Hello, friends
I use mib2c to generate the codes for me to extend the agent. But I don't know what's the difference between using the conf file of mib2c.iterate.conf and using mib2c.iterate_access.conf. I look for in
net-snmp.org, but just find the example of the former. It will generate more fil
Wes Hardaker wrote:
The configure script checks for embedded perl functions broke
recently, but it was not apparent until Thomas A. noticed it. The
fact that no one noticed was probably due to the way the #ifdefs
worked and didn't warn you when one function was missing.
Thanks for coming up wi
> On Mon, 31 Oct 2005 23:13:22 -0800 (PST), mahua dutta <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> said:
mahua> I need to use IPv6. As I understood , I should use
mahua> InetAddress for the same.
Yes, but make sure that's what the MIB says to you. If the mib still
says ipaddress there is nothing you can do
The configure script checks for embedded perl functions broke
recently, but it was not apparent until Thomas A. noticed it. The
fact that no one noticed was probably due to the way the #ifdefs
worked and didn't warn you when one function was missing.
Thus, I have two patches (which I'll commit t
Hi,
There is snmp_sess_open replacing snmp_open if used in multi-threaded
applications, is there such a thing for snmp_open_ex?
Thanks.
---
SF.Net email is sponsored by:
Tame your development challenges with Apache's Geronimo App Server.
It has previously been noted that there's a licensing/legal issue with the
code for snmpnetstat. This is affecting the release of 5.3. Dave is
working on a rewrite/fix that eliminates the code in question.
The problem is, the same code is in 5.2.2. I believe we have three main
choices.
1. Do
On Tue, 2005-11-01 at 11:56 +0100, Radek Vokál wrote:
> > We're almost at the point of releasing 5.2.2, and are starting to gear
> > up towards 5.3
>
> Any schedule for 5.3?
Not really.
The best I could do would be to guess, based on previous release
experience. Having issued the first pre-rel
On Tue, 2005-11-01 at 10:32 +, Dave Shield wrote:
> On Tue, 2005-11-01 at 10:30 +0100, Radek Vokál wrote:
> > Last week I thought the net-snmp is heading to a final release of 5.2.2
> > but now I see pre-release of 5.3.
>
> That's correct.
> We're almost at the point of releasing 5.2.2, and ar
On Tue, 2005-11-01 at 10:30 +0100, Radek Vokál wrote:
> Last week I thought the net-snmp is heading to a final release of 5.2.2
> but now I see pre-release of 5.3.
That's correct.
We're almost at the point of releasing 5.2.2, and are starting to gear
up towards 5.3
>
Hi
Last week I thought the net-snmp is heading to a final release of 5.2.2
but now I see pre-release of 5.3. I'm quite lost in versioning - what
will be the next version? Is 5.3 brand new branch and 5.2.2 just update
- It doesn't seems so to me cos 5.2.2 changes many things in libs etc.
Sorry if
On Mon, 2005-10-31 at 22:17 -0800, mahua dutta wrote:
> I like to know whether Inetaddress be considered
> as OCTET sting while implementing the mib.
Yes.
It *must* be considered as an OCTET STRING.
> If So, for Ipv6 or Ipv4, the pseudo code can be as
> snmp_set_var_typed_value(var, ASN_OCTET_ST
11 matches
Mail list logo
