Shao Zhang [[EMAIL PROTECTED]] wrote:
> I am trying to get my PGP work with mutt.
> But my sent message acutally looks like:
> [-- PGP output follows (current time: Fri Jul 2 15:06:22 1999) --]
...
> [-- End of PGP output --]
>
> [-- The following data
Hi,
I am trying to get my PGP work with mutt.
I have set the option pgp_autosign.
But my sent message acutally looks like:
[-- PGP output follows (current time: Fri Jul 2 15:06:22 1999) --]
File '/tmp/mutt-haydn-3208-4.$00' has signature, but w
On Thu Jul 1 22:27:54 1999,
Thomas Roessler wrote [To Mutt User List]:
> > I think it's look like a bug. I read that mutt converts `non-
> > printable' chars into question marks -- if someone need it it's ok,
> > but i want to turn it off. Unfortunately there are two `stan-
> > dards' in Poland
On 1999-07-01 14:46:51 -0600, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Me too. Just thought it might be convenient sometimes to not have
> to leave mutt.
So just run fetchmail in daemon mode.
On Thu, Jul 01, 1999 at 06:23:17PM -0500, David DeSimone wrote:
> "David" == David DeSimone <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
David> [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>
David> Just thought it might be convenient sometimes to not have to leave
David> mutt.
David> So
Sven Guckes [[EMAIL PROTECTED]] wrote:
> Did somebody say "changes"? Here, take a look at the history:
> http://www.math.fu-berlin.de/~guckes/mutt/hist.html
FYI, all the 'changelog' links on this page seem to be dead.
--
Jeremy Blosser | [EMAIL PROTECTED] | http://jblosser.firinn
Thomas Roessler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> You mean, the documentation doesn't exist. That's because things are
> supposed to happen automagically...
Yes, they are "supposed to", but since there is no information on how
the process works, if things don't happen the way they are supposed to,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Just thought it might be convenient sometimes to not have to leave
> mutt.
So don't leave Mutt.
macro index G "fetchmail"
--
David DeSimone | "The doctrine of human equality reposes on this:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] | that there is no man real
On 1999-07-01 10:28:27 +0200, Daniel Bauke wrote:
> I think it's look like a bug. I read that mutt converts `non-
> printable' chars into question marks -- if someone need it it's ok,
> but i want to turn it off. Unfortunately there are two `stan-
> dards' in Poland -- iso-8859-2 and cp-1250, som
On 1999-07-01 13:35:33 -0500, David DeSimone wrote:
> Unfortunately the documentation of this alleged process is so
> sparse that I have been unable to determine how one goes about
> setting up this recoding process. As far as I can tell, it is only
> understood by the people that wrote the code
Hello, I've got a slight problem, or at least that's how I view it.
I've been using an outbox of just one file, outbox, and not using
the force_name setting. My question is this: Is there any way to
parse through my outbox and make each mail go to it's own new
mailbox, like what would happen
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> > Why not use fetchmail instead? I'm using qmail+fetchmail+procmail+mutt
> > over here.
> Me too. Just thought it might be convenient sometimes to not have
> to leave mutt.
Write a macro that will call fetchmail. Should work, but I don't use
fetchmail.
randy
--
Fiv
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Why not use fetchmail instead? I'm using qmail+fetchmail+procmail+mutt
> over here.
Me too. Just thought it might be convenient sometimes to not have
to leave mutt.
> When I 'G'et mail using POP3 internal to mutt, it writes
> directly to my mailbox. Is there a way to pass it to my
> SMTP service (I'm using qmail) instead and have it deliver
> the mail? This way I can filter it into appropriate
> folders as it comes in.
Why not use fetchmail instead? I'm usin
[EMAIL PROTECTED] [[EMAIL PROTECTED]] wrote:
> And where can I read up on macros? I can't find it in the docs on the web
> site.
http://www.mutt.org/ --> Manual --> 3.5 Keyboard Macros -->
http://www.mutt.org/doc/manual/manual-3.html#ss3.5
See also
http://www.mutt.org/doc/manual/manual-3.html#bi
Sven Guckes [[EMAIL PROTECTED]] wrote:
> * [EMAIL PROTECTED] ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [990701 15:33]:
> > When I 'G'et mail using POP3 internal to mutt, it writes
> > directly to my mailbox. Is there a way to pass it to my SMTP
> > service (I'm using qmail) instead and have it deliver the mail?
>
> Pr
[EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > macro index ~ "!~N !~O"
>
> I just got around to trying it, but I can't get it to work. It will
> mark all the messages in the current folder for deletion (even those
> marked N or O).
I didn't just write the above macro off-the-cuff. I ac
Daniel Bauke <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Unfortunately there are two `standards' in Poland -- iso-8859-2 and
> cp-1250, sometimes I also get some mail with charset us-ascii, though
> it contains iso or cp chars.
Mutt is supposed to "recode" the message from the character set that the
originato
> If you use (bound to "D" by default), you can give it a
> pattern of "! ~N ! ~O", which means "Not new and not old". It sets the
> delete flag on all the messages meeting that criteria.
>
> Maybe instead of "alias" you meant "macro", like so:
>
> macro index ~ "!~N !~O"
Hello again!
I
On Wed, Jun 30, 1999 at 02:43:37PM -0600, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> When I 'G'et mail using POP3 internal to mutt, it writes
> directly to my mailbox. Is there a way to pass it to my
> SMTP service (I'm using qmail) instead and have it deliver
> the mail? This way I can filter it into appropriate
* [EMAIL PROTECTED] ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [990701 15:33]:
> When I 'G'et mail using POP3 internal to mutt, it writes
> directly to my mailbox. Is there a way to pass it to my SMTP
> service (I'm using qmail) instead and have it deliver the mail?
Probably...
> This way I can filter it into appropri
When I 'G'et mail using POP3 internal to mutt, it writes
directly to my mailbox. Is there a way to pass it to my
SMTP service (I'm using qmail) instead and have it deliver
the mail? This way I can filter it into appropriate
folders as it comes in.
I think it's look like a bug. I read that mutt converts `non-
printable' chars into question marks -- if someone need it it's
ok, but i want to turn it off. Unfortunately there are two `stan-
dards' in Poland -- iso-8859-2 and cp-1250, sometimes I also get
some mail with charset us-ascii, though i
23 matches
Mail list logo
