Dear All,
My smux peer is getting an error message indicating an
authentication failure from snmpd. I have configured
net-snmp with smux before building.Also, in the
snmpd.conf, a smux peer is added.
The smux peer I am trying to set up is quagga.
May be I have missed some obvious settings. Pleas
On Tue, 15 Jun 2004 12:47:07 +0530 Mukherjee, wrote:
MA>It worked like magic :) Thanks a ton...,
Note that you are just masking the problem, as I'm pretty sure the code is
correct. The actual problem is either in the index parsing code, or your table
registration isn't correctly set up. Co
I'm using net-snmp on FreeBSD 3.2. The implementation has gone pretty
smoothly, with a few exceptions. I'm actively troubleshooting them on my
end, but any feedback or pointers would be helpful. *thanks*
1. I have a subagent that supports a rather large table (up to 2000
entries). I've impleme
> Reason I ask is because I'm getting 'no such file' for
> usr/local/include/net-snmp/system/sysv.h from linux.h.
> This comes from including net-snmp-config.h in my
> instrumentation.
Darn it, this happened because it really wasn't there at
the time -- side-effect from moving to a new code tree.
How does SYSTEM_INCLUDE_FILE get set in net-snmp-config.h?
I mean is this hard-coded or set when running configure
before building net-snmp?
Reason I ask is because I'm getting 'no such file' for
usr/local/include/net-snmp/system/sysv.h from linux.h.
This comes from including net-snmp-config.h in
Dave> It looks as if the main CVS branch has rather more robust argument
Dave> parsing code, which *does* report on unrecognised options.
Dave> Is it worth applying this approach to the 5.1.2 code as well,
Dave> or would this count as a "new feature" ?
Wes> Though I agree it's a bug, its on the b
> output of the script and executable
>
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] root]# /tmp/a/lbclient
> .1.3.6.1.4.1.96.255.1.0
> integer
> 32
>
> [root@ root]# /tmp/a/test.sh
> .1.3.6.1.4.1.96.255.2.0
> integer
> 50
But that's not quite how these two commands will actually be invoked.
What happens if you tr
> Is there a common, typical, or expected organization of the objects
> in an enterprise MIB?
As a third example, the overall framework I set out for the Net-SNMP
subtree is basically defined in NET-SNMP-MIB. This lays out
separate subtrees for:
- real management objects (NET-SNMP
DFP> In the example notification.c, the definition of the trap is included
DFP> at NET-SNMP-EXAMPLES-MIB:
DFP>
DFP> netSnmpExampleNotification OBJECT-TYPE
DFP> SYNTAX SnmpAdminString
DFP> MAX-ACCESS accessible-for-notify
DTS> Actually that definition is wrong.
DTS> This is the defin
Dear Wes,
Both applications share the same file rights (neverthless I gave
executable and read rights to everyone), the only difference is that one
appplication lbclient is a c program and the other a simple shell script that
I made in order to determine what is going wrong.
The log of the
Dirk,
It worked like magic :) Thanks a ton...,
Regards,
Arijit
-Original Message-
From: Froese Dirk [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, June 15, 2004 12:01 PM
To: '[EMAIL PROTECTED]'
Subject: Re: Problem with snmp getnext in table
I have had the same problem. Only if all indi
Hello
I try to monitor Gigabit-ether traffic value,
but can not get ifHCInOctets object.
google Search and find this ML archive.
http://sourceforge.net/mailarchive/message.php?msg_id=3890924
I looked "counter64 support at net-snmp-5.2" somewhere..
(sorry lost pointer)
some questions.
1) What
12 matches
Mail list logo
