On Tue, Jul 26, 2022 at 08:30:27PM +0200, Fourhundred Thecat wrote:
>> On 2022-07-26 19:38, Dennis Preiser wrote:
>> set size_show_mb
>> index-format-hook size_flags "~z -1M" " "
>> index-format-hook size_flags "~z >1M" "%5c&qu
> On 2022-07-26 19:38, Dennis Preiser wrote:
On Tue, Jul 26, 2022 at 04:53:28PM +0200, Fourhundred Thecat wrote:
I have following index_format:
set size_show_mb
index-format-hook size_flags "~z -1M" " "
index-format-hook size_flags "~z >1M" "%5c
On Tue, Jul 26, 2022 at 04:53:28PM +0200, Fourhundred Thecat wrote:
> I have following index_format:
>
> index_format="%{%Y-%b-%d %H:%M} %?X?(%X)& ? %-25.25F %.96s %> %5c"
>
> I would like to make following change to the last column, where message
> siz
Hello,
I have following index_format:
index_format="%{%Y-%b-%d %H:%M} %?X?(%X)& ? %-25.25F %.96s %> %5c"
I would like to make following change to the last column, where message
size is shown:
1) if message size is less than 0.1M, show empty column
2) if message size is mo
ript to extract
>>>the name part of the full address?
>>>
>>>set index_format="%D %@from_part@ %S %?M?(%M) ?%?H?[%H] ?%s%* %?y? y?
>>> %4c"
>>>index-format-hook from_part '%f polyname' "~/bin/extractname '%f'|"
>>>i
On 29Jul2020 09:13, Cameron Simpson wrote:
>On 28Jul2020 13:27, Kevin J. McCarthy wrote:
>>On Tue, Jul 28, 2020 at 12:52:02PM +1000, Cameron Simpson wrote:
>>>What I would rather do is keep the full name in my alias, but have some
>>>kind of $index_format format str
[I'm moving this into a separate thread, because it doesn't directly
help Leho.]
Here's a little bit of new functionality I've added to master for the
next release. I just wanted to give a peek. (Both require enabling
$muttlisp_inline_eval).
Three-way $index_format toggle. (The index
On 28Jul2020 13:27, Kevin J. McCarthy wrote:
>On Tue, Jul 28, 2020 at 12:52:02PM +1000, Cameron Simpson wrote:
>>What I would rather do is keep the full name in my alias, but have some
>>kind of $index_format format string which accesses the "raw" full name
>>
On Tue, Jul 28, 2020 at 12:52:02PM +1000, Cameron Simpson wrote:
What I would rather do is keep the full name in my alias, but have some
kind of $index_format format string which accesses the "raw" full name
from the message header instead of the name from $reverse_alias.
Is this pos
es. This is goming
to be fragile for me, and feels hacky.
I looked at using the recent %@macro@ syntax, here's part of my attempt
there:
set index_format="%D %@from_part@ %S %?M?(%M) ?%?H?[%H] ?%s%* %?y? y? %4c"
index-format-hook from_part '%f polyname' 'ZZ%F'
index
Hi,
Thanks for your answer.
Le 10-06-2020, à 09:58:05 -0700, Kevin J. McCarthy a écrit :
On Wed, Jun 10, 2020 at 04:11:58PM +0200, steve wrote:
When forwarding a message to recipient R, that message is listed as the
author (me) since I defined $index_format with the %n variable. This is
fine
On Wed, Jun 10, 2020 at 04:11:58PM +0200, steve wrote:
When forwarding a message to recipient R, that message is listed as the
author (me) since I defined $index_format with the %n variable. This is
fine when I create a message or reply to a message, but it would be more
convenient to see
Hi,
When forwarding a message to recipient R, that message is listed as the
author (me) since I defined $index_format with the %n variable. This is
fine when I create a message or reply to a message, but it would be more
convenient to see the recipient's name when I forward a message.
So
On 18.06.15 16:55, Alan Mackenzie wrote:
Just as a matter of interest, when I hit F1 in mutt, I get the error
message:
sh: sensible-pager: command not found
gzip: /usr/share/doc/mutt/manual.txt.gz: No such file or directory
Press any key to continue...
The manual is actually at
Hello, Michael.
On Thu, Jun 18, 2015 at 12:41:22PM +0200, Michael Tatge wrote:
Hi Allen,
* On Thu, Jun 18, 2015 10:23AM + Alan Mackenzie (a...@muc.de) muttered:
The default value of the configuration variable index_format is
%4C %Z %{%b %d} %-15.15L (%?l?%4l%4c?) %s
On Thu, Jun 18, 2015 at 08:45:14PM +1000, Erik Christiansen wrote:
On 18.06.15 10:23, Alan Mackenzie wrote:
The parentheses are literal characters, but what do all the ?s
mean?
In the manual, section: 30.2. Conditionals
Just searching the manual for $? gets there quite quickly, without
On 18.06.15 09:47, Jon LaBadie wrote:
I was certain you meant %?. But to be certain I looked at my
manual.txt and searched for '$?'. There were tons of them.
Yet there were zero '$?' in my manual.html.
Jon, you're spot on. Sorry for the typo. (Late in the day, when
there's too little
Hello, Erik.
On Fri, Jun 19, 2015 at 01:35:57AM +1000, Erik Christiansen wrote:
The manual I use; just hit F1 in mutt, does (AIUI) a
zcat /usr/share/doc/mutt/manual.txt.gz
but a search found no \$\? there. (So circumstances have conspired to
confuse.)
Just as a matter of interest, when I
Hello, mutt.
I'm using mutt 1.5.23.
The default value of the configuration variable index_format is
%4C %Z %{%b %d} %-15.15L (%?l?%4l%4c?) %s.
My personal value is similar. The construct (%?l?%4l%4c?) puzzles
me. The parentheses are literal characters, but what do all the ?s
mean
Am 2015-06-18 12:23, schrieb Alan Mackenzie:
Hello, mutt.
I'm using mutt 1.5.23.
The default value of the configuration variable index_format is
%4C %Z %{%b %d} %-15.15L (%?l?%4l%4c?) %s.
My personal value is similar. The construct (%?l?%4l%4c?) puzzles
me. The parentheses are literal
Hi Allen,
* On Thu, Jun 18, 2015 10:23AM + Alan Mackenzie (a...@muc.de) muttered:
The default value of the configuration variable index_format is
%4C %Z %{%b %d} %-15.15L (%?l?%4l%4c?) %s.
The construct (%?l?%4l%4c?) puzzles me. The parentheses are
literal characters, but what
On 18.06.15 10:23, Alan Mackenzie wrote:
The parentheses are literal characters, but what do all the ?s
mean?
In the manual, section: 30.2. Conditionals
Just searching the manual for $? gets there quite quickly, without any
knowledge of its existence.
Erik
--
Looking into the UN's crystal
emails in the index but you can colour different email entries
differently.
Actually, it is. If you set index_format to a shell command that
ends with a pipe, that Mutt will run that shell command for each
message and use the output as the actual index_format. If you pass
index_format
= On [2011-11-08 09:13:27 -0800]:
Gary Johnson Said:
On 2011-11-08, Gregor Zattler wrote:
Hi stardiviner,
* stardiviner [08. Nov. 2011]:
= On [2011-11-08 11:40:18 +0100]:
* stardiviner [08. Nov. 2011]:
Is there other way to set different *index_format* for mails
entries
differently.
Actually, it is. If you set index_format to a shell command that
ends with a pipe, that Mutt will run that shell command for each
message and use the output as the actual index_format. If you pass
index_format expandos as arguments, Mutt will pass the expanded
string. The shell
On 2011-11-09, stardiviner wrote:
= On [2011-11-08 09:13:27 -0800]:
Gary Johnson Said:
You can also use conditional elements in index_format that will
print different pieces of information depending on the values of
other pieces of information. This is explained in the mutt manual
Hi stardiviner,
* stardiviner numbch...@gmail.com [08. Nov. 2011]:
I try to set different *index_format* for maials. like this:
message-hook ~g set index_format = ' A %H %C| +%N [%4Z] %-13L %s %
%4c' # signed
message-hook ~g set index_format = ' B %H %C| %N [%4Z] %-13L %s
= On [2011-11-08 11:40:18 +0100]:
Gregor Zattler Said:
Hi stardiviner,
* stardiviner numbch...@gmail.com [08. Nov. 2011]:
I try to set different *index_format* for maials. like this:
message-hook ~g set index_format = ' A %H %C| +%N [%4Z] %-13L %s
% %4c' # signed
Hi stardiviner,
* stardiviner numbch...@gmail.com [08. Nov. 2011]:
= On [2011-11-08 11:40:18 +0100]:
* stardiviner numbch...@gmail.com [08. Nov. 2011]:
Is there other way to set different *index_format* for mails ?
index_format describes the format of your index which shows
(normally
= On [2011-11-08 14:13:05 +0100]:
Gregor Zattler Said:
Hi stardiviner,
* stardiviner numbch...@gmail.com [08. Nov. 2011]:
= On [2011-11-08 11:40:18 +0100]:
* stardiviner numbch...@gmail.com [08. Nov. 2011]:
Is there other way to set different *index_format* for mails ?
index_format
On Tue, Nov 08, 2011 at 02:13:05PM +0100, Gregor Zattler wrote:
It's not possible to change the index format for individual
emails in the index but you can colour different email entries
differently.
Actually, it is. If you set index_format to a shell command that ends
with a pipe, that Mutt
On 2011-11-08, Gregor Zattler wrote:
Hi stardiviner,
* stardiviner [08. Nov. 2011]:
= On [2011-11-08 11:40:18 +0100]:
* stardiviner [08. Nov. 2011]:
Is there other way to set different *index_format* for mails ?
index_format describes the format of your index which shows
(normally
Quoth Gary Johnson on Tuesday, 08 November 2011:
On 2011-11-08, Gregor Zattler wrote:
Hi stardiviner,
* stardiviner [08. Nov. 2011]:
= On [2011-11-08 11:40:18 +0100]:
* stardiviner [08. Nov. 2011]:
Is there other way to set different *index_format* for mails ?
index_format
* On 08 Nov 2011, Chip Camden wrote:
As an example, I have this string as part of my index_format.
%?X?* ?
If the number of attachments (X) is non-zero, * is inserted.
Otherwise, is inserted.
That doesn't seem to work for me (it always prints the *). What versions
On 2011-11-08, Chip Camden wrote:
Quoth Gary Johnson on Tuesday, 08 November 2011:
As an example, I have this string as part of my index_format.
%?X?* ?
If the number of attachments (X) is non-zero, * is inserted.
Otherwise, is inserted.
That doesn't seem to work for me
* On 08 Nov 2011, Gary Johnson wrote:
I don't know--I've been out of the development loop for a while.
I've used conditionals in my status_format for a long time, at least
as far back as 1.4.2.2i. I think the %X sequence may be fairly
recent, though, introduced in 1.5.something. I
index_format to a shell command that
ends with a pipe, that Mutt will run that shell command for each
message and use the output as the actual index_format. If you pass
index_format expandos as arguments, Mutt will pass the expanded
string. The shell command could then use that to emit different
= On [2011-11-08 09:13:27 -0800]:
Gary Johnson Said:
On 2011-11-08, Gregor Zattler wrote:
Hi stardiviner,
* stardiviner [08. Nov. 2011]:
= On [2011-11-08 11:40:18 +0100]:
* stardiviner [08. Nov. 2011]:
Is there other way to set different *index_format* for mails
I try to set different *index_format* for maials. like this:
message-hook ~g set index_format = ' A %H %C| +%N [%4Z] %-13L %s %
%4c' # signed
message-hook ~g set index_format = ' B %H %C| %N [%4Z] %-13L %s %
%4c' # replied
This does not work. But folder-hook can set different
I want to set different index_format for different mails.
Just like set different index_format for different mailbox.
Like this example:
folder-hook \!set index_format = '%H %C| %N [%4Z] %-13L » %s %
%4c'
folder-hook =INBOX set index_format = '➤ %H %C| ✣%N [%4Z] %-13L » %s
I want to set different index_format for different mails.
Just like set different index_format for different mailbox.
Like this example:
folder-hook \!set index_format = '%H %C| %N [%4Z] %-13L » %s %
%4c'
folder-hook =INBOX set index_format = '➤ %H %C| ✣%N [%4Z] %-13L » %s
Hi,
Is there any way that mutt can expand for example %{fmt} variable in
push command?
Here is example, message under cursor is from year 2011, I'm executing
following command in mutt 1.5.21:
:push change-folder=Archives/%{!%Y}enter
and I would like that mutt will do command equivalent
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Monday, February 2 at 12:21 PM, quoth Paul E Condon:
I'm puzzled by the default index_format which is, I think:
set index_format=%4C %Z %{%b %d} %-15.15L (%?l?%4l%4c?) %s
I don't understand the string inside parentheses. Where can
I find
On 2009-02-02, Paul E Condon pecon...@mesanetworks.net wrote:
I'm puzzled by the default index_format which is, I think:
set index_format=%4C %Z %{%b %d} %-15.15L (%?l?%4l%4c?) %s
I don't understand the string inside parentheses. Where can
I find an explanation? Question marks often invoke
I'm puzzled by the default index_format which is, I think:
set index_format=%4C %Z %{%b %d} %-15.15L (%?l?%4l%4c?) %s
I don't understand the string inside parentheses. Where can
I find an explanation? Question marks often invoke some sort
of conditional action, but I don't see them in printf
* On Mon, Feb 02, 2009 12:21PM -0700 Paul E Condon (pecon...@mesanetworks.net)
muttered:
set index_format=%4C %Z %{%b %d} %-15.15L (%?l?%4l%4c?) %s
I don't understand the string inside parentheses. Where can
I find an explanation? Question marks often invoke some sort
of conditional action
In the manual at www.mutt.org/doc/manual, there is no section 3.277.
But there is documantation of status_format in section 6.1 and it describes the
use of the question mark. The description of status_format in the man page also
describes the use of the question mark.
Thanks to all
--
Paul E
Thanks for your help, but i know the page of Gary Johnson. My question
is, if there is a possibility to show the expire-date at the index
(index_format).
Sorry about the encrypted signature, but iam working at a university and
this is my standard to send mails. So now without signature.
Toni
* Anton Achatz anton.ach...@fh-deggendorf.de [01-26-09 08:58]:
Thanks for your help, but i know the page of Gary Johnson. My question
is, if there is a possibility to show the expire-date at the index
(index_format).
Sorry about the encrypted signature, but iam working at a university
Hi,
I'm using the mutt-utils (mutt-expires-editor) to set an expire date in
the mail. Is it possible to show this date in the index?
greetings
Toni
smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME cryptographic signature
=- Christian Mongeau wrote on Sat 10.Jan'09 at 17:27:01 +0100 -=
How can I change the $date_format in the index after setting it
with a reply-hook?
Maybe replace your send key with a macro to reset date_format
after sending.
--
© Rado S. -- You must provide YOUR effort for your goal!
EVERY
On Mon, Jan 12, 2009 at 10:27:44AM +0100, Rado S wrote:
=- Christian Mongeau wrote on Sat 10.Jan'09 at 17:27:01 +0100 -=
How can I change the $date_format in the index after setting it
with a reply-hook?
Maybe replace your send key with a macro to reset date_format
after sending.
Ah,
Hi List,
I'd like to have date_format=%d/%b %H:%M in the message index and a
more detailed one (date_format=!%a, %b %d, %Y at %I:%M:%S%p %Z) in
the $attribution. I tried this:
folder-hook . 'set date_format=%d/%b %H:%M'
reply-hook . 'set date_format=!%a, %b %d, %Y at %I:%M:%S%p %Z'
but I read
On Fri, Jun 20, 2008 at 7:42 PM, David Champion [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Is there any way to setup mutt (the date_format variable?) such that
in the index view, the year is shown only if the year of the message
is different from the current year? The default %d shows only the
Month date.
Is there any way to setup mutt (the date_format variable?) such that
in the index view, the year is shown only if the year of the message
is different from the current year? The default %d shows only the
Month date.
You need the date_conditional patch to make date formats conditional
upon
On 20 Jun 2008 12:42 -0500, by [EMAIL PROTECTED] (David Champion):
You need the date_conditional patch to make date formats conditional
upon relative date offsets, but even so you can only say in the last 6
months or the like -- not in the current year.
I haven't looked at this particular
Hi,
Is there any way to setup mutt (the date_format variable?) such that
in the index view, the year is shown only if the year of the message
is different from the current year? The default %d shows only the
Month date.
Thanks,
SK
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Saturday, June 7 at 12:27 PM, quoth Rado S:
=- Kyle Wheeler wrote on Fri 6.Jun'08 at 16:36:22 -0500 -=
I use folder-hooks to set the index_format; for example, in
folders of mailing list messages, I use an index_format that
always shows
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Friday, June 6 at 07:56 PM, quoth [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Thus spake Kyle Wheeler [06/06/08 @ 16.36.22 -0500]:
Does anyone know how to set a hook to change the index_format in the
Postponed Messages selector?
I use folder-hooks to set
Thus spake Kyle Wheeler [06/07/08 @ 14.37.40 -0500]:
On Friday, June 6 at 07:56 PM, quoth [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Thus spake Kyle Wheeler [06/06/08 @ 16.36.22 -0500]:
Does anyone know how to set a hook to change the index_format in the
Postponed Messages selector?
I use folder-hooks
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hey,
Does anyone know how to set a hook to change the index_format in the
Postponed Messages selector?
I use folder-hooks to set the index_format; for example, in folders of
mailing list messages, I use an index_format that always shows
Thus spake Kyle Wheeler [06/06/08 @ 16.36.22 -0500]:
Does anyone know how to set a hook to change the index_format in the
Postponed Messages selector?
I use folder-hooks to set the index_format; for example, in folders of
mailing list messages, I use an index_format that always shows
Is it possible to show in index display which email has an attachment?
I was looking for a solution but it seems to me I need to install a
patch in order to show this information in index_format.
This page indicate I would need this patch in order to show this
information:
http
* Joseph on Saturday, October 06, 2007 at 00:48:00 -0600
Is it possible to show in index display which email has an attachment?
I was looking for a solution but it seems to me I need to install a
patch in order to show this information in index_format.
Your version of Mutt should already have
in index_format.
Your version of Mutt should already have the patch included.
Experiment with %X in index format, and have a look at the, you
know, fine manual:
%X
number of qualifying MIME parts in this part and its children
(please see the ``attachments'' section for possible
set my index like this it displays
0 on all files, even the one with attachments.
set index_format=%4C %Z %d %X %-15.15n (%?l?%4l%4c?) %s
Did you properly configure all 'attachment' commands (see the system
Muttrc file for examples) or did you just add '%X' to $index_format?
You have
Did you properly configure all 'attachment' commands (see the system Muttrc
file for examples) or did you just add '%X' to $index_format?
You have to tell mutt what an you consider an attachment before %X does
display the counts in $index_format.
Right. You can type :attachments
On 10/06/07 13:44, David Champion wrote:
Right. You can type :attachments ? (no quotes) into mutt to see
what settings it has now. The defaults come from the system
muttrc:
Current attachments settings:
attachments +A */.*
attachments -A text/x-vcard
attachments -A application/pgp.*
On 2007-10-06, Joseph [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Thanks Dave for the example, no my muttrc did not come with these
defaults, and yes it works now.
It displays attachments but is there a way to suppress the 0 if there is
no attachment.
The 'index_format' accepts conditional elements, so
Thanks Dave for the example, no my muttrc did not come with these
defaults, and yes it works now.
These defaults are installed when you build from source. Are you
using a distributed package? If so, sounds like someone oopsed.
It displays attachments but is there a way to suppress the 0
move=no
set index_format=%4C %Z %{%b %d} %-16.16L %s
and that is all. Though, there is a pointer to Gentoo Mutt Guide which
is very, very good example in explaining the basics and if a user want
something fancy we need to pull our sleeves up get to work :-)
Though they have one
re bonjour,
dans set index_format=%4C %Z %[!%d/%m] %-17.17F (%3l) %s
%3l me renvoie tjrs 0 alors qu'il devrait me renvoyer le nombre de
ligne non ?
--
Philippe Monroux
Ile de la Reunion
E 55.3 S 21.5
Bonjour,
Le mer 06 oct 2004, à 10 h 37 min 38 s (UTC +0200),
vous (Loïc Minier [EMAIL PROTECTED])
avez écrit :
%3l me renvoie tjrs 0 alors qu'il devrait me renvoyer le nombre de
ligne non ?
Il me semble qu'il utilises le header Lines: (mais je n'ai pas
vérifié). J'ai ça dans mon
bonjour,
Dans muttrc quand je mets :
set index_format=%4C %Z %[!%d/%m] %-17.17F (%3l) %s
ça marche bien mais lorsque je mets :
folder-hook sent set index_format=%4C %Z %[!%d/%m] %-17.17t (%3l) %s
pour changer le format d'affichage de l'index de la boite des mails
envoyés (sent)
là cela ne
On Tue, 24 Sep 2002, Sven Guckes wrote:
set index_format=%4C %Z %[!%y%m%d] %-17.17F (%3l) %s
you are mixing up %Z with %F there. rtfm.
thank you Sven. I read the fine manual a few times and can't find
--you know, it's part of human nature to make the same mistake more
than once
On Wed, Sep 25, 2002 at 12:42:36PM -0700, Rob Lingelbach wrote:
set index_format=%4C %Z %[!%y%m%d] %-17.17F (%3l) %s
thank you Sven. I read the fine manual a few times and can't find
--you know, it's part of human nature to make the same mistake more
than once, according to physicist
is there a way to use 'subscribe' and index_format to have
the 'L' flag on a message to show it's from a list, but
instead of having the string To list returned,
return the name of the author, as would happen if I didn't
have the list subscribed? in other words i like the L flag
* Rob Lingelbach [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2002-09-24 13:08]:
is there a way to use 'subscribe' and index_format to have the 'L' flag
on a message to show it's from a list, but instead of having the string
To list returned, return the name of the author, as would happen if
I didn't have the list
index_format=%d %t (%3l) %s
Works here.
Why not use %v or %L instead ot %t? So you wouldn't have to use
folder-hooks, I guess, because %v makes exactly the distinction
you'd like to have.
If I use this line:
folder-hook sentbox set index_format=%d %s
Hmm, you could try enclosing the command
I want my sentbox folder to show me the recipient's name,
the date, etc. So I use this line in .muttrc. But all I get are blank
lines.
folder-hook sentbox set index_format=%d %t (%3l) %s
If I use this line:
folder-hook sentbox set index_format=%d %s
All I get is the date. What am I
Hi,
* Michael Montagne [04/17/02 20:25:08 CEST] wrote:
I want my sentbox folder to show me the recipient's name,
the date, etc. So I use this line in .muttrc. But all I get are blank
lines.
folder-hook sentbox set index_format=%d %t (%3l) %s
Works here.
Why not use %v or %L instead
Hi,
On Fri, 18 Jan 2002 Hanspeter Roth spewed into the ether:
Some mailinglists prefix every subject with the name of the list.
Is it possible to suppress this prefix in the index_format? How?
Or is this a case for procmail?
This works for me :
http://www.symonds.net/~prahladv/files
Some mailinglists prefix every subject with the name of the list.
Is it possible to suppress this prefix in the index_format? How?
Or is this a case for procmail?
-Hanspeter
On Freitag, 18. Jan. 2002 at 19:08:45, Hanspeter Roth wrote:
Some mailinglists prefix every subject with the name of the list.
Is it possible to suppress this prefix in the index_format? How?
Or is this a case for procmail?
Hello Hanspeter,
I have this procmail recipe for the german
Hanspeter Roth wrote:
Some mailinglists prefix every subject with the name of the list.
Is it possible to suppress this prefix in the index_format? How?
Or is this a case for procmail?
It's more efficient to do it with procmail since you only have to do the
operation once at delivery time.
* Michael Elkins ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
Hanspeter Roth wrote:
Some mailinglists prefix every subject with the name of the list.
Is it possible to suppress this prefix in the index_format? How? Or
is this a case for procmail?
It's more efficient to do it with procmail since you only
Thomas Hurst wrote:
Some of us are alergic to subject mangling like this (and there's no
knowing what the mailing list will do if we strip it entirely); and
Can you give an example of some mail list software which is dependent upon
the format of the subject header field? Given the wide
On 2002.01.19, in [EMAIL PROTECTED],
Thomas Hurst [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
* Michael Elkins ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
Hanspeter Roth wrote:
Some mailinglists prefix every subject with the name of the list.
Is it possible to suppress this prefix in the index_format? How
I'd like to make the index_format show number (or existence) of attachment in
message, but failed to find a way.
It is usual to see a mark of attachment in GUI MUA's, isn't it? Could
mutt do it?
charlie
sorts the mail to), the format doesn't seem to be obeyed. The main
thing that's frustrating is that I don't see the %Z message info (like
T for thread, etc.).
I think after digging around in /usr/doc/mutt, some more, I need to
modify my question... I think that probably, %Z is working, it's
On Fri Dec 14, 2001 at 11:21:24AM -0600, Kenneth Pronovici wrote:
[...snip...]
The main thing that's frustrating is that I don't see the %Z message info (like
T for thread, etc.).
T for Thread? Unless I'm utterly mistaken (in which place I apologize
for sticking my foot in my ...), T
Do you have the line
set to_chars= +TCF
in your .muttrc?
[nothing]= not to you
+ = To you
T = CC you
F = From you
hope this helps
I didn't, and yes (duh) it explains why I didn't see T in my mail list
folders (none of the messages were to me). I'll make this transition
On Fri, Dec 14, 2001 at 07:53:11PM +0100, Martin Karlsson [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
[nothing]= not to you
+ = To you
T = CC you
F = From you
The Fine Manual says:
+ message is to you and you only
T message is to you, but also to or cc'ed to others
C message is cc'ed to you
On Sat Dec 15, 2001 at 12:21:10AM +0100, Nicolas Rachinsky wrote:
On Fri, Dec 14, 2001 at 07:53:11PM +0100, Martin Karlsson [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
[nothing]= not to you
+ = To you
T = CC you
F = From you
The Fine Manual says:
+ message is to you and you only
T message
Seems my foot was only half-way in... ;-) (see my previous post)
I think I shall spend the next few hours Reading The Friendly Manual!
Yeah, don't feel bad. I'll join you.
KEN
--
Kenneth J. Pronovici [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Personal Homepage: http://www.skyjammer.com/~pronovic/
They that can
by default, mutt displays the lines count in the index listing. the %c
format option allows the display of the size in bytes. is there anyway
to have mutt display size in kb, possibly rounded to 2 significant
figures, or an accuracy of 0.1?
mutt-users, please CC me on the reply.
thanks,
--
have
time to decode which letter it is now, but here's mine:
set index_format=%4C %Z %{%b %d} %-15.15F (%4c) %s
you rock! i saw %c and tried it, but it wouldn't succeed. i mean, it
did work, but i had hooks overriding it. so now it's beautuitous!
--
martin; (greetings from
On Wed, Oct 03, 2001 at 03:42:46PM, Shawn D. McPeek wrote:
{ hdr_format, DT_SYN, R_NONE, UL index_format, 0 },
The DT_SYN meens hdr_format is the same as index_format. Here are some
other examples of DT_SYNs:
edit_hdrs and edit_headers
forw_decode and forward_decode
hi,
if I look in the mutt manual, I can find the definition of index_format
but not hdr_format.
They seems to do the same but what's the difference between them ?
cu,
binny
--
Para La Queja Mexica
Este Sueño De America
Celebramos La Aluna
De Siempre, Ahorita
-- Bertrand Cantat, Tostaky
On 2001.10.03, in [EMAIL PROTECTED],
Benjamin Michotte [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
hi,
if I look in the mutt manual, I can find the definition of index_format
but not hdr_format.
They seems to do the same but what's the difference between them ?
They're synonymous. From init.h
1 - 100 of 169 matches
Mail list logo
