* Charles Jie [EMAIL PROTECTED] [27-12-2001 05:32]:
| I've tried to auto-move all messages To: or CC: to
| [EMAIL PROTECTED] into a mailbox =mutt. But the following trial
| failed:
|
| save-hook ~C mutt-users +mutt
|
| or
|
| save-hook ~Cmutt-users +mutt
My muttrc says:
save-hook '~C
On Thu, Dec 27, 2001 at 01:36:51PM +0800, Charles Jie (dis)graced my inbox with:
You should not keep that many messages in a working 'folder' (indeed
file). You'd better initialize a new one for high traffic folder
yearly, quarterly or even monthly.
I agree, I automatically move all my old
hi folks,
first, please CC me on replies as i am not subscribed to mutt-users...
i am using 1.3.24 and i get annoyed by the new way of displaying
threaded messages in the index. for instance, this is an excerpt of
my current inbox, sender abbreviated to make textwidth == 76...
41 NP Dec 25
Philip --
...and then Philip Mak said...
%
% On Wed, 26 Dec 2001, David T-G wrote:
%
% Your MDA will also escape any ^From_ in the body to avoid confusion with
% a message separator line -- if it's delivering to an mbox file.
%
% That doesn't seem to be true. For example, in one of my
Charlie --
...and then Charles Jie said...
%
% Hi,
Hello!
%
% I've tried to auto-move all messages To: or CC: to [EMAIL PROTECTED] into a
mailbox =mutt. But the following trial failed:
%
% save-hook ~C mutt-users +mutt
%
% or
%
% save-hook ~Cmutt-users +mutt
If you want to move
On Wed, Dec 26, 2001 at 09:22:33PM -0500 I heard the voice of
David T-G, and lo! it spake thus:
Thus, it should be sufficient to match on any ^From_ line as long as
you're working with an mbox file (which you can confirm by checking the
very first line of the file, which should tell you one
* Charles Jie [EMAIL PROTECTED] [27-12-2001 05:32]:
| I've tried to auto-move all messages To: or CC: to
^
Aargh, I'm reading too fast! Use David's solution instead of mine
(that is, try procmail first, mbox-hook afterwards!)
Bye,
--
René Clerc -
Matthew, et al --
...and then Matthew D. Fuller said...
%
% On Wed, Dec 26, 2001 at 09:22:33PM -0500 I heard the voice of
% David T-G, and lo! it spake thus:
%
% Thus, it should be sufficient to match on any ^From_ line as long as
% you're working with an mbox file (which you can confirm by
Rene --
...and then Rene Clerc said...
%
% * Charles Jie [EMAIL PROTECTED] [27-12-2001 05:32]:
%
% | I've tried to auto-move all messages To: or CC: to
% ^
%
% Aargh, I'm reading too fast! Use David's solution instead of mine
% (that is, try procmail first, mbox-hook
On Thu, Dec 27, 2001 at 06:39:56AM -0500 I heard the voice of
David T-G, and lo! it spake thus:
%
% I was just testing some mbox-parsing code the other day, and I needed a
% quick mbox of reasonable size to test it against. Hey, how about
% ~/mail/sent?
One would think so...
%
%
Matthew --
...and then Matthew D. Fuller said...
%
% On Thu, Dec 27, 2001 at 06:39:56AM -0500 I heard the voice of
% David T-G, and lo! it spake thus:
% %
% % But it's got bare ^From lines in mid-message where they 'naturally'
% % appeared. So, either you need a bit more smarts than just
On Thu, Dec 27, 2001 at 06:54:57AM -0500 I heard the voice of
David T-G, and lo! it spake thus:
% And your regex will break on it too. For instance:
[snipped]
Because of the single space before the day in each header, right? If
that's the case note that I noted it and didn't guarantee
Philip --
...and then Philip Mak said...
%
% Is there a way to make it so that when I use the c command to change to
% a different folder, the original one remains open?
Nope; mutt works on a single folder at a time. You could, however, open
up a second instance of mutt (even one pointing to
On Thu, 27 Dec 2001, Matthew D. Fuller wrote:
Mutt, I guess, outsmarts the mbox by reading Content-Length:, which you'd
pretty much have to do I guess. To me, it just seems like putting too
much trust in the LDA, whatever that may be, but... Then again, why not
trust? mbox is fragile as
Cleber, Philip, et al --
...and then Philip Mak said...
%
% * Cleber S. Mori [EMAIL PROTECTED] [011207 22:32]:
% Mutt have just one problem. It is slow to open folders, because
% it does not cache them. Pine did it, and it feels much more fast.
% I don't know if there is a option for that,
Martin --
...and then martin f krafft said...
%
% hi folks,
% first, please CC me on replies as i am not subscribed to mutt-users...
Done. But you missed the whole new-threading-style discussion because
you weren't here :-)
%
% i am using 1.3.24 and i get annoyed by the new way of
Martin --
...and then martin f krafft said...
%
% also sprach David T-G [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2001.12.27.1307 +0100]:
% ...and then martin f krafft said...
% %
% % hi folks,
% % first, please CC me on replies as i am not subscribed to mutt-users...
%
% Done. But you missed the whole
also sprach David T-G [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2001.12.27.1307 +0100]:
...and then martin f krafft said...
%
% hi folks,
% first, please CC me on replies as i am not subscribed to mutt-users...
Done. But you missed the whole new-threading-style discussion because
you weren't here :-)
right,
I have two inexplicable (though minor) configuration problems.
(1) Vim no longer does syntax highlighting. It isn't major, but it did look
nice.
(2) I can't get my mailing lists to be found. It was found a few hours ago,
and now they aren't. I can't think of anything that has been changed for
* Skylar Thompson [EMAIL PROTECTED] [27-12-2001 14:10]:
| I have two inexplicable (though minor) configuration problems.
|
| (1) Vim no longer does syntax highlighting. It isn't major, but it did look
| nice.
I spotted:
set editor=vim -u ~/.muttvimrc +/^$
in your .muttrc. It would be nice to
Hi!
Somebody can tell me how to write the exact command to send a mail with
an attachment using the command line (mutt), without the need to enter
the vi editor to write the message body???. I need to use a mutt command
to be executed in a UNIX shell ...
Please help me with this problem
Ivan --
...and then Ivan Castillo Escobar said...
%
% Hi!
Hello!
%
% Somebody can tell me how to write the exact command to send a mail with
% an attachment using the command line (mutt), without the need to enter
% the vi editor to write the message body???. I need to use a mutt command
%
Read man mutt.
echo My message | mutt -s ImportantLetter -a Attachment [EMAIL PROTECTED]
You can cat a file to mutt as well.
Joel
On Thu, Dec 27, 2001 at 09:32:05AM -0400, Ivan Castillo Escobar wrote:
Hi!
Somebody can tell me how to write the exact command to send a mail with
an attachment
* Ivan Castillo Escobar [EMAIL PROTECTED] [27-12-2001 14:35]:
| Somebody can tell me how to write the exact command to send a mail with
| an attachment using the command line (mutt), without the need to enter
| the vi editor to write the message body???. I need to use a mutt command
| to be
On Thu, 27 Dec 2001, Ivan Castillo Escobar wrote:
Somebody can tell me how to write the exact command to send a mail with
an attachment using the command line (mutt), without the need to enter
the vi editor to write the message body???. I need to use a mutt command
to be executed in a UNIX
Charles Jie wrote:
I found mutt can not decode qp strings in Subject if there is space in it. Such like
=?big5?Q?Re: =BCW=A5[=B1z=AA=BA=A6=AC=A4J?=
If I change ' ' to '=20', it works.
Does the spec. of qp not allow spaces?
No. Quote from RFC 2047:
IMPORTANT: 'encoded-word's
On Thu, Dec 27, 2001 at 08:29:00AM -0500, Philip Mak wrote:
On Thu, 27 Dec 2001, [iso-8859-1] René Clerc wrote:
* Skylar Thompson [EMAIL PROTECTED] [27-12-2001 14:10]:
| (1) Vim no longer does syntax highlighting. It isn't major, but it did look
| nice.
set editor=vim -u
Jelmer Vernooij [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Try using the lbdb, which has support for bbdb.
I'd like to get away from using BBDB in general, however, since
it's slow. And I've switched from Gnus to Mutt, so abook probably
makes more sense.
Thanks, though.
Sam
Thomas Hurst [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
* Samuel Padgett ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
Does anyone know of a tool to import records from the Insidious Big
Brother Database into abook, or am I condemned to do it by hand (my
penance for using an Emacs-specific address book)?
Write a bit of
Scenario: When I press $ to purge the deleted messages in my mailbox,
and it asks me:
Purge 8 deleted messages? ([yes]/no):
and I answer yes, if new mail has arrived that mutt didn't see yet, it
will show the new mail and *abort* the purge operation. Is this a bug/is
there a workaround for
* Philip Mak ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [Dec 27. 2001 11:10]:
Scenario: When I press $ to purge the deleted messages in my mailbox,
and it asks me:
Purge 8 deleted messages? ([yes]/no):
and I answer yes, if new mail has arrived that mutt didn't see yet, it
will show the new mail and *abort*
On Thu, 27 Dec 2001, Brian Clark wrote:
if new mail has arrived that mutt didn't see yet, it
will show the new mail and *abort* the purge operation. Is this a bug/is
there a workaround for this?
If you don't want to be asked, I think you want this:
### delete
### Type: quadoption
###
On Thu, Dec 27, 2001 at 11:20:07AM -0500, Philip Mak wrote:
On Thu, 27 Dec 2001, Brian Clark wrote:
if new mail has arrived that mutt didn't see yet, it
will show the new mail and *abort* the purge operation. Is this a bug/is
there a workaround for this?
If you don't want to be
* Benjamin Smith [EMAIL PROTECTED] [27-12-2001 17:47]:
| That's not what I was talking about, actually. I was saying that when it
| asks me Purge 8 deleted messages? ([yes]/no): and I answer yes, it DOES
| NOT purge the messages if new mail has just arrived.
|
|
| I've found this
Does anyone have a vim configuration to make writing bullets/lists easier?
e.g. when I'm writing something like this:
--- begin example ---
1. Pick one of the RaQs to be the DNS server.
2. E-mail [EMAIL PROTECTED] and ask him for an additional IP for
that RaQ.
3. When you get the IP, tell me
I was thinking about the merits of keeping one large mailbox, versus
keeping a mailbox that's rotated monthly/quarterly/yearly. Some people
prefer to keep one huge mailbox, and some other people prefer to rotate
it. I'd like to explore the reasons why people do it one way and not the
other.
On Thu, Dec 27, 2001 at 05:53:40PM +0100, René Clerc wrote:
* Benjamin Smith [EMAIL PROTECTED] [27-12-2001 17:47]:
| That's not what I was talking about, actually. I was saying that when it
| asks me Purge 8 deleted messages? ([yes]/no): and I answer yes, it DOES
| NOT purge the messages
On Thu, 27 Dec 2001, Benjamin Smith wrote:
I was thinking of that too, but since mutt still knows how to mark the
messages to be deleted after the purge, why not delete them after the
check... ?
Good question... Currently the code just does this (in
mbox_sync_mailbox):
/* Check to
* Benjamin Smith [EMAIL PROTECTED] [27-12-2001 18:32]:
| I was thinking of that too, but since mutt still knows how to mark the
| messages to be deleted after the purge, why not delete them after the
| check... ?
|
| Good question... Currently the code just does this (in
|
I am not sure how to do that just with vi but:
Since you can easily pass your document through a unix command filter, you
could just write your own sed command to do that for you and bind it to a
key with map.
eg.
:1,5 !tr a-z A-Z makes line 1 to 5 uppercase.
or
:1,10 !sed s/^[a-z].*/ /
Might
* Philip Mak ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
A fine-grained rotation scheme might work better; e.g. I could have
a primary folder that holds the last 3 months of messages, and an
archive folder that holds everything else.
I have a script scan all my mailspools (I use mbox) and move anything
older
Date: Thu, 27 Dec 2001 11:59:46 -0500 (EST)
From: Philip Mak [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Mutt Users' List [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Writing bullets/lists in vim
Does anyone have a vim configuration to make writing bullets/lists easier?
e.g. when I'm writing something like this:
--- begin
On Thu, Dec 27, 2001 at 06:33:53PM +, Thomas Hurst wrote:
* Philip Mak ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
A fine-grained rotation scheme might work better; e.g. I could have
a primary folder that holds the last 3 months of messages, and an
archive folder that holds everything else.
I have
On Donnerstag, 27. Dez. 2001 at 18:33:53, Thomas Hurst wrote:
I have a script scan all my mailspools (I use mbox) and move anything
older than a week to archive/year/mailbox/month-year-mailbox -
this keeps my active mail easily to hand, and searching for older mail's
as easy as I need it to
Philip, et al --
...and then Philip Mak said...
%
% Scenario: When I press $ to purge the deleted messages in my mailbox,
% and it asks me:
%
% Purge 8 deleted messages? ([yes]/no):
%
% and I answer yes, if new mail has arrived that mutt didn't see yet, it
% will show the new mail and *abort*
* Benjamin Smith ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
How does it scan your mailboxes, does it use grep mail or some other
methods? If its short could you perhaps post it?
It reads the file line by line looking for ^From lines.
It's not very well written, but it works. I really should make use of
Philip, et al --
...and then Philip Mak said...
%
...
% I think a better way of handling this would be for mutt to remember what
% messages were marked as deleted when $ was pressed. If the user then
% confirms the deletion but mutt detects a changed mailbox, it should go
% read the mailbox
Philip, et al --
...and then Philip Mak said...
%
% Does anyone have a vim configuration to make writing bullets/lists easier?
% e.g. when I'm writing something like this:
...
% it would be nice if when the line wraps while I'm typing point #2, the
% cursor starts on column 3 instead of column
I was trying to setup mutt to move deleted mail to a mailbox on my IMAP server
named Deleted Items. This would emulate the way the MS-Outlook client
(foisted upon me at the office) works. After searching through the archives
I found some macros that looked like they would do the trick.
On Thu, Dec 27, 2001 at 12:29:34PM -0500, Philip Mak wrote:
I was thinking about the merits of keeping one large mailbox, versus
keeping a mailbox that's rotated monthly/quarterly/yearly. Some people
prefer to keep one huge mailbox, and some other people prefer to rotate
it. I'd like to
On Thu, Dec 27, 2001 at 01:30:08PM +0100, martin f krafft (dis)graced my inbox with:
right, but i am already on two million other high traffic lists, i
would die if i were on mutt. how many messages a day would you say?
Well, mutt is the highest-traffic list I'm on, but I'm only on one or
two
On Thu, Dec 27, 2001 at 07:36:34AM -0500, David T-G (dis)graced my inbox with:
% Done. But you missed the whole new-threading-style discussion because
% you weren't here :-)
%
% right, but i am already on two million other high traffic lists, i
% would die if i were on mutt. how many
On Thu, Dec 27, 2001 at 07:00:02AM -0500, David T-G (dis)graced my inbox with:
% My ~/Maildir/ folder has 1 messages, and my =sent folder has 6000
% messages, so it's slow to switch between them if they get closed each time
% I switch.
I'm not going to suggest that you rotate your mail
On Thu, Dec 27, 2001 at 12:29:34PM -0500, Philip Mak (dis)graced my inbox with:
Reasons I keep my mail in one large mailbox:
- I'm too lazy to go look up how to rotate my mail.
That's no excuse. Maybe the next time I drive by your house, I'll be too
lazy to stop and I'll just drive right
On Thu, 27 Dec 2001, martin f krafft wrote:
okay, i use debian, and i'd rather stick with the packages rather than
patching the source. so i'll wait. but i am glad to know that mutt is
working on it.
I'd grab the deb source and the patch and see if it applys, if it does
you can just build
55 matches
Mail list logo
