On April 29, 2022 at 09:55 n...@blastcomm.com (Nate Burke) wrote:
> As much as I hate legislation, more and more municipalities are levying a tax
> on streaming services. I wonder how the taxing bodies would feel if they
> knew
> that the company doesn't even know where their customers
I thought I'd put a smile on your faces for Friday. This is how
networking happens in Hawaii...
https://www.civilbeat.org/2022/04/thousands-of-hawaiians-could-lose-phone-and-internet-service-amid-bankruptcy-dispute
--
There's a nearby Lumen route (originally Digital Teleport) where they have
built their route to someone else's network where they've built a POP between
their own construction and that third party dark fiber provider.
That dark fiber provider is friendly.
Knowing what they've built out in
On 29/04/2022 18:21, Norman Jester wrote:
We're having a heck of a time with this, customers are posting all
over social media about it etc.
The company who does their ip classification is Neustar and we have
been talking to them.
In our case, it is a /17 that moved from Germany to us in the
I'd suggest you reach out to hosting company and have them mark the block(s) in
question as re-allocated to your organization. Also Neustar does support
self-published geofeeds so you could also publish your own + leased IP space
and them get them to subscribe to your list.
This is an automated weekly mailing describing the state of the Global
IPv4 Routing Table as seen from APNIC's router in Japan.
The posting is sent to APOPS, NANOG, AfNOG, SANOG, PacNOG, SAFNOG
TZNOG, MENOG, BJNOG, SDNOG, CMNOG, LACNOG and the RIPE Routing WG.
Daily listings are sent to
On Fri, Apr 29, 2022 at 6:07 AM Brian Turnbow wrote:
>
> Hi Norman
> >Anyone from Disney+ here? If you can reply off-list I'd appreciate it. I
> >have emailed every place I can think of to solve a geoip problem affecting
> >hundreds of customers, no reply in weeks.
>
>
> Yeah we just went
> On Apr 29, 2022, at 11:09 AM, Nick Suan via NANOG wrote:
>
> The fact that it even has to come to this idea is ridiculous but I wonder
> about the success of holding a normal customer account with repeat offending
> streaming services so you could report this, by proxy, /as/ a customer.
>
> On Apr 29, 2022, at 10:55, Nate Burke wrote:
>
> As much as I hate legislation, more and more municipalities are levying a tax
> on streaming services. I wonder how the taxing bodies would feel if they
> knew that the company doesn't even know where their customers are.
Minus that whole
The fact that it even has to come to this idea is ridiculous but I wonder about
the success of holding a normal customer account with repeat offending
streaming services so you could report this, by proxy, /as/ a customer.
On Fri, Apr 29, 2022, at 8:38 AM, Josh Luthman wrote:
> >Disney+ appear
As much as I hate legislation, more and more municipalities are levying
a tax on streaming services. I wonder how the taxing bodies would feel
if they knew that the company doesn't even know where their customers are.
On 4/29/2022 8:38 AM, Josh Luthman wrote:
>Disney+ appear to be the worst
>
> The thing that is basically always true is that no commercial network is
> mixing cloud computing and eye ball users in the same blocks of IP
> addresses. I guess where this might be a grey area is Windows VMs on Azure
> where yes they are both eyeballs and potentially VPN users.
>
This is
>Disney+ appear to be the worst outfit at handling this kind of thing: They
have no concept of a service provider
Aren't all of them that way? That's been my experience. Their front line
support often tells me to call my ISP.
On Fri, Apr 29, 2022 at 9:35 AM Paul Thornton wrote:
> On
On 29/04/2022 14:22, Josh Luthman wrote:
Did you try:
Disney+: E-mail them the trouble subnet at
techops-distribut...@disneystreaming.com. Also,
techops-servi...@disneystreaming.com will probably be where that sends
you. Another possible email is disneyplusispsupp...@disneyplus.com.
Hello,
I had a user complain to me this morning about something called "DoubleCounter"
which I guess is a Discord bot that supposedly identifies who is a "real
person" and who is a "bot" or a "vpn".
While some part of any commercial network could potentially be "cloud
computing" and as such
Did you try:
Disney+: E-mail them the trouble subnet at
techops-distribut...@disneystreaming.com. Also,
techops-servi...@disneystreaming.com will probably be where that sends you.
Another possible email is disneyplusispsupp...@disneyplus.com.
https://thebrotherswisp.com/index.php/geo-and-vpn/
I am having this same trouble, again.
Last year, it took over 4 months to get it solved, and required
outside-normal-channel assistance from more than one person who reached out
to me directly off the NANOG list. If not for that, I don’t think it would
have ever been resolved.
It just started
Hi Norman
>Anyone from Disney+ here? If you can reply off-list I'd appreciate it. I have
>emailed every place I can think of to solve a geoip problem affecting hundreds
>of customers, no reply in weeks.
Yeah we just went through the same thing.
Many other providers in Italy have been impacted
I believe the intent is for the service provider to then look up that call by
source:destination, investigate how it came into the network, investigate if
STIR/SHAKEN signed, and deal with appropriately. If signed, then there's a
responsible party to engage.
-
Mike Hammett
19 matches
Mail list logo
