On Mon, Jan 28, 2002 at 08:38:45PM -0600, Jeremy Blosser wrote:
Yeah, you can do some great stuff with that. My own settings do the
following:
Sounds great, maybe you could send part of your muttrc responsible for
such colors?
--
_.|._ |_ _. | Adam Byrtek, [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Jan 29, [EMAIL PROTECTED] [[EMAIL PROTECTED]] wrote:
On Mon, Jan 28, 2002 at 08:38:45PM -0600, Jeremy Blosser wrote:
Yeah, you can do some great stuff with that. My own settings do the
following:
Sounds great, maybe you could send part of your muttrc responsible for
such colors?
On Tue, Jan 29, 2002 at 09:35:26AM -0600, Jeremy Blosser wrote:
Sounds great, maybe you could send part of your muttrc responsible for
such colors?
Heh, here. There are some comments at the top about the verbosity of the
way it's done.
Thanks a lot, BTW I'm still being amazed by mutt's
On 28/01/02, from the brain of Justin R. Miller tumbled:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Thus spake Nicholas A. Martini ([EMAIL PROTECTED]):
folder-hook lists 'color index brightmagenta default ~x
mithrandir.codesorcery.net !~P'
Can you explain how this works? I
On Jan 29, Michael Montagne [[EMAIL PROTECTED]] wrote:
folder-hook lists 'color index brightmagenta default ~x
mithrandir.codesorcery.net !~P'
Can you explain how this works?
It matches if the References: header (specified by the ~x pattern) contains
the pattern
in message [EMAIL PROTECTED],
wrote parv thusly...
in message [EMAIL PROTECTED],
wrote Justin R. Miller thusly...
...
folder-hook . push 'T~N~P\n;N\n\ct.\n'
Note that this is untested, but what I think I'm trying to do is, upon
entering a folder, tag all new messages that were
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Thus spake parv ([EMAIL PROTECTED]):
there is a problem w/ jrm's version, and will be w/ my version if
tag-pattern is changed from ~P to ~N~P.
problem is when no ~N~P messages are found, tag-prefix fails.
then regardless of tag-prefix failure,
* On Tue, Jan 29, 2002 at 03:25:32PM -0500,
* Justin R. Miller [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Thus spake parv ([EMAIL PROTECTED]):
problem is when no ~N~P messages are found, tag-prefix fails.
then regardless of tag-prefix failure, N flag is toggled, or
cleared, of the first new/unread message.
Hi,
On Mon, 28 Jan 2002 Jeremy Blosser spewed into the ether:
On Jan 28, Nicholas A. Martini [[EMAIL PROTECTED]] wrote:
does anyone know how to make mutt show messages from yoursef (or another
address) show up as read, or not new, or something? it would be handy
for high-volume lists.
in message [EMAIL PROTECTED],
wrote Nicolas Rachinsky thusly...
* On Tue, Jan 29, 2002 at 03:25:32PM -0500,
* Justin R. Miller [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Thus spake parv ([EMAIL PROTECTED]):
problem is when no ~N~P messages are found, tag-prefix fails.
then regardless of tag-prefix
in message [EMAIL PROTECTED],
wrote parv thusly...
in message [EMAIL PROTECTED],
wrote Nicolas Rachinsky thusly...
* Justin R. Miller [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
...
Without conditional checking (which is lacking in Mutt), I
don't know of a way around this...
the topic is for lack of a better discription.
does anyone know how to make mutt show messages from yoursef (or another
address) show up as read, or not new, or something? it would be handy
for high-volume lists.
nk
--
Nicholas A. Martini [Autonomous Drone #AD-2918787-REJ]
Redhat
On Jan 28, Nicholas A. Martini [[EMAIL PROTECTED]] wrote:
does anyone know how to make mutt show messages from yoursef (or another
address) show up as read, or not new, or something? it would be handy
for high-volume lists.
depends... if you mean to do it at any given time, use:
T
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Thus spake Nicholas A. Martini ([EMAIL PROTECTED]):
does anyone know how to make mutt show messages from yoursef (or
another address) show up as read, or not new, or something? it would
be handy for high-volume lists.
Well, as for something, I
On Jan 28, Justin R. Miller [[EMAIL PROTECTED]] wrote:
Thus spake Nicholas A. Martini ([EMAIL PROTECTED]):
does anyone know how to make mutt show messages from yoursef (or
another address) show up as read, or not new, or something? it would
be handy for high-volume lists.
Well, as for
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Thus spake Justin R. Miller ([EMAIL PROTECTED]):
Thus spake Nicholas A. Martini ([EMAIL PROTECTED]):
does anyone know how to make mutt show messages from yoursef (or
another address) show up as read, or not new, or something? it would
be
On Mon, Jan 28, 2002 at 10:37:34PM -0500, Justin R. Miller wrote:
I just now realized that I think you're not trying to colorize or
otherwise indicate messages from you, but instead just mark them read.
Maybe something like this:
folder-hook . push 'T~N~P\n;N\n\ct.\n'
Note that
Justin --
...and then Justin R. Miller said...
%
% -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
% Hash: SHA1
%
% Thus spake Justin R. Miller ([EMAIL PROTECTED]):
%
% Thus spake Nicholas A. Martini ([EMAIL PROTECTED]):
%
% does anyone know how to make mutt show messages from yoursef (or
% another
On Jan 28, David T-G [[EMAIL PROTECTED]] wrote:
...and then Justin R. Miller said...
% folder-hook . push 'T~N~P\n;N\n\ct.\n'
You'd want to clear the new flag instead of toggle it, or when he entered
the folder a second time all of his old new messages would be new and
then his new new
Jeremy Justin --
...and then Jeremy Blosser said...
%
% On Jan 28, David T-G [[EMAIL PROTECTED]] wrote:
% ...and then Justin R. Miller said...
% % folder-hook . push 'T~N~P\n;N\n\ct.\n'
%
% You'd want to clear the new flag instead of toggle it, or when he entered
...
%
% I had the same
in message [EMAIL PROTECTED],
wrote Justin R. Miller thusly...
Thus spake Nicholas A. Martini ([EMAIL PROTECTED]):
does anyone know how to make mutt show messages from yoursef (or
another address) show up as read, or not new, or something? it would
be handy for high-volume lists.
On Jan 29, parv [[EMAIL PROTECTED]] wrote:
when you want something done, you have to do it yourself.
enough w/ all the fudging! given all the guesses flying around, i
fed up and tried on my own. so here it is...
Er, what fudging? What you have is pretty much identical to what was
in message [EMAIL PROTECTED],
wrote Justin R. Miller thusly...
...
I just now realized that I think you're not trying to colorize or
otherwise indicate messages from you, but instead just mark them read.
Maybe something like this:
folder-hook . push 'T~N~P\n;N\n\ct.\n'
Note that
in message [EMAIL PROTECTED],
wrote Jeremy Blosser thusly...
On Jan 29, parv [[EMAIL PROTECTED]] wrote:
...
enough w/ all the fudging! given all the guesses flying around, i
fed up and tried on my own. so here it is...
Er, what fudging? What you have is pretty much identical to what
On Jan 29, parv [[EMAIL PROTECTED]] wrote:
in message [EMAIL PROTECTED],
wrote Justin R. Miller thusly...
folder-hook . push 'T~N~P\n;N\n\ct.\n'
i tried the above which works (1.3.25i), or at least worked once.
can anybody enlighten me why the variation below does not?
folder-hook
in message [EMAIL PROTECTED],
wrote Jeremy Blosser thusly...
On Jan 29, parv [[EMAIL PROTECTED]] wrote:
in message [EMAIL PROTECTED],
wrote Justin R. Miller thusly...
folder-hook . push 'T~N~P\n;N\n\ct.\n'
i tried the above which works (1.3.25i), or at least worked once.
can
26 matches
Mail list logo
