On Jun 2, 2010, at 6:08 AM, Jimmy Changa wrote:
I was wondering if anyone had recommendations on IPv4 Anycast resources
(whitepapers, RFCs) as it relates to DNS?
http://www.pch.net/resources/papers/anycast/
http://www.pch.net/resources/papers/dns-service-architecture/
On Jun 28, 2010, at 5:58 PM, Paul Stewart wrote:
Does anyone know of BGP statistical data based on country? If I wanted
to know top 5 service providers in country XYZ based on number of BGP
peers for example, is there something that can tell me this
information? I can manually run a list of
On Jul 21, 2010, at 9:13 AM, Vitkovsky, Adam wrote:
Do you know of any vpn exchange point implementations please? -I mean
something like IXP but for mpls vpns
That would be like an IXP but for email. Or an IXP but for web traffic. VPNs
are an application that run over IP, and IXPs are
On Jul 21, 2010, at 5:44 AM, Jason Lewis wrote:
This says it's not just down for me.
http://downforeveryoneorjustme.com/pch.net
Anyone else?
We don't know of an outage this morning, but one of our web servers has been a
bit slow because someone's been multi-thread downloading our
On Jul 21, 2010, at 12:59 PM, William McCall wrote:
OP is referencing MPLS/BGP VPNs, not like IPsec VPNs. And I'm not sure
that I've (personally) ever heard of an IXP for MPLS.
Isn't that what one iteration of IXP-NSP in Japan was? I seem to recall that
they talked about it a lot, back
On Jul 22, 2010, at 10:47 AM, Mikhail Strizhov wrote:
Dead again?
Web page says Could not connect: .
The multi-threaded download that's been hammering our web servers is still
going on. We've just turned up a new server this morning, and expect to have
the bulk-download processes moved
You should be able to find of these at http://www.internetmeetings.org . A few
not mentioned so far:
CaribNOG - http://www.caribnog.org/
NZNOG - http://www.nznog.org/
LacNOG - http://www.lacnog.org/
There were a couple attempts at Nordic, Scandinavian and Northern European
NOGs, which are now
On Nov 29, 2010, at 11:44 AM, Richard A Steenbergen wrote:
On Sun, Nov 28, 2010 at 04:09:55PM -0600, Aaron Wendel wrote:
According to pch they don't run most of them. I would say they run
very few compared to how many there actually are.
Uhh... Reality check, with the SD acquisition
On Dec 1, 2010, at 8:43 AM, Chris Adams wrote:
Once upon a time, Christopher Morrow morrowc.li...@gmail.com said:
the colo provider may not want to 'waste' electricity/cooling on a
vending machine...
A plain (non-drink) machine draws a few watts. I don't think rack
screws and patch
On Dec 8, 2010, at 10:13 AM, Eugen Leitl wrote:
Butlerian Jihad.
-Bill
On Dec 9, 2010, at 19:02, Robert E. Seastrom r...@seastrom.com wrote:
mikea mi...@mikea.ath.cx writes:
On Thu, Dec 09, 2010 at 06:26:30PM +, Dobbins, Roland wrote:
On Dec 10, 2010, at 1:19 AM, Michael Smith wrote:
front lines of this
http://tech.slashdot.org/submission/1416250/68-of-US-broadband-connections-arent-broadband
-Bill
PGP.sig
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Feb 4, 2011, at 10:47 AM, Heinrich Strauss wrote:
So once the early adopters migrate their networks to IPv6, there is no
business need to maintain the IPv4 allocation and that will be returned to
the free pool, since Business would see it as
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Feb 4, 2011, at 1:11 PM, Bill Woodcock wrote:
No, and in fact, I believe all the RIRs will probably do a reasonably brisk
business in reclamation and reallocation, albeit in ever smaller blocks.
On Feb 4, 2011, at 12:39 PM, Daniel
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Feb 5, 2011, at 11:22 AM, bmann...@vacation.karoshi.com wrote:
ARIN's community certinly is dominated by a particular type of network
operator.
It's dominated by the type of network operator who shows up and participates.
Generally, I hear
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Feb 5, 2011, at 10:27 AM, bmann...@vacation.karoshi.com wrote:
If I justified an allocation 20 years ago, under the then current policy,
it's presumptuous to presume the power of expropriation.
No one presumes it, and a lot of us are in the
subnet, others actively seek out sources of transit for the exchange
subnet.
-Bill Woodcock
Research Director
Packet Clearing House
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.4.11 (Darwin
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Feb 17, 2011, at 7:24 PM, Randy Bush wrote:
this from the guy who pushed layer three exchange points for years?
rofl!
I was one of the people who built one in 1994, and used it quite happily for a
few years, until it had outlasted its need.
On Mar 24, 2011, at 7:40 AM, Tore Anderson wrote:
They can only get them for free from ARIN if they can document
an immediate demand. Perhaps they don't have an immediate demand…
They can only get them _at all_ if they can document need. All receipt of
address space, whether from the
On Mar 24, 2011, at 1:47 PM, Patrick W. Gilmore wrote:
On Mar 24, 2011, at 3:40 PM, Owen DeLong wrote:
On Mar 24, 2011, at 12:42 PM, Zaid Ali z...@zaidali.com wrote:
I have seen age old discussions on single AS vs multiple AS for backbone
and datacenter design. I am particularly interested
On Mar 24, 2011, at 4:27 PM, Ravi Ramaswamy wrote:
Hi All - I am new to this mailer. Hopefully my question is posed to the
correct list.
Welcome.
I am using 2.5 Tbps as the peak volume of peering traffic over all peering
points for a Tier 1 ISP, for some modeling purposes. Is that a
On Mar 25, 2011, at 10:51 AM, Patrick W. Gilmore wrote:
The question is whether some data is better than no data. Honestly, I'm
not sure.
Yes, Patrick, I was just trying to be diplomatic about saying not such a good
idea so he'd keep reading through to the end, where I suggested some other,
On Dec 14, 2012, at 8:59 AM, Michael Thomas m...@mtcc.com wrote:
Matthew Newton wrote:
So really stupid question, and hopefully it's just me, do I need to do
something
on my servers?
Update the hints file. /var/named/ somewhere in all likelihood.
Second question: I know that renumbering
On Dec 14, 2012, at 11:51 AM, Mike A mi...@mikea.ath.cx wrote:
Yep. _Gloriously_! The US walked out, followed by bunchty others.
http://www.pcworld.com/article/2020469/opponents-say-itu-treaty-threatens-internet-freedom.html
At current count, to the best of my incomplete knowledge,
On Dec 20, 2012, at 10:20 AM, Michael Thomas m...@mtcc.com wrote:
I was looking at a Raspberry Pi board and was struck with how large the
ethernet
connector is in comparison to the board as a whole. It strikes me: ethernet
connectors haven't changed that I'm aware in pretty much 25 years.
Please consider signing this petition:
http://DeFundTheITU.org
…so we can stop paying for both sides of this idiotic fight. Note that if the
U.S. pulls its funding from the ITU, that's 10%, and if all of the countries
that stood with us at the WCIT do so, that would be 74% of the ITU's
On Jan 12, 2013, at 9:59 PM, bmann...@vacation.karoshi.com wrote:
its not that black/white. The ITU-R is actually -very- useful
I'm not sure I'd go so far as to say that, but we can't withdraw from it, which
is why it's called out as an exception in the petition.
On Jan 12, 2013, at 9:04 PM, Fred Baker (fred) f...@cisco.com wrote:
ITU-D and ITU-R do a lot of good work.
Care to try to cite an example? R we can't pull out of because NRO needs its
slots. I'm not sure that constitutes good work. It's minor ledger-keeping,
and that's why it's excluded
On Jan 12, 2013, at 8:17 PM, John Levine jo...@iecc.com wrote:
The political fallout from the US being seen as a big rich bully taking its
wallet
and going home is likely not worth the trivial amount of money involved.
Trivial to whom? Is $11M/year trivial relative to the $181M/year ITU
On Jan 13, 2013, at 7:54 AM, bmann...@vacation.karoshi.com wrote:
Since it is possible to fund -by sector-, there is no good reason to tar the
entire Union with the same brush.
Bill, please read the petition before attempting to comment on it.
Again, the petition specifically excludes ITU-R,
On Jan 14, 2013, at 11:12 AM, Owen DeLong o...@delong.com wrote:
On Jan 14, 2013, at 7:27 AM, John Levine jo...@iecc.com wrote:
The solution is not to cut off the poor countries.
I have no reason whatsoever to believe that defunding the ITU would
cut off the poor countries.
Quite the
On Feb 14, 2013, at 12:06 PM, Rubens Kuhl rube...@gmail.com wrote:
Not tested under attack, but this DNS provider is worth a look since
it's the only one with both IPv6 and DNSSEC a colleague could find:
http://www.dnsunlimited.com/
Hm. Your colleague didn't look very far. All of the
On Mar 28, 2013, at 2:17 PM, Warren Bailey
wbai...@satelliteintelligencegroup.com wrote:
- Welding Gear is expensive, underwater gear is insanely expensive.
- Welding is pretty difficult..
- Underwater welding requires knowledge of SCUBA *AND* welding techniques
under water.
...going after
On Apr 16, 2013, at 11:27 AM, Mark Jeftovic mar...@easydns.com wrote:
We need to find a clueful P.O.C at the Government of Canada NOC,
Introductions made off-list.
-Bill
On Wed, 3 Jun 2009, Drew Weaver wrote:
Should the additional sites be connected to the primary site
(and/or the Internet directly)?
Yes, because any out-of-band synchronization method between the servers at
the production site and the servers at the DR site is likely to be more
On Thu, 4 Jun 2009, Roland Dobbins wrote:
With all due respect, both of these posited choices are quite ugly and
tend to lead to huge operational difficulties, susceptibility to DDoS,
etc. Definitely not recommended except as a last resort in a difficult
situation, IMHO.
On Sat, 13 Jun 2009, Jared Mauch wrote:
the menog lists require you to subscribe to
view the archives. (So this could be redundant to content
there.. i am not on their list).
No, this conversation is not also occuring on the MENOG list.
On Jul 15, 2009, at 5:07 AM, Sean Donelan wrote:
The typical network architecture problem, what are the best
(shortest latency, greatest bandwidth, etc) locations to connect to
the every nation in the world? As you increase the number of
locations, how do the choices change?
If you only
So I've embarked on the no-doubt-futile task of trying to interpret
SLAs as empirically-verifiable technical specifications, rather than
as marketing blather. And there's something that I'm finding
particularly puzzling:
In most SLAs, there seem to be two separate guarantees proffered:
On Thu, 6 Aug 2009, Marshall Eubanks wrote:
http://www.nytimes.com/2009/08/07/technology/internet/07twitter.html
Mr. Woodcock said this
particular attack consisted of a wave of spam e-mail messages, which began
infiltrating Twitter
Uh... Yes, well, the gist of my
On Thu, 6 Aug 2009, Bill Woodcock wrote:
Note that this is a deeply-layered conflict, with both sides trying to
pass off actions as those of the other, and I don't know of anyone who's
asserted that they have any means of determining whether this was a
Georgian attack
If your 95th percentile utilization is at 80% capacity...
s/80/60/
s/60/40/
I would suggest that the reason each of you have a different number is
because there's a different best number for each case. Looking for any
single number to fit all cases, rather than understanding the underlying
On Mon, 23 Nov 2009, Stephane Bortzmeyer wrote:
% whois -h whois.ripe.net AS1712
as-name:FR-RENATER-ENST
% whois -h whois.arin.net AS1712
OrgName:Twilight Communications
That would be ARIN, rather than RIPE:
On Mon, 23 Nov 2009, Darren Bolding wrote:
I need to identify a quality data cabling contractor in the Bay Area
Kray Cabling. http://kraycablinginc.com/
-Bill
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
On Oct 14, 2011, at 8:36 AM, Dobbins, Roland wrote:
http://www.arbornetworks.com/survey/ISR2011
404
The page you requested cannot be found.
-Bill
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.4.11 (Darwin)
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
On Oct 18, 2011, at 11:46 PM, Nathanael C. Cariaga wrote:
Is it safe to conclude that the web hosting provider's available routes would
would depend on the peers who are advertising their AS / network? (i.e if
web hosting provider claims that
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
On Wed, Feb 29, 2012 at 10:08 AM, Justin M. Streiner
strei...@cluebyfour.org wrote:
On Wed, 29 Feb 2012, Rodrick Brown wrote:
There's about 1/2 a dozen or so known private and government research
facilities on Antarctica and I'm surprised to
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
Hello, Anurag.
On Mar 8, 2012, at 9:51 PM, Anurag Bhatia wrote:
1. For anycasting does announcing a /24 from different ASNs (of
different datacenters) makes sense or it will be an issue to have a block
being announced from different ASNs?
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
On Mar 9, 2012, at 12:11 AM, Elmar K. Bins wrote:
Well, let's say, using Quagga/BIRD might not really be best practice for
everybody... (e.g., *we* are using Cisco equipment for this)
How does your Cisco know whether an adjacent nameserver is
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
On Mar 9, 2012, at 1:34 AM, Elmar K. Bins wrote:
Re Bill,
wo...@pch.net (Bill Woodcock) wrote:
Well, let's say, using Quagga/BIRD might not really be best practice for
everybody... (e.g., *we* are using Cisco equipment for this)
How does
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
On Mar 9, 2012, at 11:05 PM, Graham Beneke wrote:
There appear to be no anycast instances of the gTLD servers in Africa either.
That's not the case. .ORG, for example, is hosted in Cape Town and Cairo, and
we host more than a hundred ccTLDs in
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
On Mar 10, 2012, at 8:05 AM, Suresh Ramasubramanian wrote:
Sure, if you can find a datacenter that's capable of handling all the
traffic, and has staff who are able to provide efficient remote hands for
huge racks of extremely powerful servers .
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
On Mar 30, 2012, at 11:21 AM, Raphael MAUNIER wrote:
Hello All,
This is now the end. The French regulator ( Arcep ) is now asking all the
people with an ASN in France ( with a L33 license ) to get all their
information on their peering.
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
On Mar 30, 2012, at 11:29 AM, Stefan Neufeind wrote:
You have to give them information twice a year
Well, then for a few hundered peerings send them one letter each and
wait for a reaction :-)
Remember, these are bureaucrats… Their reaction
Any recommendations of such?
-Bill
On May 19, 2012, at 9:20, Seth Mattinen se...@rollernet.us wrote:
On 5/19/12 3:48 AM, Jonathan Lassoff wrote:
On Sat, May 19, 2012 at 3:23 AM, Anurag Bhatia m...@anuragbhatia.com wrote:
Was wondering if there's anyone from Server
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
On Jun 3, 2012, at 12:35 PM, Anurag Bhatia wrote:
I tried doing anycasting with 3 nodes, and seems like it didn't worked well
at all. It seems like ISPs prefer their own or their customer route (which
is our transit provider) and there is almost
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
On Jun 15, 2012, at 10:36 AM, Isabel Dias wrote:
are you any good in Maths?
http://www.stanford.edu/~milgrom/publishedarticles/Advances%20in%20Routing%20Technologies%20and%20Internet%20Peering%20Agr.%202001.pdf
If you're good in maths, you'll
On Jul 16, 2012, at 3:23 PM, Jay Hanke wrote:
After a bit of googling, I found some references to an Internet
Exchange in St. Louis, MO called the St. Louis Regional Exchange.
Is this project still active?
It appears to be dead. The web site redirects to a commercial colo, and the
last few
On Jul 22, 2012, at 7:44 PM, ML wrote:
I was looking for information on any IX in Pittsburgh. Found PitX [1] ..info
is rather limited to say the least. Is there any information out there about
participants, size, etc?
Here:
On Wed, 15 Oct 2008, Colin Alston wrote:
I'm considering trying to come up with some means to automatically detect
a networks topology and draw pretty pictures.
InterMapper.
http://dartware.com/network_monitoring_products/intermapper/index.html
On Tue, 11 Nov 2008, Mark Tinka wrote:
Anyone know how we can contact AS16735 and their upstream
AS27664. We think they are hijacking a number of our
prefixes (AS24218- and AS17992-originated).
Have you tried CERT-BR? Uh... I was about to say they're usually very
On Wed, 19 Nov 2008, Heather Schiller wrote:
I don't know if a report like this already exists, but I haven't been able
to find one. Can someone (CIDR Report? BGPMon? PCH?) offer a report that
shows the discrepencies in Origin ASN according to the whois records, and
On Nov 19, 2008, at 4:16 PM, Heather Schiller wrote:
I don't know if a report like this already exists, but I haven't
been able to find one. Can someone (CIDR Report? BGPMon? PCH?)
offer a report that shows the discrepencies in Origin ASN according
to the whois records, and routes in the
http://www.pch.net/routing-origin-inconsistency/
Andrew Partan just pointed out to me that this is somewhat less useful
than it might be if the way we do our web apps were a little more
fully documented. There are tool-tips on organization names, which
show the actual AS numbers. And
On Tue, 25 Nov 2008 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
If I may... I am in possesion of your certified letter
-AND- the signed acknowledgement that you received notice
that I have taken posession of said certified mail.
please get your facts straight, esp. when
On Tue, 25 Nov 2008, Dean Anderson wrote:
A photo of Bill Woodcock's refused letter is at
http://www.av8.net/BillWoodcock.jpg
Oh my god... What _is_ that sitting on? Is your desk upholstered with
the hides of your victims?
Also, I suggest you consult a dictionary. The word
OmniGraffle is the better Visio.
Me three. We all use OmniGraffle. And Adobe Illustrator to create new
objects.
-Bill
On Mar 16, 2009, at 11:03 AM, Jeffrey Lyon wrote:
Check out Wataniya and Zain...
On Mon, Mar 16, 2009 at 1:12 PM, Robert D. Scott rob...@ufl.edu
wrote:
A unit within the University has need to get reliable network
connectivity
to Iraq, more specifically Baghdad. I was wondering if any
On Mon, 6 Apr 2009, Peter Beckman wrote:
Probably be cheaper to get shock-tolerant packing crates and use normal
cabinets. You'll probably learn a few hard lessons the first time around
-- should have put in styrofoam wedges between servers, or the rackmounts
you
On Fri, 17 Apr 2009, Paul Vixie wrote:
with the advent of vlan tags, the whole idea of CSMA for IXP networks is
passe.
just put each pair of peers into their own private tagged vlan.
Uh, I'm not sure whether you're being sarcastic or not.
-Bill
Sorry, hit send a little early, by accident.
On Apr 17, 2009, at 11:52 AM, Paul Vixie wrote:
with the advent of vlan tags, the whole idea of CSMA for IXP
networks is passe.
just put each pair of peers into their own private tagged vlan.
I'm not sure whether you're being sarcastic, and if
Stephen, that's a straw-man argument. Nobody's arguing against VLANs. Paul's
argument was that VLANs rendered shared subnets obsolete, and everybody else
has been rebutting that. Not saying that VLANs shouldn't be used.
Sent via BlackBerry by ATT
-Original Message-
From: Stephen
On Thu, 8 May 2008, NetSecGuy wrote:
Anyone else not able to access the PCH BGP Archive?
http://www.pch.net/resources/data/routing-tables/archive/
I'm getting a 403 Forbidden.
Oop, you're right, I just replicated the problem, about to take a look at
fixing it. Our
On Thu, 8 May 2008, NetSecGuy wrote:
Anyone else not able to access the PCH BGP Archive?
http://www.pch.net/resources/data/routing-tables/archive/
I'm getting a 403 Forbidden.
Fixed again now. The front-end web server was having trouble with its
connection to the back-end
On Mon, 11 Aug 2008, Deepak Jain wrote:
A coop, best-effort switch fabric colo'd at a few sites would allow
participants to peer off traffic at a price of the order of a single
cross-connect (~$500/month per 10G port is possible, maybe less),
$0/month per 10G port is common
On Tue, 12 Aug 2008, Patrick W. Gilmore wrote:
Could one of the dangers of a coop be borg'ed by for-profit
entity looking to rip out every cent they can?
That's one of the reasons many of them incorporate as non-profits...
Under the tax laws of most countries, the U.S. and
On Tue, 12 Aug 2008, Paul Wall wrote:
If it were as easy as you make it sound, I can assure you people would
be doing it.
Yup, they are. There are a bit over three hundred IXPs in the world,
about eighty of them in the U.S., and the vast majority of them were built
by ISPs
On Fri, 12 Sep 2008 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Looks like they found a new willing partner.
I like how their web page says Network Uptime: 03:56:55 up 1562 days,
17:51 (100%) 1 user, load average: 0.03, 0.03, 0.02
Now, the difference between host and network aside, I find the idea of
On Fri, 12 Sep 2008, William Hamilton wrote:
What's amusing about having one user on that particular host?
That's the _front page of their corporate web site_. It doesn't say
host it says that's their _network_.
-Bill
On Sat, 13 Sep 2008, Frank Bulk wrote:
Perhaps there's no answer to this, or it's obvious and I ought to know.
How can I find out when ARIN or the applicable registry has assigned a
block
to a certain organization, and I don't know the block, just the
organization.
On Sat, 13 Sep 2008, Bill Woodcock wrote:
Those are both very simple reports to run from PCH's existing databases
and data-feeds.
By that, I mean that they could be run daily, and specific results emailed
to people who were interested in following the allocation patterns
On Sat, 13 Sep 2008, Bill Woodcock wrote:
By that, I mean that they could be run daily, and specific results
emailed
to people who were interested in following the allocation patterns for
specific organizations, any time there was a match.
Following up on my own post
On Tue, 16 Sep 2008 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
This time I want to create a visual map of the LAN.
Intermapper.
http://dartware.com/network_monitoring_products/intermapper/index.html
-Bill
On Wed, 24 Sep 2008, Tuc at T-B-O-H.NET wrote:
I hate to use NANOG for outages... But can anyone else get to
puck.nether.net or the outages.org list?
As regards Puck, so says Jared:
INCORRECT BLOCK COUNT I=121740614 (24704 should be 24736)
CORRECT? yes
** Phase
On Wed, 24 Sep 2008, Christopher Morrow wrote:
;; AUTHORITY SECTION:
outages.org. 86400 IN NS puck.nether.net.
outages.org. 86400 IN NS anyns.pch.net.
incorrect NS record setup maybe??
That too. We're moving the
On Fri, 18 Dec 2009, Joly MacFie wrote:
I have posted sa comment on this from ISOC England on
http://www.isoc-ny.org/p2/?p=134
Please feel free to add comments there.
If anyone has questions about this, the invited experts who managed to
wedge their feet in the door at the
On Fri, 18 Dec 2009, Deepak Jain wrote:
ITU is already acknowledging that BGP isn't its baby, so it has nothing
to say there.
Yes, that was the successful (for us) outcome of the meeting, which would
not have been the case had we not been prepared and had people there.
Just to
On Fri, 18 Dec 2009, Dobbins, Roland wrote:
The decision on that will mostly be made in mid-March.
By whom?
A working group of the ITU Council.
The RIRs aren't just going to say, OK, ITU folks, it's all yours, heh.
Indeed not. However, the RIRs don't have a voice in the
The connection may not be immediately apparent, but I think Philip
Greenspun's article critiquing Malcolm Gladwell's musings on cranial
metrics etc. has some bearing:
http://philip.greenspun.com/flying/foreign-airline-safety
...or is at least an interesting read. In observing network
On Fri, 15 Jan 2010, Eric Brunner-Williams wrote:
After the Katrina landfall a diverse group of wireless people started
organizing a relief effort...
There are quite a lot of us working on it, is there something specific
you're volunteering to do?
On Jan 19, 2010, at 11:27 AM, Rodney Joffe wrote:
Is there anything that any of us can do to help, exert influence, etc (short
of donating which many of us are already doing).
I'm sure other people involved in the relief work can suggest other things, but
a few comments from my point of
On Jan 19, 2010, at 3:56 PM, Martin Hannigan wrote:
Re your plan to potentially run a cable from SD to PaP. Interesting. Looks
like 300nm to me. I think you're going to need op amp and power.
The idea was to do a festoon cable instead, landing at coastal towns along the
way, and using
On Jan 23, 2010, at 8:41 AM, Eric Brunner-Williams wrote:
Reginald Chauvet, the owner of the Data Center in Boutillers, in which the
.ht Country Code registry is a tenant, has left Haiti with his family. All
the critical telecom infrastructures are located at the Data Center in
Boutillers.
On Mar 3, 2010, at 3:13 PM, Sean Donelan wrote:
Are there any common locations in Alaska where multiple local ISPs exchange
traffic, either transit or peering? Or is Seattle the closest exchange point
for Alaska ISPs?
PCH doesn't know of any. If any exist, we'd very much like to hear
On Thu, 4 Mar 2010, Matthew Petach wrote:
Would anyone here know of any 24x7 contact at APNIC? The TXT records
indicate they just signed the reverse zone for 203.in-addr.arpa today, and
the delegations for our IP blocks disappeared when they did; and the
helpdesk is
On Tue, 30 Mar 2010, Jared Mauch wrote:
You can speak for yourself :)
Some of us are watching the lists on the appropriate mailing list(s)
hosted by the US State Department. I know I facilitated a few people joining
them.
Yep, I would agree that the Internet technical
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Mar 30, 2011, at 1:58 PM, Ronald F. Guilmette wrote:
As I already mentioned, 159.223.0.0/16, which is actually registered to
the Hoechst Celanese Corporation, has quite obviously been hijacked
And have you reported this to ARIN?
.
Thanks for considering this,
-Bill Woodcock
Research Director
Packet Clearing House
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.4.11 (Darwin
I've removed the doorframe before, and usually replaced with a wider doorframe
later.
-Bill
On May 4, 2011, at 11:07, James Aldridge j...@mcvax.org wrote:
On 04/05/2011 10:53, Leigh Porter wrote:
This may be a silly question but.. How did it get in there?
I'm
represented in our dataset, we would be very happy to include
your information in future iterations.
Thank you all very much,
-Bill Woodcock
Research Director
Packet Clearing House
-BEGIN
1 - 100 of 326 matches
Mail list logo
