Re: security fix for local/fixproc (Bug 1203376)

Wes Hardaker wrote: > Certainly we may have just upped the requirements for > minimal perl version, but I don't see an alternative. Agreed. I'd vote to apply to 5.[0123].x (which you may have started to do anyway). +Thomas --- This SF.Net ema

Re: security fix for local/fixproc (Bug 1203376)

> On Mon, 23 May 2005 19:59:28 +0200, Thomas Anders <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > said: Thomas> Even better, of course. Thanks for taking the time. While Thomas> File::Temp is part of Perl core nowadays, what about earlier Thomas> Perl versions that lack File::Temp::tempfile by default? Thomas> W

Re: getting rid of strtok: leftover in perl/SNMP/SNMP.xs [patch]

> On Mon, 23 May 2005 14:52:02 +0200, Thomas Anders <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > said: Thomas> now that strtok should have been replaced by strtok_r in all Thomas> 5.[123].x code, I noticed that there are still some Thomas> occurrences of strtok() in perl/SNMP/SNMP.xs. I've applied this to the

Re: Possible Spam: Re: SNMP query

Wes Hardaker wrote: On Wed, 18 May 2005 15:03:46 +0100 (BST), shrikanth <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said: shrikanth> Right now i am in to a project to develop an application shrikanth> titled "Network Topology discovery" using SNMP protocol.As shrikanth> part of the discovery my applicati

Re: security fix for local/fixproc (Bug 1203376)

Wes Hardaker wrote: > Proposal: [...] > +use File::Temp qw(tempfile); Even better, of course. Thanks for taking the time. While File::Temp is part of Perl core nowadays, what about earlier Perl versions that lack File::Temp::tempfile by default? What's the minimum Perl version we require anyway?

Re: SNMP query

> On Wed, 18 May 2005 15:03:46 +0100 (BST), shrikanth <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > said: shrikanth> Right now i am in to a project to develop an application shrikanth> titled "Network Topology discovery" using SNMP protocol.As shrikanth> part of the discovery my application should discover the s

Re: snmpv3 Decryption error with net-snmp 5.2.1

> On Mon, 23 May 2005 10:26:58 +0200, Stage Iup - Fabrice & Frédéric > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said: Stage> I use net-snmp 5.2.1, i have created a snmpv3 user with : Stage> net-snmp-config --create-snmpv3-user -ro -x mypassword -X DES Stage> -A MD5 myuser It looks like you're missing a -a fl

Re: Ask about Tunnel Mib

> On Mon, 16 May 2005 19:17:30 -0700 (PDT), ho minh tri <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > said: ho> I am investigating about Tunnel Mib in snmp daemon. I ho> had 2 problems about OID tunnelIfEncapsMethod and ho> tunnelIfSecurity. ho> About tunnelIfEncapsMethod, I don't know how about UDP ho> encap

Re: Peername in snmp-seesion object

> On Fri, 20 May 2005 15:27:52 -0700, Rajeswari Natarajan <[EMAIL > PROTECTED]> said: Rajeswari> We use net-snmp 5.0.9 version to develop our snmp Rajeswari> manager.When the trap is received ,looks like peername is Rajeswari> snmp-session object is not getting populated.Has any one Rajes

Re: security fix for local/fixproc (Bug 1203376)

> On Mon, 23 May 2005 13:15:27 -0400, Alex Burger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said: Alex> How about using Perl's mkstemp() instead? It is part of File::Temp. Alex> http://perldoc.perl.org/File/Temp.html Proposal: Objections? Index: fixproc =

Re: security fix for local/fixproc (Bug 1203376)

Hi Thomas. How about using Perl's mkstemp() instead? It is part of File::Temp. http://perldoc.perl.org/File/Temp.html Alex Thomas Anders wrote: -Coders, I've proposed a fix for the fixproc security issue reported as bug 1203376: http://sf.net/tracker/index.php?func=detail&aid=1203376&grou

RE: Peername in snmp-seesion object

Title: RE: Peername in snmp-seesion object Hi ,    Can you please let us know ,how to get peer information when receiving trap.We use net-snmp 5.0.19 to build the Snmp manager. Thanks in advance, Rajeswari -Original Message- From: Robert Story [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Sa

security fix for local/fixproc (Bug 1203376)

-Coders, I've proposed a fix for the fixproc security issue reported as bug 1203376: http://sf.net/tracker/index.php?func=detail&aid=1203376&group_id=12694&atid=112694 Hopefully this can be integrated before releasing 5.0.10 and friends. +Thomas -- Thomas Anders (thomas.anders at blue-cable.

RE: "too many textual conventions" MIB error

Robert, Thanks! We found out that we had an earlier version of the code with 1024. We increased it to 16384 to make sure we do not run out again. I appreciate a quick response. Thanks Boris -Original Message- From: Robert Story [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Saturday, May 21, 2005 12:

Re: getting rid of strtok: leftover in perl/SNMP/SNMP.xs [patch]

On Mon, 23 May 2005 14:52:02 +0200 Thomas wrote: TA> now that strtok should have been replaced by strtok_r in all 5.[123].x TA> code, I noticed that there are still some occurrences of strtok() in TA> perl/SNMP/SNMP.xs. TA> TA> I've updated patch tracker item #1040330 accordingly. Since SF doesn't

getting rid of strtok: leftover in perl/SNMP/SNMP.xs [patch]

-Coders, now that strtok should have been replaced by strtok_r in all 5.[123].x code, I noticed that there are still some occurrences of strtok() in perl/SNMP/SNMP.xs. I've updated patch tracker item #1040330 accordingly. Since SF doesn't allow me to attach the patch there, please find it att

Re: requesting help

On Mon, 2005-05-23 at 16:15, 02MCMC43-mca-Yirdaw Gashaw wrote: > I use net_snmp_5.2.1, I have implemented a table using table iterator > method. But the cache is not working properly. I added > > netsnmp_inject_handler(reg, netsnmp_get_cache_handler(CACHE_TIMEOUT, >readDa

Re: newline patch for snmp_debug.c

Robert Story wrote: On Fri, 20 May 2005 15:36:16 +0200 Thomas wrote: TA> here's a little patch (against 5.3) that properly adds "\n" to some of the TA> snmp_log debug output. Otherwise, output is much harder to read. Please TA> apply. Patches should be submitted to the patches database. That w

requesting help

Hi all I use net_snmp_5.2.1, I have implemented a table using table iterator method. But the cache is not working properly. I added netsnmp_inject_handler(reg, netsnmp_get_cache_handler(CACHE_TIMEOUT, readData, storeData, table_oid, table_oid_len)) in "init_myModule" rout

Re: net-snmp 5.0.8 - not able to get trap, my problem?

On Sat, 2005-05-21 at 16:33, Robert Story wrote: > A new 'transport' system was introduced in the 5.0 line, and it works a little > differently. Take a look at what snmptrapd.c does to open the trap port, and > mimic that instead. In particular, you probably need to use snmp_session_data.

RE: Adding new row in MIB table using API

On Fri, 2005-05-20 at 18:40, James Hardin wrote: > I don't have a specific table in mind. I just wanted to see a > general example using the UCD-SNMP API for: > > - creating a new row in a table using the "entryStatus" variable > in SNMPv1 > - creating a new row in a table using the "rowStatus"

snmpv3 Decryption error with net-snmp 5.2.1

Hi all I use net-snmp 5.2.1, i have created a snmpv3 user with : net-snmp-config --create-snmpv3-user -ro -x mypassword -X DES -A MD5 myuser and when I want to send this request at the agent : snmpget -v 3 -u myuser -l authPriv -a MD5 -A mypassword -x DES -X mypassword localhost sysUpTime.