Re: [neonixie-l] Radioactive Nixies - Study

2017-04-06 Thread NeonJohn
On 04/06/2017 11:20 AM, John Rehwinkel wrote: >> This cute little one just showed up in my in-box - $40: >> http://www.goldmine-elec-products.com/prodinfo.asp?number=C7061 >> > They have this kit on sale for $10 now: No GM

Re: [neonixie-l] Radioactive Nixies - Study

2017-04-06 Thread John Rehwinkel
> This cute little one just showed up in my in-box - $40: > http://www.goldmine-elec-products.com/prodinfo.asp?number=C7061 > They have this kit on sale for $10 now:

Re: [neonixie-l] Radioactive Nixies - Study

2017-03-26 Thread Jack Buechler
Please could I have one PCB. Could you get in touch please. Jb On Mar 16, 2017, at 7:22 PM, 'Dave' via neonixie-l > wrote: If anyone is interested, I have some extra PCBs for the open source uRADMonitor project. It's an open

Re: [neonixie-l] Radioactive Nixies - Study

2017-03-16 Thread John Rehwinkel
> A krytron. A gas filled cold cathode trigger tube, containing radioactive > material used to detonate a nuke. > > They use Nickel-63 (a beta emitter) to keep the gas ionized so the switching jitter is very low (hundreds of picoseconds, IIRC). I actually designed these into a circuit once

Re: [neonixie-l] Radioactive Nixies - Study

2017-03-15 Thread Paul Andrews
I don't know about others. For me this is just a new set of techno toys to get to know and play with! My 18 yr old son recently not-so-patiently explained to me that alpha particles are stopped dead by just about anything. We were 'discussing' whether a nuclear bomb going off on top of a silo

Re: [neonixie-l] Radioactive Nixies - Study

2017-03-15 Thread NeonJohn
On 03/15/2017 09:42 AM, Mark Moulding wrote: > On Tuesday, March 14, 2017 at 10:02:40 AM UTC-7, Paul Andrews wrote: >> >> What is your opinion of this one: >>

Re: [neonixie-l] Radioactive Nixies - Study

2017-03-15 Thread Mark Moulding
This cute little one just showed up in my in-box - $40: http://www.goldmine-elec-products.com/prodinfo.asp?number=C7061 ~~ Mark Moulding On Tuesday, March 14, 2017 at 10:02:40 AM UTC-7, Paul Andrews wrote: > > What is your opinion of this one: >

RE: [neonixie-l] Radioactive Nixies - Study

2017-03-14 Thread Tidak Ada
dose. eric -Oorspronkelijk bericht- Van: neonixie-l@googlegroups.com [mailto:neonixie-l@googlegroups.com] Namens NeonJohn Verzonden: dinsdag 14 maart 2017 23:38 Aan: neonixie-l@googlegroups.com Onderwerp: Re: [neonixie-l] Radioactive Nixies - Study On 03/14/2017 02:01 PM, gregebert

Re: [neonixie-l] Radioactive Nixies - Study

2017-03-14 Thread NeonJohn
On 03/14/2017 02:01 PM, gregebert wrote: > Anyone know how the radiation "hazard" of nixies compares to Xrays produced > by color televisions/computer monitors that used CRTs ? > None vs none. As soon as the low level X-rays from TV sets were discovered and became and issue (two different

Re: [neonixie-l] Radioactive Nixies - Study

2017-03-14 Thread GastonP
IIRC, correctly calibrated CRT television sets and computer monitors did not emit X-ray at all. Nor any other kind of harmful radiation, for what is worth. The warnings were related to the operation of the HV rectifier (in times of the vacuum ones, 1B3 and the like) way off its HV maximum

Re: [neonixie-l] Radioactive Nixies - Study

2017-03-14 Thread franetic
Those ZM1000's were made in a year ending in 6 and/or 7 according to the date code. I'm guessing 1976/77. On Tuesday, March 14, 2017 at 5:59:46 PM UTC+1, David Speck wrote: > > They are labeled as 3H, for tritium, so they would have a 12 year half > life. Any idea how old they are? > > Dave >

Re: [neonixie-l] Radioactive Nixies - Study

2017-03-14 Thread Paul Andrews
My wife sends us this link: http://thedollop.net/wp/episode-20-dollop/ about David Hahn. I think she means it as a cautionary tale! > On Mar 14, 2017, at 2:01 PM, gregebert wrote: > > Anyone know how the radiation "hazard" of nixies compares to Xrays produced > by color

Re: [neonixie-l] Radioactive Nixies - Study

2017-03-14 Thread gregebert
Anyone know how the radiation "hazard" of nixies compares to Xrays produced by color televisions/computer monitors that used CRTs ? -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "neonixie-l" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it,

RE: [neonixie-l] Radioactive Nixies - Study

2017-03-14 Thread SWISSNIXIE - Jonathan F.
That kit doesn't look too bad, but 55$ for a Geiger Counter without a display? For 39$ without a gm tube you could get this one https://sites.google.com/site/diygeigercounter/buy-the-kit-1 Many tubes are supported, gm-tubes (SbM-20 is a good choice) on ebay. And...for "just experimenting"

Re: [neonixie-l] Radioactive Nixies - Study

2017-03-14 Thread David Speck MD
They are labeled as 3H, for tritium, so they would have a 12 year half life. Any idea how old they are? Dave On 3/14/2017 12:03 PM, franetic wrote: Just as a curiosity, I have (I had) some boxed ZM1000 nixies branded by RTC (France). See attached photos. The box has a label warning about

Re: [neonixie-l] Radioactive Nixies - Study

2017-03-14 Thread John Rehwinkel
> So how should I do to properly test all old instruments and tubes that I buy > to check that they are safe, free from harmful radiation, is there any > reliable equipment that don't cost an arm and a leg that I can use at home? The BWP34 ones mentioned before are probably the most cost

Re: [neonixie-l] Radioactive Nixies - Study

2017-03-14 Thread robin bussell
On 14/03/2017 13:14, Dekatron42 wrote: So how should I do to properly test all old instruments and tubes that I buy to check that they are safe, free from harmful radiation, is there any reliable equipment that don't cost an arm and a leg that I can use at home? If you have a place that can

Re: [neonixie-l] Radioactive Nixies - Study

2017-03-14 Thread H. Carl Ott
On Tue, Mar 14, 2017 at 8:52 AM, John Rehwinkel wrote: > We declined, but I assume some gear like that surfaces at equipment > auctions occasionally. Maybe I should bring my counter to hamfests? > I always bring a pocket geiger counter to the hamfests I attend. So far It's

Re: [neonixie-l] Radioactive Nixies - Study

2017-03-14 Thread Dekatron42
So how should I do to properly test all old instruments and tubes that I buy to check that they are safe, free from harmful radiation, is there any reliable equipment that don't cost an arm and a leg that I can use at home? I'm not particularly afraid but if there is an easy way to check then

Re: [neonixie-l] Radioactive Nixies - Study

2017-03-14 Thread John Rehwinkel
> a geiger counter will do nothing to reduce your nervousness, in fact it might > even make it worse, for no real good reason. > > Quite true. I have a Geiger counter, and was working on a difficult project at work and kept getting interrupted. I brought my counter into work and just left

RE: [neonixie-l] Radioactive Nixies - Study

2017-03-12 Thread Tidak Ada
@googlegroups.com [mailto:neonixie-l@googlegroups.com] Namens Paolo Cravero Verzonden: zondag 12 maart 2017 21:44 Aan: neonixie-l@googlegroups.com Onderwerp: Re: [neonixie-l] Radioactive Nixies - Study Very interesting Jonathan. Any chance you could share a picture of the little warning sign and its

Re: [neonixie-l] Radioactive Nixies - Study

2017-03-12 Thread Paolo Cravero
Very interesting Jonathan. Any chance you could share a picture of the little warning sign and its position? I have very few of those Nixies and all tested negative, but my counter is quite insensitive. Thank you! Paolo -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google

[neonixie-l] Radioactive Nixies - Study

2017-03-12 Thread SWISSNIXIE - Jonathan F.
Hi This might be a little off topic or irrelevant, but maybe someone is interested in it too. One of my hobbies aside nixies is technology related with radiation and nuclear (geiger counters, etc). Today i was sorting my nixies into boxes and held a B-5092-A from Burroughs, as i spotted a