I recently moved to maildir/Evolution, but Evolution is still
somewhat unstable. So I finally got around to be a Mutt user. I have
to say it's love at first sight.
One thing I haven't figured out yet is how to speed up the opening of
very large mailboxes. My debian-users mailbox contains some
On Sun, Mar 17, 2002 at 12:12:41PM +0100, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Are there any tricks to speed this up, some caching mechanism or
something. I'm already using ReiserFS and maildir.
Oops. sorry, about that. I read the manual but I forgot to
google. I'll try the maildir cache patch
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
This one time, at band camp, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
very large mailboxes. My debian-users mailbox contains some 3500
messages. It takes about 60 seconds to open.
Are there any tricks to speed this up, some caching mechanism or
something.
* Shawn McMahon [EMAIL PROTECTED] [03-17-02 08:31]:
This one time, at band camp, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
very large mailboxes. My debian-users mailbox contains some 3500
messages. It takes about 60 seconds to open.
Are there any tricks to speed this up, some caching mechanism or
This one time, at band camp, MuttER wrote:
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]?subject=unsubscribe
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]?subject=subscribe
And YOU, of course, will never request aid on this list, or present a
query someone else thinks is inappropriate/unnecessary. I HOPE.
That was a
At 6:12 AM EST on March 17 [EMAIL PROTECTED] sent off:
I recently moved to maildir/Evolution, but Evolution is still
One thing I haven't figured out yet is how to speed up the opening of
very large mailboxes. My debian-users mailbox contains some 3500
messages. It takes about 60 seconds to
* [EMAIL PROTECTED] ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
I recently moved to maildir/Evolution, but Evolution is still somewhat
unstable. So I finally got around to be a Mutt user. I have to say
it's love at first sight.
One thing I haven't figured out yet is how to speed up the opening
of very
Martin Karlsson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Limit to ~A (all) does it for me.
Or why not to . (a dot)?
Fewer keystrokes :-)
As I understand it, Mutt internally translates the search pattern .
into ~A, so they are one and the same.
--
David DeSimone | The doctrine of human equality
On Sun, Mar 17, 2002 at 06:45:32PM +, Thomas Hurst wrote:
2. Use a maildir caching patch to limit scanning of new messages to
operations on a dbm.
After a nice walk in the park I've spent the evening patching and
compiling mutt. The tricky part was figuring out which packages to
This one time, at band camp, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
The patched version works very nicely. Opening the 3500 messages
mailbox took 79 seconds with the prepacked mutt. It takes less then a
second with the patched version.
Guess I was wrong, then; switching to the digest wouldn't have been
* [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] [03-17-02 14:35]:
On Sun, Mar 17, 2002 at 06:45:32PM +, Thomas Hurst wrote:
2. Use a maildir caching patch to limit scanning of new messages to
operations on a dbm.
After a nice walk in the park I've spent the evening patching and
compiling
* Shawn McMahon [EMAIL PROTECTED] [03-17-02 14:40]:
This one time, at band camp, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
The patched version works very nicely. Opening the 3500 messages
mailbox took 79 seconds with the prepacked mutt. It takes less then a
second with the patched version.
Guess I
J. Scott Dorr [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
The only problem with this is that if I let other apps do it, then my
status line in mutt won't be accurate, and mutt won't offer ~/Mailbox
as an option to change to when I hit 'c'.
There's something strange about all this... A program other that Mutt
On Sun, Mar 17, 2002 at 12:22:24PM -0500, Rob Reid wrote:
My freshmeat folder has about that many messages, but it only takes a few
seconds to open (never timed it), and I'm using mbox on ext3, so your setup
*should* be faster according to the hype.
Are you reading from NFS, IMAP, POP, or
At 3:20 PM EST on March 17 [EMAIL PROTECTED] sent off:
On Sun, Mar 17, 2002 at 12:22:24PM -0500, Rob Reid wrote:
My freshmeat folder has about that many messages, but it only takes a few
seconds to open (never timed it), and I'm using mbox on ext3, so your setup
*should* be faster
Thomas Hurst wrote:
* [EMAIL PROTECTED] ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
Are there any tricks to speed this up, some caching mechanism or
something. I'm already using ReiserFS and maildir.
The solutions are:
1. Switch to mbox and trade off individual mail modification speed
and corruption
Vincent Lefevre wrote:
When installing Mutt in my home directory, I get the following error:
[...]
This is normal, but anyway, mutt_dotlock is already installed in
/usr/bin. In fact, I just want to install the mutt binary. The
problem is that Mutt has installed a mutt_dotlock with incorrect
David T-G wrote:
Yippee!
My list of patch maintainers for my cocktail is currently
[...]
Cedric Duval
[...]
so all of you folks should get to work to make sure that your patches
work under 1.3.28 :-)
The previous versions should apply cleanly, but anyway I've updated
them all for 1.3.28:
* Andre Berger [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2002-03-17 02:05]:
What I'm trying to accomplish is more or less the same Jerome (the
original poster) wants. We use mutt with nntp-patch and want to set
headers according to the fact if we are mailing or posting.
i got that. however, you did not describe
I asked about this when 1.3.25 came out and got the answer that
this should be fixed / will be looking into it. However, 1.3.28
still can't be configured without iconv. Any chance for a change?
I've attached a patch that seems to work. It's a bit of hack, a
clean solution would be to have an
* On 2002.03.17, in [EMAIL PROTECTED],
* Claus Assmann [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I asked about this when 1.3.25 came out and got the answer that
this should be fixed / will be looking into it. However, 1.3.28
still can't be configured without iconv. Any chance for a change?
Lars
On Sun, Mar 17, 2002, David Champion wrote:
* On 2002.03.17, in [EMAIL PROTECTED],
* Claus Assmann wrote:
I asked about this when 1.3.25 came out and got the answer that
this should be fixed / will be looking into it. However, 1.3.28
still can't be configured without iconv. Any
* On 2002.03.17, in [EMAIL PROTECTED],
* Claus Assmann [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
(sorry, I don't read mutt-dev anymore, I'm getting more than 500
mails a day (obviously I can only skim through the subjects and
read only a subset...))
Lars doesn't read mutt-users anymore for the same
i am currently using v1.3.27i. is it possible to show the
flag-message indicator for a collapsed thread? currently i see
when threads are collasped...
44 Mar 14 15.21 Maxim Sobolev5 cvs commit: ports/www/mozilla...
49 Mar 15 09.08 Matthew Reimer! Re: cvs commit:
* Sven Guckes [EMAIL PROTECTED], 2002-03-17 18:26 -0500:
* Andre Berger [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2002-03-17 02:05]:
[...]
If you just want mutt to keep
a copy of all your messages
depending on Email or Usenet
then why not set FCC instead?
Why *send* a copy?
[...]
fcc-hook'~t .' +MAIL
On Sun, Mar 17, 2002 at 12:46:10PM -0800, Will Yardley wrote:
1. Switch to mbox and trade off individual mail modification speed
and corruption resistance for initial opening speed.
yum. we use Maildir on our office mailserver so i've just ended up
using this. it *is* pretty slow
Hello,
I have a few questions I was unable to find answers for in the docs/web:
1. How can I disable the 'L' flag in 1.3.28i? It's redundant for me
since I already use procmail to sort my list-mail into folders.
2. How can I match match both '[EMAIL PROTECTED]' and
'[EMAIL PROTECTED]' in a
Hi, Thomas!
I've compiled mutt-1.3.28i in the default configuration on RedHat Linux
7.2 (i386) with all updates. If I run it in xterm (from XFree86-4.1.0) or
in rxvt-2.7.6, it shows a blank screen. I can quit by pressing Ctrl-C and
Enter. The same executable runs on the Linux console
28 matches
Mail list logo
