On Mon, Dec 06, 1999 at 11:51:50AM +1100, you, the extraordinary Andrew Clark, opined:
I've been told that mutt can do what I want. I want to set up the
following:
1. Collect mail from 2 pop accounts (user1 and user2)
2. When I reply to a message addressed to user1, the from header should
thanks for the help guys. The hints did the trick.
I will now try save-hooks out. I didn't think they would work for what I want, but I
realise now that it is only the personal mail that I want to sort by hand; all the
mail I get from lists could have a hook to put it into the right directory.
I am running NetBSD 1.4.1 on a Mac IIci
Mutt 1.0 was compiled directly from the pkgsrc collection
When I go to send a message it returns:
Error sending message, child exited 71 (Operating system error.).
The message, however, is still sent. It does not seem to matter where I
mail it to. I
On Mon, Dec 06, 1999 at 11:19:53AM +1100, Andrew Clark wrote:
I have been told that mutt will do what I want, so far how ever I have not
figured it out. I want to be able to do the following:
1. Check multiple pop accounts (say [EMAIL PROTECTED] and [EMAIL PROTECTED])
2. When I reply to a
Hi !
I defined some lists with the lists command... for example :
lists intern internal
I don't add the full address because the lists are all running with 4
domains.
Now i think there is a little bug, because it seems that lists checks
via simple pattern matching... if i get mail to
Frank Altpeter [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote on Mon, 06 Dec 1999:
lists intern internal
I don't add the full address because the lists are all running with 4
domains.
As a note, you could add all four different domains as different lists.
You don't have to but I don't see why not, either.
Hi, folks --
I have noticed some interesting behavior with the PGP passphrase timeout,
controlled by pgp_timeout (which I have set to , the max value).
That works out to about 2.75 hours, and that seems to be about how long
it takes before I have to enter my passphrase again, though I
Chris Green [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I personally think it's a pity that mutt doesn't accomodate POP3 users
a bit more. The fetchmail/procmail approach has one _major_ missing
feature, it's not interactive and so can't allow the user to decide
which mails to download from the POP3 server
On 06-Dec-1999, David DeSimone wrote:
As long as I've been using mail on the Internet, I've grown accustomed
to mail just "showing up" in my account, without needing to worry about
how it got there. Fetchmail's background fetching of POP mail fits very
well into this model, whereby mail
Ronny Haryanto [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Some people doesn't have permanent internet connection, and it even
costs them by the minute. Therefore selective downloading could make
sense.
Certainly. I have to dial up to the Internet myself. Fetchmail is
configured to only poll POP servers
On 06-Dec-1999, David DeSimone wrote:
Ronny Haryanto [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Some people doesn't have permanent internet connection, and it even
costs them by the minute. Therefore selective downloading could make
sense.
Certainly. I have to dial up to the Internet myself. Fetchmail
On Mon, Dec 06, 1999 at 01:07:46PM -0600, David DeSimone wrote:
What you really want is IMAP, not POP3. In fact, Mutt supports IMAP
quite well in the development versions (1.1+), and it gives exactly the
sort of interactivity that you seek. That is, in fact, what the IMAP
protocol was
12 matches
Mail list logo
