The short answer is that that message's quoted-printable encoding is
broken.
With quoted-printable, lines must be shorter than something like 80
characters (I don't recall the precise value right now). When lines
are longer, soft line breaks must be used.
So, what you are seeing here is a
Hi Thorsten,
* Thorsten Haude [EMAIL PROTECTED] [020212 08:56]:
After GPG is called to check a signature, Mutt's terminal gets
corrupted. I can continue working by moving the cursor line over the
screwed parts to redisplay them, but it's really not nice.
I had a similar problem, and I guess,
Aleks, et al --
...and then Aleks Owczarek said...
%
% On Mon, Feb 11, 2002 sometime, David T-G wrote:
% Let's see... So you want the headers to look like
%
% To: TheGuys: joe@, jack@, tony@;
...
% To: TheGuys :;
...
% %
% % Perhaps these 2 features are planned for a future release?
%
Aleks --
...and then Aleks Owczarek said...
%
% On Mon, Feb 11, 2002 at 11:07:40PM -0500, Justin R. Miller wrote:
% -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
% Hash: SHA1
%
% Said Aleks Owczarek on Tue, Feb 12, 2002 at 02:38:08PM +1100:
%
% convoluted process easier by adding a
Hello,
As my attribution string, I have a simple
set attribution=Quoting %n %a [%(%d %b-%y %H:%M)]:
i.e. include the adress/date/time in the attribution.
However, the date and time seems to be taken from the mbox From
(no, not From:) header, instead of the Date: header field.
This means that
On Sat, Feb 09, 2002 at 19:21, Prahlad Vaidyanathan wrote:
Why do these lines starting with From keep turning up in the body.
All lines beginning with the word From seem to end up like this. Some
MTA/MDA along the way seems to be doing this. It isn't my procmail (at
least nothing I've
Hallo Charles Jie,
on Mon, Feb 11, 2002 at 09:52:34AM +0800, Charles Jie wrote:
Is it possible for mutt to switch smtp server (by default it uses my
postfix) to my ISP's with send-hook? I didn't find a related variable.
As mentioned in an earlier posting the smtp-part isn't mutt's job.
error message
I'm wondering how I can print informational messages to the
messagebox in mutt. I don't know if this area has a name, but
it's the last line on the screen, where mutt prints stuff
like the progress of loading a folder, mailbox read-only,
etc. Basically, I have a macro that
On Tue, Feb 12, 2002 at 08:12:30AM -0600, John Buttery wrote:
error message
I'm wondering how I can print informational messages to the
messagebox in mutt. I don't know if this area has a name, but
By the way, on a completely unrelated note, does anybody here use
joe as their
One thing that I've always missed since I switched from pine to mutt
was pine's more verbose e-mail notification. Instead of just saying
New mail in this mailbox. it would say something like:
[New mail from Philip Mak re New mail notification ideas]
Also, pine checks for new mail when it
Hello,
I have looked in the FAQ and Googled, but I haven't found a solution to my
problem.
Mutt has generated a file mbox in my home directory, and it is 126Mb after
less than 24 hours of using mutt. I use IMAP to my mail server, and on the
mail server my inbox is just 6Mb.
How has this
On Tue, Feb 12, 2002 at 10:31:18AM -0500, MuttER wrote:
On Tue, Feb 12, 2002 at 08:12:30AM -0600, John Buttery wrote:
error message
I'm wondering how I can print informational messages to the
messagebox in mutt. I don't know if this area has a name, but
By the way, on a
Simon --
...and then Simon White said...
%
% Hello,
Hi!
%
% I have looked in the FAQ and Googled, but I haven't found a solution to my
% problem.
%
% Mutt has generated a file mbox in my home directory, and it is 126Mb after
% less than 24 hours of using mutt. I use IMAP to my mail server,
I have reported about the following problem on Feb 05th, but no one
had a solution. For me, it looks like that this is not my bad
configuration, but an unintended behavior of mutt (= BUG). Am I
correct or not?
Problem:
Intended is a BCC to 'my@address\.de' on all mails except on mails that
are
I have discovered what it is. Mutt is moving my read messages. Can someone
give me the syntax for mutt to either NOT move read messages (I do that
manually) or to keep them in my IMAP inbox (which is the same as not moving
them).
Thanx
--
|-Simon White
|-Internet Services Manager
|-MTDS S.A.
On Tue, Feb 12, 2002 at 04:40:39PM +, Simon White wrote:
I have discovered what it is. Mutt is moving my read messages. Can someone
give me the syntax for mutt to either NOT move read messages (I do that
manually) or to keep them in my IMAP inbox (which is the same as not moving
them).
---BeginMessage---
Thanks
Now I just need a tip (if anyone has a simple way of doing it) for getting rid
of duplicates in mbox (there are loads of each read message) and then I can
hack the synchronisation with my inbox myself, I guess.
Simon.
On Tue, Feb 12, 2002 at 11:47:29AM -0500,
On Tue, Feb 12, 2002 at 05:46:09AM -0500, David T-G wrote:
% Said Aleks Owczarek on Tue, Feb 12, 2002 at 02:38:08PM +1100:
%
% convoluted process easier by adding a forward-with-attachments
% variable or am i missing something?
Please help me clarify... Is it the case that
* Steffen Evers ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
On Sat, Feb 09, 2002 at 19:21, Prahlad Vaidyanathan wrote:
Why do these lines starting with From keep turning up in the body.
All lines beginning with the word From seem to end up like this. Some
MTA/MDA along the way seems to be doing this. It
On Tue, Feb 12, 2002 at 09:05:37AM -0800, Carl B. Constantine wrote:
Wrong. It's actually part of one of the internet RFC's. MUTT is not the
only client that does this. All E-mail programs place a quoted symbol
'' for most people by the word From if it's the first word in a
paragraph.
Going
I couldn't find the answer in the manual, so I'm asking it here:
How do I make mutt not bother checking PGP signatures on messages
(since I don't have anyone's PGP keys anyway)?
On Feb 12, Simon White [[EMAIL PROTECTED]] wrote:
Now I just need a tip (if anyone has a simple way of doing it) for getting rid
of duplicates in mbox (there are loads of each read message) and then I can
hack the synchronisation with my inbox myself, I guess.
If they are real duplicates (ie
On Tue, Feb 12, 2002 at 09:05, Carl B. Constantine wrote:
* Steffen Evers ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
It IS caused by procmail in combination with your MTA normally. It is
the default behavior for procmail to do this, so you do not need to set
this explicitly. Have a look at this:
There have been various comments here by people attempting to move from the
1.2.x tree to the 1.3.x tree about the new iconv requirement, and the fact
that the --without-libiconv option documented in INSTALL does not actually
work.
Lars Hecking posted the attached message patch to mutt-dev as
At 11:48 +0100 12 Feb 2002, Stefan Alfredsson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
As my attribution string, I have a simple
set attribution=Quoting %n %a [%(%d %b-%y %H:%M)]:
However, the date and time seems to be taken from the mbox From
(no, not From:) header, instead of the Date: header field.
This
Hi - I'm not finding the functionality (or it's hiding from me) of when I
hit 'c' for composing a message, the ability to set a From: address right
there, just like a To: and Subject: line is set.
No, I don't want to just edit the headers afterwards, I want this to be a
pseudo send-hook. I have
Mutt doesn't have this functinality. Currently you can set up send-hook's
for addresses which are exceptions to your default from address (this is what
I do for switching between Mutt and non-Mutt mail), or use ESC-f in the
send menu to edit your from address. There is not a way to manually
On Feb 12, Daniel Sully [[EMAIL PROTECTED]] wrote:
Hi - I'm not finding the functionality (or it's hiding from me) of when I
hit 'c' for composing a message, the ability to set a From: address right
there, just like a To: and Subject: line is set.
No, I don't want to just edit the headers
On 12-Feb-2002 17:31 Steffen Evers wrote:
|
| I have reported about the following problem on Feb 05th, but no one
| had a solution. For me, it looks like that this is not my bad
| configuration, but an unintended behavior of mutt (= BUG). Am I
| correct or not?
While what you're trying to
Philip, et al --
...and then Philip Mak said...
%
% On Tue, Feb 12, 2002 at 09:05:37AM -0800, Carl B. Constantine wrote:
% Wrong. It's actually part of one of the internet RFC's. MUTT is not the
% only client that does this. All E-mail programs place a quoted symbol
% '' for most people by
Carl == Carl B Constantine [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Carl Wrong. It's actually part of one of the internet RFC's.
*sigh* No, it isn't. RFCs define on-the-wire protocols to be used when
communicating on the Internet. Appending a '' to a 'From ' header is
something done to a local file
Once upon a time Jeremy Blosser shaped the electrons to say...
On Feb 12, Daniel Sully [[EMAIL PROTECTED]] wrote:
Hi - I'm not finding the functionality (or it's hiding from me) of when I
hit 'c' for composing a message, the ability to set a From: address right
there, just like a To: and
On Tue, Feb 12, 2002 at 09:01:00AM -0800, Gary Johnson wrote:
On Tue, Feb 12, 2002 at 05:46:09AM -0500, David T-G wrote:
% Said Aleks Owczarek on Tue, Feb 12, 2002 at 02:38:08PM +1100:
%
% convoluted process easier by adding a forward-with-attachments
% variable or am i missing
On Tue, Feb 12, 2002 at 10:07:35AM -0600, John Buttery wrote:
On Tue, Feb 12, 2002 at 10:31:18AM -0500, MuttER wrote:
On Tue, Feb 12, 2002 at 08:12:30AM -0600, John Buttery wrote:
error message
I'm wondering how I can print informational messages to the
messagebox in mutt. I don't
Gary, et al --
...and then Gary Johnson said...
%
% On Tue, Feb 12, 2002 at 05:46:09AM -0500, David T-G wrote:
%
% Please help me clarify... Is it the case that $mime_forward does not
% work at all for you, or simply that you do not want to forward the
% message, with its attachments, in
Aleks --
...and then Aleks Owczarek said...
%
% On Tue, Feb 12, 2002 at 05:46:09AM -0500, David T-G wrote:
%
% Please help me clarify... Is it the case that $mime_forward does not
...
%
% Read Gary Johnson's explanation for clarification.
Actually, all I needed was a simple the former or
On Tue, Feb 12, 2002 at 10:24:47PM -0500, David T-G wrote:
Sure; that's fair, and you're entitled to your HO. So write it :-)
well I suppose the point of my question was to inspire someone with
the know-how to do just that ... and you sound like such a clever
fellow David ...
anyway, thanks
--17pEHd4RhPHOinZp
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
* Daniel Sully ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [020212 11:04]:
Hi - I'm not finding the functionality (or it's hiding from me) of when I
hit 'c' for composing a message,
Hi Thorsten,
* Thorsten Haude [EMAIL PROTECTED] [020213 07:28]:
I guessed as much, but have no idea where to look. Do you know what
was the cause in your case?
not exactly. It happened every time when mutt tried to display a larger
html file.
First I thought, that lynx could not display it
39 matches
Mail list logo
