* Dave Goodrich [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2002-07-27 12:25]:
On Sat, Jul 27, 2002 at 05:58:55PM +0100, Dean Richard Benson wrote:
Hi all
I am wondering if anyone has any good suggestions for how to handle the
usage of an outbox.
I have a procmail recepie which will allow you to filter all
* Doug Wright [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2002-07-18 22:11]:
Hi,
I have postfix and procmail setup to deliver mail to maildirs. Mutt reads
the maildirs just fine. when i want to move a message to another folder,
mutt will only copy it to a mbx. I realize that I could add one entry to my
.muttrc but
* jbw [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2002-07-17 14:54]:
On Wed, Jul 17, 2002 at 05:39:56AM -0500, David T-G spewed into the ether:
[clip]
% Problem...
%
% When I receive mime encoded msgs I can't read it and mutt reports that
% the signature couldn't be verified even though the screen output
%
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
* jbw [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2002-07-17 16:12]:
On Wed, Jul 17, 2002 at 03:35:29PM -0700, Michael Maibaum spewed into the ether:
FWIW, I don't find the key...
Michael
I just resent to keyserver wwwkeys.nl.pgp.net. Try it now.
Much better
On Tue, Jun 18, 2002 at 11:50:17AM -0500, Jason wrote:
howdy
I recently switched from mbox to maildir, but I can't get the mail folder
browser to tell me which folders have new mail in them.
Do you have the mailboxes you want mutt to watch set in muttrc, eg
mailboxes +/spam/in.junk
On Tue, Jun 18, 2002 at 01:33:43PM -0500, David T-G wrote:
One thing to add...
Qingjia --
...and then Qingjia Zhu said...
%
% Dear mutt users,
%
% Maybe it's a dumb question, but how do I mark all mails in
% a mailbox as already read?
I would tag them and do it that way. You
On Thu, Jun 13, 2002 at 11:19:34AM -0400, Brett Sanger wrote:
Answers to so far unanswered questions below.
Okay, this is a simple one, but I didn't come across it in the docs. How
do I set my From: address? I tinkered with my EMAIL enviroment, but that
didn't make a difference.
Others
On Mon, Jun 03, 2002 at 09:44:56AM -0500, David T-G wrote:
Dan, et al --
...and then Dan Boger said...
%
% On Mon, Jun 03, 2002 at 05:17:10PM +0300, Jussi Ekholm wrote:
% It doesn't do the job either. I did tag a certain thread with
% tag-thread, and then pressed ;N. Still, only the
On Tue, Mar 26, 2002 at 02:59:37PM -0700, Rob 'Feztaa' Park wrote:
Alas! David T-G spake thus:
% Lets see you work out an x-nuke solution and we'll see how many lines it
% is... :P
[0] This officially means that every single binary on my entire system
is GPL'd ;)
SSH, openssl? I
On Fri, Mar 08, 2002 at 12:03:56AM +0100, Marco Fioretti wrote:
Any language can be made readable or unreadable. Personally, I think
that any program is readable if it has complete, up to date embedded
comments explaining what is happening and meaningful variable names,
even if the actual
On Thu, Mar 07, 2002 at 03:39:48PM -0800, Will Yardley wrote:
Michael Maibaum wrote:
On Fri, Mar 08, 2002 at 12:03:56AM +0100, Marco Fioretti wrote:
So, what language do the volunteers know better?
Perl.
my guess is that more people know perl well... that's nothing against
python
On Wed, Mar 06, 2002 at 10:16:24PM -0800, Will Yardley wrote:
Sven Guckes wrote:
mutt does not strive to be popular with everyone. after all, all
those bad mailers were written to *fit* some people - and they
certainly do! so dont take them away from those - they deserve it!
i
On Sun, Mar 03, 2002 at 08:36:58AM -0800, David Ellement wrote:
On 020303, at 11:30:58, Josh Kuperman wrote
On Sun, Mar 03, 2002 at 03:00:12AM -0500, Josh Kuperman wrote:
I installed mutt on my MacOS X (using the fink package version) and it
works fine except for the aliases.
Let me
On Sat, Jan 26, 2002 at 12:05:21PM -0500, Thomas Dickey wrote:
On Fri, Jan 25, 2002 at 09:52:26PM -0800, David Ellement wrote:
The best ones are from the IT department, rejoicing in their
latest efficiency measures...
worse - the ones that have the message in plain text, along with a
On Sat, Jan 26, 2002 at 05:42:57PM -0600, Knute wrote:
On Sat, 26 Jan 2002, Nick Wilson wrote:
* and then Michael Maibaum blurted
My favorite was the last bi-monthly report from our (win NT
dominated...) IT dept...It was a 4Mb word document for about a page and
a half, plus
Hi all,
Stimulated by recent threads on organisation, I want to save the fcc
copies of my outgoing mail to a subdir. At present they are saved by
name to the top level of my Mail dir and to please my slightly
obbsessive sense of tidieness I would like to move them to a subdir
called outbox/
On Thu, Jan 10, 2002 at 02:00:18PM -0500, David T-G wrote:
Michael --
...and then Michael Maibaum said...
%
% Hi all,
% name to the top level of my Mail dir and to please my slightly
% obbsessive sense of tidieness I would like to move them to a subdir
% called outbox/
% this seems
On Thu, Jan 10, 2002 at 11:45:20PM -0600, Knute wrote:
tatus: RO
Content-Length: 1638
Lines: 49
On Thu, 10 Jan 2002, Michael Maibaum wrote:
On Thu, Jan 10, 2002 at 02:00:18PM -0500, David T-G wrote:
Michael --
...and then Michael Maibaum said...
%
% Hi all,
% name
18 matches
Mail list logo
