On Thu, May 12, 2011 at 3:57 PM, Niels Baggesen
wrote:
> On Thu, May 12, 2011 at 06:35:12AM -0700, Wes Hardaker wrote:
>> WH> A) produce 5.6.1.1 immediately
>>
>> I think that needs to be done (and fedora patched immediately for updates).
>
> I think I said it earlier, but now that it is formally
On 12 May 2011 19:07, Ravi Depa wrote:
>The problem what I have is when I
> send a snmpget request to agent, snmp agent is not responding for one
> specific OID which is related to TIMETICKS
> char return_val[256];
> case MODE_GET:
> snmp_set_var_typed_value(req
2011/5/12 Ernst Albrecht Köstlin :
> Anyhow, what I had in mind when posting/talking about "more process related
> informatation" were such info one could find under the /proc/ tree in
> certain *X OSes.
Can you be specific, please?
What are the precise items of information that you are looking to
RS> Unless you really need an IETF standard MIB to proceed,
Should I have the need? ;-)
I initially mentioned the HOST-RESOURCES-MIB because the extensions I
have in mind seem to fit into it quiet well (at least from the/my
technical point of view).
"My needs" are to have the extensions in the
Hi,
I am running Debian 6.0 with netsnmp 5.4.3. I developed a snmp agent with
dlmod. The basic agent source code is generated using mib2c tool and I
modified the source files for my project. The problem what I have is when I
send a snmpget request to agent, snmp agent is not responding for one
s
> On Thu, 12 May 2011 15:09:43 +0100, Dave Shield
> said:
DS> Next question: should 5.6.1.1 contain *just* this reversion
DS> or should it contain other changes on the 5.6.x branch?
If it's not just that one, then it'd be 5.6.2.
>> (and fedora patched immediately for updates).
DS> Th
Hello Everyone,
I'm currently working on an snmp application, written in C, that requests
certain information from a device.
These requests contain OIDs of the LLDBMIB.
In order to request for different information I've created a function that
wraps
the Net-SNMP function 'snmp_synch_response(...)
On 12 May 2011 14:35, Wes Hardaker wrote:
> WH> 2) Change the u_int32 back to u_long, and *fix the broken code*.
> WH> (IE, If printing doesn't work that can be fixed)
>
> WH> A) produce 5.6.1.1 immediately
>
> I think that needs to be done
I don't really like that solution.
But on due considera
On Sat, 16 Apr 2011 17:40:58 -0500 ecsel...@rockwellcollins.com wrote:
EC> Although there is no C++ in net-snmp, it would be helpful if the use of
EC> C++ reserved words was avoided.
Every few releases we try and make sure C++ is supported. If it's not working
for you, feel free to file a bug wit
On Tue, 5 Apr 2011 14:02:46 -0400 Doug wrote:
DM> My main concern is that net-snmp not break when two threads are doing
DM> their own v3 things at the same time.
DM>
DM> Ideally, I want two threads to talk to the same agent via different
DM> session pointers. Essentially, each thread would do its
On Thu, May 12, 2011 at 06:35:12AM -0700, Wes Hardaker wrote:
> WH> A) produce 5.6.1.1 immediately
>
> I think that needs to be done (and fedora patched immediately for updates).
I think I said it earlier, but now that it is formally a CFV: +1 (at least)
/Niels
--
Niels Baggesen - @home - Århu
On Thu, 21 Apr 2011 18:11:34 -0400 Jayson A wrote:
RJA> HP doesn't want to support this because they're saying that Net-SNMP
doesn't provide a binary for RHEL6 x64 and RHEL 6 x64 currently only provides
net-snmp 5.5 ( which works ). So kinda stuck between a rock and a hard place
and not sure at
On Thu, 12 May 2011 06:35:12 -0700 Wes wrote:
WH> > On Tue, 10 May 2011 11:01:30 -0700, Wes Hardaker
WH> > said:
WH>
WH> Ok, I'll bite. At least for the 5.6 branch:
WH>
WH> WH> 2) Change the u_int32 back to u_long, and *fix the broken code*.
WH> WH> (IE, If printing doesn't work that ca
On Tue, 26 Apr 2011 09:31:23 -0700 Wes wrote:
WH> MF> What is the purpose of agent/object_monitor.c?
WH>
WH> My recollection was that it was the start of a process for monitoring
WH> variables... Maybe it never got used or finished.
Looking at the code, it looks like it was created as a way for
> On Tue, 10 May 2011 11:01:30 -0700, Wes Hardaker
> said:
Ok, I'll bite. At least for the 5.6 branch:
WH> 2) Change the u_int32 back to u_long, and *fix the broken code*.
WH> (IE, If printing doesn't work that can be fixed)
WH> A) produce 5.6.1.1 immediately
I think that needs to be
On Tue, 10 May 2011 08:53:16 +0100 Dave wrote:
DS> On 10 May 2011 00:08, Wes Hardaker wrote:
DS> > 2) We can, however, extend [the Host Resources MIB] by adding objects to
the
DS> > Net-SNMP MIB tree that adds the needed functionality or definitions.
DS>
DS> > For things like this, we'd need to
Hi All,
I'm following netSnmpHostsTable coming with netsnmp 5.4 and it seems doesn't
work for snmp table set correctly. The RowStatus is always in RS_ACTIVE and
setting can't be committed into file.
Any comments?
Thanks,
-Zimmer
---
17 matches
Mail list logo
