Previously, SDN could manage transaction with the @Transaction only for the
embedded mode.
Indeed, we had to manually create neo4j batches to manage them instead.
Does SDN version 2.3.3 manage them ?
Thanks a lot,
Michael
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the
Hi,
I would like to know what would be a best practice to deal with range
dates.
So, here my use case:
I have a lot of events in my graph, I want to return all events that
occurred between two dates (format /MM/DD HH:MM).
Currently, I structured each Event node with a startAt indexed
Hi,
I would like to know what would be a good practice to deal with range dates
in a graph database.
So, here my use case:
I have a lot of events in my graph, I want to return all events that
occurred between two dates (format /MM/DD HH:MM).
Currently, I structured each Event node with a
Hi Alex,
I'm especially interested in the theory of this practice.
On Thursday, January 23, 2014 3:07:11 AM UTC+1, Alex Frieden wrote:
got a graphgist or console?
On Wed, Jan 22, 2014 at 9:04 PM, Michael Azerhad
michael...@gmail.comjavascript:
wrote:
Hi,
I would like to know what
According to github links concerning each jar, it should be the case,
that's why I ask the question.
On Sunday, January 26, 2014 1:43:22 PM UTC+1, Michael Azerhad wrote:
Hi,
I want to use the neo4j server version 2.0.
The jars I combine (using SBT) are the following:
org.neo4j % neo4j
Sorry, I forgot to precise one important dependency above:
org.neo4j % neo4j-rest-graphdb % 2.0.0
On Sunday, January 26, 2014 1:45:23 PM UTC+1, Michael Azerhad wrote:
According to github links concerning each jar, it should be the case,
that's why I ask the question.
On Sunday, January
Framework 2.2.0 to Play 2.2.1 ...
Anyway, thanks a lot Michael :)
On Sunday, January 26, 2014 2:19:07 PM UTC+1, Michael Hunger wrote:
Looks as if the jersey 1.9 dependency is missing.
On Sun, Jan 26, 2014 at 1:45 PM, Michael Azerhad
michael...@gmail.comjavascript:
wrote:
According
I would like to drop the @Indexed annotation on my field, in favor of the
auto indexing from a label like this Cypher query would bring:
CREATE INDEX ON :User(_id)
On Monday, January 27, 2014 8:50:07 PM UTC+1, Michael Azerhad wrote:
Currently I use SDN 3.0.0M1 for the domain objects mapping
No problem, thanks :)
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
Neo4j group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email
to neo4j+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit
Hello,
My question is pretty simple:
May it be a normal scenario when neo4jTemplate.fetch returns ALWAYS the
first collection's element? (concerning a @RelatedTo collection's field
without any @Fetch annotation)
On the contrary, when @Fetch is placed, the whole collection is well
transaction and in distinct transaction.
Am I missed something obvious?
Thanks,
Michael
On Sunday, February 2, 2014 3:53:54 AM UTC+1, Michael Azerhad wrote:
Hello,
My question is pretty simple:
May it be a normal scenario when neo4jTemplate.fetch returns ALWAYS the
first collection's element
?*
Thanks a lot
On Sunday, February 2, 2014 3:29:45 PM UTC+1, Michael Azerhad wrote:
I use Scala.
In my class Meeting, I have this relation:
@RelatedTo(`type` = TO, direction = Direction.INCOMING)
var _participants: java.util.Set[Participation] = _
Participation is another node entity, linked
, Mar 2, 2014 at 10:54 AM, Michael Azerhad
michael...@gmail.com javascript: wrote:
Currently, I use SDN 3.0.0 RC1.
In this version, labels are not taking in account by default when using
`@Indexed` on fields.
Involving the need to create Dummy objects (ugly...) at the start
Hi,
My question is simple:
I have a User node.
Each time an action is made in my application concerning the User, (for
instance an Authentication event (loginTimestamp, etc..)), I create the
corresponding Event node and attached it to the User node.
It's a kind of event store, with each
)
Does the red traversal part could be impacted by a huge amount of events on
the user node? or is it totally independent?
Thanks a lot,
I hope I'm more clear with this example.
On Thursday, March 13, 2014 2:29:18 PM UTC+1, Michael Azerhad wrote:
Hi,
My question is simple:
I have a User
Hi,
I try to update the relationship of a Node that is a collection.
Example: User has a list of Cars.
Firstly, I saved the User with the Cars set beforehand, and the whole works
with embedded mode and REST mode.
Now, I want to add one Car to the list of this User.
So I tried the following:
for cool Graph Models http://bit.ly/graphgist
Am 13.03.2014 um 14:38 schrieb Michael Azerhad
michael...@gmail.comjavascript:
:
More specifically, could it impact some traversal from the nodes
independent of the node events?
For instance:
(event) - (user
UTC+1, Michael Hunger wrote:
How does it fail?
D
Am 14.03.2014 um 01:54 schrieb Michael Azerhad
michael...@gmail.comjavascript:
:
Hi,
I try to update the relationship of a Node that is a collection.
Example: User has a list of Cars.
Firstly, I saved the User with the Cars set
exposed above is
correct.
I will then search myself for the reason :)
Thanks a lot :)
On Friday, March 14, 2014 2:57:16 AM UTC+1, Michael Azerhad wrote:
It sounds to be a deadlock:
A deadlock scenario has been detected and avoided. This means that two ormore
transactions
, which were holding
://graphdatabases.com (in Deutschhttp://bit.ly/das-buch
)
We're trading T-shirts for cool Graph Models http://bit.ly/graphgist
Am 14.03.2014 um 03:18 schrieb Michael Azerhad
michael...@gmail.comjavascript:
:
I've just fixed the deadlock: I was missing the tx.close() statement
Models http://bit.ly/graphgist
Am 14.03.2014 um 12:11 schrieb Michael Azerhad
michael...@gmail.comjavascript:
:
Hi Michael,
The whole works :) except one improvement I want to make:
The deadlock was caused due to multiple threads (Akka Actor) updating the
same Node or its
or
Read a Book http://graphdatabases.com (in Deutschhttp://bit.ly/das-buch
)
We're trading T-shirts for cool Graph Models http://bit.ly/graphgist
Am 14.03.2014 um 12:46 schrieb Michael Azerhad
michael...@gmail.comjavascript:
:
The trick is I can't know in advance which nodes I have
Hi,
Let's assume this beginning of Cypher query, aiming to retrieve all
shortest paths (regarding knowledge) between two users:
MATCH (u1:User {id: 1}), (u2:User {id: 2}), knowledgePath =allShortestPaths
(u1-[:KNOWS*..4]-(u2))
Besides, each User is linked to a UserProfile node in the graph
I use the SDN 3.0.0 in production (I know this isn't the last version).
Basically, I have a `Parent` class (@NodeEntity) having a relationship
(Set[Child]) to its children, without no declared @Fetch on it.
When I want to update the parent, I do:
1. Find the parent to update through the
, Michael Hunger wrote:
I rather think that the managed field accessor set is too eager in what it
is doing :)
There are no transactions over the wire.
On Tue, Apr 1, 2014 at 11:24 AM, Michael Azerhad
michael...@gmail.comjavascript:
wrote:
Hi Michael,
Indeed, you're right... the type
retrieved in Simple Mapping mode ?
Thanks,
Michael
On Tuesday, April 1, 2014 11:51:32 AM UTC+2, Michael Azerhad wrote:
Hum...no I don't think :) :
@org.springframework.data.neo4j.annotation.RelatedTo(`type` =
KNOWS,direction
= Direction.BOTH)
var knowledge: java.util.Set[User] = new
, so most probably a bug :) of an too eager implementation.
On Tue, Apr 1, 2014 at 11:58 AM, Michael Azerhad
michael...@gmail.comjavascript:
wrote:
But.. it seems right to use the ManagedFieldAccessorSet for a Lazy
collection, to fetch on access...so my post above is a nonsense :)
What I
://projects.spring.io/spring-data-neo4j/ too
Best is probably to ask :)
Cheers,
Michael
On Tue, Apr 1, 2014 at 12:24 PM, Michael Azerhad
michael...@gmail.comjavascript:
wrote:
Ok good :)
Last question: What is the best way to be warned about the future
evolution of SDN, releases, and especially
).
@NodeEntity
public class SponsorNode {
@RelatedTo(type=BRAND_IMAGE, direction=Direction.OUTGOING)
private SetImageNode images;
}
Did you find the root of your problem Michael?
On Sunday, 2 February 2014 22:27:56 UTC, Michael Azerhad wrote:
Maybe it's an incompatibility with Scala
Hi,
I know that SDN 3.X.X is not full tested yet but I come across this
potential bug, and I would like to know if it is a known one:
I have an acceptance test written using Specs2 (using a pretty DSL)
containing this:
meetingRepository.findAllParticipants(meetingId) must have size 3
Suppose a Notification entity.
To keep thing simple, let's assume a single property: *readFlag*, that
could be *true* if the notification was already read by the client, or
*false* if it is new or not checked by the client yet.
What is the difference in term of performance between those both
mode is detached from the db you should need to save it again
to persist changes
Mark could you create a unit test for that fetching/loading behavior?
Thanks a lot
Sent from mobile device
Am 17.04.2014 um 02:31 schrieb Michael Azerhad michael...@gmail.com:
Oh, so the problem should
I'm pointing out that my _id variable does not represent the graphId but an
entityId.
On Tuesday, May 20, 2014 2:31:52 PM UTC+2, Michael Azerhad wrote:
I also confirm that is the explanation :)
Indeed, I had a bad hashcode implementation:
override def hashCode(): Int = {
if (_id
into a NOT expression doesn't work.
On Wednesday, May 21, 2014 11:32:28 PM UTC+2, Michael Azerhad wrote:
Hi everyone,
My case is very simple.
Let's assume three Car nodes:
Car(name: Ferrari)
Car(name: Porsche)
Car(name: Aston Martin)
And this request:
MATCH (c:Car)
RETURN c.name
Oh cool :)
Do you know when should the 2.1 RELEASE emerge ?
I searched on the Net but in vain.
Thanks a lot,
Michael
On Thursday, May 22, 2014 1:14:21 AM UTC+2, Wes Freeman wrote:
It looks like it's fixed in 2.1-rc1.
Wes
On Wed, May 21, 2014 at 5:48 PM, Michael Azerhad
michael
. No
idea. :) Last time, the RC1 to release time was less than a month, though.
I'd love to hear official estimates.
Wes
On Wed, May 21, 2014 at 7:18 PM, Michael Azerhad
michael.azer...@gmail.comwrote:
Oh cool :)
Do you know when should the 2.1 RELEASE emerge ?
I searched on the Net but in vain
Using Neo4J = 2.0.0.
Can I assert that the following ways of doing are similar in performance:
MATCH (c: Car)
WHERE c.id = 345 // id being indexed with CREATE INDEX ON :Car(id)
RETURN c
MATCH (c: Car {id: 345})
RETURN c
Let's imagine 100 Car nodes in the graph.
Thanks a lot,
MATCH (user)-[:PARTICIPATES]-(meeting:Meeting {id: 123})
RETURN user
This query returns all users participating to the Meeting `123`.
Now I want to return all users participating to the Meeting `123` *ONLY if
user `456` participates in it*.
So concretely, if user1, user2 and user3 participates
})-[:PARTICIPATES]-(meeting:Meeting {id: 123})
MATCH (user)-[:PARTICIPATES]-(meeting)
RETURN user
Sent from mobile device
Am 06.06.2014 um 13:25 schrieb Michael Azerhad michael...@gmail.com
javascript::
MATCH (user)-[:PARTICIPATES]-(meeting:Meeting {id: 123})
RETURN user
This query returns all
Oh... It does not work with embedded graph.
I tested again and without any future, the whole works.
Can't figure out why... just stuck
On Tuesday, June 10, 2014 3:00:45 PM UTC+2, Michael Azerhad wrote:
I have this conceptual (Scala) code:
should return the total of meetings in new
I've just updated my instance from 2.0.3 to 2.1.2 (using REST mode).
I got this error at start time:
2014-06-29T12:08:17.189474+00:00 app[web.1]: Caused by:
org.springframework.beans.factory.BeanCreationException: Error creating
bean with name 'neo4jMappingContext' defined in class
Is it a possible reason = is THERE a possible reason (typo)
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
Neo4j group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email
to neo4j+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit
:)
Thanks a lot for your feedback.
Michael
On Sunday, June 29, 2014 2:17:53 PM UTC+2, Michael Azerhad wrote:
Is it a possible reason = is THERE a possible reason (typo)
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
Neo4j group.
To unsubscribe from this group
I just rollbacked to 2.0.3 and SDN 3.1.0.RELEASE and it well works.
I keep that for now.
On Sunday, June 29, 2014 2:52:07 PM UTC+2, Michael Azerhad wrote:
I think I guess a possible reason :
I use two dynos (Heroku server) in parallel: One for the Web requests,
and one acting
or not.
Could you raise a jira issue for it? Thanks a lot Michael
Sent from mobile device
Am 29.06.2014 um 16:00 schrieb Michael Azerhad michael...@gmail.com
javascript::
I just rollbacked to 2.0.3 and SDN 3.1.0.RELEASE and it well works.
I keep that for now.
On Sunday, June 29, 2014 2
Hi,
My use case is pretty simple.
I want to create a *Meeting* (represented by a node).
Each Meeting accepts several *Participation*s (Participation represented by
another node linked to Meeting) :
class Meeting {
Hi,
I well know that SDN is fully optimized for embedded database.
I would like to know if there are any plan (or maybe already done?) to
improve the way SDN manages @Fetch requests on lazy collections when using
REST mode.
Indeed, some use cases are very slow with it.
A good workaround
based OGM which then uses a Cypher
connector (like the Neo4j-JDBC driver) to talk t an embedded or remote
Neo4j database.
Unfortunately I haven't yet found the time to address that.
Am 11.07.2014 um 01:23 schrieb Michael Azerhad michael...@gmail.com
javascript::
Hi,
I well know that SDN
Hi,
I really think about making the following scenario optimal using Cypher and
Neo4j 2.X.X:
Let's suppose this classic person knowledge pattern:
(a:Person)-[:KNOWS]-(b:Person)
Each person can sell his car by specifying its visibility according to the
degree of separation of its choice.
:24:41 AM UTC+2, Michael Azerhad wrote:
Hi,
I really think about making the following scenario optimal using Cypher
and Neo4j 2.X.X:
Let's suppose this classic person knowledge pattern:
(a:Person)-[:KNOWS]-(b:Person)
Each person can sell his car by specifying its visibility according
, Michael Azerhad michael.azer...@gmail.com
wrote:
Fix of my query above, I missed to specify the logged user node:
MATCH (d:Degree {id: 1})-[:TARGET_TO]-(c:Car)-[:SELLS]-(p:Person)-[KNOWS
]-(loggedUser:Person{id: 123})
RETURN c
UNION
MATCH (d:Degree {id: 2})-[:TARGET_TO]-(c:Car)-[:SELLS
order by car.name asc
Michael
On Fri, Aug 1, 2014 at 9:41 AM, Michael Azerhad michael.azer...@gmail.com
wrote:
Hello Michael,
Thanks for this really great detailed answer ! Like it :)
However I have a question :
I do really prefer the last way (at the very bottom) using cypher
by car.name asc
Michael
On Fri, Aug 1, 2014 at 9:41 AM, Michael Azerhad michael...@gmail.com
javascript: wrote:
Hello Michael,
Thanks for this really great detailed answer ! Like it :)
However I have a question :
I do really prefer the last way (at the very bottom) using cypher
I guess I found the reason of the slowness:
If Person A is friend with B, and B is friend with C and C is friend with A
(cyclic), then the query returns duplicated cars.
I end up with 180 cars instead of 51 ..
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
, Michael Azerhad wrote:
I guess I found the reason of the slowness:
If Person A is friend with B, and B is friend with C and C is friend with
A (cyclic), then the query returns duplicated cars.
I end up with 180 cars instead of 51 ..
--
You received this message because you are subscribed
On Sun, Aug 3, 2014 at 7:01 PM, Michael Azerhad michael.azer...@gmail.com
wrote:
Hi,
I know my question is rather abstract.
But I've just come across the following issue:
I have a running Neo4j 2.0.4.
I updated my source code (my application) on Heroku and restarted the
dynos.
When dynos
Hi,
Let's suppose this Cypher query snippet:
RETURN user.name, count(game.name)
= a user can have multiple video games
No matter the example is, the important thing is that I can count names of
user's video games associated with the user's name.
Result would be:
NAME
I managed to do the trick with:
RETURN extract(d IN user.ranks | d) as ranks, count(game.name)
= one shot :)
Michael
On Thursday, August 7, 2014 9:01:55 PM UTC+2, Michael Azerhad wrote:
Hi,
Let's suppose this Cypher query snippet:
RETURN user.name, count(game.name)
= a user can
Azerhad michael...@gmail.com
javascript: wrote:
I managed to do the trick with:
RETURN extract(d IN user.ranks | d) as ranks, count(game.name)
= one shot :)
Michael
On Thursday, August 7, 2014 9:01:55 PM UTC+2, Michael Azerhad wrote:
Hi,
Let's suppose this Cypher query snippet
Hi Michael,
What better than a GraphGist to show you the issue :)
http://gist.neo4j.org/?fc9672035185189521cf
So I would expect the output:
MyMeetingTitle[1, 2, 3]2
rather than:
MyMeetingTitle[1, 2, 3]1MyMeetingTitle[1, 2, 3]1
Do you see an obvious reason ?
Many thanks,
Michael
--
I've just updated the graphgist: http://gist.neo4j.org/?fc9672035185189521cf
in order to better explain my issue.
In case where someone already opened it..
On Friday, August 8, 2014 5:38:07 PM UTC+2, Michael Azerhad wrote:
Hi Michael,
What better than a GraphGist to show you the issue
Hi,
I'm using SDN 3.1.2 with Neo4j 2.1.2.
I have this (simple) Akka code (a worker actor retrieving new events in a
kind of loop to consume them):
def receive = {
case RetrieveNewEvents =
val tx = graphDatabaseService.beginTx() //starts transaction
try {
val newEvents
The title is not exact, I wanted to mean tx.success() instead of tx.close().
Thanks ;)
On Tuesday, August 12, 2014 12:36:12 PM UTC+2, Michael Azerhad wrote:
Hi,
I'm using SDN 3.1.2 with Neo4j 2.1.2.
I have this (simple) Akka code (a worker actor retrieving new events in a
kind of loop
?
On Tuesday, August 12, 2014 12:39:01 PM UTC+2, Michael Hunger wrote:
Would you be able to reproduce it without SDN, just plain neo and
ExecutionEngine?
Sent from mobile device
Am 12.08.2014 um 12:36 schrieb Michael Azerhad michael...@gmail.com
javascript::
Hi,
I'm using SDN 3.1.2
I forgot to point out that I'm using the REST mode, more relevant to a
potential async behaviour.., just for the info.
On Tuesday, August 12, 2014 12:48:08 PM UTC+2, Michael Azerhad wrote:
I didn't try without SDN ..
I'm reading the actual code of SDN to detect something that could
;)
Michael
On Tuesday, August 12, 2014 12:53:28 PM UTC+2, Michael Azerhad wrote:
I forgot to point out that I'm using the REST mode, more relevant to a
potential async behaviour.., just for the info.
On Tuesday, August 12, 2014 12:48:08 PM UTC+2, Michael Azerhad wrote:
I didn't try
Hi,
Using SDN 3.1.2, I came across a weird behavior.
Let's take this example:
I've got a User entity (@NodeEntity) that I create and save.
This well works, I have my User in the graph.
This Car Entity has a relationship like this:
@RelatedTo(`type` = KNOWS, direction = Direction.OUTGOING)
Sorry, I made a typo:
This Car Entity has a relationship like this: = This *User*
Entity has a relationship like this:
On Thursday, August 14, 2014 2:30:46 AM UTC+2, Michael Azerhad wrote:
Hi,
Using SDN 3.1.2, I came across a weird behavior.
Let's take this example:
I've
Hi,
I've just set the Neo4j Spatial on my server and using SDN 3.1.2 to create
my *wkt* index:
@Indexed(indexName = CarsLocation, indexType = IndexType.POINT) var wkt:
String
The whole works great and I can make queries involving withinDistance
using the HTTP console like this:
POST
On Thursday, August 21, 2014 4:40:55 PM UTC+2, Michael Azerhad wrote:
Hi,
I've just set the Neo4j Spatial on my server and using SDN 3.1.2 to create
my *wkt* index:
@Indexed(indexName = CarsLocation, indexType = IndexType.POINT) var wkt:
String
The whole works great and I can make queries
, Aug 21, 2014 at 5:07 PM, Michael Azerhad michael...@gmail.com
javascript: wrote:
I tried to add the node to the index manually like this:
POST /db/data/index/node/CarsLocation {value:dummy,key:dummy,
uri:http://localhost:7474/db/data/node/25} //25 being my Car
node's Id
to answer too many things at the same time! :-)
Glad it is working now.
On Fri, Aug 22, 2014 at 1:54 PM, Michael Azerhad michael.azer...@gmail.com
wrote:
Hi Craig,
Thanks for this well detailed answer :)
Finally, I found the trick to make the whole work without setting ANYTHING.
I
it is working now.
On Fri, Aug 22, 2014 at 1:54 PM, Michael Azerhad michael.azer...@gmail.com
wrote:
Hi Craig,
Thanks for this well detailed answer :)
Finally, I found the trick to make the whole work without setting ANYTHING.
I just reverse the latitude and longitude as suggested
Thanks a lot Craig, your explanation is really helpful :)
Le 26 août 2014 à 13:59, Craig Taverner cr...@amanzi.com a écrit :
Hi Michael,
If I well understand, by visualizing my actual graph, I notice that the
spatial graph is completely distinct from my domain graph; therefore using
the proxy
the array into a collection as you already showed.
Cheers,
Michael
Am 08.08.2014 um 18:05 schrieb Michael Azerhad michael.azer...@gmail.com:
I've just updated the graphgist: http://gist.neo4j.org/?fc9672035185189521cf
in order to better explain my issue.
In case where someone
Hi,
Let's suppose a node Called *Participation* (participation to a meeting).
A user can participate, so this path is created:User-[:PARTICIPATES]-
*Participation*-[:TO]-Meeting
Now, the user can cancel his participation.
Should I add a label to Participation, let's called it
Hi,
I'm using SDN 3.2.1 and a dedicated instance Neo4j 2.1.5 database hosted at
GrapheneDB.
I have this use case in my app:
User can participate to a meeting.
It works, but too slow... = 10375 ms exactly = 10 seconds !
Here's the code snippet I exactly use, associated with comments:
Hi,
Analyzing the evolution of the SDN github repo, I noticed this task:
DATAGRAPH-253 REST Transaction support
https://github.com/spring-projects/spring-data-neo4j/commit/e27287a4e1cd3de19eddb1f2fa3cb7a466fb1bc3
Is it about to be release in some days?
Furthermore, is it possible to know if
Cool ! :)
Thanks Michael
On Thursday, December 18, 2014 6:00:57 AM UTC+1, Michael Hunger wrote:
Yes: See
http://jexp.de/blog/2014/12/spring-data-neo4j-improving-remoting-performance/
On Wed, Dec 17, 2014 at 5:16 PM, Michael Azerhad michael...@gmail.com
javascript: wrote:
Hi
Hi,
I've just updated SDN from 3.2.2 to 3.3.RC.
I'm testing it against neo4J 2.1.7 in *REST mode* and use this spatial
plugin version: 0.13-neo4j-2.1.4 (plugin well installed on neo4J server).
The whole works *except when inserting an object having a spatial index*
like this:
Using Neo4J 2.1.5.
Data:
- 2000 Persons
- KNOWS relationships between some of them
Goal of the query:
For each person, display her fullname + amount of friends + amount of
friends' friends + amount of friends' friends' friends.
MATCH (person:Person)
WITH person
OPTIONAL MATCH
atively
>>>
>>> MATCH (person:Person)
>>> OPTIONAL MATCH (person)-[:KNOWS]-(f1:Person)-[:KNOWS]-(f2:Person)
>>> WITH person, count(distinct f1) as f1, count(distinct f2) as
>>> f2,collect(distinct f2) as p2
>>> WITH person, f1,f2, reduce(
gt;
> On Wed, Mar 16, 2016 at 12:25 AM, Michael Azerhad <michael.azer...@gmail.com
> <mailto:michael.azer...@gmail.com>> wrote:
> Hi Michael,
>
> I think your query would result wrong results.
>
> Michael - KNOWS - Julia - KNOWS - Robert - KNOWS - Michael (sa
shortestPath returns the right results.
Without it, wrong results.
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"Neo4j" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email
to neo4j+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more
_firstName + " " + person._lastName, f1, f2, f3
>
>
>
> On Tue, Mar 15, 2016 at 10:30 PM, Michael Azerhad <michael...@gmail.com
> > wrote:
>
>> Using Neo4J 2.1.5.
>>
>> Data:
>>
>>- 2000 Persons
>>- KNOWS relationshi
tinct nodes(path)[1]) as f1, count(distinct
> nodes(path)[2]) as f2, count(distinct nodes(path)[3]) as f3
> RETURN person._firstName + " " + person._lastName,f1,f2,f3
>
> Michael
>
>> Am 16.03.2016 um 00:42 schrieb Michael Azerhad <michael.azer..
86 matches
Mail list logo
