Hi,
I was reached with question about $SUBJ, that I am not sure, if it's possible.
Imagine this situation.
Someone have linux system, on which is disabled IPv6 support via grub file
(/etc/default/grub -> ipv6.disable=1). After reboot, this will cause following
error message by snmpd [
Hi,
We want to use this library for IPV6 support of our product.
How to use it?
Regards,
S.M.BASHA.
--
10 Tips for Better Web Security
Learn 10 ways to better secure your business today. Topics covered
> On Tue, 05 Oct 2010 21:38:04 +0200, Niels Baggesen
> said:
NB> I count +3 (my self, Wes, Magnus), and two abstain (Dave and Bart), so I
NB> will go ahead and commit it when I have got the proper autoconf tools in
NB> place :-)
Please do! I just got the rest of my plate cleared and
Den 28-09-2010 15:20, Niels Baggesen skrev:
> IPv6 detection for Solaris was broken with the configure.d rewrite.
> The following patch re-enables it.
I count +3 (my self, Wes, Magnus), and two abstain (Dave and Bart), so I
will go ahead and commit it when I have got the proper autoconf tools in
On Wed, 2010-09-29 at 22:35 +0200, Niels Baggesen wrote:
> Den 29-09-2010 18:02, Wes Hardaker skrev:
> > I agree... the issue is that the current symbol being checked for in
> > the if statement doesn't match the symbol that is actually being set
> > previously.
>
> Yes, and the (frightening) res
Den 29-09-2010 18:02, Wes Hardaker skrev:
> I agree... the issue is that the current symbol being checked for in
> the if statement doesn't match the symbol that is actually being set
> previously.
Yes, and the (frightening) result is that --enable-ipv6 is silently
ignored. I could fear that thi
> On Tue, 28 Sep 2010 21:51:06 +0200, Magnus Fromreide
> said:
MF> There is only one place mentioning
MF> ac_cv_have_struct_sockaddr_in6_sin6_addr in the configure script
MF> (the one Niels is removing) but there is code to set
MF> ac_cv_member_struct_sockaddr_in6_sin6_addr so I'd say it
On 28 September 2010 14:20, Niels Baggesen wrote:
> IPv6 detection for Solaris was broken with the configure.d rewrite.
> The following patch re-enables it.
My main concern about this patch is that it amends the configure script,
and hence potentially affects all builds, regardless of architectur
On Tue, 2010-09-28 at 17:33 +0200, Bart Van Assche wrote:
> On Tue, Sep 28, 2010 at 3:20 PM, Niels Baggesen
> wrote:
> IPv6 detection for Solaris was broken with the configure.d
> rewrite.
> The following patch re-enables it.
>
> --- configure.d/config_proj
On Tue, Sep 28, 2010 at 3:20 PM, Niels Baggesen
wrote:
> IPv6 detection for Solaris was broken with the configure.d rewrite.
> The following patch re-enables it.
>
> --- configure.d/config_project_ipv6_types (revision 19393)
> +++ configure.d/config_project_ipv6_types (working copy)
>
IPv6 detection for Solaris was broken with the configure.d rewrite.
The following patch re-enables it.
--- configure.d/config_project_ipv6_types (revision 19393)
+++ configure.d/config_project_ipv6_types (working copy)
@@ -175,7 +175,7 @@
#endif
]])
AC_MSG_CHE
On 4 May 2010 14:00, Ron Bets wrote:
> Thanks. I am not tied specifically to the 5.4.x stream. My main requirement
> is support for
> IPv6 transport on Windows, Solaris, and Linux. Would I be better off with a
> different release?
I've just put together the latest (hopefully final) pre-relea
eadme mentioned that 5.4 finally support IPv6 on Solaris.
Backwards compatibility is considered very important for the Net-SNMP project,
so the latest release of the 5.4 or 5.5 branch should be fine. Regarding IPv6
support on Windows: it is easier to build Net-SNMP with IPv6 support enabled
us
e the readme mentioned that 5.4 finally support IPv6 on Solaris.
>
Backwards compatibility is considered very important for the Net-SNMP
project, so the latest release of the 5.4 or 5.5 branch should be fine.
Regarding IPv6 support on Windows: it is easier to build Net-SNMP with IPv6
support enabl
Problems building 5.2.4.1 with IPv6 support on Windows
On Mon, May 3, 2010 at 3:45 PM, Ron Bets wrote:
Thanks once again. When I added 'gdi32.lib' to the linker, snmpwalk linked
fine. Based on your response, I looked at the generated makefile for the
OpenSSL build, and sure enough
On Mon, May 3, 2010 at 3:45 PM, Ron Bets wrote:
> Thanks once again. When I added 'gdi32.lib' to the linker, snmpwalk linked
> fine. Based on your response, I looked at the generated makefile for the
> OpenSSL build, and sure enough gdi32.lib was there.
>
> It would still be nice to understand
2010 2:59 PM
To: Ron Bets
Cc: Net SNMP Coders ([email protected])
Subject: Re: Problems building 5.2.4.1 with IPv6 support on Windows
On Fri, Apr 30, 2010 at 8:40 PM, Ron Bets wrote:
Thanks again. I had noticed that in the readme, and the project is apparently
attempting to l
On Fri, Apr 30, 2010 at 8:40 PM, Ron Bets wrote:
> Thanks again. I had noticed that in the readme, and the project is
> apparently attempting to link against the open ssl lib, but there seems to
> be an additional external dependency that is not met. Here is an example of
> the actual linker er
[email protected])
Subject: Re: Problems building 5.2.4.1 with IPv6 support on Windows
On Fri, Apr 30, 2010 at 7:40 PM, Ron Bets wrote:
Thanks. The PSDK include directory does come before the VC98 include dirs. I
*think* I was successful building the libs from the IDE, but the errors persist
On Fri, Apr 30, 2010 at 7:40 PM, Ron Bets wrote:
> Thanks. The PSDK include directory does come before the VC98 include dirs.
> I *think* I was successful building the libs from the IDE, but the errors
> persist from the cmd line. However, when I try to build an executable,
> e.g., snmpwalk, I
IPv6 support on Windows
On Fri, Apr 30, 2010 at 6:00 PM, Ron Bets wrote:
Hi folks. I am struggling a little bit, trying to get 5.2.4.1 built under
Windows with IPv6 support enabled. My environment is something like this:
Visual Studio 6.0 sp5
ActivePerl
Microsoft SDK (Feb 2003)
I have run
On Fri, Apr 30, 2010 at 6:00 PM, Ron Bets wrote:
> Hi folks. I am struggling a little bit, trying to get 5.2.4.1 built under
> Windows with IPv6 support enabled. My environment is something like this:
>
> Visual Studio 6.0 sp5
> ActivePerl
> Microsoft SDK (Feb 2003)
>
&
Hi folks. I am struggling a little bit, trying to get 5.2.4.1 built under
Windows with IPv6 support enabled. My environment is something like this:
Visual Studio 6.0 sp5
ActivePerl
Microsoft SDK (Feb 2003)
I have run "Register PSDK Directories with Visual Studio" and VCVARS32.BA
fyRestart
The trap2sink in my snmpd.conf are:
trap2sink localhost notify 162
trap2sink udp6:[::1]:162 notify 162
Emi
-Original Message-
From: Emi Yanagi
Sent: Thursday, November 15, 2007 4:33 PM
To: [email protected]
Subject: trap2sink IPv
Dear net-snmp-coders,
I tried the following syntax but neither worked for me.
trap2sink udp6:[fe80::214:22ff:fe7b:fca2]:162
trap2sink udp6:'[fe80::214:22ff:fe7b:fca2]':162
trap2sink with IPv4 address works just fine.
How to specify trap2sink with IPv6?
Thanks for your support.
Emi
---Original Message-
From: Thomas Anders [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, September 06, 2006 7:18 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: [email protected]; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: IPv6 support not enabled on Solaris 9 when building Net-SNMP_5.3.
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> netsnmp_udp6_getSecName: resolve <"SNMP_COMMUNITY-61",
> fe80::203:baff:fe2a:a645>
> netsnmp_udp6_getSecName: compare <"SNMP-COMMUNITY-61",
> 0x/0xffbfed00>... nope
> netsnmp_udp6_getSecName: compare <"SNMP_COMMUNITY-62",
> 0x/0x
--Original Message-
From: Thomas Anders [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, September 06, 2006 2:03 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [email protected]; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: IPv6 support not enabled on Solaris 9 when building Net-SNMP_5.3.1
[EMAIL PR
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> ./snmpd -d -p udp:161,udp6:1161
Why "-p"? This option is meant to be used for
-p FILE store process id in FILE
which means that "udp:161,udp6:1161" would be treated as a filename
rather than a transport identifier. Please try again with
./snmpd -d -f -
now getting timeout.
Sincerely,
Rahul K
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Dave Shield
Sent: Wednesday, September 06, 2006 1:23 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: [email protected]; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: IPv6 support no
On 06/09/06, [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> The output is "No match".
> For example
>
> COMMAND -> snmpget -v1 -c SNMP_COMMUNITY-61 udp6:[fe80::203:baff:fe2a:a645]
> sysName.0
> OUTPUT -> No match
That feels like a shell error, rather than an SNMP one.
I suspect that snmpget is ne
PROTECTED]
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [email protected]; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: IPv6 support not enabled on Solaris 9 when building Net-SNMP_5.3.1
Hi,
The output is "No match".
For example
COMMAND -> snmpget -v1 -c SNMP_COMMUNITY-61 udp6:[fe80::203:baff:fe2a:a64
s Anders [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, September 05, 2006 10:28 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [email protected]
Subject: Re: IPv6 support not enabled on Solaris 9 when building Net-SNMP_5.3.1
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> IPv6:
> a) snmpget -v1 -c
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> IPv6:
> a) snmpget -v1 -c SNMP_COMMUNITY-61 udp6:[fe80::203:baff:fe2a:a645] sysName.0
> -> No match - NOT OK
> b) snmpget -v1 -c SNMP_COMMUNITY-62 udp6:[fe80::203:baff:fe2a:a645] sysName.0
> -> No match - NOT OK
What exactly is the output here?
Anyway, I'm sorry to co
>Thomas Anders wrote:
>I can reproduce your problem and confirm that this is a bug. I've checked >in a
>fix for CVS MAIN that should allow you to build net-snmp on Solaris (and >AIX,
>Tru64, ...) with support for the UDPIPv6/TCPIPv6 transports. The mibII/ipv6
>>MIB
>module still won't be supported
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> We are not able to enable IPv6 support on Solaris 9 when building
> Net-SNMP_5.3.1
I can reproduce your problem and confirm that this is a bug. I've checked in a
fix for CVS MAIN that should allow you to build net-snmp on Solaris (and AIX,
Tru64, ...) with
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Please provide help/pointers to enable Net-SNMP IPv6 support on Solaris 9.
Thanks for providing a proper problem report. A few more things to check (and
report back):
1) grep -i inet6 include/net-snmp/net-snmp-config.h
2) net-snmp-config --cflags
3) lsof -p (if
Hi All,
We are not able to enable IPv6 support on Solaris 9 when building Net-SNMP_5.3.1
The software versions we are using are as follows
1) Net-SNMP 5.3.1
2) GCC 3.3
3) Solaris 5.9
The steps we are following are as follows
1) Running configure
./configure --prefix=/net
On Fri, 8 Jul 2005 08:02:22 -0700 (PDT) Ganesh wrote:
GCN> I had 2 questions :
Which you posted on both lists. I responded on the users list recently.
--
NOTE: messages sent directly to me, instead of the lists, will be deleted
unless they are requests for paid consulting services.
Robert
Hi all ..
This is my first post to these mailing lists. I hope I am following the normal etiquette here.
I had 2 questions :
1. IPv6 support
In your website home page, you have mentioned that IPv6 is supported. Is it supported on all platforms ? Has it been tested reasonably ?
2. Build
> Same question ask weeks ago... noone seems to know
> or is willig to answer!
But your question wasn't quite the same.
Srini appeared to be asking about using IPv6 as a *transport*
mechanism, for transmitting SNMP requests to and from the agent.
As Robert replied, that's supported using
con
Same question ask weeks ago... noone seems to know
or is willig to answer!
-Ursprungliche Nachricht-
Von: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Auftrag von Srini
Kode
Gesendet: Dienstag, 19. Oktober 2004 23:00
An: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Betreff: IPv6 support
For a
For a new platform we ar planning to support IPv6 and for snmp we plan to
use net-snmp.
Does net-snmp support IPv6?
Thanks
Srini
> -Original Message-
> From: Robert Story (Coders) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Tuesday, October 19, 2004 11:33 AM
> To: Srini Kode
> Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTE
On Tue, 19 Oct 2004 14:00:01 -0700 Srini wrote:
SK> For a new platform we ar planning to support IPv6 and for snmp we plan to
SK> use net-snmp.
SK> Does net-snmp support IPv6?
Yes, on some platforms. (No, I don't know which ones work and which don't.)
Configure with --enable-ipv6, and it will tel
kernel.
Thanks,
Fong
-Original Message-
From: Robert Story (Coders) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, August 19, 2004 2:36 PM
To: Fong Tsui
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Fong Tsui
Subject: Re: IPV6 support for Linux
On Wed, 18 Aug 2004 21:31:41 -0700 Fong wrote:
FT> I have tr
On Wed, 18 Aug 2004 21:31:41 -0700 Fong wrote:
FT> I have tried v5.1.2.rc2, it still can't launch as
FT> snmpd udp:161,tcp:161,udp6:161,tcp6:161
It appears that it won't allow tcp:161 and tcp6:161 at the same time. That is a
bug that should be written up. Unfortunately, I don't have time for furt
3 -0700 Fong wrote:
> FT> Is it a known issue there is a problem to launch Ipv6 and ipv4
> FT> together?
>
> It works in the main line CVS, so I'd guess it should work in 5.1.2 as well.
>
> FT> It seems it only gets the first ty
Title: RE: IPV6 support for Linux
Robert,
I have tried v5.1.2.rc2, it still can't launch as
snmpd udp:161,tcp:161,udp6:161,tcp6:161
Thanks,
Fong
-Original Message- From:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] on behalf of Fong Tsui
Sent: Wed 8/18/2004 3:51 PM To:
[EMAIL PROTECTE
) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, August 16, 2004 10:07 PM
To: Fong Tsui
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Ling, Xiaofeng
Subject: Re: IPV6 support for Linux
On Fri, 6 Aug 2004 10:56:43 -0700 Fong wrote:
FT> Is it a known issue there is a problem to launch Ipv6 and ipv4
FT> together?
It works
IPv6 works itself, only not able to launch combination of IPv4 and IPv6 together.
-Original Message-
From: Robert Story (Coders) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, August 16, 2004 10:07 PM
To: Fong Tsui
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Ling, Xiaofeng
Subject: Re: IPV6 support for Linux
On
t; Any help is appreciated.
Did you configure with ipv6 support? Does ipv6 work by itself?
--
Robert Story; NET-SNMP Junkie <http://www.net-snmp.org/>
Archive: <http://sourceforge.net/mailarchive/forum.php?forum=net-snmp-coders>
You are lost in a twisty maze of littl
Ling, Xiaofeng; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>Subject: RE: IPV6 support for Linux
>
>Hi, Xiaofeng,
>
>Is it a known issue there is a problem to launch Ipv6 and ipv4
>together?
>I tried
>
>snmpd -c /home/tsui/snmpd.conf udp6:161,udp:161 but it can't
>be up. The log says,
>
ening specified endpoint "udp6:161"
It seems it only gets the first type of trapsport. I am using 5.0.9.
Any help is appreciated.
Thanks,
Fong
-Original Message-
From: Ling, Xiaofeng [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, May 16, 2003 2:37 AM
To: Fong Tsui; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
53 matches
Mail list logo
