Re: Can I use the OP's time zone in the time given on the $attribution line in a reply?

On Thu, Jan 19, 2017 at 09:35:37PM +, Alan Mackenzie wrote: Hello, mutt. I'm using mutt version 1.5.24. Suppose someone has sent me an email with this Date: header: Date: Thu, 19 Jan 2017 12:00:49 +0100 . When I reply, with g or r, the following attribution line heads my

Re: Mail-Followup-To (was Re: breaking long header lines into 2 (or more) lines)

On April 26, 2018 8:24:16 PM UTC, Ian Zimmerman wrote: > On 2018-04-25 10:24, Will Yardley wrote: > > > Kind of thread drift, but I actually wonder if Mutt shouldn't move > > away from Mail-Followup-To, as it never became a standard, and is > not > > really adopted by

Re: maildir-utils vs notmuch

On Friday, January 19, 2018 at 11:59:15 +0100, Matthias Apitz wrote: I have around 4.2 GByte of mbox mail files: $ du -sh Mail 4,2GMail $ ls Mail | wc -l 1095 can 'notmuch' index this and how big is the database after this? matthias I have 27 GiB emails. notmuch db is around

Re: maildir-utils vs notmuch

On Friday, January 19, 2018 at 17:43:32 +, Ben Oliver wrote: On 18-01-19 18:17:34, Mihai Lazarescu wrote: >On Friday, January 19, 2018 at 11:59:15 +0100, Matthias Apitz wrote: > >>I have around 4.2 GByte of mbox mail files: >> >>$ du -sh Mail >>4,2GMai

Re: [Mutt] respond inline to attached patch?

On Saturday, July 28, 2018 at 14:52:36 -0400, Xu Wang wrote: I sometime receive a message with an attached patch. I would like to make a comment on a couple of lines in the patch. Is there easy way to respond such that basically their attached patch is part of their message so easier to make my

Re: [Mutt] Re: [Mutt] respond inline to attached patch?

On Sunday, July 29, 2018 at 10:33:03 -0400, Xu Wang wrote: [-- Attachment #2: app2or_py.patch --] [-- Type: text/x-patch; charset=UTF-8, Encoding: 7bit, Size: 4.2K --] [-- text/x-patch is unsupported (use 'v' to view this part) --] So now I just need to figure out how to make it supported. I

Re: [Mutt] Long subject lines

On Sunday, August 19, 2018 at 03:17:58 +0100, David Woodfall wrote: Or is this a limitation of the RFC that subject lines need to be under a certain length? Yes, RFC 5322. Header lines cannot exceed 998 characters and should be folded at less than 78 character per line:

Re: [Mutt] Re: [Mutt] Re: Long subject lines

On Sunday, August 19, 2018 at 14:57:20 +0100, David Woodfall wrote: On Sunday 19 August 2018 13:58, Mihai Lazarescu put forth the proposition: > BTW, piping the message through "formail -c" would > concatenate continued fields in the header. Can I add a pipe to the editor

Re: [Mutt] Re: Long subject lines

On Sunday, August 19, 2018 at 10:33:35 +0100, David Woodfall wrote: It was kind of an xy problem really. My vim function that gets called when I edit a message needs fixing for subjects of 1 line. Or it will drop me in insert mode after the first line, and the second and any subsequent lines

Re: [Mutt] Exceptions to ~p based on From:?

On Saturday, September 22, 2018 at 18:49:02 -0400, John Hawkinson wrote: Although this used to work pretty well, more and more the modern mailing list paradigm (e.g. Mailchimp lists, etc.) is to have bulk or list messages that are indistinguishable from personal mail, e.g.: From:

Re: [Mutt] Exceptions to ~p based on From:?

On Sunday, September 23, 2018 at 07:44:38 -0400, John Hawkinson wrote: Mihai Lazarescu wrote on Sun, 23 Sep 2018 at 11:50:01 +0200 in <20180923095001.ga19...@mtl.m.lazarescu.org>: > If non-mutt solutions are acceptable, I'd change u...@domain.name to > user-j...@domain.name in s

Re: [Mutt] Hide a message?

On Wednesday, December 12, 2018 at 19:39:25 +0700, Victor Sudakov wrote: Is there a way to hide a message (e.g. with a certain subject) from view in a mailbox, without actually deleting it? Limit to negated pattern does not work? E.g., to see all messages *except* those with 'mutt' in

Re: [Mutt] Re: Group reply To-vs-Cc recipients

On Tuesday, December 11, 2018 at 21:08:16 +0100, Mihai Lazarescu wrote: On Tue, Dec 11, 2018 at 12:29 AM Derek Martin wrote: > > On Wed, Dec 05, 2018 at 05:31:28PM +1100, Erik Christiansen wrote: > > Thread comment: It's OK to be unaware of the usefulness of RFC features, > >

Re: [Mutt] Re: [Mutt] Re: Group reply To-vs-Cc recipients

On Tuesday, December 11, 2018 at 18:23:11 -0600, Derek Martin wrote: On Tue, Dec 11, 2018 at 09:51:08AM -0800, Kevin J. McCarthy wrote: > On Mon, Dec 10, 2018 at 05:29:01PM -0600, Derek Martin wrote: > > [...]since these are normally secondary recipients of the reply. > > > >It recomments

Re: [Mutt] Re: Group reply To-vs-Cc recipients

On Thursday, December 13, 2018 at 17:56:51 -0600, Derek Martin wrote: The majority of the community said nothing at all, which suggests (as I suggested) that most people don't actually give a $#@! about this, as well they shouldn't. I'll note that in response to Kevin's query, two people (Ariis

Re: [Mutt] Group reply To-vs-Cc recipients

On Tuesday, December 11, 2018 at 17:48:14 -0600, Derek Martin wrote: On Tue, Dec 11, 2018 at 09:08:16PM +0100, Mihai T. Lazarescu wrote: > >If a reply is sent to a message that has destination fields, it > >is often desirable to send a copy of the reply to all of the > >recipients

Re: [Mutt] Re: Group reply To-vs-Cc recipients

On Thu, Nov 29, 2018 at 04:12:08PM -0800, Kevin J. McCarthy wrote: On Thu, Nov 29, 2018 at 03:41:12PM -0800, Ian Zimmerman wrote: > I am curious to know in what context "someone" felt it would > make a difference. The ticket number is 98, but I thought mutt-users would be a better place to

Re: [Mutt] format=flowed

On Tuesday, January 08, 2019 at 16:53:11 -0600, Derek Martin wrote: On Sat, Jan 05, 2019 at 10:48:13PM +, Samir Benmendil wrote: > > I stopped using format=flowed because not much besides Mutt > > supports it, and particularly not GMail and Outlook. > > That's interesting. I've been using

Re: [Mutt] flowed text (was: Adding delsp=yes to Content-Type)

On Sunday, July 07, 2019 at 10:02:51 -0400, José María Mateos wrote: I stopped using flowed format because I like doing stuff like this: 1. A list, in which the paragraph gets aligned to the first letter of the block, so it's more noticeable. Otherwise it just looks like a regular

Re: How [Mutt] to send links from Firefox

On Monday, October 14, 2019 at 17:46:24 -0400, José María Mateos wrote: I have set up Firefox so that mutt is the designed e-mail client. However, when I click on "Email link...", the e-mail body doesn't go into the text editor (vim, in my case). Make sure that the link you follow includes

Re: Opening URLs from mutt (was: Creating HTML emails with mutt)

On Tuesday, October 29, 2019 at 13:37:29 +1300, martin f krafft wrote: Regarding the following, written by "Dave Woodfall" on 2019-10-29 at 00:10 Uhr +: >Urlview handles long and short links just fine. I've been >using it for over 10 years. Urlview also obstructs your view to context

Re: [Mutt] Going GUI...er

On Saturday, April 04, 2020 at 19:18:42 +0200, steve wrote: Le 04-04-2020, à 09:41:59 +0200, Vegard Svanberg a écrit : >However, I'm increasingly finding myself having to resort to >various >tricks to deal with HTML only emails (with picture attachments), >calendar invites, and other

Re: [Mutt] Block, autoreplay and purge messages with attachement size large than 1MB

On Wednesday, May 27, 2020 at 16:59:20 -0300, Marcelo Laia wrote: Please, is there a way for me to configure offlineimap, msmtp and mutt to: 1. to check if the message has an attachment 2. to check the attachment size 3. If the attachment is larger than 1MB, send a message with the

Re: [Mutt] see attached html documents along with chromium

On Tuesday, December 21, 2021 at 19:58:41 +0100, Gerard ROBIN wrote: I didn't understand why the changes to the /etc/mailcap file had no effect. According to mutt docs http://www.mutt.org/doc/manual/#mailcap the default mailcap locations and their search order are given by: mutt -nF

Re: [Mutt] see attached html documents along with chromium

On Tuesday, December 21, 2021 at 01:07:48 +0100, Gerard ROBIN wrote: Gerard ROBIN [12-20-21 14:35]: Hello, I have to go to a site, https://www.doctolib.fr/, which is not compatible with firefox, so I installed chromium and I set chromium as default browser but when I click on "m" it is firefox

Re: [Mutt] help on complicated per-folder or per-sender sending email hooks

On Wednesday, November 24, 2021 at 10:23:31 -0600, Ranjan Maitra wrote: set smtp_url="smtp://yourusern...@smtp.example.com:587/" set smtp_pass="Your1!Really2@AweSome3#Password" But what do I do about the work email that uses postfix? If you unset smtp_url mutt should connect to port 25 on

Re: [Mutt] Search program that can find an E-Mail with an exact Date: match

On Monday, November 29, 2021 at 12:03:31 +, Chris Green wrote: I'm looking for a way to find (and display) an E-Mail when I know the exact value of the Date: header. notmuch appears to match specific date/times: date:.. or date: DATE AND TIME SEARCH notmuch understands a

Re: [Mutt] help on complicated per-folder or per-sender sending email hooks

On Thursday, November 25, 2021 at 18:32:50 -0600, mai...@email.com wrote: I had a few more questions. Is it possible to have a hook based on where the email is coming to? So, if I am in this folder, then I use the above, but I am wondering if I can have a hook that says something like if the

Re: [Mutt] help on complicated per-folder or per-sender sending email hooks

On Friday, November 26, 2021 at 23:41:46 -0600, mai...@email.com wrote: Basically, if the email is postponed and called from the draft, it uses my work account (because that is set up to be the default). Is it possible to set things up so that mutt will look at the sending address (@email dot

Re: [Mutt] pretty-print mutt emails

On Monday, November 22, 2021 at 14:32:09 +, Globe Trotter wrote: zathura file.ps I wonder if I can get a dialog that gives me a choice of 1 or 2 pages printing. Perhaps I have two scripts for that? With zathura apparently not, but with evince (and possibly other viewers) yes. Mihai

Re: [Mutt] pretty-print mutt emails

On Monday, November 22, 2021 at 00:47:10 +, Globe Trotter via Mutt-users wrote: What is the recommended way to pretty-print mutt emails? I found a sourceforge perl script called muttprint but that was last updated in 2008, and I was wondering what folks here recommended? I use without

Re: [Mutt] Is linewrap dead? Now: Self hosted SMTP

On Monday, September 12, 2022 at 16:25:12 -0400, John Hawkinson wrote: Mihai Lazarescu wrote on Mon, 12 Sep 2022 at 15:07:37 EDT in : > It took some work to set it up, but that's it. Surely not a mass solution, yet feasible and stable. ... > Only Microsoft (outlook.com, hotmail.com

Re: [Mutt] Is linewrap dead?

On Monday, September 12, 2022 at 15:15:55 +, Nacho via Mutt-users wrote: > What you describe is becoming more and more history, which I regret. > Let me give you the link of an article that should interest you. > >

Re: [Mutt] Is linewrap dead? Now: Self hosted SMTP

On Tuesday, September 13, 2022 at 14:34:39 +, Nacho via Mutt-users wrote: > In 2022 I find astonishing how much of Microsoft's antispam seems > to rely on lists (addresses, IP blocks…). Leading to annoying > false positives, with rates well higher than Google's. Those "false positives" are

Re: [Mutt] attach file from another email to current email

On Monday, November 14, 2022 at 10:30:01 -0600, Ranjan Maitra wrote: I am sure that this is possible, but I can not figure out how to attach files from another email to my current email that I would like those emails attached to. Typically, I simply save each attachment locally, and then

Re: [Mutt] Is there any way to view text/html inline *only if* we think text/plain is not right?

On Thursday, May 18, 2023 at 19:53:50 -0400, José María Mateos wrote: 2. If I'm not convinced by that version, press some key and then text/html is displayed inline (using w3m, lynx, links, or whatever in the ~/.mailcap file). I use this macro: macro pager ~ 'unalternative_order