Den 19-11-2013 11:03, Jean-Paul VILLETTE skrev:
> The tarballs don't seem to be online. Problems ?
Sorry 'bout that :-(
A filesystem had filled up, but they should be back now
/Niels
--
Niels Baggesen - @home - Århus - Denmark - n...@users.sourceforge.net
The purpose of computing is insight,
Hello Niels,
The tarballs don't seem to be online. Problems ?
Regards,
Jean-Paul VILLETTE
Le 14/11/2013 11:28, Niels Baggesen a écrit :
> On Thu, Nov 14, 2013 at 10:55:35AM +0100, Jean-Paul VILLETTE wrote:
>> Excuse me for this question (so basic) but are those the last version of
>> the sourc
On Thu, Nov 14, 2013 at 10:55:35AM +0100, Jean-Paul VILLETTE wrote:
> Excuse me for this question (so basic) but are those the last version of
> the source code with applied patches ?
That is what will be 5.7.3, hopefully before too long.
> What are the rules between this code and the normal rel
Hello,
No. Mea culpa. I haven't yet.
Excuse me for this question (so basic) but are those the last version of
the source code with applied patches ?
What are the rules between this code and the normal release 5.7.2 (for
example) ?
Regards,
Jean-Paul VILLETTE
Le 13/11/2013 15:14, Niels Bagges
On Wed, Nov 13, 2013 at 01:19:30PM +0100, Jean-Paul VILLETTE wrote:
> I think the "configure" does not test if IP_RECVDSTADDR is present and
> usable. This means for hpux, the IP_RECVDSTADDR is enabled due to its
> definition in /usr/include/sys/socket.h but nothing enables the rest of
> the cod
Hello Niels,
OK. Understood.
I think the "configure" does not test if IP_RECVDSTADDR is present and
usable. This means for hpux, the IP_RECVDSTADDR is enabled due to its
definition in /usr/include/sys/socket.h but nothing enables the rest of
the code to use this particular format.
As i said
On Wed, Nov 13, 2013 at 12:26:33PM +0100, Jean-Paul VILLETTE wrote:
> Thanks for your mail. I don't understand what your point is exactly.
> What's your idea ? Do you mean the configure has been changed
> (or patched) to better handle this option ?
Configure tries to determine whether the option
Hello,
Thanks for your mail. I don't understand what your point is exactly. What's
your idea ? Do you mean the configure has been changed
(or patched) to better handle this option ?
Regards,
Jean-Paul VILLETTE
HP
Den 07-11-2013 12:54, Jean-Paul VILLETTE skrev:
> Due to the many uses of this
Den 07-11-2013 12:54, Jean-Paul VILLETTE skrev:
> Due to the many uses of this option in the source code, the best way for me
> is to "#undef" this
> option globally for now. But the question stays : how ? I have tried the -U
> CFLAGS without any success. Any ideas ?
You might want to try
Hello,
I have a problem using snmpd from net-snmp 5.7.2 on HPUX (version 11.23 and
11.31, IA version).
When using UDP, the daemon doesn't send back correctly the reply. There is a
mistake in defining
the distant IP address : the snmpd daemon sends the replies to itself, the
distant IP addres
10 matches
Mail list logo
