I need to forward messages to a certain email address and have it so that
the recipient will reply to original sender rather than me.
Is this possible?
I can do this automagically with procmail but the problem is that some spam
is getting through, which I'd rather not have forwarded.
--
On (22:42 27/02/09), Jussi Peltola pe...@pelzi.net put forth the proposition:
On Fri, Feb 27, 2009 at 08:21:00PM +, Dave Woodfall wrote:
I need to forward messages to a certain email address and have it so that
the recipient will reply to original sender rather than me.
Is this possible
On Saturday 1 December 2018 16:19,
Kevin J. McCarthy put forth the proposition:
> On Sat, Dec 01, 2018 at 11:31:38PM +0000, Dave Woodfall wrote:
> > Is there a way to make sure that all mail sent via CLI saves a copy in
> > =Sent? The only way I can see at the moment is by u
Hi
I have been using a script for a while now that uses mutt to send
emails out. I've just noticed today that it no longer saves in
=Sent, and I suspect it's since I started using a dynamic record
setting - i.e. ^ for most mail, but =Sent for mailing lists.
I can't see any option for fcc'ing
On Thursday 28 March 2019 13:24,
Max Görner put forth the proposition:
> Hello,
>
> I am a very pleased Mutt user for several years now. However, I would love to
> have a threading similar to GMail, showing send and received messages in the
> same thread.
>
> I wonder whether one could just
On Friday 21 June 2019 20:44,
David J. J. Ring, Jr. put forth the proposition:
> Hello,
>
> I am really happy except for one little thing.
>
> I found out how to get mutt working inside emacs / emacspeak.
>
> The only problem is that I cannot press q to quit, I have to quit emacs
> instead by
On Wed 30 Oct 2019 12:57,
martin f krafft put forth the proposition:
> Regarding the following, written by "Martin Trautmann" on 2019-10-30 at 00:14
> Uhr +0100:
> > That's such a strange thing.
> > […]
> > since they never learned, how proper threading and quoting could have
> > worked?
>
> 78
On Wed 30 Oct 2019 23:53,
martin f krafft put forth the proposition:
> Regarding the following, written by "Dave Woodfall" on 2019-10-30 at 10:05
> Uhr +:
> > I don't think embracing wrong email practices is the way forward.
>
> I don't think this is about r
On Thu 31 Oct 2019 09:24,
martin f krafft put forth the proposition:
> Regarding the following, written by "Dave Woodfall" on 2019-10-30 at 11:25
> Uhr +:
> > When messages turn up with no plain text part to them at all, or one
> > that's completely useless, it's
> 2. The ability to natively display a subset of HTML (the same subset)
>with the ability to trigger links to open in a browser (or perhaps
>execute an arbitrary configured command). Modern terminal windows
>can handle all of the formatting required to do just this much...
elinks
On Tue 29 Oct 2019 12:04,
martin f krafft put forth the proposition:
> Regarding the following, written by "Chris Green" on 2019-10-28 at 22:40 Uhr
> +:
> > Isn't that handled by your terminal program? Mine certainly allows
> > one to right click on any URL to open it.
>
> rxvt-unicode also
On Mon 28 Oct 2019 20:28,
Ben Boeckel put forth the proposition:
> On Tue, Oct 29, 2019 at 00:10:09 +0000, Dave Woodfall wrote:
> > Urlview handles long and short links just fine. I've been using it
> > for over 10 years.
>
> One issue I have with it is that context is l
On 2020-04-25 21:46,
David Engel put forth the proposition:
> Hi,
>
> My company uses PGP/GPG when sending sensitive material through email.
> Unfortunately (for them and me), most people use Outlook and our IT
> guy refuses to install any Outlook plugin for them to properly handle
> encypted
On 2020-04-26 08:04,
Dave Woodfall put forth the proposition:
> On 2020-04-25 21:46,
> David Engel put forth the proposition:
> > Hi,
> >
>
> Elinks[1] has an option to `compress-empty-lines'. Other than that
> perhaps piping the -dumped text through cat -s or --squee
On 2020-04-28 00:20,
David Engel put forth the proposition:
> On Mon, Apr 27, 2020 at 06:28:55PM -0500, Sven Semmler wrote:
> > On Sat, Apr 25, 2020 at 09:46:48PM -0500, David Engel wrote:
> > > I've since written a filter to preprocess the HTML and remove the
> > > extra formatting before
Thanks for the replies.
On 26/11/20 10:38,
Cameron Simpson put forth the proposition:
> I'd expect rsync to be faster than scp, and personally I'd use "cd
> the-mailddir; tar cf
> - . | ssh remote 'cd remote-maildir; tar xf -'" which should be much
> faster than either.
Very interesting
Hello all,
I have a Maildir folder which I want to move to another machine:
about 830M with 29000 messages.
Would just rsync'ing or scp'ing be OK?
I'm asking because I noticed that either procmail or getmail puts the
hostname in the file names, and I wondered if this would cause
problems at the
On 04/12/20 11:16,
Patrick Shanahan put forth the proposition:
> > $ /usr/libexec/w3m/w3mimgdisplay test.png
> >
> > appears to do nothing. The prompt just comes back.
Yes, it's probably easier to use w3m, come to think of it.
To use w3mimgdisplay, the path to the image needs to be piped to it,
On 04/12/20 05:30,
Mutt Users put forth the proposition:
> Hi,
> If I use w3m -o ext_image_viewer=0 test.png, I can get the file test.png
> inside xterm.
> I wanted to do the same on my mutt window (inside xterm). How do I do this?
> I tried putting:
> image/*;w3m -o ext_imageviewer=0 %s;
19 matches
Mail list logo
