On Wed, 29 Jun 2005 07:10:28 -0700 Wes wrote:
WH> Glenn> What do you think about community string indexing (like cisco
WH> Glenn> does with vlans and clusters)
WH> Glenn> Would this be any easier for me to implement?
WH>
WH> community strings aren't passed to a subagent either...
Yes, but we have
> On Tue, 28 Jun 2005 17:46:50 -0400, Glenn MacGregor <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> said:
Glenn> What do you think about community string indexing (like cisco
Glenn> does with vlans and clusters)
Glenn> Would this be any easier for me to implement?
community strings aren't passed to a subagent e
On Tue, 2005-06-28 at 17:07 -0400, Glenn MacGregor wrote:
> As far as I can tell, I can only use the context idea if I am
> using snmp v3 clients, is this correct?
No.
If you use directives such as
com2sec -Cn context1 sec1 default community1
com2sec -Cn context2 sec2 default co
Glenn MacGregor wrote:
I was thinking that I could start a new snmpd for each virtual interface (using
snmpd virtualip:161). This works but my agentx subagent will only respond to a
query on one ip (the last one started I guess). Is there a way to register a
subagent (or handler function in my cu
Sorry for all the posts...
What do you think about community string indexing (like cisco does with vlans
and clusters)
Would this be any easier for me to implement? Can I supply a function for the
authentication?
Thanks a million!
Glenn
Quoting Glenn MacGregor <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> Thanks fo
Thanks for all the responses.
As far as I can tell, I can only use the context idea if I am using snmp v3
clients, is this correct?
If so I can't go down that road because some clients of mine refuse to upgrade
their snmp clients to ones that support SNMPv3.
I am pretty well stuck here...does an
> On Mon, 27 Jun 2005 23:12:42 +0200, Thomas Anders <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> said:
Thomas> When Wes made snmptrapd's usmUserTable available under the "snmptrapd"
Thomas> context in 5.2.x, he mentioned to have fixed some context-related bugs
Thomas> first, so I guess you'll need 5.2.x. Wes
On Mon, 2005-06-27 at 22:12, Thomas Anders wrote:
> Glenn MacGregor wrote:
> > I am working off 5.1.1. Doesn't look like that version uses this method, is
> > that
> > correct? Can I use version 5.1.1?
>
> When Wes made snmptrapd's usmUserTable available under the "snmptrapd"
> context in 5.2.x
Glenn MacGregor wrote:
I am working off 5.1.1. Doesn't look like that version uses this method, is that
correct? Can I use version 5.1.1?
When Wes made snmptrapd's usmUserTable available under the "snmptrapd"
context in 5.2.x, he mentioned to have fixed some context-related bugs
first, so I
Wes,
I am working off 5.1.1. Doesn't look like that version uses this method, is that
correct? Can I use version 5.1.1? Will this work for SNMP V1 and V2c as well as
V3?
Thanks
Glenn
Quoting Wes Hardaker <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> > On Mon, 27 Jun 2005 14:03:53 -0400, Glenn MacGregor
> <[EM
Wes,
That looks like it would work. DO I need to do anything to the snmpd.conf file
to make this context work?
Thanks
Glenn
Quoting Wes Hardaker <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> > On Mon, 27 Jun 2005 14:03:53 -0400, Glenn MacGregor
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
>
> Glenn> I originally wanted to do t
> On Mon, 27 Jun 2005 14:03:53 -0400, Glenn MacGregor <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> said:
Glenn> I originally wanted to do this by knowing the ip address that
Glenn> was queried then I could go to the correct device and get the
Glenn> correct value. There is no way to know the address that was
Gl
12 matches
Mail list logo
