On Fri, 29 Apr 2005 16:22:48 +0530 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
YAC> I need to know the actual flow of the NETSNMP code for
YAC> set/get/getnext/getbulk operations since we need to customize them for
YAC> our project purpose.
YAC> [...]
YAC> Is there anyone who have done this before or is there any do
On Wed, 27 Apr 2005 10:22:52 -0700 Pete wrote:
PP> execute like " snmpgetnext -v 3 -n none -u noAuthUser -l noAuthNoPriv
PP> test.net-snmp.org sysUpTime" I'll get the following error back:
PP> snmpgetnext: Timeout.
It seems that test.net-snmp.org is down. Have you tried running the agent on
the lo
-Original Message-
From: Dave Shield [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, April 28, 2005 1:35 AM
To: Toth, Gregory S
Cc: [email protected]
Subject: Re: How to implement tables in 5.0.6
On Wed, 2005-04-27 at 22:38, Toth, Gregory S wrote:
> We are in the transiti
> On Fri, 29 Apr 2005 17:38:40 +0200 (CEST), Didier Ambroise <[EMAIL
> PROTECTED]> said:
Didier> I do not know much about snmp so I need to know about
Didier> the values to enter whan I'm configuring net-snmp.
Run "snmpconf" to help you with the configuration.
--
Wes Hardaker
Sparta,
I do not know much about snmp so I need to know about
the values to enter whan I'm configuring net-snmp.
Thank you
Didier Ambroise System Administrator for Louverturenet.
__
Découvrez le nouveau
Hi,
I need to know the
actual flow of the NETSNMP code for set/get/getnext/getbulk operations
since we need to customize them for our project purpose.
Can anyone let me
know the code flow for the set operation and which is the method where this is
implemented. Need to know how the message
> On Tue, 26 Apr 2005 09:42:09 +0100, Dave Shield <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
>> And what are the advantages/disadvantages of Net-SNMP
>> toolkit over EMANATE SNMP research Toolkit?
Dave> We're free.
Dave> They provide commercial support.
Well, and to summarize in a slightly different way: the
> On Mon, 25 Apr 2005 13:41:16 -0400, Robert Story <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
Robert> While investigating a recent problem report on a 64 bit issue,
Robert> I discovered that the function snmp_set_var_value() doesn't
Robert> really do much error checking on the values passed to it. On
Robert> t
On Fri, 29 Apr 2005 13:52:45 +0100 Dave wrote:
DS> On Thu, 2005-04-28 at 00:47, Robert Story wrote:
DS> > Think of table_container as a cake. The container conf
DS> > is red frosting.
DS>
DS> I'd regard the mib2c.container.conf as describing the bare
DS> cake. It doesn't imply any frosting at all
> On Wed, 27 Apr 2005 10:22:52 -0700, Pete Parks <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
Pete> Has anyone installed and used Net-SNMP on a Mac OS X 10.3.8
Pete> system yet? If what configuration on the build and install
Pete> works, because I can configure, make, install and run snmpd but
Pete> that about i
On Fri, 29 Apr 2005 10:31:37 -0700 Wes wrote:
WH> Robert> Like he's paying any attention.
WH>
WH> You 2 do tend to ramble on a bit ;-)
/me falls off his chair..
WH> [...] I shouldn't need to read these discussions ;-)
WH>
WH> Of course I think I just proved I do anyway.
Gee, thanks for nothing
> On Wed, 27 Apr 2005 09:57:14 +0100, Dave Shield <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
Dave> The public API for supplying index values has always been
Dave> via netsnmp_table_row_add_index.
Dave> That's my understanding anyway - Wes, care to correct any
Dave> errors?
Well, this is where we frequently d
> On Fri, 29 Apr 2005 13:41:38 +0100, Dave Shield <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
Dave> I don't believe that the instance helper is particularly useful
Dave> - but I don't think that we should actually change the
Dave> functionality.
Bz
You guys seem to think that the *only* time you'll re
> On Wed, 27 Apr 2005 10:16:36 -0400, Robert Story <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
DS> That's my understanding anyway - Wes, care to correct any errors?
Robert> Like he's paying any attention. I'd be willing to be when he
Robert> sees a thread between us that starts to get long, he stays as
Robert>
> On Tue, 26 Apr 2005 09:39:59 +0100, Dave Shield <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
Dave> In which case, can I suggest that we add suitable wrappers to
Dave> table_data and table_dataset now. Keep the same internals (so
Dave> not to break backward compatability), but provide a cleaner API.
Dave> Bett
> On Fri, 29 Apr 2005 16:30:27 +0200, Emmanuel Doguet <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> said:
Emmanuel> Have you an example please ?
Have you looked at the tutorials:
http://www.net-snmp.org/tutorial/tutorial-5/toolkit/
And at the example code in agent/mibgroup/examples/
--
Wes Hardaker
Sparta
> My guess is that xx_get_first_data_point should return the
> objectID (in the netsnmp_variable_list) of the first element table
> element (1 (column),1 (row)) for a 2 dimensional table and that given
> a object id in the "netsnmp_variable_list * put_index_data",
> xx_get_next_data_poi
Hi to all,
Sorry, I'll be back .. but after try to made a table with Iterate (but
pb with memory free and don't understand the cache_handler), I'm trying
with dataset but create/delete row dynamicly in the handle doesn't work.
I have a simple array, who need to alloc/make data for each SNMP wa
--- Dave Shield <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Mon, 2005-04-25 at 22:16, gg gg wrote:
> >Was wondering why you would implement
> 2233(proposed
> > standard) instead of 2863(draft standard and
> obsoletes
> > 2233)?
>
> But is there actually any significant difference
> between
> the two? A
On Thu, 2005-04-28 at 00:47, Robert Story wrote:
> On Wed, 27 Apr 2005 16:11:53 +0100 Dave wrote:
> DS> I think that, like it or not, the
> DS> introduction of this config file *has* effectively
> DS> defined an API for the table_container helper.
>
> Just because a mib2c conf fil
On Thu, 2005-04-28 at 00:52, Robert Story wrote:
> On Wed, 27 Apr 2005 16:00:51 +0100 Dave wrote:
> DS> In general, I'd tend to agree - I don't believe that the instance
> DS> handler is particularly useful.
> DS> But this is one of Wes' helpers, so I'm reluctant to simply
> DS> drop it.
> Don'
On Mon, 2005-04-25 at 16:38, Shobana Sampath wrote:
> I tried to add a varbind to set the snmpTrapAddress,
> but no luck, the resulting pdu does not have the
> agent_address set as they say in the RFC:
No - you're not mean to add a varbind to do this.
You are meant to assign a suitable address to
On Mon, 2005-04-25 at 22:16, gg gg wrote:
>Was wondering why you would implement 2233(proposed
> standard) instead of 2863(draft standard and obsoletes
> 2233)?
But is there actually any significant difference between
the two? A brief scan through the "Changes since 2233"
section of RFC 2863
23 matches
Mail list logo
