bogons.cymru.com has been around as a BGP feed for a long long time.
https://www.team-cymru.com/bogon-networks
From: NANOG on behalf of Gabriel
Terry
Date: Friday, 22 March 2024 at 3:56 PM
To: nanog@nanog.org
Subject: v4 and v6 BOGON list
All,
I was researching BOGON prefixes and found a
I have a feeling he’s fired far too much of his legal and compliance team to
realise
--srs
From: NANOG on behalf of Michael
Thomas
Sent: Thursday, September 14, 2023 6:17:17 AM
To: nanog@nanog.org
Subject: So what do you think about the scuttlebutt of Musk
Comcast walled garden is a good starting point to Google - there’s even an rfc
This is to quarantine malicious customers rather than billing defaulters but
well, much the same effect
--srs
From: NANOG on behalf of Steve
Saner via NANOG
Sent: Monday, September
December 99. Grandfathered
--srs
From: NANOG on behalf of Drew
Weaver
Sent: Thursday, July 27, 2023 6:12:43 PM
To: 'nanog@nanog.org'
Subject: Historical info on how 'x.com' came to be registered
Does anyone have any historical information on how ‘x.com’ came
It appears legit.
BKA.DE is the German Bundeskriminalamt (Federal Police)
And the PTR records, SPF etc check out for the domain.
Might as well check the IP in question for malware if they’ve provided date /
timestamps and such
--srs
From: NANOG on behalf of Glen A.
Pearce
Date: Monday, 3
, August 24, 2022 8:14:16 AM
To: Suresh Ramasubramanian
Cc: nanog@nanog.org
Subject: Re: email spam
Sorry about the bad examples, but I remember contacting both about issues with
SPF multiple times. They both have seemed have to fixed things at least
searching my logs for the last week. Most
Without saying why the mail was blocked (dumb content filter looking for porn?
a spamhaus listing because the police server was hacked? something else?)
that’s not going to help too much.
I’ve been spam filtering stuff at large providers since the late 90s and it
never gets any easier to block
Just leaving this (yes, satire site) link here
Legacy lookup here
ASHandle: AS394183
OrgID: ORCL-2
ASName: OROCKLLC-USA-ASN
ASNumber: 394183
RegDate:2015-07-01
Updated:2015-07-01
Source: ARIN
OrgID: ORCL-2
OrgName:Orange Rock Consulting, LLC
CanAllocate:
Street:
There are reports of bgp hijacks and ddos targeted at Ukrainian asns watch for
and mitigate those?
--srs
From: NANOG on behalf of Tony
Wicks
Sent: Friday, February 25, 2022 6:55:23 AM
To: 'William Allen Simpson'
Cc: 'North American Network Operators Group'
Yet another peering dispute ending in litigation?
From: NANOG on behalf of Sean
Donelan
Date: Friday, 1 October 2021 at 7:21 PM
To: nanog@nanog.org
Subject: S.Korea broadband firm sues Netflix after traffic surge
South Korean Internet service provider SK Broadband has sued Netflix to
pay for
of
actionable complaints.
--srs
From: Tom Beecher
Sent: Friday, August 6, 2021 11:42:48 PM
To: Suresh Ramasubramanian
Cc: Mike Hammett ; Matt Corallo ; NANOG
Subject: Re: Abuse Contact Handling
If you’re complaining about having to maintain an abuse desk
If the way x is managing their network or (not) managing their customers means
my network and my customers are affected ..
route leaks? packet kiddies? phish sites? spammers? whatever. If what you’re
doing or not doing affects someone else, expect complaints, possibly to your
upstreams if
This is probably an ex afrinic stolen block?
In which case it’s for afrinic to sort out and reclaim
--srs
From: NANOG on behalf of Siyuan
Miao
Sent: Friday, July 23, 2021 12:38:16 PM
To: North American Network Operators' Group
Subject: Spamhaus ASN-DROP list
comcast.com is their corporate mail domain
comcast.net is their customer domain
Both have entirely different mx hosts and won’t relay mail for each other.
--srs
From: NANOG on behalf of Matt
Hoppes
Sent: Monday, April 19, 2021 10:06:00 PM
To: North American
OK. In your experience, which legacy system is going to misinterpret this
record?
The current RFC is from 2014-15 but the original idea from Mark Delany (then at
Yahoo now at Apple) has been kicking around from 2006 or so. I remember
contributing some text to the original draft RFC but can’t
MTAs don’t care what online analysis tools tell you and setting a null MX for a
domain that you don’t receive mail for will work just fine, for the reasons
explained in the rfc
Having no MX means the smtp connection will fall back to the A record for your
domain if one exists
--srs
He is. He asked a perfectly relevant question based on what he saw of the
physical setup in front of him.
And he kept his cool when being talked down to.
I’d hire him the next minute, personally speaking.
From: Sabri Berisha
Date: Friday, 19 February 2021 at 2:02 PM
To: Suresh Ramasubramanian
Did you at least hire the janitor?
From: NANOG on behalf of Mark
Tinka
Date: Friday, 19 February 2021 at 10:20 AM
To: nanog@nanog.org
Subject: Re: Famous operational issues
On 2/19/21 00:37, Warren Kumari wrote:
5: Another one. In the early 2000s I was working for a dot-com boom company. We
; *From:* NANOG
> mailto:gmail@nanog.org>> on
> behalf of Rod Beck
> mailto:rod.b...@unitedcablecompany.com>>
>> https://www.quantamagazine.org/vint-cerfs-plan-for-building-an-internet-in-space-20201021/
> ---------
Right. This means we are going to catch a spaceship for a future nanog / have
interplanetary governance federation debates with space aliens from Andromeda,
and we will finally run out of v6 and ipv9 will rule the roost while there’s a
substantial aftermarket + hijack scene going on for the
I don’t know. Do I miss the days of every person and their dog running a mail
server on a Linux server in a basement cupboard?
Huge crowds and high drama on nanae and spam-l type places
You never know whether your mail is going to get through or not because of
weird and wonderful notions about
The first warning sign would be where they discuss your AUP and exceptions /
corner cases to it
--srs
From: NANOG on behalf of Ross Tajvar
Sent: Thursday, April 16, 2020 9:03:58 AM
To: Rich Kulawiec
Cc: North American Network Operators' Group
Subject: Re:
or the other.
Corporate contacts in this individual’s case, could be reports to various
upstreams in some other case.
--srs
From: Matt Corallo
Date: Tuesday, 14 April 2020 at 12:41 AM
To: Suresh Ramasubramanian
Cc: Tom Beecher , Kushal R. , Nanog
, Rich Kulawiec
Subject: Re: Constant Abuse
RiskIQ reports phish URLs for large brands
The life cycle of a typical phish campaign is in hours but I guess people can
live with 24. If you handle the complaint only after two business days, that’s
closing the barn door after the horse has bolted and crossed a state line.
--srs
RiskIQ is a known good player. If there’s a stream of abuse reports maybe
removing whatever customer it is might be a good idea?
I am not sure why they are sending out mail to every contact they can find
though. Are abuse tickets resolved in a timely manner?
From: NANOG
Date: Monday, 13
I do get some results from an online whois or two - https://ipinfo.io/AS19111
nbty.com is registered with Markmonitor so presumably they’re legit enough and
large enough to afford brand protection. “Natures Bounty Inc” sounds like a
reasonable name for a vendor of vitamins.
ASNumber:
Jesus was crucified during the later years of the reign of Tiberius
Hadrian on the other hand would have been loved by 45 for his dedication to
building the wall
--srs
From: NANOG on behalf of Mark Seiden
Sent: Monday, January 27, 2020 11:47 PM
To: Large
Post on sa...@sanog.org there should be some Airtel people there
@anurag can you please forward to someone there
--srs
From: NANOG on behalf of Elmar K. Bins
Sent: Saturday, December 7, 2019 3:40 PM
To: Bottiger
Cc: nanog@nanog.org
Subject: Re: Anyone have
The fact that the port authority building is also an office building with
multiple other tenants?
Whois contacts on a defunct domain belonging to an Australian government port
authority agency that’s since been renamed don’t appear to support your
hypothesis that this is another tenant of a
NANOG folks - I recognize that this is rather late notice for your travel
schedules but if you happen to be in the region or have teams in India please
do attend, or forward this. Thanks.
INNOG 2: Call for papers
The following is an open call for presentations for the conference and tutorial
Even among the network security community the number of people who track bgp
hijacks and gather data is quite small yet such people do exist and have been
active in speaking for this proposal when the same thing was discussed on the
ripe anti abuse wg to an expected chorus of "we are not the
Was it trying to help them save on car insurance?
On 16/03/19, 6:49 AM, "NANOG on behalf of Scott Weeks"
wrote:
I thought some here might enjoy this.
--
Technician arrived onsite and found no issue with the
fiber
That's a 2010 outage that someone dug out and was doing the rounds as a new one
--srs
From: NANOG on behalf of cosmo
Sent: Thursday, March 14, 2019 9:50 PM
To: Bryan Holloway
Cc: nanog@nanog.org
Subject: Re: FB?
Facebook pushed an update to their code that
I've tried never to hand write a sendmail.cf, to be honest - I doubt even the
sendmail authors recommended being that brave :). And I haven't done all that
much with dmarc beyond using it.
--srs
From: NANOG on behalf of Brielle Bruns
Sent: Thursday, February
... and of all those, once you solve v6 multihoming (possibly with ipv9) do
come back to nanog where I'm sure it will be operational.
On 18/02/19, 8:23 AM, "NANOG on behalf of Michel Py" wrote:
> Viruthagiri Thirumavalavan wrote :
> I solved the email spam problem.
Oh, this
g dogs. If one started to bark, everyone
> else gets the courage to do the same thing.
>
> I'm tired of fighting these assholes in every mailing list. I'm on your side
> morons. So how about you all knock it off?
>
> Six months back, it was John Levine who humiliated me in the DMA
To the IP
Other people try to sugar coat what they tell you
John has never minced his words in the past two decades that I know him and
that's good
Yes, 50 words are more than enough to decide a bad idea is bad. You don't have
to like that, or like any of us, but facts are facts
--srs
? You
already know from the dns. Concerned about the MTA version? You can configure
postfix to claim it is exchange or avian carrier for that matter
--srs
From: Constantine A. Murenin
Sent: Saturday, January 12, 2019 10:08 AM
To: Suresh Ramasubramanian
Cc: nanog
Most new MTA implementations over the past several years default to TLS with
strong ciphers. So how much of a problem is low or no TLS right now?
How much more of a problem will it be over the next year or two as older
hardware is retired and new servers + software deployed, or as is more
But why do you think creating an out of band verification channel and separate
port is going to work for this?
There is plenty of local policy available as well to mandate that tls be
negotiated with a set of allowed ciphers and prohibit others
—srs
From:
couldn't get address for 'ns1.arin.net': not found
couldn't get address for 'ns2.arin.net': not found
couldn't get address for 'u.arin.net': not found
couldn't get address for 'ns3.arin.net': not found
dig: couldn't get address for 'ns1.arin.net': no more
srs@Sureshs-MacBook-Pro-2 19:56:18 <~> $
In the USA, you need to contact NCMEC - http://www.missingkids.com/home or the
FBI.
From: Mark Seiden
Date: Friday, 7 December 2018 at 12:16 PM
To: Suresh Ramasubramanian
Cc: "Lotia, Pratik M" , "nanog@nanog.org"
Subject: Re: Should ISP block child pornography?
https://www.interpol.int/Crime-areas/Crimes-against-children/Access-blocking
From: NANOG on behalf of Mark Seiden
Date: Friday, 7 December 2018 at 11:54 AM
To: "Lotia, Pratik M"
Cc: "nanog@nanog.org"
Subject: Re: Should ISP block child pornography?
where is this list of dirty domains?
IVR credit card PIN entry is a thing
For example -
https://www.hdfcbank.com/personal/making-payments/security-measures/ivr-3d-secure
On 10/10/18, 9:57 PM, "NANOG on behalf of Naslund, Steve"
wrote:
True and that should be mandatory but does not solve the telephone agent
problem.
This is common in India but then chip and pin has been mandatory for a good few
years, as has 2fa (vbv / mastercard secure code) for online transactions.
Waiters would earlier ask for people's pins so they could go back and enter it
- back when a lot of the POS terminals were connected to POTS
Response and Management
Critical Control 20: Penetration Tests and Red Team Exercises
2 Day On Campus Boot Camp at IIIT B
Lab Session – General Threats
Lab Session – Cryptography
Boot Camp 1
Boot Camp 2
On Fri, Jul 27, 2018 at 5:39 PM Suresh Ramasubramanian
wrote:
>
> Please start with the nano
and the Limoncelli book will do very well
indeed for a start.
--srs
From: Ramy Hashish
Date: Friday, 27 July 2018 at 5:12 PM
To: NANOG Mailing List , ,
, Suresh Ramasubramanian ,
Subject: Re: SP security knowledge build up
Thank you guys for all your academic recommendation
mpton, Rich A"
Cc: Christopher Morrow , Suresh Ramasubramanian
, nanog list
Subject: Re: SP security knowledge build up
Thank you Christopher, Compton and Suresh, that was helpful.
I am still looking for more.
Does anyone want to recommend any MOOC?
Thanks,
Ramy
On 23
The usual / canonical sysadmin book might work, there is a lot of security
related material in there as well.
https://www.amazon.com/Practice-System-Network-Administration-Second/dp/0321492668
And this updated for enterprise / devops and other such new fangled things
> As I always ask, retorically, in cases like this: Where are the
grownups?
--- ops.li...@gmail.com wrote:
From: Suresh Ramasubramanian
"we are not the internet police" right? (
-
So your answer is to let t
"we are not the internet police" right? (
On 26/06/18, 10:33 AM, "NANOG on behalf of Job Snijders"
wrote:
On Mon, 25 Jun 2018 at 22:49, Ronald F. Guilmette
wrote:
> Without the generous support of Cogent, GTT, and Level3 this dumbass
> lowlife IP address space thief
Seems to be a set of MUA bugs that are being overblown and hyped up.
TL;DR = Don't use HTML email with some mail clients when sending pgp encrypted
mail.
https://lists.gnupg.org/pipermail/gnupg-users/2018-May/060315.html
--srs
On 14/05/18, 1:15 PM, "NANOG on behalf of George William Herbert"
The fun problem here is that anonymity, encryption etc - everything that's good
and recommended for privacy and security conscious people - gets heavily used,
and early adopted, by criminals, the good ones among whom are paranoid about
both these at least so they stay out of prison.
If only
Ah. ZTE is in a spot of trouble right about now.
http://www.scmp.com/tech/article/2142557/zte-calls-us-government-ban-extremely-unfair-vows-fight-its-rights
On 20/04/18, 5:58 PM, "NANOG on behalf of Colton Conor"
wrote:
Of the
These books.
https://www.amazon.com/UNIX-Linux-System-Administration-Handbook/dp/0131480057
https://www.amazon.com/Practice-System-Network-Administration-Enterprise/dp/0321919165/
https://www.amazon.com/Practice-Cloud-System-Administration-Practices/dp/032194318X/
whois -h whois.nic.ad.jp IP /e
--srs
> On 23-Aug-2017, at 7:38 PM, Kurt Kraut wrote:
>
> Hello,
>
>
> I'm having a hard time to figure out the abuse e-mail address for IPs from
> Japan. Any query I perform at the WHOIS, for any IP, from any autonomoyus
> system I get
1. They aren’t the internet police either or so quite a few of them think
2. Hanlon’s razor
--srs
> On 15-Aug-2017, at 2:17 AM, Baldur Norddahl wrote:
>
> Why are domain registrars allowing some of those domains, which are clearly
> advertising highly illegal
Which one was it that demanded 2500?
There's only one reasonably well known pay for whitelisting type of blocklist
but I'd have thought they're a lot cheaper.
--srs
> On 20-Mar-2017, at 9:02 AM, Justin Wilson wrote:
>
> Then you have the lists which want money to be removed.
Or a nanog member might be infected and the malware is scraping his mailbox for
bogus froms. Got headers?
On 10/02/17, 9:40 AM, "NANOG on behalf of Alexander Harrowell"
wrote:
I'm getting suspicious e-mail pretending to come
My guess is you have or had sometime in the long distant past a scalper
operating on your network, using automated ticket purchase bots.
If you still have that scalper around, you might want to turf him. If he’s
ancient history, saying so might induce them to remove the block.
--srs
On
font.
Personally I don’t trash abuse reports that are valid.
--srs
From: Tom Beecher <beec...@beecher.cc>
Date: Thursday, 22 September 2016 at 7:35 PM
To: Brian Rak <b...@gameservers.com>
Cc: Suresh Ramasubramanian <ops.li...@gmail.com>, "nanog@nanog.org"
&
Considering that there are likely to be many such emails - just how much time
is it going to take your abuse desk staffer to just parse out those IPs from
whatever log that they send you?
And how much time would processing say 50 individual emails take compared to 50
IPs in a single email?
http://motherboard.vice.com/read/a-loud-sound-just-shut-down-a-banks-data-center-for-10-hours?utm_source=bbcfb
Releasing inert gas from fire suppression units that were over pressurized
resulted in an extremely loud noise – causing cabinets full of hard drives to
vibrate – which got transmitted
Been meaning to dig into this one
https://www.upguard.com/blog/guardrail-tasks-a-lightweight-tracking-system-for-ops
--srs
> On 27-Jul-2016, at 11:46 PM, David Hubbard
> wrote:
>
> Hi all, curious if anyone has recommendations on software that helps manage
>
On 03/07/16, 9:05 PM, "NANOG on behalf of Suresh Ramasubramanian"
<nanog-boun...@nanog.org on behalf of ops.li...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Is anyone from Jio network engineering team on this list?
> I see AS55836 is originating 47.35.0.0/16 while the pool belongs to
>
From: sanog on behalf of Anurag Bhatia
Date: Sunday, 3 July 2016 at 8:46 PM
To: SANOG
Subject: [SANOG] Reliance Jio (AS55836) origating a /16 belonging to Charter
(AS20115)
Hello everyone!
Is anyone from Jio
There is absolutely no budgeting for idiots. Beyond a long hard process that
is helped by internal escalations from affected people on a corporate network -
ideally as senior as you can get - ot their IT staff. “Missouri isn’t in
China, you nitwit. Fix it or I, the CFO, will go have a word
Is your aim to generate attack traffic? Or rather a mix of normal and attack
traffic. That's one part. Googling ddos simulator will get you lots of
results you can evaluate
Logging it appropriately and capturing the logs, storing them in a db is the
next.
--srs
> On 11-Jun-2016, at 10:52
Worst comes to worst there's a python based whois client called pwhois that
lets you dump whois data into json
--srs
> On 10-Mar-2016, at 6:50 AM, Royce Williams wrote:
>
> I'm not affiliated, but there are a couple of companies that normalize
> whois data. It's a
Well, at least she's here rather than sprinkling eggnog and brandy flavoured
pixie dust on our gear over the Christmas break.
--srs
> On 25-Dec-2015, at 9:08 AM, Owen DeLong wrote:
>
> Yes… Isn’t it impressive just how persistent the bad idea fairy can be?
>
> Owen
Hmm, has anyone at all kept count of the number of times such a discussion has
started up in just the last year, and how many more times in the past 16 or so
years?
Mind you, back in say 2004, this discussion would have run to 50 or 60 emails
at a bare minimum, in no time at all.
--srs
On
Not protocols as much as less secure ssl ciphers is my guess
--srs
> On 23-Oct-2015, at 9:50 PM, Jay Ashworth wrote:
>
> - Original Message -
>> From: "Christopher Morrow"
>
>> Incoming settings
>> IMAP server: imap.gmail.com
>> Port: 993
Right now imap.gmail.com appears down for me from at least two local
networks in India, just saying
I guess that's what the original poster wanted to ask about.
On Wednesday, October 21, 2015, Jason Hellenthal
wrote:
> $ dig @8.8.8.8 imap.gmail.com
>
> ; <<>> DiG 9.10.3
Besides which more than one provider filters by a minimum prefix length per /8
- wasn't Swisscom or someone similar doing that? So multi homing with even a
/24 is somewhat patchy in terms of effectiveness
--srs
> On 02-Oct-2015, at 8:54 PM, William Herrin wrote:
>
>> On
<b...@herrin.us> wrote:
>
> On Fri, Oct 2, 2015 at 11:55 AM, Suresh Ramasubramanian
> <ops.li...@gmail.com> wrote:
>> Besides which more than one provider filters by a minimum prefix length
>> per /8 - wasn't Swisscom or someone similar doing that? So multi
>>
Late to the party but which best current practices were these and - as the
board asked - how much of it reinvents the several other best practice wheels
around?
--srs
> On 30-Sep-2015, at 8:47 PM, Mike Hammett wrote:
>
> If NANOG isn't developing and publishing BCOPs,
Nagios will do it at a pinch but only from one location. But if you want
professional URL monitoring from across multiple locations worldwide, you need
Gomez, Neustar Webmetrics etc. Not quite cheap.
On 05-Aug-2015, at 7:23 PM, sathish kumar Ippani
sathish.kumar.ipp...@gmail.com wrote:
It's what they call a free country
Those that don't use it don't use it, and those who do are free to do so
--srs
On 31-Jul-2015, at 4:56 PM, Ricky Beam jfb...@gmail.com wrote:
On Fri, 31 Jul 2015 17:28:34 -0400, Jaren Angerbauer
jarenangerba...@gmail.com wrote:
I work for Proofpoint --
delurk
They come to M3AAWG on a regular basis and there’s the M3AAWG hosting SIG that
you might want to participate in.
NANOG doesn’t always have a mail abuse (and not very many network abuse)
session on the agenda, plus just how many people doing routing or DNS seem to
even care what their
Er - a couple of ways
1. If you run a farm of mail servers, something like splunk for your logs is
kind of necessary. How difficult is it going to be to trigger a splunk alert
on whatever looks like an administrative block? Either by a large provider, or
by a DNS block list.
2. You can
I have sent this to a contact at another Bangladeshi ISP that should be able to
reach the right person for this ASAP.
On 30-Jun-2015, at 1:57 pm, Grzegorz Janoszka grzeg...@janoszka.pl wrote:
We have just received alert from bgpmon that AS58587 Fiber @ Home Limited has
hijacked most of our
Parkinson's law of sorts? Use expanding to fill the bandwidth available
One kid with a torrent downloading random stuff, streaming hd and music off the
internet etc and a family of four can make decent inroads into gigabit or so I
would have thought
Don't even start counting say a gb here and
Like Peter Lothberg's mother's home :)
--srs
On 27-Jun-2015, at 12:22 am, Mikael Abrahamsson swm...@swm.pp.se wrote:
And yes, fastest Internet in the world is pure BS, gigabit ethernet access
to peoples homes have been around for years in other places
Given we’re going down this “what is spam” rathole again, spam is generally
defined as unsolicited BULK email
As the email appears to be one to one, though a remarkably persistent one to
one, I would suggest procmail, unless you know he’s harvested nanog and is
sending the same offer mail
Having seen my share of pesky vendors - though not this one .. Yeah idle
speculation it is. Informed idle I hope. :)
--srs
On 28-Apr-2015, at 9:00 am, Rob Seastrom r...@seastrom.com wrote:
Have you gotten a copy too, or are you just idly speculating here?
fyi
From: Alec Peterson a...@messagesystems.com
To: techni...@mailman.m3aawg.org techni...@mailman.m3aawg.org
Date: Tue, Mar 3, 2015 11:32 PM
Subject: [Technical] M3AAWG 34 Call for Papers
The 34th General Meeting of the Messaging Malware Mobile Anti-Abuse
Working Group (M3AAWG) will be
18 million dollars revenue in three months so certainly pretty large sized.
Any idea which DC this is?
http://motherboard.vice.com/en_ca/read/police-could-charge-a-data-center-in-the-largest-child-porn-bust-ever
You think every accountant, realtor, coffee shop etc uses their own domain?
On Feb 26, 2015 3:12 AM, Bill Patterson billpatterso...@gmail.com wrote:
That was my first response as well. But that response was frowned upon by
my customer service reps.
On Feb 25, 2015 8:56 AM, Ken Chase
And how many users do you have, again?
On Feb 24, 2015 6:29 PM, Colin Johnston col...@gt86car.org.uk wrote:
block aol like china blocks with no engagement of comms as justification
colin
Sent from my iPhone
On 24 Feb 2015, at 12:36, Rich Kulawiec r...@gsp.org wrote:
On Tue, Feb 24,
they are running entirely self-contained.
On 02/12/2015 07:04 PM, Suresh Ramasubramanian wrote:
Please. Gmail isn't ever likely to use long dead hobbyist block lists.
On Feb 12, 2015 9:38 PM, Daniel Taylor dtay...@vocalabs.com mailto:
dtay...@vocalabs.com wrote:
Possibly related: http
Please. Gmail isn't ever likely to use long dead hobbyist block lists.
On Feb 12, 2015 9:38 PM, Daniel Taylor dtay...@vocalabs.com wrote:
Possibly related: http://www.ahbl.org/content/changes-ahbl
We had to manually remove it from spamassassin for our local installation,
and I am pretty sure
It is back now fwiw
On Jan 27, 2015 12:18 PM, Damien Burke dam...@supremebytes.com wrote:
Facebook outage? Everyone panic!
https://twitter.com/search?q=facebooksrc=typd
-Damien
Yes. Till that hotspots IP space gets blackholed by a major freemail
because of all the nigerians and hijacked devices emitting bot traffic
through stolen auth credentials.
There's other ways to stop this but they take actual hard work and rather
more gear than a rusted up old asa you pull out of
No. He is a comcast customer. And some third party wifi access point
blocked his smtp submission over TLS by setting up an asa device to inspect
587 as well.
On Nov 28, 2014 6:16 AM, William Herrin b...@herrin.us wrote:
On Thu, Nov 27, 2014 at 2:54 PM, joel jaeggli joe...@bogus.com wrote:
I
=
2qlcvb29i07oax-...@mail.gmail.com
, Suresh Ramasubramanian writes:
Yes. Till that hotspots IP space gets blackholed by a major freemail
because of all the nigerians and hijacked devices emitting bot traffic
through stolen auth credentials.
Why would it black hole the address rather than
, 2014 2:50 PM
To: Suresh Ramasubramanian
Cc: nanog@nanog.org
Subject: Re: Level3 rwhois broken
It's nice to see someone is using RWHOIS. Back when I wrote the RWHOIS
daemon for HE I spoke with Mark Kosters (one of the authors of RFC 2167). I
wish I still had the emails because at the time he
Anybody? Makes it a pain to perform surgical spam blocking when this
happens :)
suresh@samwise 01:52:24 ~ $ telnet rwhois.level3.net 4321
Trying 209.244.1.179...
^C
--
Suresh Ramasubramanian (ops.li...@gmail.com)
The other thing is, it is pretty much useless to measure connectivity
speed, or path through the gfw from a colo box when your users in the
mainland are using broadband or maybe dedicated leased lines.
On Nov 11, 2014 10:37 PM, Grant Ridder shortdudey...@gmail.com wrote:
You can try AWS China,
If you are planning to scrap it after retiring it from production, talk to
nsrc @ uoregon, they'll pick it up and ship it to developing countries that
could use it.
On Nov 6, 2014 4:45 AM, Jason 8...@tacorp.us wrote:
I'm interested in talking with someone who has experience shipping
hardware
1 - 100 of 509 matches
Mail list logo