Re: folder-hook push not responding as expected.

2002-06-29 Thread Vikram Goyal
On Fri, Jun 28, 2002 at 04:23:31PM +0200, Cedric Duval wrote: Hello Cedric, Also I think that it should be the default of tag-prefix i.e if the tag-pattern isn't there tag-prefix should abort Yes, I also think this would be better, at least for all these automatic operations dealing

Re: forcing mutt to think in mono

2002-06-29 Thread Cedric Duval
Hi David, No dice; I did (and found that BSD regexps are different from GNU regexps, so I had to rewrite some of it -- and I've added this color junk, too!). If you want a consistent behavior beetween Linux and FreeBSD, you could always try to compile Mutt with the integrated regexps

Re: folder-hook push not responding as expected.

2002-06-29 Thread Cedric Duval
Vikram Goyal wrote: But naturally there are more than one way to do something and better in mutt. Yeah! :) I still have to figure out how to move deleted messages form the folder dir to Trash on folder-exit. If possible give an ex. Despite its name, $maildir_trash is not the more

Re: forcing mutt to think in mono

2002-06-29 Thread Thomas Dickey
On Fri, Jun 28, 2002 at 08:44:09PM -0500, David T-G wrote: Hi, all -- Since I've moved over to FreeBSD I've found a few things different from the Linux world, and I'm starting to adjust to them :-) For one, now mutt insists on being all colorful, which just sucks for me. Is there any way

Re: forcing mutt to think in mono

2002-06-29 Thread Thomas Dickey
On Fri, Jun 28, 2002 at 09:02:42PM -0500, David T-G wrote: Hi! ...and then William Park said... % % On Fri, Jun 28, 2002 at 08:44:09PM -0500, David T-G wrote: ... % For one, now mutt insists on being all colorful, which just sucks for me. % Is there any way to force mutt into mono

Re: forcing mutt to think in mono

2002-06-29 Thread William Park
On Fri, Jun 28, 2002 at 09:02:42PM -0500, David T-G wrote: % Mutt defaults to colour in Linux too. So, copy over your .muttrc to new % machine. No dice; I did (and found that BSD regexps are different from GNU regexps, so I had to rewrite some of it -- and I've added this color junk,

mark for unread messages in a mailbox?

2002-06-29 Thread Qingjia Zhu
Dear mutt users, I have set mark_old=no in my .muttrc, and folder_format is by default. If I opened a mailbox and leave some unread messages still unread there, I want mutt to keep a 'N' mark for that mailbox the next time I start mutt, but not just

Re: new mail question..

2002-06-29 Thread Nils Vogels
On Fri, Jun 28, 2002 at 01:00:55PM -0700, Geoff Ludwiczak wrote: I have a question about how mutt checks for new mail and updates itself. I noticed that in mutt, whenever you get new mail in a mailbox, you have to first move through to another message before it beeps about new mail. Is there

Re: new mail question..

2002-06-29 Thread Geoff Ludwiczak
That's odd. I ran a test before where I had my main mailbox open. I email myself, run fetchmail, and i watch the mutt window with mail_check set to 1. I waited to see if mutt would pick up on the new message and automatically say new mail and show the message in the index. So I have to