mark_old=yes does not work for IMAP folders

2011-12-06 Thread Victor Sudakov
instead of O. Even if I explicitly mark some messages as O, they become N on the second visit to the mailbox. Thank you in advance for any help. -- Victor Sudakov, VAS4-RIPE, VAS47-RIPN sip:suda...@sibptus.tomsk.ru

Re: mark_old=yes does not work for IMAP folders

2011-12-08 Thread Victor Sudakov
Victor Sudakov wrote: After upgrading to mutt-devel-1.5.21_3 from ports (FreebSD 7.4-STABLE) the mark_old=yes option ceased working in IMAP folders (it still works in local mboxes). Now, when I exit an IMAP mailbox without reading some new messages, and then open it again, those messages

Re: mark_old=yes does not work for IMAP folders

2011-12-08 Thread Victor Sudakov
, where mutt could have stored the O flag on the IMAP server and why it doesn't do it now. Might be a change on the server? Absolutely not. It's a change in the mutt version. -- Victor Sudakov, VAS4-RIPE, VAS47-RIPN sip:suda...@sibptus.tomsk.ru

Re: mark_old=yes does not work for IMAP folders

2011-12-08 Thread Victor Sudakov
for sure. I'd suggest you file a bug. Here is a complete IMAP session: http://zalil.ru/32233113 Can you please look what could be wrong with it so that a bug can be filed? -- Victor Sudakov, VAS4-RIPE, VAS47-RIPN sip:suda...@sibptus.tomsk.ru

Re: mark_old=yes does not work for IMAP folders

2011-12-09 Thread Victor Sudakov
packet dump. I expect that mutt should try to save some flags in the second session to mark the unread messages as old, but I don't see it happening. -- Victor Sudakov, VAS4-RIPE, VAS47-RIPN sip:suda...@sibptus.tomsk.ru

Re: mark_old=yes does not work for IMAP folders

2011-12-09 Thread Victor Sudakov
, the workaround which was available in mutt-1.4.2.3_4 (be it the Recent flag or something else) worked perfectly for me. I wish I could have it back. Thanks again. -- Victor Sudakov, VAS4-RIPE, VAS47-RIPN sip:suda...@sibptus.tomsk.ru

Re: Hide a message?

2018-12-12 Thread Victor Sudakov
messages in a mailbox (e.g. ~f from a certain person only, or ~s by subject). But it has never occured to me to use it for showing all messages but one. Can scoring be used for hiding messages? I think not :-( -- Victor Sudakov, VAS4-RIPE, VAS47-RIPN 2:5005/49@fidonet http://vas.tomsk.ru/

Re: [Mutt] Hide a message?

2018-12-12 Thread Victor Sudakov
Mihai Lazarescu wrote: On Wednesday, December 12, 2018 at 19:39:25 +0700, Victor Sudakov wrote: Is there a way to hide a message (e.g. with a certain subject) from view in a mailbox, without actually deleting it? Limit to negated pattern does not work? E.g., to see all messages *except

Re: Hide a message?

2018-12-13 Thread Victor Sudakov
shold_hide alongside with $score_threshold_delete and $score_threshold_read, but I see there is none. -- Victor Sudakov, VAS4-RIPE, VAS47-RIPN 2:5005/49@fidonet http://vas.tomsk.ru/

Re: Hide a message?

2018-12-13 Thread Victor Sudakov
CommuniGate server. My dovecot configuration is simple: "mail_location = mbox:~/Mail:INBOX=/var/mail/%u" If I knew how to convert all this stuff to Maildir storage... Do I have to convert all of them at once? -- Victor Sudakov, VAS4-RIPE, VAS47-RIPN 2:5005/49@fidonet http://vas.tomsk.ru/

Re: format=flowed

2018-12-23 Thread Victor Sudakov
Cameron Simpson wrote: > On 19Dec2018 23:39, Victor Sudakov wrote: > >Christian Ebert wrote: > >>* Victor Sudakov on Wednesday, December 19, 2018 at 19:44:27 +0700: > >>>Cameron Simpson wrote: > >>>>On 19Dec2018 13:05, Victor Sudakov wrote: > &

Re: Hide a message?

2018-12-13 Thread Victor Sudakov
mobile app (AquaMail) for mail access when on the road. Do you have shell access to the server? I do, that's where I use mutt for local access to mailboxes. -- Victor Sudakov, VAS4-RIPE, VAS47-RIPN 2:5005/49@fidonet http://vas.tomsk.ru/

Re: Hide a message?

2018-12-13 Thread Victor Sudakov
Michael Tatge wrote: On 12 December 2018 13:39:25 CET, Victor Sudakov wrote: The dovecot IMAP server keeps its folder (mailbox) metadata as a pseudo-message. When I access those mboxes locally with mutt, I see this pseudo-message but I don't want to. Might be a silly question, but why do

Re: Hide a message?

2018-12-14 Thread Victor Sudakov
Cameron Simpson wrote: On 14Dec2018 11:40, Victor Sudakov wrote: Kurt, once you've mentioned it. How do I create a maildir folder from within mutt if my default $mbox_type is mbox? When I want to create a new folder "foo", I tag some messages and save them to =foo, mutt asks whether

Re: Hide a message?

2018-12-14 Thread Victor Sudakov
rge mboxes, it does not seem fragile or inefficient (from my own experience of supporting a Communigate server at an ISP). OTOH, Communigate is the only process accessing its own mboxes, and they are local, so perhaps this helps. -- Victor Sudakov, VAS4-RIPE, VAS47-RIPN 2:5005/49@fidonet http://vas.tomsk.ru/

Re: Hide a message?

2018-12-14 Thread Victor Sudakov
really works correctly with dotlocking (e.g. mutt_dotlock). Or do you mean individual message "labels" instead of folders, like in Gmail? -- Victor Sudakov, VAS4-RIPE, VAS47-RIPN 2:5005/49@fidonet http://vas.tomsk.ru/

Re: Hide a message?

2018-12-14 Thread Victor Sudakov
Ian Zimmerman wrote: On 2018-12-14 11:27, Victor Sudakov wrote: > DEFAULT=/path/to/maildir/ procmail /dev/null > > will work (but I try to avoid procmail for data-critical tasks). May I ask why? procmail has been in my ~/.forward for two decades, with lots of rules, and I've not

Re: Hide a message?

2018-12-14 Thread Victor Sudakov
on a smartphone. -- Victor Sudakov, VAS4-RIPE, VAS47-RIPN 2:5005/49@fidonet http://vas.tomsk.ru/

Hide a message?

2018-12-12 Thread Victor Sudakov
but I don't want to. -- Victor Sudakov, VAS4-RIPE, VAS47-RIPN 2:5005/49@fidonet http://vas.tomsk.ru/

Re: Hide a message?

2018-12-13 Thread Victor Sudakov
? When I want to create a new folder "foo", I tag some messages and save them to =foo, mutt asks whether to create "foo" but creates it in mbox format per $mbox_type. -- Victor Sudakov, VAS4-RIPE, VAS47-RIPN 2:5005/49@fidonet http://vas.tomsk.ru/

Re: format=flowed

2018-12-18 Thread Victor Sudakov
Victor Sudakov wrote: Does this very message conform to the flowed format? I think I have set up mutt and vim correctly to generate valid f=f mails, but for some reason Gmail and MS Outlook still show hard line breaks where I think there should not be any. What have I missed? This is how

format=flowed

2018-12-18 Thread Victor Sudakov
volutpat. Nunc sagittis et massa sed scelerisque. -- Victor Sudakov, VAS4-RIPE, VAS47-RIPN 2:5005/49@fidonet http://vas.tomsk.ru/

Re: format=flowed

2018-12-19 Thread Victor Sudakov
Cameron Simpson wrote: On 19Dec2018 13:05, Victor Sudakov wrote: Does this very message conform to the flowed format? [...] I think so. It renders just fine in my mutt (flows nicely) and when I look at the headers and text directly it all seems good. And if I send both your message and one

Re: format=flowed

2018-12-19 Thread Victor Sudakov
Christian Ebert wrote: * Victor Sudakov on Wednesday, December 19, 2018 at 19:44:27 +0700: Cameron Simpson wrote: On 19Dec2018 13:05, Victor Sudakov wrote: Does this very message conform to the flowed format? [...] I think so. It renders just fine in my mutt (flows nicely) and when I look

Re: format=flowed

2018-12-19 Thread Victor Sudakov
and the relevant options in ~/.vim/ftplugin/mail.vim for now. -- Victor Sudakov, VAS4-RIPE, VAS47-RIPN 2:5005/49@fidonet http://vas.tomsk.ru/

Re: gpg: can't query passphrase in batch mode (after upgrade of Mutt)

2019-06-17 Thread Victor Sudakov
to the increasing prevalent use of > gpg 2.1. I see. -- Victor Sudakov, VAS4-RIPE, VAS47-RIPN 2:5005/49@fidonet http://vas.tomsk.ru/ signature.asc Description: PGP signature

gpg: can't query passphrase in batch mode (after upgrade of Mutt)

2019-06-17 Thread Victor Sudakov
many years). How can I fix this new trouble with signing? -- Victor Sudakov, VAS4-RIPE, VAS47-RIPN 2:5005/49@fidonet http://vas.tomsk.ru/

fcc-hook

2021-01-15 Thread Victor Sudakov
Dear Colleagues, I'd like to disable fcc when sending to certain domains/addresses. What's the correct syntax? I've come up with fcc-hook @example.com /dev/null but this /dev/null thing looks kind of ugly. I with I could just unset fcc for some addresses. -- Victor Sudakov, VAS4-RIPE, VAS47

Re: fcc-hook

2021-01-16 Thread Victor Sudakov
Kevin J. McCarthy wrote: > On Sat, Jan 16, 2021 at 01:21:08PM +0700, Victor Sudakov wrote: > > I'd like to disable fcc when sending to certain domains/addresses. > > What's the correct syntax? I've come up with > > > > fcc-hook @example.com /dev/null > > > &