Hi,
I found that the Intel C++ version needed some libraries which weren't on my
RH9.0 system (this was when upgrading to 4.1.4g):
libcprts.so.5
libcxa.so.5
libunwind.so.5
This seems to have been reported many times e.g.
http://bugs.mysql.com/bug.php?id=4408
The resolve was to get the lib
Hi,
> I was able to get the binary storate I needed in a TinyBlob
> but I can't set this to a primary key.
Can be done:
mysql> CREATE TABLE tb
-> (
-> id TINYBLOB NOT NULL,
-> PRIMARY KEY (id(255))
-> );
Query OK, 0 rows affected (0.00 sec)
You need to say how many chars you
Hi there,
I'm finding that DELETE IGNORE doesn't actually ignore all errors when using
InnoDb and trying to remove rows that would result in a foreign key error.
I've checked the docs and think that what I'm doing should work, but
doesn't - I'm using server 4.1.4-gamma:
Welcome to the MySQL monit
Hi John,
Depending on the size of your datasets, you could merge the data into a
TEMPORARY table and then compute from there? If the temp table is small
enough it will fit in RAM as a heap table, and will probably be more
efficient than fetching all the results and computing them in code. Of
cou
Dear Mark,
The best way to fix this is by correctly setting your from address in your
mailer to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Thanks,
Mike
> -Original Message-
> From: Michael McTernan
> Sent: 08 April 2004 10:33
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Too Many Connections
>
>
>
Dear Mark,
You also seem to have used my email address before. Please correctly
configure your mailer such that the from address is correctly reported as
[EMAIL PROTECTED], and not mine.
Thanks,
Mike
> -Original Message-
> From: Michael McTernan
> Sent: 08 April 2004 1
Dear Mark,
I think your emailer has also experienced corruption since your from address
is actually mine. Please set it to your own email address, such as
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Thanks,
Mike
> -Original Message-
> From: Michael McTernan
> Sent: 09 April 2004 12:18
> To: [EMA
--
> From: Michael McTernan
> Sent: 09 April 2004 18:30
> To: James E Hicks III; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re: Dumping mass inserts?
>
>
> >> Ah..I see now. I was still using mysqldump..instead of mysql. Yes I'm
> >> trying to import the data from backup, int
Dear Mark,
Please set your from address to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and don't
use my email address.
Thanks,
Mike
> -Original Message-
> From: Michael McTernan
> Sent: 16 April 2004 10:21
> To: Joseph A. Nagy, Jr.; MySQL General
> Subject: Re: PHP + MySQL Not Playing Nice
Original Message-----
> From: Michael McTernan
> Sent: 19 April 2004 10:22
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: MySQL4 and phpBB
>
>
> I have recently setup a new server running EnsimPro 3.7 (Fedora) and
> upgraded the MySQL to 4.0.17-max per their tech notes.
>
> No
Dear Mark,
You should be tweaking your mailer such that your mails originate fom
[EMAIL PROTECTED], and not my own email address.
Thanks,
Mike
> -Original Message-
> From: Michael McTernan
> Sent: 27 May 2004 10:00
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Mysqld stalls
>
&g
004 13:00
> To: Mysql
> Subject: Re: DROP TEMPORARY TABLE and implicit commits
>
>
> Michael,
>
> - Alkuperäinen viesti -
> Lähettäjä: "Michael McTernan" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Vastaanottaja: "Mysql" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Kopio:
Hi there,
I'm using MySQL 4.0.18 and finding that DROP TEMPORARY TABLE is performing
an implicit commit, as is documented.
The problem is that I have a complex query in a Java function, and I need to
call it a number of times to get the overall, which I also want to do as a
single transaction so
Many Thanks :)
Mike
> -Original Message-
> From: Heikki Tuuri [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: 30 April 2004 11:56
> To: Michael McTernan; Tom O'Neil
> Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re: Error dropping databases [in InnoDb]
>
>
> Michael,
>
> Ma
Hi,
I have found this too. I think it is as a result of a change introduced in
4.0.18. From http://www.innodb.com/ibman.php#InnoDB.history :
MySQL/InnoDB-4.0.18, February 13, 2004
- Do not allow dropping a table referenced by a FOREIGN KEY constraint,
unless the user does SET FOREIGN_KEY_CHECKS
database... again. I don't see why you object to
making things easier to use, even if it is only activated by a -n00b option
in mysql_safe.
Thanks,
Mike
> -Original Message-
> From: Donny Simonton [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: 20 April 2004 17:37
> To: 'Mi
Hi,
ENUM columns can also trip you up if you insert a value outside of the ENUM;
an empty string is inserted instead. This is documented behaviour
(mysql.com seems to be going slowly though, so can't dig a reference right
now), even if it is undesired in some cases.
Thanks,
Mike
> -Origina
Hi there,
> Given this model, each thread is obviously going to want to have
> multiple transactions outstanding. Is this something that might be added
> to MySQL in future or am I totally overestimating the expense of using
> one thread per connection?
I'm guessing you mean that each thread will
is in the past too. I'll be looking out for slow queries
in the logs and then EXPLAINing them to see where I can make this
improvement.
Thankyou for all your help. While there is no simple solution, I'm a lot
more sure of my options now :)
Cheers,
Mike
> -Original Message-
&
partitioning
between the tables on disk.
I'm guessing that the real problem here is that some of my queries are
secretly doing table scans when they shouldn't, and that is causing a huge
slowdown, although I might split the BLOB column into a different table such
that table scans don
Original Message-
> From: Benoit St-Jean [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: 12 February 2004 14:04
> To: Michael McTernan
> Cc: Mysql
> Subject: Re: InnoDb Table Performance problem
>
>
> Michael McTernan wrote:
>
> >Hi,
> >
> >
> >
> >
doesn't impact tablescan performance. Is this wrong? Or is this different
for InnoDB vs MyISAM?
Of course, I'm aiming not to use table scans at all though :)
Thanks,
Mike
> -Original Message-
> From: Benoit St-Jean [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: 11 February 2004 22:47
&
Hi there,
I'm making something similar to a file revision control system, and using
MySQL on Linux as the database to drive it. Almost all my tables are
InnoDB, and generally it is going very well, with the exception of one table
that is always very slow.
This table holds the files within the da
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: 11 February 2004 19:27
> To: 'Michael McTernan'; Michael Collins
> Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: RE: best-practices backups
>
>
> > > -Original Message-
> > > From: Michael Collins [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Hi,
I'd love to see this too. Even if it was a book that cost ?40 to buy, I'd
get a copy.
Hey, maybe someone can recommend a book - I've looked hard and not really
come up with anything better than the MySQL manual, which while great, is
missing the 'best practices' :(
Thanks,
Mike
> -Ori
Hi there,
I'm using MySQL 4.0.15 on RedHat 9.0.
I've got problem for which I can't figure out how to do it efficiently
without using a subquery. 4.1.0 isn't really an option since this is going
into a stable environment.
The table is like this.
+--+--++
| revision | id |
ion, but I've
certainly learnt something now :)
Thanks,
Mike
> -Original Message-
> From: Jochem van Dieten [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: 22 January 2004 16:38
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re: LOCK TABLES and multi table UPDATE
>
&
Hi there,
I've got a small issue which looks a little like a bug. I'm using MySQL
4.0.15-standard-log, on RedHat 9.0 with InnoDb tables.
Essentially I have two tables, one table is a list of integers, while the
second is a table of integer pairs. e.g.
+---+ +-+-+
| A | | B.x | B.y |
Hi there,
I'm seeing some problems with the way I've granted access to different
users. I've setup the server to allow access only from certain clients.
For example, the backup user is only allowed access from some machines:
GRANT SELECT ON testdb.* TO [EMAIL PROTECTED]
The problem is that when
Hi there,
I had a similar problem wanting to match 'words' like "42.3.1.1" as
technical references. I couldn't get them to match using a fulltext index,
I assume because the full stops are used by the parser in MySql to break the
text into words for indexing - maybe this is the same for the slash
>From the manual:
1.8.4.1 Subqueries
Subqueries are supported in MySQL version 4.1. See section 1.6.1 Features
Available in MySQL 4.1.
Hope that helps,
Mike
> -Original Message-
> From: Scott H [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: 12 November 2003 17:45
> To: Dan Greene; MySQL Mailing L
Hi,
Have you tried "netstat -a" on the box with the MySQL server? This command
(Linux) will show what is connected to where, and will help you double check
that there really aren't any open connections to the server.
Thanks,
Mike
> -Original Message-
> From: Henrik Skotth [mailto:[EMAI
Hi,
Since joining the list I'm getting about 6 virus emails a day. Fortunately
the firewall is stripping them for me and just sending me alerts telling me
the virus and the sender of the mail e.g.
The message senders were
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
The message title was latest
hi,
> -Original Message-
> From: William R. Mussatto [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: 30 October 2003 01:14
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: RE: Multiuser Programming
>
>
> Chris said:
> > I'm not familiar with that function in MS SQL, and you're a bit unclear,
> > but it looks like you
EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: 28 October 2003 15:54
> To: mysql
> Cc: MySQL Java
> Subject: Re: DROP TEMORARY TABLE
>
>
> Michael McTernan wrote:
>
> > My problem, that so far no one has been able to answer, is that
> I'm using
> > connection pooling with the To
Hi,
If you mean foreign key constraints, it's available with InnoDb tables under
MySQL, as are atomic transactions (commit and rollback). I'm using this
with MySQL4.0 and it works a treat :)
Thanks,
Mike
> -Original Message-
> From: Juliana Gubert Ehrensperger [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Original Message-
> From: Steve Buehler [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: 28 October 2003 11:37
> To: Michael McTernan; mysql
> Subject: Re: DROP TEMORARY TABLE
>
>
> TEMPORARY TABLES are suppose to work this way. They are only
> there during
> a connection and then dropp
Hi Larry,
I was wondering a similar thing, but for JDBC using connection pooling. In
your example you say that 2 people will hit the script at the same time; if
they are using independent connections this should cause no problems since
TEMPORARY tables are local to the connection so don't interfe
Hi there,
I'm trying to restrict the access that a Tomcat server has to mysql
4.0.15-standard-log database server. Unfortunately some of the queries use
temporary tables, so I've had to GRANT CREATE TEMPORARY TABLES to the user.
However, since the server is using connection pooling, it also DROP
39 matches
Mail list logo