Conor"
> To: "Faisal Imtiaz"
> Cc: "Mike Hammett" , "Luke Guillory"
> , "nanog list"
> Sent: Monday, June 19, 2017 7:14:53 PM
> Subject: Re: DWDM Mux/Demux using 40G Optics
> Do you have any idea if fiberstore has one with both a m
t; Thanks for the answers. From the sounds of it, no one knows the real
>>> difference between the expansion port, 1310 port, and 1550 port. For
>> real
>>> world applications, I would assume the monitor port would be to plug
>> in a
>>> handheld meter
t; >
> >
> > Faisal Imtiaz
> > Snappy Internet & Telecom
> > 7266 SW 48 Street
> > Miami, FL 33155
> > Tel: 305 663 5518 x 232 <(305)%20663-5518>
> >
> > Help-desk: (305)663-5518 <(305)%20663-5518> Option 2
;
> --
>
> *From: *"Colton Conor"
> *To: *"Faisal Imtiaz"
> *Cc: *"Mike Hammett" , "Luke Guillory" <
> lguill...@reservetele.com>, "nanog list"
> *Sent: *Monday, June
: "Luke Guillory"
> To: "Faisal Imtiaz" , "Colton Conor"
>
> Cc: "nanog list"
> Sent: Monday, June 19, 2017 3:13:10 PM
> Subject: RE: DWDM Mux/Demux using 40G Optics
> Faisal,
>
> How would he inject his current 4x10 40g into the mux wh
k: (305)663-5518 <(305)%20663-5518> Option 2 or Email:
> supp...@snappytelecom.net
>
> --
>
> *From: *"Colton Conor"
> *To: *"Faisal Imtiaz"
> *Cc: *"Mike Hammett" , "Luke Guillory" <
> lguill...@res
> Help-desk: (305)663-5518 Option 2 or Email: supp...@snappytelecom.net
>>> From: "Colton Conor" < colton.co...@gmail.com >
>>> To: "Mike Hammett" < na...@ics-il.net >
>>> Cc: "Luke Guillory" < lguill...@reservetele.com >,
Original Message-
> From: NANOG [mailto:nanog-bounces+lguillory=reservetele@nanog.org] On
> Behalf Of Colton Conor
> Sent: Monday, June 19, 2017 3:32 PM
> To: Mike Hammett
> Cc: nanog list
> Subject: Re: DWDM Mux/Demux using 40G Optics
>
> I guess that makes sense. The plus or m
ssage-
From: NANOG [mailto:nanog-bounces+lguillory=reservetele@nanog.org] On
Behalf Of Colton Conor
Sent: Monday, June 19, 2017 3:32 PM
To: Mike Hammett
Cc: nanog list
Subject: Re: DWDM Mux/Demux using 40G Optics
I guess that makes sense. The plus or minus some is the question. FS is
claiming
tiaz
Cc: nanog list
Subject: Re: DWDM Mux/Demux using 40G Optics
Thanks for the answers. From the sounds of it, no one knows the real difference
between the expansion port, 1310 port, and 1550 port. For real world
applications, I would assume the monitor port would be to plug in a handheld
meter, an
33155
> Tel: 305 663 5518 x 232
>
> Help-desk: (305)663-5518 Option 2 or Email: supp...@snappytelecom.net
>
>
>
>
>
> From: "Colton Conor" < colton.co...@gmail.com >
> To: "Mike Hammett" < na...@ics-il.net >
> Cc: "Luke Guillory" < lg
Monday, June 19, 2017 3:14 PM
To: Faisal Imtiaz
Cc: Mike Hammett; Luke Guillory; nanog list
Subject: Re: DWDM Mux/Demux using 40G Optics
Thanks for the answers. From the sounds of it, no one knows the real difference
between the expansion port, 1310 port, and 1550 port. For real world
applicati
ot;Colton Conor"
To: "Faisal Imtiaz"
Cc: "Mike Hammett" , "Luke Guillory"
, "nanog list"
Sent: Monday, June 19, 2017 3:14:19 PM
Subject: Re: DWDM Mux/Demux using 40G Optics
Thanks for the answers. From the sounds of it, no one knows the real diff
Guillory" , "nanog list" <
> nanog@nanog.org>, "Faisal Imtiaz"
> *Sent: *Monday, June 19, 2017 3:30:37 PM
> *Subject: *Re: DWDM Mux/Demux using 40G Optics
>
> I guess that is the real question. Besides the client ports that are
> clearly identified by ch
gt;
> -
> Mike Hammett
> Intelligent Computing Solutions
> http://www.ics-il.com
>
> Midwest-IX
> http://www.midwest-ix.com
>
> - Original Message -
>
> From: "Luke Guillory"
> To: "Faisal Imtiaz"
> Cc: "nanog list"
Pics came in on my side, that's when I figured you were saying 1 40g plus 10s.
-Original Message-
From: Faisal Imtiaz [mailto:fai...@snappytelecom.net]
Sent: Monday, June 19, 2017 2:50 PM
To: Luke Guillory
Cc: Colton Conor; nanog list
Subject: Re: DWDM Mux/Demux using 40G Opti
19, 2017 3:47:29 PM
> Subject: RE: DWDM Mux/Demux using 40G Optics
> Gotcha, figured I misread it. Sorry it's Monday.
>
>
>
> -Original Message-
> From: Faisal Imtiaz [mailto:fai...@snappytelecom.net]
> Sent: Monday, June 19, 2017 2:45 PM
> To: Luk
Gotcha, figured I misread it. Sorry it's Monday.
-Original Message-
From: Faisal Imtiaz [mailto:fai...@snappytelecom.net]
Sent: Monday, June 19, 2017 2:45 PM
To: Luke Guillory
Cc: Colton Conor; nanog list
Subject: Re: DWDM Mux/Demux using 40G Optics
Let me try to explain b
-
From: "Luke Guillory"
To: "Faisal Imtiaz"
Cc: "nanog list"
Sent: Monday, June 19, 2017 2:39:00 PM
Subject: RE: DWDM Mux/Demux using 40G Optics
And how would he pass his current 40g through that mux? Unless I'm misreading
your email which I took as he can
t;Colton Conor" , "nanog list"
> Sent: Monday, June 19, 2017 3:39:00 PM
> Subject: RE: DWDM Mux/Demux using 40G Optics
> And how would he pass his current 40g through that mux? Unless I'm misreading
> your email which I took as he can use his current setup along wi
--
From: Faisal Imtiaz [mailto:fai...@snappytelecom.net]
Sent: Monday, June 19, 2017 2:27 PM
To: Luke Guillory
Cc: Colton Conor; nanog list
Subject: Re: DWDM Mux/Demux using 40G Optics
Bench test of the system, with the muxes...
sorry for the large pictures :)
Faisal Imtiaz
Snappy Internet &
uillory" , "nanog list"
> ,
> "Faisal Imtiaz"
> Sent: Monday, June 19, 2017 3:30:37 PM
> Subject: Re: DWDM Mux/Demux using 40G Optics
> I guess that is the real question. Besides the client ports that are clearly
> identified by channel number on Muxes,
olton.co...@gmail.com>
> *Cc: *"nanog list"
> *Sent: *Monday, June 19, 2017 2:13:10 PM
> *Subject: *RE: DWDM Mux/Demux using 40G Optics
>
>
> Faisal,
>
> How would he inject his current 4x10 40g into the mux which is currently
> on a single LC cable?
>
: "Luke Guillory"
To: "Faisal Imtiaz" , "Colton Conor"
Cc: "nanog list"
Sent: Monday, June 19, 2017 2:13:10 PM
Subject: RE: DWDM Mux/Demux using 40G Optics
Faisal,
How would he inject his current 4x10 40g into the mux which is currently on a
singl
Of Faisal Imtiaz
Sent: Monday, June 19, 2017 2:02 PM
To: Colton Conor
Cc: nanog list
Subject: Re: DWDM Mux/Demux using 40G Optics
Answers in-line below.
If you look at the CWDM Muxes (8 or 9 channel) you will notice a common
configuration of
Upgrade Port (expansion port) + 1450 or 1470
nor; NANOG
Subject: Re: DWDM Mux/Demux using 40G Optics
The guys at fibrestore will point you in the right direction on all this if you
ask them these questions. They are actually very helpful and will assign you a
specialist to assist.
Original message
From: Colton Conor
Date
gt; Sent: Monday, June 19, 2017 2:26:55 PM
> Subject: DWDM Mux/Demux using 40G Optics
> We are building a 40G metro ring using 40-Gigabit Ethernet QSFP+
> Transceivers. Specifically, we are using Juniper JNP-QSFP-40G-LR4. This is
> a QSFP+ Transceiver with a LC duplex head. We only have
On Mon, 19 Jun 2017 13:26:55 -0500, Colton Conor wrote
[snip]
> Maybe I should just ditch the 40G QSFP+ optics and use all 10G optics,
> but the switches I am using have 48 10G SFP+ ports and 6 QSFP+ ports
> built in. I know there are 40G breakout cables, but the whole point of
> 40G is to aggr
: DWDM Mux/Demux using 40G Optics
We are building a 40G metro ring using 40-Gigabit Ethernet QSFP+
Transceivers. Specifically, we are using Juniper JNP-QSFP-40G-LR4. This is
a QSFP+ Transceiver with a LC duplex head. We only have one pair of single
mode dark fibers around the ring. Our distance
We are building a 40G metro ring using 40-Gigabit Ethernet QSFP+
Transceivers. Specifically, we are using Juniper JNP-QSFP-40G-LR4. This is
a QSFP+ Transceiver with a LC duplex head. We only have one pair of single
mode dark fibers around the ring. Our distance between nodes around the
ring are al
30 matches
Mail list logo