On Tue, Jan 18, 2005 at 10:16:09AM -0500, Eric S wrote:
Brandon -
Been real busy lately, sorry. I'd guess between 1-2 months, this is a
ballpark and I surely hope it's less, but for sure by then.
--Brandon
___
mythtv-users mailing list
Brandon -
Nice to hear efforts are underway to get the 3000 working with
unencrypted QAM over cable. I have Detroit Area Comcast and I
understand most of the local HD stations are available unencrypted
over cable. This may mean the difference between installing the
pchdtv card in my current
I've been watching this thread with interest, but have a question
regarding statements referring to over cable. Are we speaking about
digital cable, or analog?
Forgive me if QAM or some other acronym should easily answer my
question. I'm not yet familiar with all of the terms.
Garry W. Cook, CCNA
On Tue, 18 Jan 2005, Cook, Garry wrote:
I've been watching this thread with interest, but have a question
regarding statements referring to over cable. Are we speaking about
digital cable, or analog?
Forgive me if QAM or some other acronym should easily answer my
question. I'm not yet familiar
On Tue, 18 Jan 2005 09:21:59 -0700, Cook, Garry [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I've been watching this thread with interest, but have a question
regarding statements referring to over cable. Are we speaking about
digital cable, or analog?
Forgive me if QAM or some other acronym should easily answer
Can someone explain then what the hopes for recording encrypted HD
digital cable content with the HD-3000 or a similar device? I
know there are smart cards and the like, which TiVo intends to
support, but what hope is there that MythTv will be able to support
such schemes? For me, and prob.
On Tue, Jan 18, 2005 at 09:16:12AM -0800, Julian wrote:
Hi,
Can someone explain then what the hopes for recording
encrypted HD digital cable content with the HD-3000
or a similar device? I know there are smart cards and
the like, which TiVo intends to support, but what hope
is there that
: Re: [mythtv-users] HDTV, Myth, HD-2000, HD-3000,questions galore (and hopefully answers from the smart people... )
Date: Tue, 18 Jan 2005 11:56:34 -0500
On Tue, 18 Jan 2005 09:21:59 -0700, Cook, Garry [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I've been watching this thread with interest, but have a question
On Tuesday 18 January 2005 14:17, Michael Haan wrote:
Other than trolling through forums, is there any other way to
determine if my cable company encrypts or not?
You could try asking them, but you might as well as ask a brick wall.
By the time you found someone that you could speak with who
Brad,
This is where my hopes of capturing the stream after
the set top box started. Too bad they were dashed.
Anyway I have read that the cable companies can detect
how much bandwidth you are consuming...so viewing the
content without paying is risky. Oh well, I guess the
easy answer to
On Tue, Jan 18, 2005 at 02:23:16PM -0800, Julian wrote:
Brad,
This is where my hopes of capturing the stream after
the set top box started. Too bad they were dashed.
Anyway I have read that the cable companies can detect
how much bandwidth you are consuming...so viewing the
content
--- Julian [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Anyway I have read that the cable companies can
detect
how much bandwidth you are consuming...so viewing
the
content without paying is risky.
I think it would be a good trick if cable companies
could detect how much bandwidth you were receiving
from
disclaimer:
I've searched the archives, google, etc, and haven't found a
consolidated source for this information. I'm happy to throw it into
someone's WIKI once we get core information in one location:
Subject: HDTV, Myth, and you...
Hardware:
-- Do the HD-2000 work better, or are better
On 01/17/2005 07:15 PM, Blammo [doh] wrote:
disclaimer:
I've searched the archives, google, etc, and haven't found a
consolidated source for this information. I'm happy to throw it into
someone's WIKI once we get core information in one location:
Subject: HDTV, Myth, and you...
Hardware:
-- Do the
Hardware:
-- Do the HD-2000 work better, or are better supported than the
HD-3000 cards?
I find the 3000 cards work much, much better in my setup than the 2000
cards. The 2000 cards appear to have too small a hardware FIFO, so in
some machines they may not be able to get access to the PCI bus
Hi,
sorry if i sound like a schmoe...I have only been
looking at this for a week, but glad to contribute to
this effort from a newbie point of view. I would also
like to add that in theory by capturing the HD signal
on the way to the TV after the set top box, one can
get unencrypted streams. In
So far, the HD-2000/3000 only do OTA. Supposedly they'll soon do
*unencrypted* QAM-encoded digital cable.
is there such a thing as unencrypted QAM offered by any of the US
cable companies? If so, do folks believe that will be the case for a
while? I am curious as to, beside broadcast
Gabe Rubin wrote:
So far, the HD-2000/3000 only do OTA. Supposedly they'll soon do
*unencrypted* QAM-encoded digital cable.
is there such a thing as unencrypted QAM offered by any of the US
cable companies? If so, do folks believe that will be the case for a
while? I am curious as to,
On Mon, 17 Jan 2005 21:01:50 -0500, Gabe Rubin [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
is there such a thing as unencrypted QAM offered by any of the US
cable companies? If so, do folks believe that will be the case for a
while? I am curious as to, beside broadcast channels in HD, what can
the HD-3000 give
On Mon, Jan 17, 2005 at 10:06:02PM -0500, Roy Murphy wrote:
On Mon, 17 Jan 2005 21:01:50 -0500, Gabe Rubin [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
is there such a thing as unencrypted QAM offered by any of the US
cable companies? If so, do folks believe that will be the case for a
while? I am curious as
Atleast here in Utah, Comcast is unencrypted and has been tested with
the pcHDTV HD-3000 card and it works just fine. From my pinging around,
it seems about half the US has unencrypted QAM.
is this just broadcast they do unencrypted or other stations?
--
Email me if you want a gmail
Atleast here in Utah, Comcast is unencrypted and has been tested with
the pcHDTV HD-3000 card and it works just fine. From my pinging around,
it seems about half the US has unencrypted QAM.
--Brandon
Where does one ping for such things?
This would influence my decision between the pcHDTV
On Mon, Jan 17, 2005 at 09:54:50PM -0800, Alex wrote:
Atleast here in Utah, Comcast is unencrypted and has been tested with
the pcHDTV HD-3000 card and it works just fine. From my pinging around,
it seems about half the US has unencrypted QAM.
--Brandon
Where does one ping for such
On Mon, Jan 17, 2005 at 11:10:39PM -0700, Matt Porter wrote:
On Mon, Jan 17, 2005 at 09:54:50PM -0800, Alex wrote:
Atleast here in Utah, Comcast is unencrypted and has been tested with
the pcHDTV HD-3000 card and it works just fine. From my pinging around,
it seems about half the US has
24 matches
Mail list logo
