On 2/15/12 21:04 , Kenneth M. Chipps Ph.D. wrote:
> How widespread would you say the use of IS-IS is?
>
> Even more as to which routing protocols are used, not just in ISPs, what
> percent would you give to the various ones. In other words X percent of
> organizations use OSPS, Y percent use EIGRP,
On 2/15/12 20:14 , Mario Eirea wrote:
> This is my guess too, i guess there is some bleed over from their antenna
> arrays.
Even the most directional sector antenna in the world has a back lobe...
and there there's the clients...
there's no magic bullet you simply can't do it all in one ap with
On 2/11/12 19:34 , Sven Olaf Kamphuis wrote:
> yes, domain names that cannot be typed in with any keyboard/charset on
> any computer out there, excellent idea, devide and conquerer, i wonder
> who came up with that idiotic plan again, probably the ITU or one of
> their infiltrants in icann.
If it'
On 2/8/12 08:59 , keith tokash wrote:
>
> Hi,
I've done it either way, I prefer to put the v6 peers in a different
group than the v4 peers so that I can group the policies at the group
rather than neighbor level.
> I'm prepping an environment for v6 and I'm wondering what, if
> any, benefit th
On 2/6/12 06:48 , Glen Kent wrote:
> One example that comes to my mind is that a few existing routers
> cant do line rate routing for IPv6 traffic as long as the netmask is
> < 65.
I'm sorry that's bs. It's trivial to partition a cam in order to do
/128s in a single lookup. that's actually the w
On 2/5/12 17:20 , Glen Kent wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Most routers today are basically IPv4 routers, with IPv6 thrown in.
> They are however designed keeping IPv4 in mind.
>
> With IPv6 growing, if we were to design a native IPv6 router, with
> IPv4 functionality thrown in, then is it possible to design a
On 2/2/12 21:59 , Randy Bush wrote:
>>> The suits won, and many nerds either threw in with them or revealed
>>> their affinity for the easy life and gave up. Being principled and
>>> turning away dirty money or exercising the "fire the customer" clause
>>> tends to be disliked by corporate officers
On 1/30/12 12:46 , Jim Gonzalez wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I am looking for a Wireless bridge or Router that will
> support 600 wireless clients concurrently (mostly cell phones). I need it
> for a proof of concept.
an aruba controller and 8 dual radio aps.
>
>
>
>
> Thanks in adva
On 1/27/12 02:35 , Tei wrote:
> Can internet in USA support that? Call of Duty 15 releases may 2014
> and 30 million gamers start downloading a 20 GB files. Would the
> internet collapse like a house of cards?.
Given the way the these things are staged, the pre-order/pre-load model
works pretty
On 1/27/12 06:13 , Eric Tykwinski wrote:
> The PS Vita still uses a proprietary memory card format, so it's not just
> download only.
> The best example of download only would be OnLive, which basically is a game
> system that only delivers on demand games.
Onlive isn't download at all. the games
On 1/27/12 15:40 , bas wrote:
> Hi All,
>
> On Sat, Jan 28, 2012 at 12:32 AM, Joel jaeggli wrote:
>> On 1/27/12 14:53 , bas wrote:
>>> While I agree _again_!
>>>
>>> It does not explain why TOR boxes have little buffers and chassis box
>>>
On 1/27/12 15:01 , George Bonser wrote:
>
>
>> -Original Message- From: bas Sent: Friday, January 27, 2012
>> 2:54 PM To: George Bonser Subject: Re: 10GE TOR port buffers (was
>> Re: 10G switch recommendaton)
>>
>> While I agree _again_!
>>
>> It does not explain why TOR boxes have
On 1/27/12 14:53 , bas wrote:
> While I agree _again_!
>
> It does not explain why TOR boxes have little buffers and chassis box
> have many.
you need purportionally more buffer when you need to drain 16 x 10 gig
into 4 x 10Gig then when you're trying to drain 10Gb/s into 2 x 1Gb/s
there
On 1/27/12 12:35 , Christopher Morrow wrote:
> On Fri, Jan 27, 2012 at 3:32 PM, Jon Lewis wrote:
>> On Fri, 27 Jan 2012, Christopher Morrow wrote:
>>
>>> lots of folks still use it yes. is it helpful? maybe? maybe not? is
>>> this peering over a shared media (like a 10base-T hub).
>>>
>>> You migh
vendors that specify a minimum distance for lx typically spec 2 meters.
even EX shouldn't spike the receiver at that distance as long as the max
RX is about +1.
On 1/25/12 11:26 , jon Heise wrote:
> we are moving a router between 2 data centers and we only have LX sfp's for
> connection, is ther
On 1/21/12 11:38 , George Bonser wrote:
>> Not that I would not be a bit miffed if personal files disappeared,
>> but that's one of the risks associated with using a cloud service
>> for file storage. It could have been a fire, a virus erasing file,
>> bankruptcy, malicious insider damage... Does
By the same token, The mobile broadband network is not some also-ran adjunct to
the residential broadband service.
On Jan 18, 2012, at 16:45, "Justin M. Streiner" wrote:
> On Wed, 18 Jan 2012, Joel jaeggli wrote:
>
>> On 1/18/12 15:56 , Justin M. Streiner wrote:
&
On 1/18/12 15:56 , Justin M. Streiner wrote:
> On Wed, 18 Jan 2012, Christopher Morrow wrote:
>
>> My question is when is FiOS going to get v6 natively? could we get the
>> engineers there to actually do something as opposed to trials of
>> non-production systems that'll never actually get deploye
On 1/17/12 23:45 , Leigh Porter wrote:
>
>
> On 18 Jan 2012, at 05:06, "toor" wrote:
>
>> Hi list,
>>
>> I am wondering if anyone else has seen a large amount of DNS
>> queries coming from various IP ranges in China. I have been trying
>> to find a pattern in the attacks but so far I have come
On 1/15/12 11:30 , Ken King wrote:
> I need to choose a wireless solution for a new office.
>
> up to 600 devices will connect. most devices are mac books and mobile phones.
>
> we can see hundreds of access points in close proximity to our new office
> space.
>
> what are the thoughts these d
On 1/15/12 09:56 , Phil Regnauld wrote:
> Abdullah Al-Malki (a.almalki1402) writes:
>> Hi fellows,
>> I am supporting a big service provider and sometimes I face this problem.
>> Sometimes I want to access my customer network and want to extract some
>> verification output "show commands" from a la
On 1/13/12 11:19 , -Hammer- wrote:
> OK, So I'm doing a lot of reading lately on Nexus as we are about to get
> into the 7k/5k game and of course a lot of the marketing revolves around
> VPC. Every time I see it referenced, I keep remembering a reasonably
> reliable Nortel implementation called Spl
Greetings,
The BOF topic that I proposed during the recent thread:
Re: Sad IPv4 story?
Got approved, I'm still looking for 1-2 additional speakers to round out
the agenda. To recap:
* IPV4 run-out means new entrants will from the outset deploy techniques
the present operators consider undes
On 1/6/12 12:31 , Bonald wrote:
> Hi,
> We need to purchase some switch that support 1gbit QinQ.
> Any suggestions ? We need to connect 9 schools together in layer2.
> All 9 schools have 1gb link from our provider, provider gaves us 5 vlan to
> work with.
> We have around 35 vlan in-house.
>
> We
On 12/28/11 07:30 , Ryan Malayter wrote:
> Except nowhere in there is the prefix length for the test indicated,
> and the exact halving of forwarding rate for IPv6 leads one to believe
> that there are two TCAM lookups for IPv6 (hence 64-bit prefix lookups)
> versus one for IPv4.
A cam (assuming
On 12/30/11 08:47 , Kevin Loch wrote:
> It is very common to have different "routers" (routers, firewalls or
> load balancers) on the same vlan with different functions in hosting
> environments. It is also sometimes necessary to have multiple default
> gateways on the same vlan for load balancin
On 12/24/11 15:33 , Masataka Ohta wrote:
> Karl Auer wrote:
>
>>> Not necessarily. You can use ARP and DHCPv6 and you don't have
>>> to waste time and power for DAD.
>
>> IPv6 does not do ARP, it does ND.
>
> First of all, ND use is optional and, if ND is used, RA
> must be used.
>
> It means t
On 12/23/11 11:16 , Joel Maslak wrote:
> On Fri, Dec 23, 2011 at 2:18 AM, jacob miller wrote:
>
>> Am having a debate on the results of speed tests sites.
>>
>> Am interested in knowing the thoughts of different individuals in regards to
>> this.
>
> It's one data point of many.
>
> Depending
I haven't done wireless in downtown palo alto, only metro-e however.
Given your proximity to 345 hamilton (under 1000 feet most likely) I
would think at&t would be in a position to offer fairly high-rate dsl,
On 12/16/11 10:24 , Darren Bolding wrote:
> Apologies if this is not the most appropriat
On 12/17/11 00:14 , Mark Tinka wrote:
> On Friday, December 16, 2011 05:02:33 AM Joe Malcolm wrote:
>
>> Once upon a time, UUNET did the opposite by setting
>> origin to unknown for peer routes, in an attempt to
>> prefer customer routes over peer routes. We moved to
>> local preference shortly th
On 12/15/11 14:12 , Jeff Wheeler wrote:
> On Thu, Dec 15, 2011 at 4:54 PM, Joel jaeggli wrote:
>> We know rather alot about the original posters' business, it has ~34
>> million wireless subscribers in north america. I think it's safe to
>> assume that adequate d
On 12/15/11 13:43 , Leo Bicknell wrote:
> In a message written on Thu, Dec 15, 2011 at 01:36:32PM -0800, David Conrad
> wrote:
>> ARIN's job (well, beyond the world travel, publishing comic books, handing
>> out raffle prizes, etc.) is to allocate and register addresses according to
>> community
On 12/14/11 18:46 , Jimmy Hess wrote:
> On Wed, Dec 14, 2011 at 3:15 PM, Cameron Byrne wrote:
>> Fyi, I just was rejected from arin for an ipv4 allocation. I demonstrated I
>> own ~100k ipv4 addresses today.
>> My customers use over 10 million bogon / squat space ip addresses today,
>> and I have
On 12/12/11 02:05 , Leigh Porter wrote:
>> -Original Message- From: Vitkovsky, Adam
>> [mailto:avitkov...@emea.att.com] Sent: 12 December 2011 09:19 To:
>> Eric Parsonage; valdis.kletni...@vt.edu Cc: nanog@nanog.org
>> Subject: RE: Sad IPv4 story?
>>
>>> and models that doesn't take "we m
s to akamai and level3
>> Faisal
>>
>> On Dec 11, 2011, at 10:21 PM, Joel Jaeggli wrote:
>>
>>> Netflix uses CDNs for content delivery and the platform runs in EC2. What
>>> would peering with them achieve?
>>>
>>> Sent from my iPhone
>
Netflix uses CDNs for content delivery and the platform runs in EC2. What would
peering with them achieve?
Sent from my iPhone
On Dec 11, 2011, at 18:06, Faisal Imtiaz wrote:
> Which leads to a question to be asked...
>
> Is netflix willing to peer directly with ISP / NSP's ?
>
> Regards.
>
On 12/10/11 21:42 , Joel jaeggli wrote:
> On 12/10/11 17:48 , Barry Shein wrote:
>>
>>>> I just had a personal email from a brand new ISP in the Asia-Pacific
>>>> area desperately looking for enough IPv4 to be able to run their
>>>> business the way th
On 12/10/11 17:48 , Barry Shein wrote:
>
>>> I just had a personal email from a brand new ISP in the Asia-Pacific
>>> area desperately looking for enough IPv4 to be able to run their
>>> business the way they would like?
>
> This sniping elicited by the above seems inappropriate and
> unprofessio
On 12/9/11 18:22 , Keegan Holley wrote:
>>
>>
>>> assumption that writable SNMP was a bad idea but have never actually
>> tried
>>> it. I was curious what others were using, netconf or just scripted
>> logins.
>>> I'm also fighting a losing battle to convince people that netconf isn't
>>> evil. I
On 12/6/11 00:50 , Florian Weimer wrote:
> * Alex Le Heux:
>
>> The RIPE NCC is aware that 128.0.0.0/16 is configured as a martian by
>> default in (some) Juniper OS, even though RFC 5735 and RFC3330 outline
>> that this /16 should no longer be reserved as specialised address
>> space.
>
> Would
On 11/29/11 09:30 , Owen DeLong wrote:
> I believe those have been obsoleted, but, /64 remains the best choice, IMHO.
operational practice has moved on.
http://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc6164
> Owen
>
> On Nov 29, 2011, at 9:00 AM, McCall, Gabriel wrote:
>
>> Note that /127 is strongly discouraged
On 11/25/11 12:02 , Jay Hennigan wrote:
> On 11/25/11 11:34 AM, Joel jaeggli wrote:
>
>> Cars generically cause at lot more deaths than faulty traffic
>> controllers 13.2 per 100,000 population in the US annually.
>
> The cars don't (often) cause them. The drivers d
On 11/22/11 08:16 , Jay Ashworth wrote:
> - Original Message -
>> From: "Owen DeLong"
>
>> As in all cases, additional flexibility results in additional ability
>> to make mistakes. Simple mechanical lockouts do not scale to the
>> modern world. The benefits of these additional capabiliti
On 11/21/11 14:18 , Nathan Eisenberg wrote:
>> Look at the number that are refusing to make generous prefix
>> allocations
>> to residential end users and limiting them to /56, /60, or even worse,
>> /64.
>
> Owen,
>
> What does Joe Sixpack do at home with a /48 that he cannot do with a /56 or a
On 11/19/11 01:35 , Fearghas McKay wrote:
>
> On 17 Nov 2011, at 12:58, A. Chase Turner wrote:
>
>> I am seeking a $100 turnkey micro hardware appliance to plug into a LAN hub
>> (behind a consumer-level cable modem) whose only purpose in life is to send
>> heartbeat (and simple quality of serv
On 11/14/11 10:24 , Joe Greco wrote:
>> Sure, anytime there's an attack or failure on a SCADA network that
>> wouldn't have occurred had it been air-gapped, it's easy for people to
>> knee-jerk a "SCADA networks should be airgapped" response. But that's
>> not really intelligent commentary unless
On 11/7/11 08:37 , Jared Mauch wrote:
>
> On Nov 7, 2011, at 11:27 AM, Richard Golodner wrote:
>
>> On Mon, 2011-11-07 at 11:09 -0500, Todd Snyder wrote:
>>> Can anyone point to any authoritative updates about this?
>>
>> I think Jared's suggestion was about as close as your going to get for
The cellular radios firmware doesn't support ipv6(on your iPhone)...
Sent from my iPhone
On Nov 4, 2011, at 4:45 PM, Pete Carah wrote:
> On 11/04/2011 06:04 PM, Cameron Byrne wrote:
>> FYI.
>>
>> T-Mobile USA now has opt-in beta support for an Android phone on IPv6,
>> more info here https://s
On 10/31/11 03:43 , Jeroen Massar wrote:
> On 2011-10-31 08:56 , Dmitry Cherkasov wrote:
>> Hello,
>>
>> Please advice what is the best practice to use IPv6 address block
>> across distributed locations.
>
> You go to multiple RIRs and get multiple prefixes.
>
> Heck, you apparently can even get
On 10/31/11 05:59 , Owen DeLong wrote:
> Ideally, you should put a /48 at each location.
>
> Owen
>
> On Oct 31, 2011, at 12:56 AM, Dmitry Cherkasov wrote:
>
>> Hello,
>>
>> Please advice what is the best practice to use IPv6 address block
>> across distributed locations.
>>
>> Recently we obtain
Email as facility is a public good whether it constitutes a commons or
not... If wasn't you wouldn't bother putting up a server that would
accept unsolicited incoming connections on behalf of yourself and
others, doing so is generically non-rival and non-excludable although
not perfectly so in eith
On 10/27/11 20:24 , Ryan Finnesey wrote:
> If I want to get a block of IP's issued for a network within Mexico who do I
> talk with? I have been told arin does not cover Mexico. It was my
> understand arin covers North America.
mexico moved to the lacnic region with the formation of the lacnic r
On 10/12/11 07:47 , andrew.wallace wrote:
> Guys the outage has moved to U.S and Canada, I think we need to look at this
> perhaps being sabotage.
>
> http://news.cnet.com/8301-30686_3-20119163-266/blackberry-service-issues-spread-to-u.s-and-canada/
North American outages of the blackberry platf
On 10/10/11 07:00 , Owen DeLong wrote:
> It would be wise for NANOG to approach future venues and specifically
> discuss these things with the hotel IT departments in question ahead
> of time so that they have some remote chance of being prepared.
The hotel IT department is the guy who runs the a
On 10/10/11 21:25 , Christopher Morrow wrote:
> On Mon, Oct 10, 2011 at 11:36 PM, Owen DeLong wrote:
>> I don't think it is. I think that you can negotiate and I will point out
>> that the hotel
>> here has wanted our business enough that they have now scrambled to make
>> life significantly bett
On 10/10/11 17:12 , Randy Carpenter wrote:
>
> Very nice. I wonder if this is an option we could try to use in
> future meetings. It makes sense, really, since we already have decent
> connectivity for the conference areas, and we wouldn't be destroying
> the hotel's outside connection (only their
On 10/9/11 05:10 , Martin Millnert wrote:
> On Sat, Oct 8, 2011 at 6:14 PM, Florian Weimer wrote:
>> IPv4 addresses will never run out in a strict sense of the word, it
>> will just become increasingly more difficult to reassign IPv4 address
>> space to those who need it.
>
> If you by difficult
On 10/7/11 11:31 , Arturo Servin wrote:
>
> What do you mean with "purchasing or renting IPv4".
>
> Last time that I check it was not possible in the RIR world.
If you're not a legitimate business why would you bother with commonly
accepted policy?
> If you mean "hijacking" un
On 10/7/11 08:26 , Paul Graydon wrote:
> On 10/6/2011 8:02 PM, John Levine wrote:
>>> DISCLAIMER:...
>> Wow. I was thinking about answering the question, but now I don't dare.
>>
>> Regards,
>> John Levine, jo...@iecc.com, Primary Perpetrator of "The Internet for
>> Dummies",
>> Please consider th
On 10/5/11 10:05 , Michael Sinatra wrote:
> The thread on f-root reminded my of an anecdotal datum regarding DNSSEC
> in China. I was in China back in August, staying at the Green Lake
> Hotel in Kunming, Yunnan Provence. When connecting to the hotel in-room
> network (there was no wireless but a
On 10/2/11 15:43 , Joel jaeggli wrote:
> On 10/2/11 15:25 , Jimmy Hess wrote:
>> On Sun, Oct 2, 2011 at 4:53 PM, wrote:
>>> On Sun, 02 Oct 2011 08:38:36 PDT, Michael Thomas said:
>>>> I'm not sure why lack of TLS is considered to be problem with Facebook.
>
On 10/2/11 15:25 , Jimmy Hess wrote:
> On Sun, Oct 2, 2011 at 4:53 PM, wrote:
>> On Sun, 02 Oct 2011 08:38:36 PDT, Michael Thomas said:
>>> I'm not sure why lack of TLS is considered to be problem with Facebook.
>>> The man in the middle is the other side of the connection, tls or otherwise.
>> O
On 9/30/11 15:58 , Seth Mattinen wrote:
> On 9/30/11 3:41 PM, Michael Painter wrote:
>> Steven G. Huter wrote:
>>> this August 2011 article in the Economist outlines some relevant info
>>> about the prineville, oregon FB datacenter.
>>>
>>> http://www.economist.com/node/21525237
>>>
>>> steve
>>
>>
On 9/30/11 15:19 , Steven G. Huter wrote:
>>> I can't tell you the kind of servers, but I can say that I was
>>> recently in Prineville, OR, where FB is building a data center (and a
>>> second data center). I was used to the ol data centers - you know,
>>> where there's raised floors, cabinets, co
On 9/30/11 14:59 , Jones, Barry wrote:
> I can't tell you the kind of servers, but I can say that I was
> recently in Prineville, OR, where FB is building a data center (and a
> second data center). I was used to the ol data centers - you know,
> where there's raised floors, cabinets, cool air, a g
On 9/29/11 17:46 , Robert Bonomi wrote:
>> From: Nathan Eisenberg
>> Subject: RE: Synology Disk DS211J
>> Date: Thu, 29 Sep 2011 21:58:23 +
>>
>>> And this is why the prudent home admin runs a firewall device he or she
>>> can trust, and has a "default deny" rule in place even for outgoing
>
On 9/20/11 10:22 , Hank Nussbacher wrote:
> On Tue, 20 Sep 2011, Patrick W. Gilmore wrote:
>
> Newbie question:
>
> If I do:
> route-views>sho ip bgp 4.0.0.0
> BGP routing table entry for 4.0.0.0/9, version 821994
>
> why do I see the /9 and not the /8 by default? If I do a specific
> lookup fo
routeviews says the /9s have been announced for a while
the route object for 4.0.0.0/9 was last updated 20060203
On 9/20/11 10:13 , Hank Nussbacher wrote:
> Did Level3 withdraw 4.0.0.0/8 today and start announcing it as two /9s?
>
> -Hank
>
On 9/19/11 18:49 , Richard Barnes wrote:
> And if they turn up the voltage on the fence high enough, dinner could be
> cooked by the time the crew gets there!
montana experience says:
cows have rather thick skin, sheep come with insulation, and bison will
go through anything that gets in their wa
given that as 729 maxes out at 800cpi there are probably slightly kinky
ways to attack the problem, e.g. someone doing it with disk packs.
http://chrisfenton.com/cray-1-digital-archeology/
there's still plenty of equipment that can wrap 1/2" tape around a spindle.
On 9/19/11 21:14 , valdis.kletn
On 9/16/11 11:42 , Steve Bohrer wrote:
> My general question is "what meaning do I give to lossy traceroutes,
> even when pings show no problem."
>
> Can I expect that backbone routers should never give me timeouts on a
> traceroute through them, so, lots of asterisks from these systems
> indicate
On 9/16/11 13:50 , Nathan Eisenberg wrote:
>>> As an ISP, ARIN will not give you any space if you are new. You
>>> have to already have an equivalent amount of space from another
>>> provider.
>>
>> does arin *really* still have that amazing barrier to market
>> entry?
>
> Yes. If you want PI sp
On 9/14/11 14:24 , Don Gould wrote:
> * Did you know that Cisco has a 100Gb solution?
need more L3 1u TORs with 4 x 40 and 48 x 10...
On 9/10/11 23:30 , Damian Menscher wrote:
> On Fri, Sep 9, 2011 at 11:33 PM, Jimmy Hess wrote:
>
>> On Fri, Sep 9, 2011 at 4:48 PM, Marcus Reid wrote:
>>> On Wed, Sep 07, 2011 at 09:17:10AM -0700, Network IP Dog wrote:
>>> I like this response; instant CA death penalty seems to put the
>>> incen
On 9/8/11 08:49 , Lyle Giese wrote:
> Can we really push an IPv6 agenda for CDN's when IPv6 routing at high
> backend levels is still not complete? I certainly don't have the
> 'clout' to push that, but full routing between Cogent and HE needs to be
> fixed.
It's your job to run your network such
On 9/7/11 09:37 , valdis.kletni...@vt.edu wrote:
> On Wed, 07 Sep 2011 09:28:28 PDT, Joel jaeggli said:
>
>> The way to achieve a return on invested capital is to attract and retain
>> customers who pay for a service which they find compelling.
>
> Only true if long-te
On 9/7/11 09:02 , Michael Holstein wrote:
>
>> I would love a world where engineering was consulted by marketing :(
>>
>
> Wouldn't be a problem is management invested based on engineering's
> recommendations.
>
> There are few problems that money can't solve .. in this case, it's
> "sure, we
On 9/3/11 04:20 , Skeeve Stevens wrote:
> Hey all,
>
> I've been thinking about the impact that iCloud (by Apple) will have
> on the Internet.
>
> My guess is that 99% of consumer internet access is Asymmetrical
> (DSL, Cable, wireless, etc) and iCloud when launched will 'upload'
> obscene amount
On 8/30/11 02:21 , Michael J McCafferty wrote:
> All,
> Orange innerduct/split-loom tubing for multi-mode, yellow for
> single-mode... Where's the aqua for the aqua OM3 fiber?
> I feel like the Ethernet fashion police, but it's a horrible color
> clash for aqua fiber dressed in yellow o
On 8/28/11 12:29 , John Levine wrote:
>> It looks like the DHS, FEMA got this emergency wrong... by the time
>> it got to NYC it was the equivalent of a normal day in Scotland. I
>> live in Scotland...
http://www.metoffice.gov.uk/climate/uk/actualmonthly/
22.5cm seems to be the max for the month
On Aug 20, 2011, at 10:29 PM, Tammy A. Wisdom wrote:
> I completely agree... the real issue here is the system is flawed and
> RIPE/ARIN/APNIC etc have zero actual authority over actual routing. Yet
> another reason they aren't worth the money we flush down the toilet for them
> to do absolut
On Aug 16, 2011, at 9:40 AM, valdis.kletni...@vt.edu wrote:
> On Tue, 16 Aug 2011 10:53:24 EDT, Christopher Morrow said:
>
>> anyway, they do these donkey things because they can :( people have no
>> real option (except not to play the game, ala war games).
>
> My brother recently tried to get
On Aug 16, 2011, at 11:52 PM, Måns Nilsson wrote:
> Subject: Re: Verizon Business - LTE? Date: Tue, Aug 16, 2011 at 11:49:38AM
> -0400 Quoting chris (tknch...@gmail.com):
>> Overall, IMO the trends are just seem to be going backwards. We have more
>> speed but we can use it less? What kind of te
On Aug 11, 2011, at 3:19 PM, Randy Bush wrote:
>> The only reason in my opinion to run IS-IS rather than OSPF today is
>> due to the fact that IS-IS is decoupled from IP making it less
>> vulnerable to attacks.
>
> how about simpler and more stable?
not rooted to a particular area.
supports mo
On Aug 10, 2011, at 6:43 PM, William Herrin wrote:
> I mean really, why
> wouldn't the life safety system in a car dynamically acquire its
> globally-addressable IPv6 addresses from the customer's cheap home
> Internet equipment? So they'll each need their /64's which means the
> car as a whole n
On Aug 10, 2011, at 6:52 PM, Brian E Carpenter wrote:
> On 2011-08-11 12:45, james machado wrote:
>
>> what is the life expectancy of IPv6? It won't live forever and we
>> can't reasonably expect it too. I understand we don't want run out of
>> addresses in the next 10-40 years but what about
On Aug 8, 2011, at 5:14 PM, Owen DeLong wrote:
> I'm sure there will be platforms that end up on both sides of this question.
I know of no asic in a switch that claims to support ipv6 that does it this
way... That would tend to place you at a competitive disadvantage to
broadcom/marvell/fulcru
On Aug 7, 2011, at 3:09 PM, Jonathon Exley wrote:
> This has probably been said before, but it makes me uncomfortable to think of
> everybody in the world being given /48 subnets by default.
> All of a sudden that wide expanse of 2^128 IP addresses shrinks to 2^48
> sites. Sure that's still 655
This is one of the reasons that I thought a useful output from the opsec or idr
working group would be a documented set of community functions. Not mapped to
values mind you. but I really like to say to providers "do you support rfc blah
communities" or "what's your rfc blah community mapping" r
On Aug 5, 2011, at 9:17 AM, Brian Mengel wrote:
> In reviewing IPv6 end user allocation policies, I can find little
> agreement on what prefix length is appropriate for residential end
> users. /64 and /56 seem to be the favorite candidates, with /56 being
> slightly preferred.
>
> I am most cu
On Aug 5, 2011, at 3:56 PM, Frank Bulk wrote:
> Let's clarify -- /48 is much preferred by Owen,
It's is also supported by RIR policy, and the RFC series. It would unfair to
characterize owen as the only holder of that preference.
> but most ISPs seem to be
> zeroing in on a /56 for production.
On Aug 2, 2011, at 9:56 PM, Mark Newton wrote:
>
> On 03/08/2011, at 1:20 PM, Jima wrote:
>
>> Alas, I will maintain that any household that multi-homes at this stage is,
>> indeed, abnormal.
>
>
> I'll go out on a limb and suggest that most people loathe their telcos with
> an undying venom
On Aug 2, 2011, at 3:37 PM, james machado wrote:
>>>
>>> Yes I am saying a household that mulithomes is abnormal and with
>>> today's and contracted monopolies I expect that to continue. You are
>>> not a normal household in that 1) you multihome 2) you are willing to
>>> pay $1500+ US a
On Aug 2, 2011, at 2:42 PM, james machado wrote:
>>> Lets look at some issues here.
>>>
>>> 1) it's unlikely that a "normal" household with 2.5 kids and a dog/cat
>>> will be able to qualify for their own end user assignment from ARIN.
>>>
>>
>> Interesting...
>>
>> I have a "normal household
On Aug 2, 2011, at 10:17 AM, Owen DeLong wrote:
>>
>> en1: flags=8863 mtu 1500
>> ether 60:33:4b:01:75:85
>> inet6 fe80::6233:4bff:fe01:7585%en1 prefixlen 64 scopeid 0x5
>> inet 192.168.191.223 netmask 0xff00 broadcast 192.168.191.255
>> inet6 fd92:7065:b8e::6233:4bff:f
On Jul 27, 2011, at 5:05 PM, Denys Fedoryshchenko wrote:
> On Wed, 27 Jul 2011 10:15:04 -0500, David E. Smith wrote:
>>>
> I think on cheap platforms, they have wirespeed gigabit only on switching
> functions, but rest will suck. Their top products can do more, but they are
> still cannot b
My measured availability for a automatic reverse ssh tunnel connection made
through a 4g radio in the field was 52%. this was vs 95% on the lab/office
environment with the same equipment. That particular experiment I declared a
failure.
There was never a closer truism than ymmv.
joel
On Jul 2
given how often the cellular address changes on my Verizon 4g router not to
mention the external ip address on their LSN I think I can speculate...
joel
On Jul 26, 2011, at 12:11 PM, JORDI PALET MARTINEZ wrote:
> Hi Cameron,
>
> What about routers ? In some locations, users may have only the
On Jul 20, 2011, at 6:25 PM, Owen DeLong wrote:
> SSDs can be a good alternative these days as well. Some of them have gotten
> to be quite fast. Sure, you'll have to replace them more often than spinning
> media,
> but,
Actually the the scale of writes associated with this application is unlik
On Jul 20, 2011, at 3:37 PM, Walter Keen wrote:
> We've recently setup ISC DHCPd with failover for lease information, and
> LDAP as a configuration source (mostly because of our need for
> dynamically adding dhcp reservations for cable modems, etc) -- we don't
> have any performance issues thu
401 - 500 of 975 matches
Mail list logo
