Re: shared library versioning

2007-07-03 Thread Jochen Friedrich
Hi Wes, I actually suspect more people fall into that boat than people that will make use of the new structure directly in their application. I just think most people don't mind recompiling as much as third party commercial products running on an OS which just distributed a new version of

Re: 5.4.rc3 build issue on Debian Etch?

2006-11-24 Thread Jochen Friedrich
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Hi Thomas, Logged with Debian, right? Packaging bugs don't belong in our tracker... No, in *our* tracker, because the issue prevents us from upgrading to autoconf 2.60 (or later) for 5.5. In fact autoconf 0.59c contains the relevant change: *

Re: 5.4.rc3 build issue on Debian Etch?

2006-11-24 Thread Jochen Friedrich
Hi Dave, Index: agent/mibgroup/Makefile.in === RCS file: /cvsroot/net-snmp/net-snmp/agent/mibgroup/Makefile.in,v retrieving revision 5.3 diff -u -r5.3 Makefile.in --- agent/mibgroup/Makefile.in13 Sep 2006 17:00:27 -

Re: rfv: 5.4.rc2 SNMP.pm MIB code broken on 64-bit

2006-11-16 Thread Jochen Friedrich
Hi Thomas, I think it's overdue. I'm happy to attach a revised patch that changes all oid length variables/parameters consistently to size_t, matching the main library. I'm calling for votes to include this in 5.4. +1 from me. From the Debian point of view, the next release will support yet

Re: rfv: add missing manual pages

2006-11-16 Thread Jochen Friedrich
Thomas Anders schrieb: -Coders, I've committed a few additional manual pages that have been supplied by Debian: encode_keychange.1.def mib2c-update.1.def tkmib.1.def fixproc.1.def net-snmp-config.1.def traptoemail.1.def Attached please find the proposed patch to

Debian packages and RFCs

2006-11-16 Thread Jochen Friedrich
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Hi, net-snmp-5.4 comes with the new directory doc/rfc containing several IETF RFCs. Unfortunately, they come with a license that prevents a redistribution under the Debian terms (see http://wiki.debian.org/NonFreeIETFDocuments for details). This

Re: 5.4.rc1 released

2006-11-07 Thread Jochen Friedrich
Hi, Wes Hardaker wrote: I've published 5.4.rc1 to the Net-SNMP download site: https://sourceforge.net/project/showfiles.php?group_id=12694package_id=11571release_id=448774 While building a package for Debian, i found pythoninstall not honoring the DESTDIR environment variable. Any

Re: Bug#380252: net-snmp: FTBFS on GNU/kFreeBSD

2006-08-10 Thread Jochen Friedrich
Hi Petr, In long term we have to simplify include/net-snmp/system/kfreebsd.h by polishing our kernel headers and glibc headers. But in mean time, it would be nice, if you could include this patch. It would help us, as libsnmp-dev have rather big set of packages that (recursively)

Re: Bug#363399: Net SNMP has broken sysObjectID

2006-04-19 Thread Jochen Friedrich
Hi Hilmar, The default value of the sysObjectID is .1.3.6.0.0.0.0.0.0.0, which is not a valuable information. I've compared it to an how grown net snmp 5.0.6, which give out on that OID the value .1.3.6.1.4.1.8072.3.2.xx (where xx is one of the numbers 1-13 depending on which OS it is

RE: rfc: library SONAME

2005-08-19 Thread Jochen Friedrich
Hi Dave, I can sort-of see an argument for distinguishing the 5.2.x line, given this is still being actively maintained. But 5.1.x is basically winding down, and 5.0.x is completely closed. So I'm unconvinced that it's worth distinguishing between the two at this late stage. I would also

RE: rfc: library SONAME

2005-08-18 Thread Jochen Friedrich
Hi Dave, I can sort-of see an argument for distinguishing the 5.2.x line, given this is still being actively maintained. But 5.1.x is basically winding down, and 5.0.x is completely closed. So I'm unconvinced that it's worth distinguishing between the two at this late stage. I would also

Re: Debian patches

2004-10-06 Thread Jochen Friedrich
Hi Mike, Do you have individual patches which may have been rolled up into net-snmp_5.1.2-5.diff.gz ? No, not yet. One of my plans is to switch the build system for net-snmp to cdbs after sarge is out of the door. This will include seperating the patches. Jochen, Would like to review these

Re: Debian: snmpd cannot handle 64 bit interface counters

2004-08-26 Thread Jochen Friedrich
Hi Robert, Ack! Is there a bug report for this one? I just opened bug number 1017112 for this problem. I'm guessing this a 64 bit system, where a long is 64 bits? This is on an alpha. long is really 64 bits on this arch. Thanks, Jochen

Re: Debian: snmpd cannot handle 64 bit interface counters

2004-08-24 Thread Jochen Friedrich
Hi Richard, Checking a few of the sourceforge compile farms hosts reveal that neither FreeBSD or OpenBSD have SCNuMAX defined in inttypes.h. So instead of an out-and-out replacement, we need to break down and use an ifdef on __STDC_FORMAT_MACROS to add the new 64-bit compatabile definitions.