler wrote:
"Thomas" == Thomas Roessler [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Thomas Changes against 1.1.8 are a couple of bug-fixes. Unless someone
Thomas has some real show-stoppers, I'd consider this to be a release
Thomas candidate for
Eric Boehm [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I have found that mutt 1.1.9 is about 4x slower reading a 7.4 MB mail
file with 1451 messages in it than mutt 1.0.
NFS? What type(s) of file locking? Differences in "mutt -v" output?
I don't know if you would consider this a show stopper but it was
On Tuesday, 14 March 2000 at 21:23, Eric Boehm wrote:
On Tue, Mar 14, 2000 at 06:59:48PM -0600, David DeSimone wrote:
"David" == David DeSimone [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Eric I have found that mutt 1.1.9 is about 4x slower reading a 7.4 MB
Eric mail file with 1451 messages in it
Mutt-1.1.9 is out on ftp://ftp.mutt.org/pub/mutt/devel/,
and the usual mirror sites, see
http://www.mutt.org/download.html.
Changes against 1.1.8 are a couple of bug-fixes. Unless
someone has some real show-stoppers, I'd consider this to
be a release candidate for 1.2, and release that
On Mon, Mar 13, 2000 at 08:03:37PM +0100, Thomas Roessler wrote:
Changes against 1.1.8 are a couple of bug-fixes. Unless
someone has some real show-stoppers, I'd consider this to
be a release candidate for 1.2, and release that version
later that week.
Works like a charm on HP-UX 10.20
--
On Monday, 13 March 2000 at 20:03, Thomas Roessler wrote:
Mutt-1.1.9 is out on ftp://ftp.mutt.org/pub/mutt/devel/,
and the usual mirror sites, see
http://www.mutt.org/download.html.
Changes against 1.1.8 are a couple of bug-fixes. Unless
someone has some real show-stoppers, I'd consider
Hi!
On Mon, Mar 13, 2000 at 08:03:37PM +0100, Thomas Roessler wrote:
Changes against 1.1.8 are a couple of bug-fixes. Unless
someone has some real show-stoppers, I'd consider this to
be a release candidate for 1.2, and release that version
later that week.
A pgp6.rc file to use PGP 6 with
On 2000-03-13 16:03:43 -0500, Brendan Cully wrote:
I've got a bug report from Rex Walters that read-only
mailboxes on IMAP override ACLs incorrectly.
Specifically, if a mailbox is readonly you can't set or
unset the Seen flag, even if you have permission to
according to the ACL.
What you
On Mon, Mar 13, 2000 at 09:24:00PM +0100, Ralf Hildebrandt wrote:
Works like a charm on HP-UX 10.20
That's good news! I've had to hack the configure script of previous
releases (0.95.4 and 1.0) to get them to use the proper curses library
on my HP-UX 10.20 system. Is this still necessary?
Gary Johnson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I've had to hack the configure script of previous releases (0.95.4 and
1.0) to get them to use the proper curses library on my HP-UX 10.20
system. Is this still necessary?
I've never had trouble with the --with-slang or --with-curses configure
On Mon, Mar 13, 2000 at 05:14:34PM -0600, David DeSimone wrote:
Gary Johnson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I've had to hack the configure script of previous releases (0.95.4 and
1.0) to get them to use the proper curses library on my HP-UX 10.20
system. Is this still necessary?
I've never
CPPFLAGS="$CPPFLAGS -I/usr/include/curses_colr"
LIBS="$LIBS -lcur_colr"
Hhm, yes, I remember seeing this before :)
One other thing: mutt has to be built with GNU make. The standard SysV
UNIX make that comes with HP-UX won't work.
Details? I, too, have seen problems, but with
On Tue, Mar 14, 2000 at 01:19:29AM +, Lars Hecking wrote:
One other thing: mutt has to be built with GNU make. The standard SysV
UNIX make that comes with HP-UX won't work.
Details? I, too, have seen problems, but with BSD makes.
Sure. The problem has to do with the expansion of
35 matches
Mail list logo
