Did you disable fcntl-style locking when building Mutt?
-Clint
On Mar 14, Eric Boehm wrote:
>
> I have found that mutt 1.1.9 is about 4x slower reading a 7.4 MB mail
> file with 1451 messages in it than mutt 1.0.
>
> I tried this several times to eliminate the effects of caching. It took
> mut
On Sun, Mar 19, 2000 at 06:13:16PM -0500, David T-G wrote:
> Now that I can build because I have a working compiler (sorry for the
> noise :-) I would like to look into my favorite feature patches. I use
> patch-0.00.sec.patchlist.7
> patch-0.95.4.sec.expand_hook.1
[...]
> Can the au
Hello,
> patch-0.95.3.hb.save_alias.1
You can download a new version of this patch at:
http://www.stack.nl/~hansbo/mutt.html
The version for the development version is patch-1.1.1.hb.save_alias.1
--
Doei
Hans
=+==
| Hans Bogaards
On 2000-03-20 01:27:51 +, Thomas Ribbrock wrote:
> I have a slight problem with Muttrc in the 1.1.9. In
> 1.0.1 and before, the Muttrc that got installed was
> automatically changed during install to contain the
> correct path to "manual.txt" according to --prefix.
> This no longer works for
On Sun, Mar 19, 2000 at 18:13:16 -0500, David T-G wrote:
> Can the authors or maintainers of the patches let me know if any
> of them are obsoleted or need to be updated, and where to get them?
I'm now updating my patches (those with "bj" in their filenames) to
the soon-coming Mutt 1.2. More info
Hi *!
I have a slight problem with Muttrc in the 1.1.9. In 1.0.1 and before, the
Muttrc that got installed was automatically changed during install to
contain the correct path to "manual.txt" according to --prefix. This no
longer works for 1.1.9. Even after configuring with --prefix, the installe
Hi, folks --
Now that I can build because I have a working compiler (sorry for the
noise :-) I would like to look into my favorite feature patches. I use
patch-0.00.sec.patchlist.7
patch-0.95.4.sec.expand_hook.1
patch-0.95.4.sec.reverse_reply.1
patch-0.95.sec.condense_pgp.1
patch-0.9
Hi, folks --
I guess I know what's up now :
...and then Mike said...
% On Fri, Mar 17, 2000 at 13:31:50, David T-G said...
%
% > 6.1 Linux system and tried to run configure, but configure couldn't tell
% > my host type. I've not had this problem before.
%
% Dave, that's not a problem with mu
Hi, folks --
...and then Thomas Roessler said...
% Mutt-1.1.9 is out on ftp://ftp.mutt.org/pub/mutt/devel/,
% and the usual mirror sites, see
% http://www.mutt.org/download.html.
I pulled down 1.1.9i.tar.gz and extracted it on my dual-Celeron SuSE
6.1 Linux system and tried to run configure, b
> Lars> Convenient as they are, charsets are another feature that
> Lars> make it easier for ppl to shoot themselves (and others) in the
> Lars> foot. Now that my mutt is charset sensitive, I often find messages
> Lars> with big5, iso-2022-jp, or koi8-r, although none of the spe
Eric Boehm <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Yes, across NFS. I copied the file to a local drive and ran both
> mutts. The time was about the same (1.8 sec). Both mutts were also
> run from a local drive.
Mutt wants to use fcntl-locking on the file. This forces NFS to use a
non-caching mode, whe
On 2000-03-15 09:36:26 -0500, Eric Boehm wrote:
> It sounds like you are saying that I should change the
> combination of
>
> +USE_DOTLOCK +USE_FCNTL -USE_FLOCK
>
> to something else but it isn't clear to me what I
> should change it to.
You really want to compile your mutt 1.0 with an extern
> "Thomas" == Thomas Roessler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> "Lars" == Lars Hecking <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Thomas> You are transferring almost 8 MBit/s with the new mutt versions.
Thomas> This looks like the bottleneck is really NFS and your Ethernet,
Thomas> not mutt. Wi
> I have found that mutt 1.1.9 is about 4x slower reading a 7.4 MB mail
> file with 1451 messages in it than mutt 1.0.
>
> I tried this several times to eliminate the effects of caching. It took mutt
> 1.0 about 7.8 seconds to bring up the file, it took mutt 1.1.9 about 28.8
> seconds to bring u
On 2000-03-14 21:23:36 -0500, Eric Boehm wrote:
>> I have found that mutt 1.1.9 is about 4x slower
>> reading a 7.4 MB mail file with 1451 messages in it
>> than mutt 1.0.
You are transferring almost 8 MBit/s with the new mutt
versions. This looks like the bottleneck is really NFS
and your Ethe
On Tuesday, 14 March 2000 at 21:23, Eric Boehm wrote:
> On Tue, Mar 14, 2000 at 06:59:48PM -0600, David DeSimone wrote:
> > "David" == David DeSimone <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> Eric> I have found that mutt 1.1.9 is about 4x slower reading a 7.4 MB
> Eric> mail file with 1451 mess
On Tue, Mar 14, 2000 at 06:59:48PM -0600, David DeSimone wrote:
> "David" == David DeSimone <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Eric> I have found that mutt 1.1.9 is about 4x slower reading a 7.4 MB
Eric> mail file with 1451 messages in it than mutt 1.0.
David> NFS? What type(s) of file
Eric Boehm <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> I have found that mutt 1.1.9 is about 4x slower reading a 7.4 MB mail
> file with 1451 messages in it than mutt 1.0.
NFS? What type(s) of file locking? Differences in "mutt -v" output?
> I don't know if you would consider this a show stopper but it was
On Mon, Mar 13, 2000 at 02:03:37PM -0500, Thomas Roessler wrote:
> "Thomas" == Thomas Roessler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Thomas> Changes against 1.1.8 are a couple of bug-fixes. Unless someone
Thomas> has some real show-stoppers, I'd consider this to be a release
Thomas> candid
On Tue, Mar 14, 2000 at 10:27:43AM +0100, Ralf Hildebrandt wrote:
> I use slang-1.4.0 -- the latest. Right now I'm trying to build PGP-6.5.1,
> the guy who made the hpux/aix patch is a moron. I had to give patch the
> filenames by hand... -- does GNUpg work on your HP-UX box?
I don't know about
On 2000-03-14 10:15:41 +0100, Martin Schröder wrote:
> Just a reminder: There is a mutt-announce mailing list.
Thanks, I know.
> The last mail there announced 1.0pre3 :-{
The last mail I sent there announced 1.0.1.
Additionally, I have intentionally announced the public
1.1 betas to mutt-us
On Mon, Mar 13, 2000 at 02:16:40PM -0800, Gary Johnson wrote:
> > Works like a charm on HP-UX 10.20
>
> That's good news! I've had to hack the configure script of previous
> releases (0.95.4 and 1.0) to get them to use the proper curses library
> on my HP-UX 10.20 system. Is this still necessa
On 2000-03-13 20:03:37 +0100, Thomas Roessler wrote:
> Mutt-1.1.9 is out on ftp://ftp.mutt.org/pub/mutt/devel/,
Just a reminder: There is a mutt-announce mailing list.
The last mail there announced 1.0pre3 :-{
Best regards
Martin
--
Martin Schröder, [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Mon, Mar 13, 2000 at 09:24:00PM +0100, Ralf Hildebrandt wrote:
> Works like a charm on HP-UX 10.20
That's good news! I've had to hack the configure script of previous
releases (0.95.4 and 1.0) to get them to use the proper curses library
on my HP-UX 10.20 system. Is this still necessary? W
On 2000-03-13 16:03:43 -0500, Brendan Cully wrote:
> I've got a bug report from Rex Walters that read-only
> mailboxes on IMAP override ACLs incorrectly.
> Specifically, if a mailbox is readonly you can't set or
> unset the Seen flag, even if you have permission to
> according to the ACL.
What y
Hi!
On Mon, Mar 13, 2000 at 08:03:37PM +0100, Thomas Roessler wrote:
> Changes against 1.1.8 are a couple of bug-fixes. Unless
> someone has some real show-stoppers, I'd consider this to
> be a release candidate for 1.2, and release that version
> later that week.
A pgp6.rc file to use PGP 6 wi
On Monday, 13 March 2000 at 20:03, Thomas Roessler wrote:
> Mutt-1.1.9 is out on ftp://ftp.mutt.org/pub/mutt/devel/,
> and the usual mirror sites, see
> http://www.mutt.org/download.html.
>
> Changes against 1.1.8 are a couple of bug-fixes. Unless
> someone has some real show-stoppers, I'd con
On Mon, Mar 13, 2000 at 08:03:37PM +0100, Thomas Roessler wrote:
> Changes against 1.1.8 are a couple of bug-fixes. Unless
> someone has some real show-stoppers, I'd consider this to
> be a release candidate for 1.2, and release that version
> later that week.
Works like a charm on HP-UX 10.20
Mutt-1.1.9 is out on ftp://ftp.mutt.org/pub/mutt/devel/,
and the usual mirror sites, see
http://www.mutt.org/download.html.
Changes against 1.1.8 are a couple of bug-fixes. Unless
someone has some real show-stoppers, I'd consider this to
be a release candidate for 1.2, and release that version
29 matches
Mail list logo
