xxx_get_oid(var, table_info->indexes, "column1",
> entry_val);
Again, does this call succed?
I've no real idea what this routine is meant to do, or whether it
returns anything.
Where are you updating the OID within the varbind for GETNEXT requests?
That&#x
Thanks...
On Thu, Oct 20, 2011 at 12:41 PM, Dave Shield wrote:
> On 20 October 2011 08:07, Ravi Kumar wrote:
> > I have registered my table with netsnmp_register_table to implement
> > my own getnext.
> > Every thing seems to be working fine except snmpgetnext req
On 20 October 2011 08:07, Ravi Kumar wrote:
> I have registered my table with netsnmp_register_table to implement
> my own getnext.
> Every thing seems to be working fine except snmpgetnext request with
> multiple oid returns only first oid and its value in response PDU.
> Any
I have registered my table with netsnmp_register_table to implement my own
getnext.
Every thing seems to be working fine except snmpgetnext request with
multiple oid returns
only first oid and its value in response PDU. Any guesses ? my code loops
over
for (request = requests; request; request
x27;s at the heart of the iterator-based
table implementations.
> what if some one wants to implement his own getnext functionality ?
Then register the table using "netsnmp_register_table"
The point of using one of the various table helpers is to take
advantage of the stuff that'
Can you please point me the function or code where this conversion is
happening with
respect to netSnmpHostsTable . what if some one wants to implement his own
getnext functionality ?
Thanks.
On Wed, Oct 19, 2011 at 1:05 PM, Dave Shield wrote:
> On 19 October 2011 07:53, R
On 19 October 2011 07:53, Ravi Kumar wrote:
> I was going though netSnmpHostsTable table implementation based
> on mib2c.iterate_access.conf.
> I could no find a GETNEXT handling in netSnmpHostsTable_handler from the
> code looks like only get and set are handled.
That's cor
Hi,
I was going though netSnmpHostsTable table implementation based
on mib2c.iterate_access.conf.
I could no find a GETNEXT handling in netSnmpHostsTable_handler from the
code looks like only
get and set are handled. But while querying the table getnext is working
fine as well. Can any body tell
On 12 April 2011 15:54, Dave Shield wrote:
> On 12 April 2011 15:38, Zimmer Hu wrote:
>> Could you tell me which way is the right way to make such a change?
>
> Not unless you send the header files I asked for.
Oops!
Sorry - I've just spotted the later message that included them.
OK - I'll try
On 12 April 2011 15:38, Zimmer Hu wrote:
> Could you tell me which way is the right way to make such a change?
Not unless you send the header files I asked for.
In order to help you solve this problem, I need to reproduce it
first - which means I need a version of the agent that includes
this mo
Dave, After I have "stCnt = 1" removed from free_loop_context_at_end(), the
index of column grows endlessly. Hence, snmpwalk can't move to the next
column. Could you tell me which way is the right way to make such a change?
Thanks,
-Z
On Tue, Apr 12, 2011 at 10:28 AM, Zimmer Hu wrote:
> Here th
Here they are.
The last file is the freshly generated snmpwalk output log file with a
shortened syslog sample.
I'm trying the one with stCnt removed...
On Tue, Apr 12, 2011 at 10:15 AM, Dave Shield wrote:
> On 12 April 2011 14:57, Zimmer Hu wrote:
> > Dave, attached is my code.
>
> And the hea
On 12 April 2011 14:57, Zimmer Hu wrote:
> Dave, attached is my code.
And the header files?
> The rationale behind the code is to set index value at every beginning of
> column loop. When loop goes back to the beginning of next column, the index
> is reset to 1 and count again.
The iterator fr
t_info*reqinfo,
netsnmp_request_info *requests)
{
netsnmp_request_info *request;
netsnmp_table_request_info *table_info;
// struct syslogMsgTable_entry *table_entry;
syslogMsgTable_loop_context *table_loopctx;
syslogMsgTable_data_context *table_entry;
//
On 12 April 2011 14:28, Zimmer Hu wrote:
>> You still haven't provided the output from "snmpwalk" that I asked for.
>
> Here is snmpwalk output (only partial, too long as a whole).
No - please post the *WHOLE* of the output.
(Probably as an attachment would be best).
Or at least make it available
On Tue, Apr 12, 2011 at 4:10 AM, Dave Shield wrote:
> On 11 April 2011 19:17, Zimmer Hu wrote:
> > Here are exact output:
> >
> > 1a) snmpget
> >
> > # snmpget -v 2c -c public localhost .1.3.6.1.2.1.192.1.2
> > .1.3.6.1.2.1.192.1.2 = No Such Object available on this agent at this
> OID
>
> Yes -
On 11 April 2011 19:17, Zimmer Hu wrote:
> Here are exact output:
>
> 1a) snmpget
>
> # snmpget -v 2c -c public localhost .1.3.6.1.2.1.192.1.2
> .1.3.6.1.2.1.192.1.2 = No Such Object available on this agent at this OID
Yes - that is correct.
For "snmpget", you have to provide the OID of an instan
On 11 April 2011 18:07, Zimmer Hu wrote:
> I'm going to try snmptable command,
>better to have snmptable command in mbrowse...
You'll have to talk to the mbrowse developers about that.
It's nothing to do with the Net-SNMP project.
(other than apparently being built on out toolkits)
Dave
t;> > with error same as that in 1a))
>>
>> Again, that's really too vague to be useful.
>> Please post the exact command(s) and full output.
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> > I just can't conceive an example let me go through one row's col
7;t conceive an example let me go through one row's columns
> first,
> > then move to next row....Is this to say Snmpv1 is not capable to
> handle
> > table efficiently
>
> It's nothing to do with SNMPv1 vs SNMPv2 - this is a consequence of
> the basic behavi
gt; > with error same as that in 1a))
>
> Again, that's really too vague to be useful.
> Please post the exact command(s) and full output.
>
>
>
>
> > I just can't conceive an example let me go through one row's columns
> first,
> > then move to next
...Is this to say Snmpv1 is not capable to handle
> table efficiently
It's nothing to do with SNMPv1 vs SNMPv2 - this is a consequence of
the basic behaviour of the GETNEXT command, combined with the
OID ordering rules of SMI.
An "snmpwalk" will *always* traverse tab
> > tried using "snmpget" to retrieve the data in your way, and mbrowse to
> > retrieve only one MO (column) in one row from a table but it failed
>
> That description is a little bit vague.
> What was the exact "snmpget" command that you tried?
> (And for comparison, what's the full output from sn
On 10 April 2011 19:46, Zimmer Hu wrote:
> I'm asking this because I am using "snmpwalk" to send the requests,
> so, is it true for the most nature case, my explanation is right?
If you are using "snmpwalk", then this sends a series of GETNEXT
requests, each contai
Yes, that's to say, only when client wants to do this deliberately.
Otherwise, the requests is one column after the other.
Dave, I'm asking this because I am using "snmpwalk" to send the requests,
so, is it true for the most nature case, my explanation is right? I have
tried using "snmpget" to ret
On 10 April 2011 16:46, Zimmer Hu wrote:
> Right, I took it for granted that the varbinds for "each requests" is for
> the columns of "each row". There may be holes in table so this may not be
> the case. Nevertheless, is this assertion true for the "full-filled" table
> (a varbind in one requests
Right, I took it for granted that the varbinds for "each requests" is for
the columns of "each row". There may be holes in table so this may not be
the case. Nevertheless, is this assertion true for the "full-filled" table
(a varbind in one requests list == a request ==a column in a row)?
On Sun,
On 9 April 2011 13:46, Zimmer Hu wrote:
> As to my understanding (and your hints),
> netsnmp_table_iterator_helper_handler goes through each row first; Then for
> each row, it stores each column data(data_context) in TI_REQUEST_CACHE;
Close - but not quite.
The iterator goes through each row of
> If the helper framework knows (or can find out) the list of valid rows,
> then it can automatically determine which row is needed to answer a
> given GETNEXT request.
>
Dave, Thanks.
As to my understanding (and your hints),
netsnmp_table_iterator_helper_handler goes through ea
On 8 April 2011 06:33, Zimmer Hu wrote:
>> I'm using wireshark 1.2.11 to monitor SNMP traffic, I observed when I
>> snmpwalk through MyTable, there are a lot of GETNEXT request sent out, but
>> in my handler, branch GETNEXT doesn't get execute
Ok, I have found in netsnmp_table_iterator_helper_handler(), it changes all
GETNEXT requests to GET. ( Line 778 in table_iterator.c for netsnmp-5.4.3).
On Thu, Apr 7, 2011 at 4:23 PM, Zimmer Hu wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I'm using wireshark 1.2.11 to monitor SNMP traffic, I observed whe
Hi,
I'm using wireshark 1.2.11 to monitor SNMP traffic, I observed when I
snmpwalk through MyTable, there are a lot of GETNEXT request sent out, but
in my handler, branch GETNEXT doesn't get executed, the string I put there
doesn't get printout. Same thing for netSnmpHostsTable an
Hi!
Probably problem in function int check_getnext_results (netsnmp_agent_session
*asp) from snmp_agent.c (a line 2798).
There is no check of the status of request. If the status of request is
erroneous, function check_getnext_results all can return 1 (request GETNEXT
correct).
It is necessary
On Fri, Feb 18, 2011 at 3:58 PM, Dave Shield wrote:
> On 18 February 2011 20:28, Fulko Hew wrote:
> > I have two regions registered, and I perform a getnext to the master...
> >
> > The master sends an AgentX getNext PDU on the first region looking for a
> > positi
On 18 February 2011 20:28, Fulko Hew wrote:
> I have two regions registered, and I perform a getnext to the master...
>
> The master sends an AgentX getNext PDU on the first region looking for a
> positive response. Unfortunately, the 'next' variable isn't within t
I'm confused by what Net-SNMP (5.6.rc2) is doing when interacting with
my AgentX sub-agent.
I have two regions registered, and I perform a getnext to the master...
The master sends an AgentX getNext PDU on the first region looking for a
positive response. Unfortunately, the 'next
following OIDs:
1.3.6.1.4.1.881.500.1.5.1.1.1
1.3.6.1.4.1.881.500.1.5.1.2.1
1.3.6.1.4.1.881.500.1.5.1.3.1
1.3.6.1.4.1.881.500.1.5.1.4.1
ie, columns 1 through 4 for row 1
2/ To test it, I query my agent with a:
getnext 1.3.6.1.4.1.881.500.1
3/ What I see in the AgentX getNext PDU is:
list, where others can both learn
> and offer advice. Thanks. ]
Sorry for the trouble.
>
> We probably need a bit more information about exactly what is happening here.
>
> Can you please try running the agent using the flags
>
> -D snmp_agent,agentx
>
> and issu
andler does not terminate a poll subagent when it
> receives generror.
We probably need a bit more information about exactly what is happening here.
Can you please try running the agent using the flags
-D snmp_agent,agentx
and issue a single GETNEXT request, that will trigger the problem
On 11 November 2010 15:16, Robert Story wrote:
> On Thu, 11 Nov 2010 09:20:22 +0300 Phill wrote:
> PX> Has faced a strange situation. There are 4 tables in one MIB-file. All
> tables are realised in the subagent through AgentX. Net-SNMP works as the
> master. All fields of the table have type Un
On Thu, 11 Nov 2010 09:20:22 +0300 Phill wrote:
PX> Has faced a strange situation. There are 4 tables in one MIB-file. All
tables are realised in the subagent through AgentX. Net-SNMP works as the
master. All fields of the table have type Unsigned32. If any table contains an
error (for example n
Hi All!
Has faced a strange situation. There are 4 tables in one MIB-file. All tables
are realised in the subagent through AgentX. Net-SNMP works as the master. All
fields of the table have type Unsigned32. If any table contains an error (for
example negative value, the subagent returns genErro
Hi Dave,
I have submitted 2 patches, one for the trunk and one for V5.4 branch.
Please check at leased that one for trunk. 3 test scripts are also
included.
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=312694&aid=3096725&group_id=12694
Kindly regards,
Claus
On 26.10.2010, at 22:43, Cl
Ok, done.
see
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&aid=3096725&group_id=12694&atid=312694
Note, this patch does not fix the sparse table BUG at V5.4.3!
Regards
Claus
On 26.10.2010, at 06:06, Thomas Anders wrote:
> Claus Klein wrote:
>> Please apply this patch and check the result abo
Hi Dave,
thanks, you are right. I merged more than needed.
On the other site, the sparse table handling on net-snmp v5.6 works.
Without my changes at the table_dataset.c.
But I have no Idea why?
So I merged all this files ... without luck.
Later I found the solution for this problem at the ta
Ok Thomas,
I will do it again against the SVN trunk.
But I still need a hint:
At another tread I asked some question about the code ...
1.) Why is the send_trap_to_sess() called for each entry at sinks
without check the snmpNotifyFilter?
2.) And why is the snmpNotifyFilter called via callbac
On 25 October 2010 22:30, Claus Klein wrote:
> First of all, the sparse table handling for the notificationLogMib does not
> work!
>
> Second the v1 trap pdu is different from the v2/v3 trap pdu.
>
> Than there are a lot of small BUGs about the trap handling toward the
> notificationLogMib.
> Pl
Claus Klein wrote:
> Please apply this patch and check the result about my FIXME notes.
Please submit your patch to http://www.net-snmp.org/patches so it won't get
lost. Patches that apply cleanly against SVN trunk usually have a higher chance
to get accepted quickly.
+Thomas
I was able to fix it.
It was more than one BUG involved!
First of all, the sparse table handling for the notificationLogMib
does not work!
Second the v1 trap pdu is different from the v2/v3 trap pdu.
Than there are a lot of small BUGs about the trap handling toward the
notificationLogMib.
Hi all,
I am going to become crazy.
While working with net-snmp v5.4.3 i have problems with the
notificationlogmib.
An snmpwalk localhost nlmLogTable does not deliver all rows.
I checked that the missing entries are added to the table.
When I walk over the missing row, I can read the entries?
agent some error code so that it will
skip over all the subsequent row handlers. I tried sending SNMP_ENDOFMIBVIEW
but still the getnext goes through all the row handlers.
Below is the sequence of steps
1. udpTable (1.3.6.1.2.1.5.7) is indexed on IP Address and Port combination.
For simplicity lets
;
[email protected]
Subject: Re: help needed with root oid and getnext operation
2009/2/28 EYRE Bernadette :
> One of my original problem was that when using snmpwalk command
OK - so you are using "snmpwalk".
That's definitely relevant here
> on say
cted, but you hadn't given sufficient
detail to confirm this.
> my subagent handler was getting called
> once with getnext and next with get mode.
That is the designed behaviour.
Think about what things look like from the user point of view.
If I run "snmpwalk ... system", I
Hi David,
One of my original problem was that when using snmpwalk command on say a
column (without any instance index) of one of the tables,
my subagent handler was getting called
once with getnext and next with get mode. I wasn't sure if that
was the expected sequence of calls.
I wa
've no idea what information Harish has suggested, since this doesn't
> seem to have been copied to the list.
Harish email is listed below:
Hi Berndette,
Maybe you can get good sample programs for GETNEXT here
http://www.opensource.apple.com/darwinsource/10.4.4.ppc/net_snmp-18/
Hi Berndette,
Maybe you can get good sample programs for GETNEXT here
http://www.opensource.apple.com/darwinsource/10.4.4.ppc/net_snmp-18/net-snmp/apps/
Hope this helps.
Thanks
Harish
From: EYRE Bernadette [mailto:[email protected]]
Sent
Hello snmp coders and users,
I'm lost please help shed some light.
I have an subagent which registers organization root oid (several tables and
scalars)
when I run snmpwalk on one of the columns of one of the tables the
net-snmp master agent calls my handler with GETNEXT mode first
and
2009/1/21 Adrian Overbury :
>If I've got a MIB
> file that covers my whole sub-tree, is there a way I can parse that in,
> say, python or perl, and get some kind of data structure from which I
> can follow a link to the next OID in the tree?
You *cou
2009/1/21 Adrian Overbury :
> Say I've got a table, and I've just gotten a GETNEXT request for the OID
> of one of the column heads. Should I return the OID for the next column
> head or the OID of the first field of that column?
The general rule with GETNEXT is that you shoul
So this is a point I've never been clear on:
Say I've got a table, and I've just gotten a GETNEXT request for the OID
of one of the column heads. Should I return the OID for the next column
head or the OID of the first field of that column?
On a similar note, I've been
2009/1/21 satyam :
> what is the best way to handle group of similar scalars ?
> I was looking at scalar_group and it seems to meet requirement perfectly
>
> Would it take care of getnext processing and getbulk processing
what is the best way to handle group of similar scalars ?
I was looking at scalar_group and it seems to meet requirement perfectly
Would it take care of getnext processing and getbulk processing ?
--
This SF.net email
erlying table
This should probably come *after* the table_info call
(since this is where you retrieve the index values)
Duplicate this block to form a GETNEXT block, and tweak it
to search your underlying table for the appropriate row.
(Or you could
; low level snmp routines for my database. These are my requirements:
> >>
> >> 1) Given the index/indices in the OID extracted from the SNMP Varbind,
> >> I can directly access the node which has the required info. I don't
> >> want to go through a getfirst-getn
n directly access the node which has the required info. I don't
>> want to go through a getfirst-getnext cycle to find the correct row
>> for an SNMP GET request. My database is maintained as a hash table and
>> so I can access my data by hashing on my indices.
>>
>>
ctly access the node which has the required info. I don't
> want to go through a getfirst-getnext cycle to find the correct row
> for an SNMP GET request. My database is maintained as a hash table and
> so I can access my data by hashing on my indices.
>
> 2)My data base is not so
ugh a getfirst-getnext cycle to find the correct row
for an SNMP GET request. My database is maintained as a hash table and
so I can access my data by hashing on my indices.
2)My data base is not sorted, so for SNMP GetNexts , I dont mind
getfirst-getnext cycles being called.
I tried mfd (uns
iled originally?
I'll have to dig into these things later... the boss wants to focus on
failover. I'll get back to you.
> I forgot to mention, when I do a
> > getnext on netSnmp.1.8 I get an additional line that says
> >
> > Connection from
> >
> >
On 11/02/2008, Larry Dickson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Also, 2nd question - What should be our subagent's response to a "getnext"
> on the last leaf in our subtree?
The subagent should return an "endOfMibView" value for this varbind
(RFC 2741, section 7.2.
;
do you see anything unexpected?
How was the agent configured/compiled originally?
> I forgot to mention, when I do a
> getnext on netSnmp.1.8 I get an additional line that says
>
> Connection from
>
> before it jumps to our private s
I inserted ### before the "perl do" line in each copy of snmpd.conf that had
it. The behavior did not change, i.e. it still timed out as before. (Also
the subagent still appears to function.) I forgot to mention, when I do a
getnext on netSnmp.1.8 I get an additional line that says
On 11/02/2008, Larry Dickson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Apparently we have no extend, etc, entries, though there's a "perl do"; here
> is the full text (excluding comments and blank lines) of the 3 snmpd.conf
> files I found on the system (=== lines are my commentary):
> === Contents of (recent
rapsink 192.168.1.22
perl do /etc/edgeware-subagent.pl
Also, 2nd question - What should be our subagent's response to a "getnext"
on the last leaf in our subtree?
Larry Dickson
On 2/11/08, Dave Shield <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> On 11/02/2008, Larry Dickson <[EMA
On 11/02/2008, Larry Dickson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > But my question is also more algorithmic: How is it (the agent/subagent
> > > combination) supposed to do a getnext that jumps out of the subagent's
> > > subtree?
> >
> > The subtree i
On 11/02/2008, Larry Dickson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Getnext results for netSnmp.x
> 1.4 nsCacheDefaultTimeout.0
> 1.5 same
So the cache modules is working OK
> 1.6 nsDebugEnabled.0
> 1.7 same
... as is the debug module...
> 1.8 enterprises.22782.1.2.1.1.0 =
Interleaved below...
On 2/11/08, Dave Shield <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> On 11/02/2008, Larry Dickson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Response to getnext at netSnmp.1.3 is timeout.
>
> OK - what about
>GETNEXT netSnmp.1.5
> GETNEXT netSnmp.1.7
>
On 11/02/2008, Larry Dickson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Response to getnext at netSnmp.1.3 is timeout.
OK - what about
GETNEXT netSnmp.1.5
GETNEXT netSnmp.1.7
GETNEXT netSnmp.1.9
What I'm trying to determine here is exactly *where* the blocking module
is located
Response to getnext at netSnmp.1.3 is timeout. Response to get at
netSnmp.1.3, netSnmp.1.3.1, etc, is noSuchName (though it does give a name
for the first couple of them). My guess is that whatever comes immediately
after netSnmp.1.2.1.1.6.0.12.1.3.6.1.6.3.16.1.5.2.1.6.127 is where the
damage is
On 23/01/2008, Larry Dickson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>attempting a subtree at netSnmp times out after
> netSnmp.1.2.1.1.6.0.12.1.3.6.1.6.3.16.1.5.2.1.6.127 and
> trying a getnext on this oid also times out.
That's part of the nsModuleTable
(in particular, an instance of
Hi all,
I'm new at this and using a variant of version 5.2.1 (ca 2005-05-26). I'm
using iReasoning mib browser and/or snmpwalk and friends. Attempts to do
getnext at end of a subtree get inconsistent results. In the MIB
files, ucdavis = .1.3.6.1.4.1.2021 and netSnmp=.1.3.6.1.4.1.8072 -
On Tue, 31 Oct 2006 17:24:27 +0900 Zhang wrote:
ZC> Who can tell me why agent will search B_table continuely?
As Juergen said, the agent will search continuously until it does find a
object, regardless of any table/object boundaries. There was some proposed
work to allow specifying a limiting oid,
> 1. I use AdventNet to get the A_table data. The AdventNet sent "getNext"
> message to agent:
>
> The list are copied from my Tera Term:
> GETNEXT message
>-- SNMPv2-SMI::enterprises.236.4.6.1.3.1.2.1.1
>-- SNMPv2-SMI::enterprises.236.4.6.
"getNext" message to agent:
The list are copied from my Tera Term:
GETNEXT message -- SNMPv2-SMI::enterprises.236.4.6.1.3.1.2.1.1 -- SNMPv2-SMI::enterprises.236.4.6.1.3.1.2.1.2 -- SNMPv2-SMI::enterprises.236.4.6.1.3.1.2.1.3 -- ... ... ... ... -- SNMPv2-SMI::
e
nt pass the request to my extension when issuing a
> getnext, but not a get? I would expect it to either fail in both cases,
> or pass in both.
>
> Alex
-
Using Tomcat but need to do more? Need to support web services, s
.
Failed object: .1.3.6.1.2.1.4.1.0
If I do an snmpgetnext of .1.3.6.1.2.1.4.1.0, I get:
.1.3.6.1.2.1.4.2.0 = INTEGER: 128
Why would the agent pass the request to my extension when issuing a
getnext, but not a get? I would expect it to either fail in both cases,
or pass in both.
Alex
.
KB> We had the problem that when a getNext on a subagent was called, the
KB> getNext-callbackFunction was called to often, even we returned
KB> SNMP_ENDOFMIBVIEW.
What happens if you don't return anything? That is, simply return from the
handler without doing anything.
--
NOT
Hi,
We are using agentx with shared tables (e.g. subagent 1 has row 1,
subagent 2 row 2, ...). Table_iterator is not used, because we don't
want to register a whole table, but only rows. The net-snmp version is
5.3.0.1.
We had the problem that when a getNext on a subagent was called
[ First - *please* don't mail me privately, without copying
any responses to the mailing list. I don't have the time
or inclination to offer private, unpaid, SNMP consultancy.
Keep discussions to the list, where others can both learn
and offer advice. Thanks. ]
On Mon,
> On Sun, 13 Nov 2005 23:28:07 -0500, Sharon Gowan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
Sharon> I have been looking for a good example of using get next to
Sharon> walk a section of a mib, but it doesn't pop out at me from the
Sharon> net-snmp development web site. Can anyone on this mailing
Sharon> lis
itten,
> bare-bones example similar to the one on the net-snmp site shows for GET?
What exactly are you wanting to do?
The tutorial GET example could be converted to a GETNEXT
version, simply by changing the snmp_pdu_create call
to us SNMP_MSG_GETNEXT instead.
Or you could look at the code for
Hi:
I have been looking for a good example of using get next to walk a section
of a mib, but it doesn't pop out at me from the net-snmp development web
site. Can anyone on this mailing list point me to a good, clearly-written,
bare-bones example similar to the one on the net-snmp site shows f
On Tue, 2005-08-23 at 19:22 -0300, Jordan Janeiro Lopes da Silva wrote:
> The snmpgetnext should work fine in a table generated by a
> mib2c.iterate.conf?
Yes.
> Do I have to implement something or everything is ready
> to use with snmpget and snmpgetnext?
You'll have to fill in the details o
Hello guys,
The snmpgetnext should work fine in a table generated by a
mib2c.iterate.conf? Do I have to implement something or everything is ready
to use with snmpget and snmpgetnext? Because I´ve tried to use the
snmpgetnext in a "iterate" table and nothing happens, but when I use snmpget,
e
Hi Dave,
I have rechecked it , populating the values both the indexes
If I using snmp_alarm_register, in that case reqinfo->mode
=161(GETNEXT) and if i not using that reqinfo->mode =160(GET)..
I feel this is the only problem. But I don't know , why it is coming
like that .
Thank
Hi ,
I have now populated the first index also . But still it is giving the
same result.
running snmpwalk on that node is giving "Timeout: No Response from
localhost "
Thanks & regards
Partha
Dave Shield wrote:
On Tue, 2005-06-14 at 11:36, partha wrote:
For the time being I want to work
Hi,
I am running the below test case using the SilverCreek and getting the following
errors. Please let me know does anyone face this similar problem? Also, let me know,
is there any patch/fix available in the repository for this :
== 3.07 - 1.1.5 ~ SNMP Protocol Chapter 1.0 Test 1.1.5 - FAIL-
> does GetNext and GetBulk functions column-wise in case of a table
> or row-wise..
They both walk the full length of each column (i.e. the value from
each row) before moving on to the next column.
Did you think of actually trying this with an existing agent,
to see what it does in pr
Hi!!,
Can anyone
tell me how GetNext and GetBulk functions. .I mean does GetNext and
GetBulk functions column-wise in case of a table or row-wise..
If possible if anyone can give a link which
explains the proper functionality of GETNEXT and GETBULK
functionality
98 matches
Mail list logo
